Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to develop and validate biomarkers for treatment response and survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). The chemotherapy response score (CRS) stratifies patients into complete/near-complete (CRS3), partial (CRS2), and no/minimal (CRS1) response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Our aim was to review current evidence to determine whether the CRS is prognostic in women with tubo-ovarian HGSC treated with NACT. METHODS: We established an international collaboration to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, pooling individual patient data from 16 sites in 11 countries. Patients had stage IIIC/IV HGSC, 3-4 NACT cycles and >6-months follow-up. Random effects models were used to derive combined odds ratios in the pooled population to investigate associations between CRS and progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS). RESULTS: 877 patients were included from published and unpublished studies. Median PFS and OS were 15 months (IQR 5-65) and 28 months (IQR 7-92) respectively. CRS3 was seen in 249 patients (28%). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS for CRS3 versus CRS1/CRS2 were 0·55 (95% CI, 0·45-0·66; P < 0·001) and 0·65 (95% CI 0·50-0·85, P = 0·002) respectively; no heterogeneity was identified (PFS: Q = 6·42, P = 0·698, I2 = 0·0%; OS: Q = 6·89, P = 0·648, I2 = 0·0%). CRS was significantly associated with PFS and OS in multivariate models adjusting for age and stage. Of 306 patients with known germline BRCA1/2 status, those with BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 80) were more likely to achieve CRS3 (P = 0·027). CONCLUSIONS: CRS3 was significantly associated with improved PFS and OS compared to CRS1/2. This validation of CRS in a real-world setting demonstrates it to be a robust and reproducible biomarker with potential to be incorporated into therapeutic decision-making and clinical trial design.

Context-Specific Economic Evaluation for Molecular Pathology Tests: An Application in Colorectal Cancer in the West of Scotland.

OBJECTIVES: The cost-effectiveness of molecular pathology testing is highly context dependent. The field is fast-moving, and national health technology assessment may not be relevant or timely for local decision makers. This study illustrates a method of context-specific economic evaluation that can be carried out in a limited timescale without extensive resources. METHODS: We established a multi-disciplinary group including an oncologist, pathologists and a health economist. We set out diagnostic and treatment pathways and costs using registry data, health technology assessments, guidelines, audit data, and estimates from the group. Sensitivity analysis varied input parameters across plausible ranges. The evaluation setting was the West of Scotland and UK NHS perspective was adopted. The evaluation was assessed against the AdHopHTA checklist for hospital-based health technology assessment. RESULTS: A context-specific economic evaluation could be carried out on a timely basis using limited resources. The evaluation met all relevant criteria in the AdHopHTA checklist. Health outcomes were expected to be at least equal to the current strategy. Annual cost savings of £637,000 were estimated resulting primarily from a reduction in the proportion of patients receiving intravenous infusional chemotherapy regimens. The result was not sensitive to any parameter. The data driving the main cost saving came from a small clinical audit. We recommended this finding was confirmed in a larger population. CONCLUSIONS: The method could be used to evaluate testing changes elsewhere. The results of the case study may be transferable to other jurisdictions where the organization of cancer services is fragmented.

Case report: immune-mediated cerebellar ataxia secondary to anti-PD-L1 treatment for lung cancer.

Case presentation: A 66-year-old gentleman with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer developed a wide-based gait following treatment on a clinical trial with cytotoxic chemotherapy and an anti-PD-L1 drug. He had no other significant past medical history of note. Brain imaging, blood tests and lumbar puncture did not reveal a structural, biochemical, paraneoplastic or infective cause. The main differential diagnoses were immune-mediated toxicity or a paraneoplastic syndrome. He was started on prednisolone on the suspicion that his symptoms represented an immune-mediated toxicity. His condition improved following this and his immunotherapy treatment was discontinued. Upon steroid withdrawal, his symptoms recurred and responded to further prednisolone. Conclusions: Immune-mediated toxicities can affect any part of the nervous system and should form part of the differential diagnosis for new neurological symptoms in a patient receiving immunotherapy. Corticosteroids should be the first-line treatment of immune-mediated toxicities. Immunotherapy should be permanently discontinued following severe toxicities.

