Perspectives on sustainable practices in the use of nitrous oxide for labour analgesia: A patient and staff survey.

BACKGROUND: Climate change has emerged as the single biggest global health threat of the twenty-first century. Nitrous oxide accounts for the largest carbon footprint amongst our use of anaesthetic gas. It is a potent greenhouse gas possessing a global warming potential of approximately 265 times that of carbon dioxide. Despite recent curtailment of its use, it remains extensively employed as an analgesic for women in labour. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the opinions of post-natal women and staff on nitrous oxide use and to investigate whether knowledge of its environmental harm would influence their choice of labour analgesia. DESIGN: Postnatal women and healthcare staff were invited to participate in a survey of nitrous oxide use as a labour analgesic and knowledge of its effect of the environment. SETTING: A single-centre study in a major obstetric tertiary referral centre in Ireland in 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate the awareness and perceptions of postnatal women and staff regarding the environmental impact of nitrous oxide and if it would affect their decision to use it in the future. RESULTS: One hundred postnatal women and 50 healthcare staff completed the survey. One hundred and six post-natal women were invited to complete the survey, resulting in a response rate of 94%. Knowledge of nitrous oxide's environmental impact was low. After receiving information, 46% of patients were more inclined to seek epidural or request it earlier (54%) to limit their nitrous oxide use, while 51% would choose an alternative analgesia to avoid nitrous oxide altogether. Overwhelmingly, 99% believed they had the right to know about these harmful effects when choosing an analgesic option. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be informed of the environmental impact of nitrous oxide antenatally, empowering them to make informed decision on a climate friendly analgesic option if they wish.

Evaluation of the 'Sip Til Send' regimen before elective caesarean delivery using bedside gastric ultrasound: A paired cohort pragmatic study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative fasting is routinely advocated to avoid pulmonary aspiration. The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) recommends a fasting period of 2 h for liquids before surgery. Liberal drinking policies such as the 'Sip Til Send' are a suggested alternative to maintain hydration before surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare residual gastric volumes in fully fasted nonlabouring parturients before elective caesarean delivery with the 'Sip Til Send' with water liberal drinking protocol. Our hypothesis was the 'Sip Til Send' would be noninferior to standard fasting at minimising the residual gastric volume immediately before surgery. DESIGN: A paired cohort prospective observational pragmatic study using gastric ultrasound, analysed by an operator blinded to the fasting status of each scan. SETTING: A tertiary maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. The study was conducted between January and June 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women about to undergo elective caesarean delivery who had followed ESAIC fasting guidelines before admission. INTERVENTIONS: Each participant underwent two pairs (semi-recumbent and the semi-recumbent right lateral positions) of standardised ultrasound examinations of the gastric antrum: the order of these scans was randomised. The first pair of scans occurred on admission before the 'Sip Til Send' protocol commenced, the other pair just before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, after a variable time following the 'Sip Til Send' protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the difference in antral cross-sectional area (CSA) between the fully fasted women on admission and the same women after following the 'Sip Til Send' protocol until just before spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: Fifty-eight women were randomised for the study: 55 and 54 scans in the semi-recumbent position on admission, and 55 and 54 scans in the right lateral position just before spinal anaesthesia. The mean differences (95% CI) in CSA in the semi-recumbent and RL positions were 0.07 (-0.39 to 0.53) cm 2 and 0.04 (-0.60 to 0.68) cm 2 , respectively. Since the of 95% CIs did not cross the predefined noninferiority margin of 0.88 cm 2 , 'Sip Til Send' was noninferior to fully fasting in in terms of the antral CSA. CONCLUSION: The 'Sip Til Send' protocol of liberal hydration with water was noninferior to standard fasting prior to elective caesarean delivery. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT05783427 ClinicalTrials.gov.

An ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying following tea with milk in pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Peri-operative fasting guidelines allow clear fluids including tea without milk to be consumed up to 2 h before surgery. Recent evidence has shown that a modest amount of milk consumed with clear fluids does not significantly slow gastric emptying. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the gastric emptying of tea with milk versus water using ultrasonography in fasted pregnant patients. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial quantifying gastric emptying in two groups using ultrasonography by an operator blinded to the group allocation. SETTING: Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin. The study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Total 50 nonlabouring pregnant women, more than 36 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: After a standard overnight fast, women were randomised to either 250 ml of water or 250 ml of tea with milk. All patients underwent a gastric ultrasound assessment at regular intervals for 2 h after consumption of their drink. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the difference in gastric antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) at 2 h. RESULTS: A total of 50 women were recruited to the study. There was no significant difference in the median [IQR] gastric antrum CSA in either group at 2 h: 3.2 cm [2.3 to 3.7] vs. 3.1 cm [2.6 to 3.9]; P = 0.720. The gastric antrum CSA had returned to its baseline measurement in both groups by 90 min. CONCLUSION: The change of gastric antrum CSA after 250 ml of tea with milk is similar to a corresponding volume of water in fasted pregnant patients. This study could help inform future peri-operative fasting guidelines regarding the use of a modest volume of milk with clear fluids. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03694509 ClinicalTrials.gov.

The evolution of the midwife in the obstetric high dependency unit.

BACKGROUND: This study involves two stand-alone tertiary level maternity hospitals with a combined average of 17,000 births per year, and with approximately 300 obstetric high dependency unit (OHDU) admissions annually. Many midwives feel that working in an OHDU does not constitute normal midwifery work and they have voiced concerns regarding their training in this setting. Midwives and nurses from different departments throughout the two hospitals are often asked to care for the OHDU patients. Co-location and expansion of a new OHDU, as well as a discussion around staffing, prompted this questionnaire. AIMS: The aim of this study was to formally assess midwives' and nurses' attitudes and confidence working in an OHDU. METHODS: After obtaining ethics committee approval, we conducted a survey and collected information on previous training in critical care, level of competence with HDU-related equipment and management of common HDU conditions. RESULTS: In total, 188 staff participated in the survey (38% response rate). The majority (n = 142, 76%) did not feel competent caring for critically ill patients despite almost 40% (n = 69) saying they had experience doing so. Nurses or dual trained midwives were more likely to state they felt competent caring for critically ill patients, with only 2 midwives feeling competent (2.2%) compared to 32 nurses or dual trained staff (34.4%), p < 0.01. One hundred forty-seven (78%) and 136 (72%) respondents felt confident managing major haemorrhage and sepsis respectively. One hundred sixty-nine (89%) respondents would be interested in further training. CONCLUSIONS: A greater proportion of nurses and dual trained midwives feel confident caring for ODHU patients. This survey suggests that a mixture of specialty-trained critical care nurses and midwives is required in order to provide a full complement of HDU care to both the antenatal and postnatal women.

A randomised trial of the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia.

CONTEXT: Previous studies examining the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section have mostly been in parturients under spinal anaesthesia. OBJECTIVES: We postulated that the advantage of performing transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section might be even more obvious after general anaesthesia, resulting in reduced 24-h consumption of morphine. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: In this single centre, randomised double-blind controlled trial, 40 women who underwent caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to receive a transversus abdominis plane block or no block. In those who received the block, 20 ml of levobupivacaine 2.5 mg ml was deposited bilaterally into the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance using a Sonosite Titan (SonoSite, Bothell, Washington, USA) 7-13 MHz linear transducer at the end of surgery when the patient was still anaesthetised. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded patient-controlled intravenous morphine use for 24 h, pain scores at rest and activity, sedation, nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetic medication and overall maternal satisfaction. The primary outcome was 24-h morphine consumption. RESULTS: Patients who received the transversus abdominis plane block used significantly less morphine in 24 h than those in the control group [12.3 (2.6) vs. 31.4 mg (3.1), P<0.001) and had higher satisfaction scores [16 (80%) vs. 5 (25%), P = 0.012). There were no differences between groups in the visual analogue pain scores, sedation level, nausea and vomiting or the use of antiemetic medication. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block reduced morphine consumption following caesarean section under general anaesthesia, with increased maternal satisfaction.

