A head-to-head comparison of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Chinese family caregivers of cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Although both EQ-5D-3L(3L) and EQ-5D-5L(5L) have demonstrated good measurement properties in several patient populations, there is currently limited evidence comparing the measurement properties of 3L and 5L in family caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of 3L and 5L in a sample of family caregivers of cancer patients. METHODS: A consecutive sample of FCs of cancer patients recruited from three tertiary hospitals were invited to complete the two versions of the EQ-5D in two rounds of interviews. We compared i) the ceiling effect using the McNemar's test, ii) test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's Kappa, iii) convergent validity using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, iv) known-group validity using F-statistic, v) and discriminant capacity using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 416 FCs completed the baseline questionnaire and 120 caregivers completed the follow-up questionnaire. Ceiling effects were smaller in 5L (12.5%) than in 3L (20.7%). The convergent validity (r = 0.344-0.771), known-groups validity (Fratio5L/3L = 2.06-4.09), discriminant capacity (ES = 0.341-0.396), and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.725) of the 5L were slightly better than those of the 3L in China. CONCLUSION: The current study found both 3L and 5L to be suitable for use by FCs of cancer patients. However, 5L showed superior measurement properties compared to 3L and therefore could be the preferred instrument when EQ-5D data of cancer patients FCs is required.

Investigating the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L, CHU-9D, and PedsQL in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta.

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L, CHU-9D, and PedsQL, in a sample of children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among Chinese children and adolescents with OI in 2021. The EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L, CHU-9D, and PedsQL were used to assess the health-related quality of life for the participants. Construct validity, including convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity, and test-retest reliability, was examined to assess the psychometric properties of the measures. A total of 157 pediatric OI patients self-completed the questionnaire. Few of them reported the full health status. A strong ceiling effect was observed for all dimensions on the EQ-5D-Y and most on CHU-9D. Most dimensions of the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D showed statistically significant correlations with the hypothesized PedsQL subscales. The test-retest reliability for the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L, and CHU-9D was acceptable. The EQ-5D-Y-5L showed a better known-group validity than EQ-5D-Y-3L, CHU-9D, and PedsQL in differentiating patients in risk groups. CONCLUSION: The results confirmed that the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D are reliable and valid in pediatric OI patients. The EQ-5D-Y-5L performed better than EQ-5D-Y-3L regarding acceptability, convergent validity, and discriminatory power. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Performance of the preference-based measures has never been reported in patients with Osteogenesis imperfecta. WHAT IS NEW: • The EQ-5D-Y demonstrated higher sensitivity and discriminatory power than the CHU-9D in patients with osteogenesis Imperfecta • The EQ-5D-Y-3L performed slightly better than EQ-5D-Y-5L regarding convergent validity and discriminant ability.

Measurement Properties of the EQ VAS Around the Globe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to synthesize and evaluate published evidence on the measurement properties of the EQ VAS, a component of all EQ-5D questionnaires. METHODS: This systematic review followed the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L validation articles published from January 1, 2009, to November 5, 2019. Evidence for construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness was extracted from individual studies before being aggregated for evaluation of the populations represented by the studied samples. Multivariable logistic meta-regression was conducted to explore the effects of potential covariates on construct validity. RESULTS: A total of 50 articles containing 488 studies, using samples drawn from 12 different populations, were identified. Generally, the quality of evidence was high for construct validity studies (n = 397) but only moderate for both test-retest reliability studies (n = 21) and responsiveness studies (n = 70). "Sufficient" construct validity of EQ VAS was found in 8 of 12 populations, "sufficient" test-retest reliability was found in 3 of 11 populations, and "sufficient" responsiveness was found in 5 of 12 populations. Meta-regression analyses suggested that construct validity studies from the Asian-Pacific region were more likely to show a negative rating compared with studies from Europe and North America. CONCLUSION: The EQ VAS exhibits "sufficient" construct validity, "inconsistent" test-retest reliability, and "inconsistent" responsiveness across a broad range of populations. Additional studies are needed to explore the suboptimal validity of the EQ VAS in the Asian-Pacific region, whereas more high-quality validation studies are needed to assess its reliability and responsiveness.

