Emergency department interventions for frailty (EDIFY): improving functional outcomes in older persons at the emergency department through a multicomponent frailty intervention.

OBJECTIVES: emergency department interventions for frailty (EDIFY) delivers frailty-centric interventions at the emergency department (ED). We evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent frailty intervention (MFI) in improving functional outcomes among older persons. DESIGN: a quasi-experimental study. SETTING: a 30-bed ED observation unit within a 1,700-bed acute tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: patients aged ≥65 years, categorised as Clinical Frailty Scale 4-6, and planned for discharge from the unit. METHODS: we compared patients receiving the MFI versus usual-care. Data on demographics, function, frailty, sarcopenia, comorbidities and medications were gathered. Our primary outcome was functional status-Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and Lawton's iADL. Secondary outcomes include hospitalisation, ED re-attendance, mortality, frailty, sarcopenia, polypharmacy and falls. Follow-up assessments were at 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: we recruited 140 participants (mean age 79.7 ± 7.6 years; 47% frail and 73.6% completed the study). Baseline characteristics between groups were comparable (each n = 70). For the intervention group, MBI scores were significantly higher at 6 months (mean: 94.5 ± 11.2 versus 88.5 ± 19.5, P = 0.04), whereas Lawton's iADL scores experienced less decline (change-in-score: 0.0 ± 1.7 versus -1.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.001). Model-based analyses revealed greater odds of maintaining/improving MBI in the intervention group at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-6.03, P = 0.04] and 12 months (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.18-7.54, P = 0.02). This was similar for Lawton's iADL at 12 months (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.70-9.48, P = 0.002). ED re-attendances (rate ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.90, P = 0.03) and progression to sarcopenia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.94, P = 0.04) were also lower at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: the MFI delivered to older persons at the ED can possibly improve functional outcomes and reduce ED re-attendances while attenuating sarcopenia progression.

Effect of an evidence-based poster on the knowledge of delirium and its prevention in student nurses: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: A major barrier to nurses adopting evidence-based practice (EBP) has been the limited awareness of evidence underpinning clinical practice, often due to poor access and understanding of the literature base. To address this, we piloted the development of educational posters summarizing the evidence base around clinical practices to see if they help nurses better understand the rationale behind their care. Our first poster focused on the evidence supporting the management of delirium in older persons, specifically delirium identification and its prevention. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of an evidence-based poster education on the delirium knowledge of student nurses. DESIGN: A prospective two-armed quasi-experimental study. METHODS: 188 student nurses were recruited in December 2017. Participants were alternated to receive either an evidence-based poster education session or a reflective education session as a control. Both groups were assessed on their general knowledge on delirium, knowledge on delirium detection and knowledge on delirium prevention. This was conducted both before exposure to either the intervention or control, and one week after exposure. Unpaired t-tests with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied to compare the mean change in pre-test and post-test delirium knowledge. We used the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) checklist to report our methods and findings. RESULTS: Students in the poster education group reported greater improvements in mean scores of delirium identification (Mean increase = 1.0, p = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.3-1.6), delirium prevention (Mean increase = 1.6, p < 0.001, 9% CI: 1.0-2.2) and overall delirium knowledge (Mean increase = 2.7, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.5-3.8) than students in the control. CONCLUSION: Summarised research evidence within a poster format can increase student nurses' access to the evidence base. This has shown to increase their knowledge to guide their clinical practice. IMPACT STATEMENT: Exposure to poster summaries of research evidence underpinning delirium care increases student nurses' clinical knowledge of delirium identification and prevention.

Emergency Department Interventions for Frailty (EDIFY): Front-Door Geriatric Care Can Reduce Acute Admissions.

OBJECTIVES: The EDIFY program was developed to deliver early geriatric specialist interventions at the emergency department (ED) to reduce the number of acute admissions by identifying patients for safe discharge or transfer to low-acuity care settings. We evaluated the effectiveness of EDIFY in reducing potentially avoidable acute admissions. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study. SETTING: ED of a 1700-bed tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: ED patients aged ≥85 years. MEASUREMENTS: We compared EDIFY interventions versus standard care. Patients with plans for acute admission were screened and recruited. Data on demographics, premorbid function, frailty status, comorbidities, and acute illness severity were gathered. We examined the primary outcome of "successful acute admission avoidance" among the intervention group, which was defined as no ED attendance within 72 hours of discharge from ED, no transfer to an acute ward from subacute-care units (SCU) within 72-hours, or no transfer to an acute ward from the short-stay unit (SSU). Secondary outcomes were rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, institutionalization, functional decline, mortality, and frailty transitions at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: We recruited 100 participants (mean age 90.0 ± 4.1 years, 66.0% women). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between intervention (n = 43) and nonintervention (n = 57) groups. Thirty-five (81.4%) participants in the intervention group successfully avoided an acute admission (20.9% home, 23.3% SCU, and 44.2% SSU). All participants in the nonintervention group were hospitalized. There were no differences in rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, institutionalization and mortality over the study period. Additionally, we observed a higher rate of progression to a poorer frailty category at all time points among the nonintervention group (1, 3, and 6 months: all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results from our single-center study suggest that early geriatric specialist interventions at the ED can reduce potentially avoidable acute admissions without escalating the risk of rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, or mortality, and with possible benefit in attenuating frailty progression.