RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of global disability. The understanding of the role of psychosocial factors in knee OA outcomes is still evolving particularly in an Asian context. The primary aim of this study is to explore psychosocial factors that prognosticate short and long-term clinical outcomes, productivity, and healthcare utilization in patients with knee OA. Secondary aims are to explore the mediation and directional relationships and the role it plays in predicting the discordance between self-reported measures (SRM), physical-performance measures (PPMs) and objective clinical parameters. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective cohort study of community ambulant knee OA patients seeking treatment in the tertiary healthcare institutions in Singapore will be conducted. Patients with secondary arthritis, significant cognitive impairment, severe medical comorbidities or previous knee arthroplasty will be excluded. Primary clinical outcome measure is the Knee injury and OA Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12). Baseline characteristics include sociodemographic status, arthritis status including symptom duration and radiographic severity, comorbidities and functional status through Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI), Barthel Index (BI) and Parker Mobility Score (PMS). Psychosocial variables include social support, kinesiophobia, negative affect, self-efficacy, injustice, chronic illness shame and the built environment. Clinical outcomes include quality of life, physical performance, global assessment, satisfaction and physical activity levels. Productivity and healthcare utilization will be assessed by a modified OA Cost and Consequences Questionnaire (OCC-Q) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Variables will be collected at baseline, 4, 12 months and yearly thereafter. Regression, mediation and structural equation modelling will be used for analysis. DISCUSSION: Results will allow contextualization, identification, and phenotyping of the critical (and potentially modifiable) psychosocial parameters that predict positive clinical outcomes in the OA population to guide optimization and refinement of healthcare and community. This will facilitate: 1. identification of high-risk knee OA subpopulations that will likely experience poor outcomes and 2. formulation of targeted multidisciplinary comprehensive approaches to address these psychosocial factors to optimize non-surgical treatment care, maximize functional outcomes and create more value-based care model for knee OA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been registered under clinicaltrials.gov registry (Identifier: NCT04942236).
Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Singapura , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommends that after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients should be mobilized early. However, there is no consensus on how early physical therapy should be commenced. We aim to investigate whether ultra-early physical therapy (< 12 h postoperatively) leads to better outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 569 patients who underwent primary TKA from August 2017 to December 2019 at our institution. We compared patients who had undergone physical therapy either within 24 h or 24-48 h after TKA. Further subgroup analysis was performed on the < 24 h group, comparing those who had undergone PT within 12 h and within 12-24 h. The outcomes analyzed include the Oxford Knee Scoring System score, Knee Society Scores, range of motion (ROM), length of stay (LOS) and ambulatory distance on discharge. A student's t test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used where appropriate, to determine statistical significance of our findings. RESULTS: LOS in the < 24 h group was shorter compared to the 24-48 h group (4.87 vs. 5.34 days, p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis showed that LOS was shorter in the ultra-early PT (< 12 h) group compared to the early PT (12-24 h) group (4.75 vs. 4.96 days, p = 0.009). At 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in ROM, ambulatory distance or functional scores between the < 24 h group and 24-48 h group, or on subgroup analysis of the < 24 h group. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent physical therapy within 24 h had a shorter length of stay compared to the 24-48 h group. On subgroup analysis, ultra-early (< 12 h) physical therapy correlated with a shorter length of stay compared to the 12-24 h group (4.75 vs. 4.96 days, p = 0.009) - however, the difference is small and unlikely to be clinically significant. Ultra-early (< 12 h) physical therapy does not confer additional benefit in terms of functional scores, ROM or ambulatory distance. These findings reinforce the importance of early physical therapy after TKA in facilitating earlier patient discharge.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Tempo de Internação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos de Coortes , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reduced the length of stay (LOS) and cost of TKA in the Western population. Asians had been identified to be at higher odds of non-home discharge following TKA due to cultural differences. The efficacy of ERAS in TKA for Asian patients is less known. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of ERAS in reducing the LOS, transition to ambulatory surgery, improving home discharges, and reducing cost in an Asian population following TKA. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 634 TKA patients in 2017 (pre- ERAS) and 584 TKA patients who had undergone ERAS in 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Results: Patients in 2022 (ERAS) were older (69 ± 7 vs. 68 ± 7 years old, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of patients with poorer function (p < 0.001). The LOS reduced from 5.4 days (95% CI:5.2-5.6) to 2.9 days (95% CI:2.7-3.2) (p < 0.001) with about 49 % of patients transitioning to ambulatory surgery and having a LOS of 1.4 days (95 %CI:1.3-1.5). The proportion of patients being discharged home in 2022 (78.9 %) was higher compared to 2017 (62.2 %) (p < 0.001). This saved the hospital 1817.4 inpatient ward bed days, which translated to S$2,124,540.60 of cost saving in a year, and up to S$2397.28 for the individual patient. Conclusion: ERAS after TKA was able to safely achieve LOS comparable to the western population and allowed transition to ambulatory knee replacement in the Asian population. Consequently, this led to higher proportion of home discharges and achieved significant cost saving and hospital bed days.