Development, implementation and evaluation of high-quality virtual preoperative anaesthetic assessment during COVID-19 and beyond: a quality improvement report.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk factor identification and optimisation are widely accepted as the gold standard of care for elective surgery and are essential for reducing morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 public health restrictions required a careful balance between ensuring best medical practices and maintaining safety by minimising patient face-to-face attendance in the hospital. Based on the successful implementation of telemedicine (TM) in other medical specialties and its feasibility in the preoperative context, this study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a high-quality virtual preoperative anaesthetic assessment process. METHODS: The three-step model for improvement was used. The specific, measurable, actionable, relevant, time aim (step 1) and measures for improvement (step 2) were defined at the onset of the project. The plan-do-study-act tool was used for the structured implementation of improvement interventions (step 3) in three phases. Data relating to virtual and in-person referrals, assessments, did-not-attend (DNA) rate, consultation time, day of surgery delays and cancellations, and service-user and provider experience surveys were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 2805 patients were assessed in the preoperative anaesthetic assessment clinic between July 2020 and March 2021. The mean rate of virtual preoperative assessments was 50% (SD ±10) (1390/2805). 0.1% (30/2805) were inappropriately referred on the alternative pathway. The DNA rate was 0.4% (8/1398) and 3% (43/1458) for virtual and in-person pathways, respectively. The mean consultation times for virtual and in-person attendance were 19 (SD ±7) and 31 (SD ±13) min, respectively. There were five same-day surgery cancellations and one delay due to medical reasons. When asked about their experience with the virtual assessment, both service users and providers reported high satisfaction, minimal technical difficulties and shared concerns about limited opportunities for physical examination. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first implementational studies to comprehensively outline the feasibility of TM in preoperative anaesthetic assessment during COVID-19.

Chewing Gum for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting After Elective Caesarean Section: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Nausea and vomiting are common complications in patients undergoing caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia. When experienced after surgery, they may delay recovery, reduce patient satisfaction and affect the bonding between mother and baby. Various pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have been employed with different degree of efficacy. In this pilot randomised controlled trial, we aimed to determine the possible preventative effects of chewing gum on the rate of PONV in expectant mothers undergoing neuraxial anaesthesia for elective lower segment caesarean section. All participants underwent spinal anaesthesia with administration of 10-11.5 mg of intrathecal heavy Bupivicaine 0.5% according to anaesthetists' preference, Morphine 100 µg and Fentanyl 25 µg. Postoperative analgesia regimen was also standardised. Two hundred ninety-six patients were randomised to an intervention arm to receive chewing gum in addition to standard therapy and to a non-intervention arm to receive standard therapy. After exclusions, 258 patients were followed up 24 h postoperatively. Standard therapy is defined as Ondansetron 4 mg IV intra-operatively. The primary outcomes were the incidences of nausea and vomiting in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of episodes of nausea or vomiting in the recovery room and on the ward 24 h postoperatively, use of anti-emetics postoperatively, severity of nausea and patient satisfaction with the intervention. Our study revealed no significant differences in rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the intervention and standard therapy groups (41.4% v 36.9% p = 0.461). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between groups. Chewing gum does not reduce the incidence of PONV after elective LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. Our trial was registered with clinicaltrials.org (NCT04191694).

Reducing Caesarean Section Surgical Site Infection (SSI) by 50%: A Collaborative Approach.

OBJECTIVE: Caesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) is a surgical wound site infection occurring within 30 days of surgery with a reported incidence of 3-15%. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to reduce caesarean section SSI by 50% in a tertiary maternity center. METHODS: Using multidisciplinary team approach, the project was designed with evidence-based interventions. The Royal College of Physicians of Ireland/Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland "Preventing Surgical Site Infections Key Recommendations for Practice" guideline was used as standard perioperative care. A care bundle was designed targeting preoperative personal patient preparation, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics, and strict skin preparation technique, all measured using a patient survey. The rate of SSI was followed for 14 months. The Model for Improvement methodology was used to implement change. RESULTS: Surgical site infection rate decreased from 6.7% (n = 684 caesarean sections, n = 46 SSI) to 3.45% (n = 3,206 caesarean sections, n = 110 SSI), p = .0006. Reduction occurred in both elective (4.4%-2.7%) and emergency (9.1%-4.1%) caesarean section groups. There was excellent adherence to all three elements of the care bundle. The 50% reduction in caesarean section SSI was sustained over the 14-month period, significantly reducing maternal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The success of this QI project is attributable to frontline ownership and empowerment of patients and staff.

