Successful management of super-refractory status epilepticus with thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Super-refractory status epilepticus is a condition characterized by recurrence of status epilepticus despite use of deep general anesthesia, and it has high morbidity and mortality rates. We report a case of a 17-year-old boy with a prolonged super-refractory status epilepticus that eventually resolved after commencing deep brain stimulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus. Later attempt to reduce stimulation parameters resulted in immediate relapse of status epilepticus, suggesting a pivotal role of deep brain stimulation in the treatment response. Deep brain stimulation may be a treatment option in super-refractory status epilepticus when other treatment options have failed. ANN NEUROL 2017;81:142-146.

The Correlation between Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording and 3-Tesla MRI in Patients Undergoing ANT-DBS for Refractory Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus) (ANT) has been suggested as a treatment option in refractory epilepsy. The targeting of ANT is especially challenging due to its poor visualization in commonly used MRI sequences, lack of easily observable symptom relief during surgery and high degree of anatomical variation between individuals. OBJECTIVES: To study whether intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER), a method widely used in movement disorder surgery, provides clinically relevant information during the ANT-DBS implantation procedure. METHODS: A total of 186 MER samples from 5 patients and 10 thalami obtained from ANT-DBS surgery for refractory epilepsy were analyzed with respect to the signal characteristics and location in 3-tesla (3T) MRI STIR (short T1 inversion recovery) images. The location of each MER sample was calculated relative to visible borders of the ANT after correction of the sample locations according to the position of the final DBS electrode in postoperative CT-MRI fusion images. RESULTS: We found that the lateral aspect of the ANT lacked spiking activity consistent with the presence of white matter. The spike frequency in samples correlating with location at the ANT showed significantly lower spike frequency compared to samples correlating with location at the ventral anterior nucleus (median 3.0 and 7.0 spikes/2 s; p < 0.05), but spike bursts were morphologically similar in appearance. Trajectories entering the dorsomedial nucleus according to 3T MRI STIR images showed a yet different firing pattern with more low-amplitude regular activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that MER provides clinically relevant information during implantation surgery by demonstrating both nucleus-specific neuronal firing patterns and white matter laminae between different nuclear groups.

Imaging of Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus Using 1.5T MRI for Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting in Refractory Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) is an evolving treatment option in refractory focal epilepsy. Due to poor visualization of ANT in traditional MRI sequences used for movement disorder surgery, targeting of ANT is mainly based on stereotactic atlas information. Sophisticated 3T MRI methods enable visualization of ANT, but 1.5T MRI is still preferred or more readily available in a large number of centers performing DBS. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we sought to determine whether ANT could be adequately visualized at 1.5T MRI pre- and postoperatively using imaging techniques similar to the ones visualizing ANT in 3T MRI. A total of 15 MRI examinations with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted magnetization prepared gradient echo (MPRAGE) images were performed to visualize ANT in nonepileptic subjects (n = 2), patients with vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) (n = 3), stereotactic MRI (n = 3), patients with ANT-DBS (n = 7). RESULTS: ANT was distinctly visualized in STIR and T1-weighted MPRAGE images in patients without implanted stimulators, with Leksell stereotactic frame and with fully implanted VNS. Postoperative 1.5T MRI was able to demonstrate some of the anatomical landmarks around ANT enabling assessment of electrode contact locations. CONCLUSIONS: The visualization of ANT is possible in preoperative 1.5T MRI enabling direct targeting of ANT all examined situations. The use of indirect targeting and its inherent potential for lead misplacement due to anatomical variation may be avoided using these MRI methods. Furthermore, postoperative MRI with STIR and T1-weighted MPRAGE images enable detailed postoperative assessment of contact locations.