A head-to-head comparison of measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L(3L) and EQ-5D-5L(5L) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in China. METHODS: We consecutively recruited 168 patients with AML from three tertiary hospitals to complete two rounds of interviews using the two versions of the EQ-5D. We compared (i) the ceiling effect using the McNemar's test, (ii) test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's weighted Kappa, (iii) convergent validity using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) and iv) discriminatory ability using F statistic and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of the 5L and the 3L. RESULTS: The 5L descriptive system showed significantly lower ceiling effects in comparison to the 3L descriptive system (p < 0.001). While 5L showed superior reproducibility (Cohen's weighted Kappa = 0.56-0.67 and ICC = 0.89), both instruments exhibited good test-retest reliability. Even though both 3L and 5L showed good convergent and known-groups validity, 5L showed better convergent validity and discriminatory ability. CONCLUSION: The current study found both 3L and 5L to be suitable for use in AML patients. However, 5L showed superior measurement properties compared to 3L. Thus, 5L could be the preferred instrument over 3L for use in AML patients.

A hearing bolt-on item increased the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L in a community-based hearing loss screening program.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the measurement properties of a hearing item ('bolt-on') added to the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system with the addition of a hearing bolt-on item, namely, 'I have no/slight/moderate/severe/extreme problems hearing', was collected through face-to-face interviews with 418 participants of a community-based hearing loss screening program in Singapore. The distribution of responses to the EQ-5D and the hearing items were compared in terms of the proportion of 'no problems' and the Shannon index (H'). The measurement properties of the hearing item were assessed by testing its correlation with the hearing thresholds in dBHL; and with the standard EQ-5D items. The properties were also evaluated by comparing the proportion of 'full health' in participants with different hearing severities between standard and hearing bolt-on EQ-5D-5L; and the ability in identifying the participants between the standard EQ-5D-5L index score and the level sum score (LSS) of the hearing bolt-on system. RESULTS: Compared to the standard EQ-5D items, the hearing item has a lower proportion of 'no problems' (80.1% vs. 80.9-97.9%); more evenly-distributed responses (H' value: 0.92 vs. 0.18-0.87); and much stronger correlation with the hearing thresholds (|r|: 0.322 and 0.325 vs. 0.008-0.139). It generally has a weak correlation with EQ-5D items (|r|: 0.055-0.160); and reduces the proportion of 'full health' for the participants with different hearing functions with the percentage reduction varying from 6.6 to 22.7%. The LSS is more discriminative than the standard EQ-5D-5L index score as well (F-statistic: 12.71 and 13.93 vs.4.06 and 4.70). CONCLUSIONS: A hearing bolt-on to EQ-5D-5L can validly measure hearing severities and is likely to increase the sensitivity of the resultant preference-based EQ-5D index to hearing loss.

Psychometric Properties of Generic Preference-Weighted Measures for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Preference-weighted measures (PWMs)-also referred to as preference-based measures in the literature-of health status/health-related quality of life plays an essential role in estimating quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for use in economic evaluations of healthcare products and interventions. However, as PWMs are first and foremost intended to accurately reflect respondent health status, they should ideally demonstrate good psychometric properties for the population in question. This study aimed to systematically review published evidence on the measurement properties of commonly used PWMs for children and adolescents. METHODS: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles assessing the psychometric properties (content validity, construct validity-including convergent validity and known-group validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness) of the PWMs of interest (AQoL-6D, CHU9D, HUI2, HUI3, and EQ-5D-Y). The COsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology (COSMIN) guidelines were used to assess (a) the methodological quality of the studies included and (b) the psychometric performance of the instruments covered. Data were analysed overall as well as by population (country and disease group) and perspective (self-report or proxy-report). The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42021277296). RESULTS: In total, 53 articles were included in this systematic review. Health Utilities Index (HUI) was tested only in patient populations, CHU9D was most frequently tested in general population samples, while EQ-5D-Y was tested in both populations. Overall, there was high-quality evidence supporting sufficient construct validity for all instruments except AQoL-6D. Evidence supporting test-retest and responsiveness was scarce. There was high-quality evidence supporting sufficient responsiveness of HUI2 and HUI3, and inconsistent test-retest reliability of CHU9D and EQ-5D-Y. Evidence for content validity was minimal and therefore not extracted and synthesized for any PWMs. CONCLUSION: This review provides updated evidence on the measurement properties of existing generic PWMs for children and adolescents. High-quality evidence for all relevant psychometric properties and across a range of populations was not available for any of the instruments included, indicating that further work is needed in this direction. This study has identified some of the most noticeable evidence gaps for each of the individual measures. Users can use this information to guide their decision on the choice of PWM to administer.