RESUMO
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) represents a paradigm shift in perioperative care, aimed at achieving early recovery for surgical patients, reducing length of hospital stay, and complications. The purpose of this study was to provide an insight of the impact of the COVID-19 on ERAS protocols for knee arthroplasty patients in a tertiary hospital and potential strategy changes for postpandemic practice. We retrospectively reviewed all cases that underwent surgery utilizing ERAS protocols in the quarter prior to the pandemic (fourth quarter of 2019) and during the first quarter of 2020 when the pandemic started. A review of the literature on ERAS protocols for knee arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic was also performed and discussed. A total of 199 knee arthroplasties were performed in fourth quarter of 2019 as compared with 76 in the first quarter of 2020 during the COVID-19 outbreak. Patients who underwent surgery in the first quarter of 2020 had shorter inpatient stays (3.8 vs. 4.5 days), larger percentage of discharges by postoperative day 5 (86.8 vs. 74.9%), and a larger proportion of patients discharged to their own homes (68 vs. 54%). The overall complication rate (1.3 vs. 3%) and readmission within 30 days (2.6 vs. 2%) was similar between both groups. ERAS protocols appear to reduce hospital lengths of stay for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty without increasing the risk of short-term complications and readmissions. The beneficial effects of ERAS appear to be amplified by and are synchronous with the requirements of operating in the era of a pandemic.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , COVID-19 , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pandemias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of acetabular defects has been extremely challenging in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impaction bone grafting (IBG) can restore the acetabulum bone mass and anatomically reconstruct the acetabulum. Our study aimed to report the short and medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IBG for acetabular reconstruction in the cemented THA in the Chinese population. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review enrolling 57 patients between May 2013 and July 2019. The patients with acetabular defects were treated with IBG, using low dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone with or without autograft bone, in the cemented THA performed by one senior surgeon. Harris hip score (HHS), standard pelvis anterior-posterior radiograph and lateral hip radiograph were obtained before operation and at 1 week, 3 months, 12 months, and yearly. Graft osteointegration was evaluated by Oswestry's criteria, and complication was documented at the last follow-up. Independent sample ANOVA test and Pearson chi-square tests are used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 61 hips in 57 patients. The average follow-up time was 35.59 months (5-77 months). According to AAOS classification, a total of 18 hips were identified as segmental bone deficiency (type I), with 21 and 22 hips for cavitary bone deficiency (type II) and the combined bone deficiency (type III), respectively. The average HHS was improved from 44.49 (range: 32-58) preoperatively to 86.98 (range: 78-93) postoperatively. Graft osteointegration was satisfactory (Oswestry score ≥2) in all patients. No dislocation occurred in the 57 patients (61 hips) during follow-up. Although one cup migrated, no revision, re-revision, radiographic loosening, graft bone lysis, or postoperative complications were detected at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IBG with low-dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone in acetabular bone defect reconstruction is a reliable technique for restoring acetabular bone defects in THA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Prótese de Quadril , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Aloenxertos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic accuracy is one of the key considerations of telemedicine usage in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal patient positioning to achieve accurate and reliable visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion over a digital platform for telemedicine. METHODS: A single volunteer was recruited to perform a total of 120 discrete and random knee range of motion angles in three patient positions: sitting, standing and supine. The patient image was broadcast over a digital platform to six raters. The raters recorded their visual estimation of each discrete knee flexion angle independently. After each discrete knee flexion angle, a physical goniometer was used to obtain the actual flexion angle of the knee. RESULTS: A total of 120 discrete measurements (40 measurements in the sitting, standing, and supine positions each) were recorded by each of the six raters. The supine position resulted in the highest intraclass correlation of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.98, 0.99). All three patient positions achieved low absolute difference between the goniometer and the raters with 5.6 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -21.0, 9.8) in sitting, 2.7 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -10.1, 15.4), and 1.2 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -9.8, 12.3) in the supine position. The supine position had the highest accuracy and reliability. DISCUSSION: Visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion over telemedicine is clinically accurate and reliable. Patients should be assessed in a supine position to obtain the highest accuracy and reliability for visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion during telemedicine.