Day-surgery patients anesthetized with propofol have less postoperative pain than those anesthetized with sevoflurane.

BACKGROUND: There have been recent studies suggesting that patients anesthetized with propofol have less postoperative pain compared with patients anesthetized with volatile anesthetics. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 80 patients undergoing day-case diagnostic laparoscopic gynecological surgery were either anesthetized with IV propofol or sevoflurane. The primary outcome measured was pain on a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Patients anesthetized with propofol had less pain compared with patients anesthetized with sevoflurane (P = 0.01). There was no difference in any of the other measured clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The patients anesthetized with propofol appeared to have less pain than patients anesthetized with sevoflurane.

Accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache: a retrospective review in an Irish maternity hospital.

BACKGROUND: Accidental dural puncture (ADP) during epidural catheter insertion and the possible consequent post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) remain challenging complications in obstetric anaesthesia. ADP/PDPH can represent a considerable degree of morbidity for the parturient and require immediate diagnosis and appropriate management to ensure recovery and avoid complications. AIM: This retrospective audit was carried out to identify the accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache rates at the Coombe Women and Infant University Hospital in Dublin. METHODS: Cases of ADP and PDPH were identified retrospectively from a register used to record these cases. Demographic and obstetric data was retrieved using the patients' medical records. Analysis was carried using MS Excel. RESULTS: In 1 year (June 1, 2018 to June 1, 2019), there were 25 cases of ADP during epidural catheter insertion and this is 0.78% of epidurals done in this period. Seventeen of these (68%) subsequently developed PDPH. In total, there are 32 cases of PDPH: 27 after epidural analgesia using an 18G Touhy needle and 5 after a spinal anaesthetic using a 25G Whitacre needle. All PDPH cases received first-line conservative treatment and 9 (28.1%) required an epidural blood patch (EBP). No-one required a second EBP. DISCUSSION: The incidence of ADP at our hospital (0.78%) is within the range quoted in the literature (0.1-1.5%) and below the UK standard of 1%. The incidence of PDPH after recognized ADP (68%) is also consistent with other published reports.

Managing opioid consumption after caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Caesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide and pain management after caesarean delivery remains challenging. Finding a balance between sufficient postoperative pain relief and excess sedation secondary to opioids is often difficult in this patient population. This quality improvement project aimed to manage the amount of opioid consumption after caesarean delivery using a new postoperative analgesic regimen. METHODS: The current practice was analysed in 52 patients before introducing the new regimen. Oxycodone consumption, pain scores and quality of recovery were recorded. Following this pre-implementation audit, a new postoperative analgesic protocol was introduced. All patients received standard doses of intrathecal morphine, paracetamol and diclofenac. Regular oxycodone sustained-release (SR) was replaced with oxycodone immediate-release (IR) as needed. These changes also coincided with education to improve midwifery assessment of pain and the delivery of analgesia. RESULTS: The outcome measures were re-audited in 178 patients which showed that oxycodone consumption had reduced median (IQR) 30 mg (20-40) vs 10 mg (5-15) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pain scores between the before and after groups at rest median (IQR) 2.0 (0-4.8) vs 2.0 (0.8-4.0) or at movement 5.0 (3.0-6.0) vs 5.0 (3.0-6.3) (p = 0.292, p = 0.482 respectively). The quality of recovery scores were also equivalent mean (SD) 78.6 (20.6) vs 77.8 (19.0) (p = 0.792). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that postoperative opioid consumption can be reduced with specific analgesic protocols and allow us to improve patient's quality of recovery.

Solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland: a case report and a 15-year literature review.

Solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is uncommonly found in the salivary glands and is a rare group of spindle-cell tumours. A review of literature revealed only 40 reported cases of SFT of major salivary glands over a 15-year period from 2004 to 2018. SFTs of the salivary glands are usually benign, although rarely, can be aggressive and may sometimes recur after initial resection. Histology and Immunohistochemistry are the most important criteria to distinguish SFT from other head and neck tumours. SFTs strongly stain for CD34 and hence is the most frequently used stain for diagnosis. All reported SFT cases with available information on immunohistochemical stains were positive for CD34. Recently, immunohistochemistry for STAT6 has been introduced as a surrogate diagnostic marker for SFT that is highly sensitive and specific. We report a case of a 51-year-old Chinese gentleman who presents with a 3-month history of a left parotid tumour that required a subtotal parotidectomy for complete excision. It was diagnosed as SFT based on histology and immunohistochemical features. He was followed-up for 3 months post-operatively with no clinical evidence of recurrence. This case proposes that, although rare, SFT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors in the major salivary glands. An awareness of this rare entity will help clinicians and pathologists better manage similar patients in the future.

Maternal near miss: what lies beneath?

OBJECTIVE: Capturing 'near miss' and severe maternal morbidity using standard definitions is challenging. Information about levels of care required by ill pregnant or recently pregnant women may be more informative. The aim of this study was to prospectively audit incidence, causes, categorisation of maternal morbidity and level of care required by patients admitted to a labour ward high dependency unit (HDU) in a stand-alone obstetric hospital. STUDY DESIGN: All women admitted to HDU from May 5th to November 5th 2014 were identified prospectively and morbidity was categorised according to the Scottish Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SAMM) and World Health Organisation (WHO) definitions of 'near miss' (NM), and 'severe maternal complications' (SMC). Level of care was determined by the RCOG Maternal critical care working group recommendations [1]. RESULTS: There were 128 admissions to HDU with 4502 live births (2.8%) during this period. There were 16 (12.5%) cases of NM; 83 (64.8%) of SMC and 29 'others' not meeting either criteria. Direct obstetric causes accounted for 79% of admissions. NM cases were more likely to be caused by haemorrhage (56.3%, p=0.009), postpartum (75%, p<0.05) and require blood transfusion (56.4%) compared to SMC cases, more likely to result from hypertension (39.8%, p=0.018) and be admitted antenatally (66.3%, p=0.039). Those admitted in the beneath NM and SMC group were more likely to be admitted antenatally (89.7%, p=0.039) and require specialist consultation (31%, p=0.022). Mean duration of HDU stay was 26.6 (±17 SD) hours. The perinatal mortality rate was 39/1000 total births. There were no maternal deaths. Level 2 care was required by 40 women (NM 25%; SMC 39% and others 14%) and two women required ICU transfer for Level 3 care. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one quarter of women requiring HDU care 'lie beneath' criteria for near miss or severe maternal complications. One third of women admitted to the HDU require Level 2 care and the remainder require higher levels of monitoring only. The majority of cases are antepartum and delivery is integral in their care. HDU care in a labour ward setting is a good model for care of the ill pregnant or recently pregnant woman.

Anesthesia considerations in the obese gravida.

Obesity is associated with serious morbidity during pregnancy, and obese women also are at a high risk of developing complications during labor, leading to an increased risk for instrumental and Cesarean deliveries. The engagement of the obstetrical anesthetist in the management of this group of high-risk patients should be performed antenatally so that an appropriate management strategy can be planned in advance to prevent an adverse outcome. Good communication between all care providers is essential. The obese patient in labor should be encouraged to have a functioning epidural catheter placed early in labor. Apart from providing analgesia and alleviating physiological derangements during labor, the presence of a functioning epidural catheter can also be used to induce anesthesia quickly in the event of an emergency cesarean section, thus avoiding a general anesthesia, which has exceedingly high risks in the obese parturient. Successful management of the obese patient necessitates a comprehensive strategy that encompasses a multidisciplinary and holistic approach from all care-providers.

The ongoing challenges of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetrics.

The increasing trend of caesarean section in the setting of increasing maternal age, obesity and other concomitant diseases will continue to challenge the obstetric anaesthetist in his/her task of providing regional and general anaesthesia. The challenges of providing anaesthesia for an emergency caesarean section, particularly the risks of general anaesthesia, will be debated. The need for involvement of a multidisciplinary team, good communication and challenges surrounding the provision of anaesthesia to such patients are discussed.