Impact of geriatric co-management on outcomes in hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease and frailty are common among the population aged 85+. We hypothesised these patients might benefit from geriatric co-management, as has been shown in other frail patient populations. However, there is limited evidence supporting geriatric co-management in older, hospitalised cardiology patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. We compared patients aged 85 and over admitted to the cardiology ward before (control group) and after the implementation of standard geriatric co-management (intervention group). Data on readmission, mortality, length of stay, number of consultations, delirium, and falls were analysed. RESULTS: The data of 1163 patients were analysed (n = 542 control, n = 621 intervention). In the intervention group, 251 patients did not receive the intervention because of logistic reasons or the treating physician's decision. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter length of stay (-1 day, p = 0.01) and were more often discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.54, p = 0.02) compared with the control patients. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of standard geriatric co-management for hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over, the length of hospital stay shortened and the number of patients discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility increased. The adherence to geriatric team recommendations was high. Geriatric co-management would appear to optimise care for older hospitalised patients with cardiac disease.

A New Framework to Implement Model-Informed Dosing in Clinical Guidelines: Piperacillin and Amikacin as Proof of Concept.

Background: Modeling and simulation is increasingly used to study pediatric pharmacokinetics, but clinical implementation of age-appropriate doses lags behind. Therefore, we aimed to develop model-informed doses using published pharmacokinetic data and a decision framework to adjust dosing guidelines based on these doses, using piperacillin and amikacin in critically ill children as proof of concept. Methods: Piperacillin and amikacin pharmacokinetic models in critically ill children were extracted from literature. Concentration-time profiles were simulated for various dosing regimens for a virtual PICU patient dataset, including the current DPF dose and doses proposed in the studied publications. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was compared between the different dosing regimens. Next, updated dosing recommendations for the DPF were proposed, and evaluated using a new framework based on PK study quality and benefit-risk analysis of clinical implementation. Results: Three studies for piperacillin (critically ill children) and one for amikacin (critically ill pediatric burn patients) were included. Simulated concentration-time profiles were performed for a virtual dataset of 307 critically ill pediatric patients, age range 0.1-17.9 y. PTA for unbound piperacillin trough concentrations >16 mg/L was >90% only for continuous infusion regimens of 400 mg/kg/day vs. 9.7% for the current DPF dose (80 mg/kg/6 h, 30 min infusion). Amikacin PTA was >90% with 20 mg/kg/d, higher than the PTA of the DPF dose of 15 mg/kg/d (63.5%). Using our new decision framework, altered DPF doses were proposed for piperacillin (better PTA with loading dose plus continuous infusion), but not for amikacin (studied and target population were not comparable and risk for toxicity with higher dose). Conclusions: We show the feasibility to develop model-informed dosing guidelines for clinical implementation using existing pharmacokinetic data. This approach could complement literature and consensus-based dosing guidelines for off-label drugs in the absence of stronger evidence to support pediatricians in daily practice.