A randomised trial of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with moderate bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine whether high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), a promising respiratory support in infant bronchiolitis, could reduce the proportion of treatment failure requiring escalation of care. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, we assigned infants aged <6 months who had moderate bronchiolitis to receive either HFNC at 3 L·kg-1·min-1 or standard oxygen therapy. Crossover was not allowed. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in treatment failure requiring escalation of care (mostly noninvasive ventilation) within 7 days following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included rates of transfer to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), oxygen, number of artificial nutritional support-free days and adverse events. RESULTS: The analyses included 268 patients among the 2621 infants assessed for inclusion during two consecutive seasons in 17 French paediatric emergency departments. The percentage of infants in treatment failure was 14% (19 out of 133) in the study group, compared to 20% (27 out of 135) in the control group (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-1.26; p=0.21). HFNC did not reduce the risk of admission to PICU (21 (15%) out of 133 in the study group versus 26 (19%) out of 135 in the control group) (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.41-1.41; p=0.45). The main reason for treatment failure was the worsening of modified Wood clinical asthma score (m-WCAS). Short-term assessment of respiratory status showed a significant difference for m-WCAS and respiratory rate in favour of HFNC. Three pneumothoraces were reported in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate bronchiolitis, there was no evidence of lower rate of escalating respiratory support among those receiving HFNC therapy.

Prevalence of IgG antibodies to human parvovirus B19 in haemophilia children treated with recombinant factor (F)VIII only or with at least one plasma-derived FVIII or FIX concentrate: results from the French haemophilia cohort.

Human parvovirus B19 (B19) has been transmitted by some brands of virally attenuated plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) concentrates. To quantify the differences of human parvovirus B19 risk transmission between albumin-stabilized recombinant factor and plasma-derived factor, we studied the prevalence of IgG antibodies to B19 (anti-B19) in 193 haemophiliac children between 1 and 6-years of age who had previously been treated with albumin-stabilized recombinant FVIII only (n = 104), and in children previously treated with solvent/detergent high-purity non-immunopurified and non-nanofiltered FVIII or IX concentrates (n = 89). Association between the prevalence of anti-B19 and the treatment group was analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Age, severity and type of haemophilia, number of cumulative days of exposure to factor VIII or IX, previous history of red blood cells or plasma transfusion were considered as potential confounding variables. A higher prevalence of anti-B19 was found in children previously treated with solvent/detergent high-purity non-immunopurified and non-nanofiltered FVIII or IX concentrates than in children treated with albumin- stabilized recombinant FVIII only (OR: 22.3; CI: 7.9-62.8), independently of the other factors studied.