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak was fraught with danger and despair as many medically necessary surgeries were cancelled to preserve precious healthcare resources and mitigate disease transmission. As the rate of infection starts to slow, healthcare facilities and economies attempt to return to normalcy in a graduated manner and the massive pent-up demand for surgeries needs to eventually be addressed in a systematic and equitable manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guidelines from the Alliance of International Organizations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anaesthesiologists, Association of perioperative Registered Nurses, American Hospital Association, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were evaluated and summarized into a working framework, relevant to orthopaedic surgeons. RESULTS: The guiding principles for restarting elective surgeries in a safe and acceptable manner include up-to-date disease awareness, projection and judicious management of equipment and facilities, effective human resource management, a fair and transparent system to prioritize cases, optimization of peri-operative workflows and continuous data gathering and clinical governance. CONCLUSION: The world was ill prepared for the initial COVID-19 outbreak. However, with effective forward planning, institutions can ramp-up elective surgical caseload in a safe and equitable manner.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Ortopedia/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Fluxo de Trabalho , American Hospital Association , Anestesiologia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Medicare , Pandemias , Enfermagem Perioperatória , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas , Traumatologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) undergoing elective orthopedic surgery generally have higher postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. Studies on the outcome of ESRF patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), especially those with a functioning renal transplant, are conflicting. We aim to evaluate the impact of renal transplantation on functional outcome and postoperative complications in patients with ESRF undergoing THR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 primary THRs were performed in 25 patients with ESRF between 1999 and 2013. There were 12 patients with 14 THRs who had a functioning renal transplant at the time of surgery (transplant group), and 13 patients with 15 THRs who were dialysis dependent with either no or failed prior transplant (nontransplant group). Functional outcome was evaluated with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clinical records and followup radiographs were used to evaluate postoperative complications. RESULTS: There is lower mortality rate (P = 0.02) and lower overall complication rate in the transplant group compared to the nontransplant group (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.91, P = 0.008). The mean increase in OHS postoperatively was greater in the nontransplant group (nontransplant-24.7; transplant-18.7) and trended toward statistical significance (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ESRF patients who undergo THR experience improvements in functional outcome regardless of transplant status. There was no significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes between the two groups of patients, but patients with renal transplants are less likely to experience postoperative complications and have better survival.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the accuracy of the Synovasure®, α-defensin lateral flow test kit, in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in a predominantly Asian population and to evaluate whether other patient or disease factors may affect its results. METHODS: 61 Asian patients comprising 70 hip or knee prosthetic joints, performed between November 2015 and November 2018, were retrospectively evaluated. Cases were categorized as infected or not infected using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) Criteria. Synovial fluid was tested for α-defensin using a commercially available kit. . RESULTS: The Synovasure test had a sensitivity of 73.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 48.8-90.9%) and specificity of 92.2% (95% CI: 81.1-97.8%) in an Asian population, which was slightly lower compared to previously reported studies in a predominantly Caucasian population. The positive predictive value was 77.8% (95% CI: 56.8-90.3%) and the negative predictive value was 90.4% (95% CI: 81.5-95.2%). The test had an area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graph of 0.938, which represents an accuracy that is similar to synovial white blood cells (WBCs) and almost equivalent to that of synovial polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs). The presence of diabetes ( p = 0.26), systemic inflammatory joint disease ( p = 0.33), other metallic implants ( p = 0.53), immunosuppression ( p = 0.13), prior antibiotic usage ( p = 0.99), and chronicity of symptoms ( p = 0.34) was not significantly associated with a positive test in patients with PJI. CONCLUSION: The α-defensin lateral flow test kit is highly accurate in the diagnosis of PJI but with slightly lower sensitivity and specificity in an Asian population when compared with previous studies. The test should be used in conjunction with other MSIS criteria to provide clinically relevant and meaningful results for the diagnosis of PJI.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Povo Asiático , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/metabolismo , alfa-Defensinas/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etnologia , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Líquido SinovialRESUMO
The purpose of this study is to highlight a cohort of patients with a comminuted volar shearing type of distal radius fractures (AO B3.3) with the volar ulnar fragment that is prone to re-displace, resulting in volar subluxation of the radiocarpal joint. We report our experience with two such patients with re-displacement of the fragment and joint requiring repeat surgery; one of whom required a third procedure to stabilize that fragment. Three subsequent patients were successfully treated with one surgery when particular attention was paid to stabilize the volar ulnar fragment. This highlights the importance of stabilizing this fragment at the primary procedure.