How Do Respondents Interpret and View the EQ-VAS? A Qualitative Study of Three Asian Populations.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to understand how respondents from three Asian countries interpret and perceive the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). METHOD: Data were from a project that aimed to examine the cultural appropriateness of EQ-5D in Asia. Members of the general public from China, Japan, and Singapore were interviewed one-to-one in their preferred languages. Open-ended questions (e.g. What does "best imaginable health" mean to you?) were used to elicit participants' interpretation of the labels of EQ-VAS. How the scale could be improved was also probed. Thematic and content analyses were performed separately for each country before pooling for comparison. RESULTS: Sixty Chinese, 24 Japanese, and 60 Singaporeans were interviewed. Interpretations of the label "Best Imaginable Health" varied among the participants. Interestingly, some participants indicated that "Best Imaginable Health" is unachievable. Interpretations for "Worst Imaginable Health" also varied, with participants referring primarily to one of three themes, namely, "death," "disease," and "disability." There were different opinions as to what changes in health would correspond to a 5- to 10-point change on the EQ-VAS. While participants opined that EQ-VAS is easy to understand, some criticized it for being too granular and that scale labels are open to interpretation. Findings from the three countries were similar. CONCLUSION: It appears that interpretations of the EQ-VAS vary across Asian respondents. Future studies should investigate whether the variations are associated with any respondent characteristics and whether the EQ-VAS could be modified to achieve better respondent acceptance.

Family caregivers of rare disease: A survey on health-related quality of life in family caregivers for Gaucher disease patients in China.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients and their family caregivers (FCs). However, limited evidence is available on the HRQoL of FCs of patients with Gaucher disease (GD). This study aimed to assess HRQoL and related factors among FCs of patients with GD in China. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 49 FCs recruited by convenience sampling. Participants completed the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale, the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Herth Hope Index, and a questionnaire about FCs' and patients' sociodemographic characteristics. Single-sample t tests, one-way analysis of variance, and multivariate linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data analysis. RESULTS: Participating FCs had significantly lower scores in all eight SF-36 domains compared with the general population in China (p < 0.01). FCs' gender, education, daily care time, anxiety, and the perceived disease severity of patients were significant predictors of SF-36 physical component summary scores. Caregiving help from others, anxiety, perceived disease severity, and medical insurance type were significant predictors of SF-36 mental component summary scores. CONCLUSION: The findings showed FCs of patients with GD had lower HRQoL. There is an urgent need to address the health concerns of FCs of people with rare diseases including their HRQoL.

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in Six Commonly Diagnosed Cancers.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L (3L) and EQ-5D-5L (5L) in cancer patients. METHODS: A consecutive sample of inpatients with lung, breast, colorectal, liver, gastric, or thyroid cancer were interviewed using the 3L, 5L, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaires, and a subgroup was invited to complete the 3L and 5L again. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess test-retest reliability, and Spearman's correlation between the EQ-5D and FACT-G was evaluated to assess convergent validity. Comparison of subgroups defined using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status and cancer stage were performed to assess known-group validity and discriminatory power using the F-statistic and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. All analyses were also performed for each subgroup of cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 416 cancer patients completed the baseline questionnaire and 90 patients also completed the follow-up survey after 2 days. Ceiling effects were smaller in 5L (10.1%) than in 3L (17.8%). The test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the 5L were slightly better than those of the 3L. Both the 3L and 5L showed known-group validity; however, the 5L index showed better discriminatory power. Similar trends were found in the six types of cancers. CONCLUSION: In general, 5L appears to have better measurement properties than 3L for measuring the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. While both the 3L and 5L are suitable, 5L should be preferable to 3L for use in cancer outcomes research.

Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on the construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of generic preference-based measures (PBMs) used in East and South-East Asia. METHODS: This systematic review was guided by the COSMIN guideline. A literature search on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed databases up to August 2019 was conducted for measurement properties validation papers of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index (HUI), Quality of Well-Being (QWB), 15-Dimensional (15D) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL) in East and South-East Asian countries. Included papers were disaggregated into individual studies whose results and quality of design were rated separately. The population-specific measurement properties (construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness) of each PBM were assessed separately using relevant studies. The overall methodological quality of the studies used in each of the assessments was also rated. RESULTS: A total of 79 papers containing 1504 studies were included in this systematic review. The methodological quality was 'very good' or 'adequate' for the majority of the construct validity studies (99%) and responsiveness studies (61%), but for only a small portion of the test-retest reliability studies (23%). EQ-5D was most widely assessed and was found to have 'sufficient' construct validity and responsiveness in many populations, while the SF-6D and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) exhibited 'inconsistent' construct validity in some populations. Scarce evidence was available on HUI and QWB, but current evidence supported the use of HUI. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of the quality of existing generic PBMs in Asian populations. The current evidence supports the use of EQ-5D as the preferred choice when a generic PBM is needed, and continuous testing of all PBMs in the region.

A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the effect of adding a vision dimension ('bolt-on') to the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) on their responsiveness, and (2) to compare the responsiveness of a vision 'bolt-on' EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L + V) with SF-6D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) to the benefit of cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were assessed before and after their cataract surgery using the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI3, as well as a 3-level and a 5-level vision dimension. Preference-based indices were calculated using available value sets for EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-3L + V, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, and HUI3, and non-preference-based indices were calculated using the sum-score method for EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-5L + V (vision bolt-on EQ-5D-5L). Responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean (SRM) and F-statistic. RESULTS: Among preference-based indices, mean changes from pre to post-surgery in EQ-5D-3L + V and EQ-5D-3L indices were 0.031 and 0.018, respectively. The mean changes for EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D and HUI3 indices were 0.020, 0.012 and 0.105, respectively. The SRM (F-statistic) for EQ-5D-3L + V and EQ-5D-3L indices were 0.458 (13.2) and 0.098 (0.6), respectively. The responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L + V was better than EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D; the responsiveness of HUI3 was better than all other measures. Using non-preference-based indices, mean change for EQ-5D-5L + V and EQ-5D-5L were 0.067 and 0.017, respectively. The corresponding SRM (F-statistic) were 0.709 (31.7) and 0.295 (5.4). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence from our study suggests that a vision 'bolt-on' may increase the responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L to change in health outcomes experienced by patients undergoing cataract surgery. In absence of the preference-based vision bolt-on EQ-5D-5L index, HUI3 was the most responsive measure.

EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) utilities based on recently developed value sets are more responsive than 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) utilities. OBJECTIVES: The study aims were to compare (1) the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L utilities and (2) the responsiveness of these utilities with the Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) utilities to the treatment benefit of cataract surgery. METHODS: A total of 148 patients were interviewed before and after their cataract surgery using EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, and HUI3. Responsiveness was assessed for all measures using the mean change (post-treatment-pre-treatment), standardized effect size (SES), standardized response mean (SRM), and F-statistic. RESULTS: Using the Singapore value sets, mean change for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L utilities was 0.016 and 0.028, SES was 0.097 and 0.199; SRM was 0.091 and 0.196; and F-statistic was 1.2 and 5.7, respectively. Similar trends were observed using the UK/England EQ-5D value sets, although the magnitude was slightly smaller. The mean change, SES, SRM and F-statistics for SF-6D (UK value set) were 0.020, 0.234, 0.249, and 9.2, respectively. The values of mean change, SES, SRM and F-statistics for HUI3 (Canada value set) were 0.080, 0.472, 0.474, and 33.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L utilities tend to be more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L utilities to treatment benefits of cataract surgery. The HUI3 utilities are more responsive than both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D, and SF-6D utilities may be slightly more responsive than the EQ-5D-5L for assessing patients undergoing cataract surgery.