Loss-of-heterozygosity analysis of small-cell lung carcinomas using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Human cancers arise by a combination of discrete mutations and chromosomal alterations. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosomal regions bearing mutated tumor suppressor genes is a key event in the evolution of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. Global patterns of LOH can be understood through allelotyping of tumors with polymorphic genetic markers. Simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs, or microsatellites) are reliable genetic markers for studying LOH, but only a modest number of SSLPs are used in LOH studies because the genotyping procedure is rather tedious. Here, we report the use of a highly parallel approach to genotype large numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for LOH, in which samples are genotyped for nearly 1,500 loci by performing 24 polymerase chain reactions (PCR), pooling the resulting amplification products and hybridizing the mixture to a high-density oligonucleotide array. We characterize the results of LOH analyses on human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and control DNA samples by hybridization. We show that the patterns of LOH are consistent with those obtained by analysis with both SSLPs and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), whereas amplifications rarely are detected by the SNP array. The results validate the use of SNP array hybridization for tumor studies.

High level amplification of 1p32-33 and 2p22-24 in small cell lung carcinomas.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a frequently occurring, highly aggressive tumor with a generally poor clinical outcome. In order to approach the genetic mechanisms behind the tumor progression, a general screen for DNA copy number alterations was performed using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In the series of 23 cases analyzed, CGH alterations were frequently detected ranging from 9 to 22 abnormalities in the individual tumors. The most frequent losses were detected on chromosome arms 3p (23/23), 13q14-21 (23/23), 4p (20/23), 4q (20/23), and 2q22-24 (18/23), while gains preferentially involved chromosome arms 19p (18/23), 19q (17/23), 1p31-35 (15/23), 17q22-25 (11/23), and 5p14-15.3 (9/23). In addition, high level amplification at chromosome arms 1p32-33 and 2p22-24 were found in three and two cases, respectively. Candidate genes for these amplifications include the l-MYC (1p32) and n-MYC (2p24.1) oncogenes, which have been previously found to be overexpressed in SCLC. Taken together, the findings demonstrate a high level of chromosomal instability in SCLC, which is well in agreement with the highly malignant phenotype of this tumor type. Subchromosomal regions involved in gains and losses were delineated and the amplifications of 1p32-33 and 2p22-24 were demonstrated, thus providing starting points for the exact characterization of molecular events involved in SCLC tumor progression.

Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor's ligand binding domains.

The 2.8-A crystal structure of the complex formed by estradiol and the human estrogen receptor-alpha ligand binding domain (hERalphaLBD) is described and compared with the recently reported structure of the progesterone complex of the human progesterone receptor ligand binding domain, as well as with similar structures of steroid/nuclear receptor LBDs solved elsewhere. The hormone-bound hERalphaLBD forms a distinctly different and probably more physiologically important dimer interface than its progesterone counterpart. A comparison of the specificity determinants of hormone binding reveals a common structural theme of mutually supported van der Waals and hydrogen-bonded interactions involving highly conserved residues. The previously suggested mechanism by which the estrogen receptor distinguishes estradiol's unique 3-hydroxy group from the 3-keto function of most other steroids is now described in atomic detail. Mapping of mutagenesis results points to a coactivator-binding surface that includes the region around the "signature sequence" as well as helix 12, where the ligand-dependent conformation of the activation function 2 core is similar in all previously solved steroid/nuclear receptor LBDs. A peculiar crystal packing event displaces helix 12 in the hERalphaLBD reported here, suggesting a higher degree of dynamic variability than expected for this critical substructure.