Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 9: E131, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22814237

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) funds 25 states and 4 tribal organizations to promote and increase colorectal cancer screening population-wide. The CRCCP grantees must use evidence-based strategies from the Guide to Community Preventive Services, including small media and client reminders. METHODS: To assess the existing resources and needs to promote colorectal cancer screening, we conducted 2 web-based surveys of CRCCP grantees and their community partners. Survey 1 sought to identify priority populations, the number and quality of existing colorectal cancer resources for different population subgroups, and the types of small media and client reminder they were most interested in using. Survey 2 assessed screening messages that were used in the past or might be used in the future, needs for non-English-language information, and preferences for screening-related terminology. RESULTS: In survey 1 (n = 125 from 26 CRCCPs), most respondents (83%) indicated they currently had some information resources for promoting screening but were widely dissatisfied with the quality and number of these resources. They reported the greatest need for resources targeting rural populations (62% of respondents), men (53%), and Hispanics (45%). In survey 2 (n = 57 from 25 CRCCPs), respondents indicated they were most likely to promote colorectal cancer screening using messages that emphasized family (95%), role models (85%), or busy lives (83%), and least likely to use messages based on faith (26%), embarrassment (25%), or fear (22%). Nearly all (85%) indicated a need for resources in languages other than English; 16 different languages were mentioned, most commonly Spanish. CONCLUSION: These findings provide the first picture of CRCCP information resources and interests, and point to specific gaps that must be addressed to help increase screening.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento , Avaliação das Necessidades , Sistemas de Alerta , Adulto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Neoplasias Colorretais/etnologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente/etnologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Psicometria , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA