Development of an MRI-Based Comprehensive Model Fusing Clinical, Radiomics and Deep Learning Models for Preoperative Histological Stratification in Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative histological stratification (HS) of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (ISFTs) can help predict patient outcomes and develop personalized treatment plans. However, the role of a comprehensive model based on clinical, radiomics and deep learning (CRDL) features in preoperative HS of ISFT remains unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of a CRDL model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative HS in ISFT. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Three hundred and ninety-eight patients from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University (primary training cohort) and 49 patients from Lanzhou University Second Hospital (external validation cohort) with ISFT based on histopathological findings (237 World Health Organization [WHO] tumor grade 1 or 2, and 210 WHO tumor grade 3). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T/T1-weighted imaging (T1) by using spin echo sequence, T2-weighted imaging (T2) by using fast spin echo sequence, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (T1C) by using two-dimensional fast spin echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the CRDL model and a clinical model (CM) in preoperative HS in the external validation cohort. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical net benefit provided by the CRDL model. STATISTICAL TESTS: Cohen's kappa, intra-/inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, AUC, DCA, calibration curves, DeLong test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The CRDL model had significantly better discrimination ability than the CM (AUC [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.895 [0.807-0.912] vs. 0.810 [0.745-0.874], respectively) in the external validation cohort. The CRDL model can provide a clinical net benefit for preoperative HS at a threshold probability >20%. DATA CONCLUSION: The proposed CRDL model holds promise for preoperative HS in ISFT, which is important for predicting patient outcomes and developing personalized treatment plans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Topical Chinese patent medicines for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is defined as persistent or recurrent pain that occurs in the joints, musculo-soft tissue, spine or bones for more than three months and is not completely curable. Although topical Chinese patent medicine (CPM) is the most extensively utilized medication in Asia and is widely used for pain management, its efficacy remains controversial. This article presents a systematic review of clinical studies on the therapeutic properties of topical CPM for CMP patients to better inform clinical decision-making and provide additional and safer treatment options for patients with CMP. METHOD: We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, web of science and Chinese databases (CNKI and WanFang data) from 2010 to 2022. In all the studies, knee osteoarthritis, cervical spondylosis, low back pain, and periarthritis of shoulder met the International Pain Association definition of chronic musculoskeletal pain. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using topical CPM primarily for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. To determine the effect of topical CPM on clinical symptoms, we extracted the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 0-10) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scores (WOMAC pain, range 0-20), in which the lower the score, the better the results. We also accepted the comprehensive outcome criteria developed by the Chinese National Institute of Rheumatology as an endpoint (total effectiveness rate, range 0-100%, higher score = better outcome), which assesses the overall pain, physical function and wellness. Finally, trial sequential analysis of VAS pain score and total effectiveness rate was performed using TSA software. RESULTS: Twenty-six randomized controlled trials (n = 3180 participants) compared topical CPM with oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) (n = 15), topical NSAIDs (n = 9), physiotherapy (n = 5), exercise therapy (n = 4), and intra-articular Sodium hyaluronate injection (n = 2). Sixteen studies found that topical CPM was statistically significant in improving CMP pain (measured by VAS pain and Womac pain scores)(p < 0.05), and 12 studies found topical CPMs to be more clinically effective (assessed by ≥ 30% reduction in symptom severity) in treating patients with CMP (p < 0.05). Trial sequential analysis indicates that the current available evidence is robust, and further studies cannot reverse this result. In most of the studies, randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding were not sufficiently described, and no placebo-controlled trials were identified. CONCLUSION: Most studies showed superior analgesic effects of topical CPM over various control treatments, suggesting that topical CPM may be effective for CMP and is an additional, safe and reasonable treatment option. These reported benefits should be validated in higher-quality RCTs.

