RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of 10 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK). METHODS: This is a retrospective consecutive case-series study. The IOL power was calculated using K and TK measured by IOLMaster 700 in 6 new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, RBF Calculator 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Ladas Super Formula) and 4 traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T). The arithmetic prediction error (PE) and mean absolute PE (MAE) were evaluated. The locally-weighted scatterplot smoothing was performed to assess the relationship between PE and PK. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients (576 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery were included. Compared with using K, all formulas using TK showed a hyperopic shift in the whole group. Specifically, for eyes with PK exceeding -5.90 D, all formulas using TK exhibited a hyperopic shift (all P < 0.001), while eyes with PK less than -5.90 D showed a myopic shift (all P < 0.001). The MAE of new-generation formulas calculated with TK and K showed no statistical differences, while the MAE of traditional formulas with TK was larger (TK: 0.34 ~ 0.43 D; K: 0.33 ~ 0.42 D, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prediction bias of formulas with TK increased as PK deviated from -5.90 D. TK did not improve the prediction accuracy of new-generation formulas, and even performed worse in traditional formulas.
Assuntos
Biometria , Córnea , Lentes Intraoculares , Óptica e Fotônica , Refração Ocular , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Biometria/métodos , Idoso , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the between-eye differences of the crystalline lens in subjects with unilateral high myopia and assess its contribution to the interocular refractive error disparity. METHODS: Children and adolescents with unilateral high myopia, defined as cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -5D in one eye and ≥ -3D in the other eye, were recruited. Ocular biometric parameters, including axial length (AL) and lens thickness (LT), were measured by IOLMaster 700. Other lens-related parameters, including anterior lens radius of curvature (ALR) and posterior lens radius of curvature (PLR), were measured by CASIA2 swept-source optical coherence tomography. Lens power (LP) was calculated using Bennett's formula. Paired t-test was used to assess the between-eye difference in biometric parameters, and multiple regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with the between-eye SE difference. RESULTS: Ninety-one participants (6-18 years of age; 52.75% girls) were included. The highly myopic eyes showed significantly lower LP (P < 0.001) and smaller ALR (P < 0.001) than the contralateral eyes, while no significant difference was found in central LT. In both eyes, ALR was significantly related to SE (P = 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively); while LT was not associated with SE (P = 0.051 and P = 0.052, respectively). Paired-eye analysis showed that the between-eye difference in ALR was the only lenticular parameter significantly associated with the between-eye difference in SE (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In highly myopic eyes, the crystalline lens reduced total power but morphologically changed to a more curved shape without significant lens thinning, suggesting that the LP loss is mainly achieved by reducing its internal power in high myopes.
Assuntos
Cristalino , Miopia , Erros de Refração , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Olho , Miopia/complicações , Refração Ocular , Erros de Refração/complicações , Comprimento Axial do OlhoRESUMO
Importance: Capsular tension rings (CTRs) can support weak zonules and inhibit capsular shrinkage, thus potentially reducing intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt. However, it has been debated whether CTRs can reduce IOL decentration and tilt in highly myopic eyes and whether CTR implantation is necessary for all highly myopic eyes. Objective: To evaluate the influence of CTR implantation on IOL decentration and tilt in highly myopic eyes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted between November 2021 and September 2023 at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. Patients with cataract and an axial length (AL) of 26 mm or longer were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were stratified into 3 groups based on the AL (stratum 1, 26 mm ≤ AL <28 mm; stratum 2, 28 mm ≤ AL <30mm; stratum 3, AL ≥30 mm), and further randomly assigned to the CTR group (a C-loop IOL combined with a CTR) or the control group (only a C-loop IOL) within each stratum. Main Outcomes and Measures: IOL decentration at 3 months after cataract surgery was evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: A total of 186 eyes of 186 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.3 [10.9] years; 118 female [63.4%]) were randomized into the CTR group (93 [50%]) or control group (93 [50%]), with 87 eyes (93.6%) and 92 eyes (98.9%) completing follow-up at 3 months, respectively. The CTR group showed smaller IOL decentration (0.19 mm vs 0.23 mm; difference, -0.04 mm; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01 mm; P = .02) and tilt at 3 months, and lower proportions of clinically significant IOL decentration (≥0.4 mm) and tilt (≥7°) at 3 months compared with the control group. Similar results were only found in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer (IOL decentration: 0.20 mm vs 0.28 mm; difference, -0.08 mm; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.02 mm; P = .01). Additionally, the CTR group showed a smaller change in IOL decentration from 1 week to 3 months, higher prediction accuracy, and better visual quality and patient satisfaction in this stratum. No differences were observed between the CTR and control groups in eyes with an AL less than 30 mm. Conclusions and Relevance: CTR implantation reduced C-loop IOL decentration and tilt, increased position stability, and improved visual quality in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer. These findings support use of CTR implantation in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer and implanted with C-loop IOLs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05161520.
Assuntos
Migração do Implante de Lente Intraocular , Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificação , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Migração do Implante de Lente Intraocular/fisiopatologia , Migração do Implante de Lente Intraocular/cirurgia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Miopia Degenerativa/fisiopatologia , Miopia Degenerativa/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Estudos Prospectivos , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Seguimentos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Cápsula do Cristalino/cirurgia , Implantação de PróteseRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine whether correcting the axial length (AL) measurement error of the IOLMaster 700 could improve the refractive prediction accuracy in silicone oil-filled eyes. METHODS: This study included 265 cataract patients (265 eyes) with silicone oil tamponade who were scheduled for phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The performances of various formulas, including Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical, Hoffer-QST, Kane, Ladas Super Formula, Pearl-DGS, Radial Basis Function and traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T), were evaluated. The refractive prediction errors (PE) calculated with measured AL (ALmeas) and corrected AL with silicone oil adjustment (SOAL) were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the ALmeas (<23 mm; 23-26 mm; ≥26 mm). RESULTS: Using SOAL significantly reduced the hyperopic PE of formulas when compared to ALmeas (-0.05 to 0.17 D vs 0.15 to 0.38 D, p < 0.001). After applying AL correction, all formulas showed a lower mean absolute PE (0.47-0.57 D vs 0.50-0.69 D). The percentage of eyes within ±1.0 D of PE increased from 84.91%-88.68% to 89.81%-91.32% for new formulas and from 78.11%-83.40% to 85.66%-88.68% for traditional formulas, with the use of SOAL. Subgroup analysis showed that the majority of formulas with SOAL in prediction accuracy for eyes with an AL ≥26 mm (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The refractive prediction accuracy in silicone oil-filled eyes was improved by correcting the AL measurement error of the IOLMaster 700, especially for long eyes.
Assuntos
Comprimento Axial do Olho , Facoemulsificação , Refração Ocular , Óleos de Silicone , Humanos , Óleos de Silicone/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Comprimento Axial do Olho/diagnóstico por imagem , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Idoso , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Biometria/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tamponamento Interno/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Erros de Refração/fisiopatologia , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Lentes Intraoculares , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas and the effect of anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL) and lens thickness (LT) on the prediction accuracy in shallow ACD eyes. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive case-series study included 648 eyes of 648 patients with an ACD < 3.0 mm who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Eleven formulas were evaluated: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, Olsen, Pearl-DGS and traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T). Subgroup analysis was performed based on ACD, AL and LT. RESULTS: Overall, the Hoffer QST and Kane showed no systematic bias. The Kane, EVO 2.0, Hill-RBF 3.0 and Hoffer QST had relatively lower mean absolute error and higher percentages of prediction error within ±0.5 D. For the ACD of 2.5-3.0 mm and AL < 22.0 mm subgroup, the Pearl-DGS exhibited the lowest MAE (0.45 D) and MedAE (0.41 D). Most formulas had a significant myopic bias (-0.43 to -0.18 D, p < 0.05) in the LT < 4.3 mm subgroup and a significant hyperopic bias (0.09-0.29 D, p < 0.05) in the LT ≥ 5.1 mm subgroup. CONCLUSION: The Kane and Hoffer QST were recommended for shallow ACD eyes. In eyes with an ACD between 2.5 and 3.0 mm and a short AL, the Pearl-DGS showed excellent performance. Clinicians need to fine-tune the target refraction according to LT in shallow ACD eyes.
Assuntos
Câmara Anterior , Comprimento Axial do Olho , Biometria , Lentes Intraoculares , Refração Ocular , Humanos , Câmara Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Biometria/métodos , Idoso , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Facoemulsificação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Óptica e Fotônica , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between effective lens position (ELP) and patient characteristics, and to further develop a new intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula for cataract patients with previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 2793 age-related cataract patients (group 1) and 915 post-PPV cataract patients (group 2) who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were included. The ELP of 2 groups was compared and the association between ELP and patient characteristics was further evaluated using standardized multivariate regression coefficients. An ensemble artificial intelligence-based ELP prediction model was developed using a training set of 810 vitrectomized eyes, and a thick-lens IOL formula (LISA-PPV) was constructed and compared with 7 existing formulas on an external multi-center testing set of 105 eyes. RESULTS: Compared to eyes with age-related cataract, vitrectomized eyes showed a similar ELP distribution (P = .19), but different standardized coefficients of preoperative biometry for ELP. The standardized coefficients also varied with the type of vitreous tamponade, history of scleral buckling, and ciliary sulcus IOL implantation. The LISA-PPV formula showed the lowest mean and median absolute prediction error (MAE: 0.63 D; MedAE: 0.44 D), and the highest percentages of eyes within ±0.5 D of prediction error (57.14%) in the testing dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The ELP prediction required optimization specifically for vitrectomized eyes based on their biometric and surgical characteristics. The LISA-PPV formula is a useful and accurate tool for determining IOL power in cataract patients with previous PPV (available at http://ppv-iolcalculator.com/).