Cardiotoxicity of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors: A Longitudinal Study Incorporating Contemporary Definitions and Risk Scores.

Background: Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type (BRAF) and mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors have revolutionized treatment for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Although left ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with these therapies has been reported in clinical trials, the real-world incidence is poorly defined, as are risk factors for its development. Objectives: This study sought to characterize the incidence, time course, and risk factors for cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in patients with melanoma receiving BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Methods: Patients with melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors at a cancer hospital network between June 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, were included retrospectively. CTRCD was defined as mild, moderate, or severe according to International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) definitions. Baseline cardiotoxicity risk stratification was performed using the Heart Failure Association/ICOS tool. Results: Of the 63 patients included, 27% developed CTRCD (17% mild and 10% moderate). No patients developed severe CTRCD or symptomatic heart failure. CTRCD occurred most frequently in patients considered to be at "low" and "medium" baseline risk of cardiotoxicity (82%). The baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain were not different in patients who developed moderate CTRCD vs those who did not. Left ventricular internal diameters in diastole and systole were larger in patients who developed moderate CTRCD compared with those who did not (left ventricular internal diameter in diastole: 4.9 ± 0.6 cm vs 4.3 ± 0.6 cm; P = 0.023; left ventricular internal diameter in systole: 3.3 ± 0.4 cm vs 2.8 ± 0.5 cm; P = 0.039). Conclusions: BRAF and MEK inhibitor-associated CTRCD is common. The utility of the Heart Failure Association/ICOS risk stratification tool appears limited in this group, and better risk prediction tools are needed. The long-term consequences of CTRCD, particularly mild CTRCD, warrant evaluation in larger prospective studies.

Mechanistic and Clinical Overview Cardiovascular Toxicity of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.

Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type (BRAF) and mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors have revolutionized melanoma treatment. Approximately half of patients with melanoma harbor a BRAF gene mutation with subsequent dysregulation of the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Targeting this pathway with BRAF and MEK blockade results in control of cell proliferation and, in most cases, disease control. These pathways also have cardioprotective effects and are necessary for normal vascular and cardiac physiology. BRAF and MEK inhibitors are associated with adverse cardiovascular effects including hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, venous thromboembolism, atrial arrhythmia, and electrocardiographic QT interval prolongation. These effects may be underestimated in clinical trials. Baseline cardiovascular assessment and follow-up, including serial imaging and blood pressure assessment, are essential to balance optimal anti-cancer therapy while minimizing cardiovascular side effects. In this review, an overview of BRAF/MEK inhibitor-induced cardiovascular toxicity, the mechanisms underlying these, and strategies for surveillance, prevention, and treatment of these effects are provided.

High-Dose Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Metastatic Germ-Cell Cancer: The Scotland Experience.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for metastatic germ-cell cancer in Scotland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent this treatment between the years 2001 and 2016 at the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre in Glasgow were identified. Information regarding baseline patient and tumor characteristics, prognostic features, HDCT delivery, and survival outcomes were obtained retrospectively from patients' medical records. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (15 male and 3 female subjects) received HDCT and ASCT in the salvage setting. Of the 14 male patients who had relapsed disease, 8 (57%) were high or very high risk according to the International Prognostic Factor Study Group (IPFSG) risk categorization. The mean time interval between HDCT cycles was 8.6 weeks, which is longer than the specified 3 to 4 weeks in the literature. A total of 67% of patients had no biochemical or radiologic evidence of disease after salvage treatment, including surgery. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates at 2 years were 67% and 72%, respectively. However, 12 patients (67%) and 6 patients (39%) had long-term neurotoxicity and ototoxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Delivery of HDCT and ASCT as salvage treatment for metastatic germ-cell cancer is feasible within a tertiary cancer center with survival outcomes comparable to published literature, although maintaining dose intensity is a challenge. We hope to recruit subjects to the international TIGER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02375204), which will attempt to clarify if HDCT is superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy in the salvage setting.