Development of an artificial intelligent model for pre-endoscopic screening of precancerous lesions in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Given the high cost of endoscopy in gastric cancer (GC) screening, there is an urgent need to explore cost-effective methods for the large-scale prediction of precancerous lesions of gastric cancer (PLGC). We aim to construct a hierarchical artificial intelligence-based multimodal non-invasive method for pre-endoscopic risk screening, to provide tailored recommendations for endoscopy. METHODS: From December 2022 to December 2023, a large-scale screening study was conducted in Fujian, China. Based on traditional Chinese medicine theory, we simultaneously collected tongue images and inquiry information from 1034 participants, considering the potential of these data for PLGC screening. Then, we introduced inquiry information for the first time, forming a multimodality artificial intelligence model to integrate tongue images and inquiry information for pre-endoscopic screening. Moreover, we validated this approach in another independent external validation cohort, comprising 143 participants from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital. RESULTS: A multimodality artificial intelligence-assisted pre-endoscopic screening model based on tongue images and inquiry information (AITonguequiry) was constructed, adopting a hierarchical prediction strategy, achieving tailored endoscopic recommendations. Validation analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of AITonguequiry were 0.74 for overall PLGC (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.76, p < 0.05) and 0.82 for high-risk PLGC (95% CI 0.82-0.83, p < 0.05), which were significantly and robustly better than those of the independent use of either tongue images or inquiry information alone. In addition, AITonguequiry has superior performance compared to existing PLGC screening methodologies, with the AUC value enhancing 45% in terms of PLGC screening (0.74 vs. 0.51, p < 0.05) and 52% in terms of high-risk PLGC screening (0.82 vs. 0.54, p < 0.05). In the independent external verification, the AUC values were 0.69 for PLGC and 0.76 for high-risk PLGC. CONCLUSION: Our AITonguequiry artificial intelligence model, for the first time, incorporates inquiry information and tongue images, leading to a higher precision and finer-grained pre-endoscopic screening of PLGC. This enhances patient screening efficiency and alleviates patient burden.

Clinical efficacy of Osteoking in knee osteoarthritis therapy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized controlled study in China.

Background: Osteoking has been extensively used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, it is lack of high-quality evidence on the clinical efficacy of Osteoking against KOA and the comparison with that of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Osteoking in treating KOA. Methods: In the current study, a total of 501 subjects were recruited from 20 medical centers, and were divided into the Osteoking treatment group (n = 428) and the NSAIDs treatment group (n = 73). The Propensity Score Matching method was used to balance baseline data of different groups. Then, the therapeutic effects of Osteoking and NSAIDs against KOA were evaluated using VAS score, WOMAC score, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS, while the safety of the two treatment were both assessed based on dry mouth, dizziness, diarrhea, etc. Results: After 8 weeks of treatment, the Osteoking group was compared with the NSAIDs group, the VAS score [2.00 (1.00, 3.00) vs. 3.00 (2.00, 4.00)], WOMAC pain score [10.00 (8.00, 13.00) vs. 11.00 (8.00, 16.00) ], WOMAC physical function score [32.00 (23.00, 39.00) vs. 39.07 ± 16.45], WOMAC total score [44.00 (31.00, 55.00) vs. 53.31 ± 22.47) ], EQ-5D-3L score [0.91 (0.73, 0.91) vs. 0.73 (0.63, 0.83) ] and EQ-VAS score [80.00 (79.00, 90.00) vs. 80.00 (70.00, 84.00) ] were improved by the treatment of Osteoking for 8 weeks more effectively than that by the treatment of NSAIDs. After 8 weeks of treatment with Osteoking, the VAS scores of KOA patients with the treatment of Osteoking for 8 weeks were reduced from 6.00 (5.00, 7.00) to 2.00 (1.00, 3.00) (p < 0.05), which was better than those with the treatment of NSAIDs starting from 2 weeks during this clinical observation. Importantly, further subgroup analysis revealed that the treatment of Osteoking was more suitable for alleviating various clinical symptoms of KOA patients over 65 years old, with female, KL II-III grade and VAS 4-7 scores, while the clinical efficacy of NSAIDs was better in KOA patients under 65 years old and with VAS 8-10 scores. Of note, there were no differences in adverse events and adverse reactions between the treatment groups of the two drugs. Conclusion: Osteoking may exert a satisfying efficacy in relieving joint pain and improving life quality of KOA patients without any adverse reactions, especially for patients with KL II-III grades and VAS 4-7 scores. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=55387, Identifier ChiCTR2000034475.

Chinese patent medicine for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chinese patent medicine (CPM) has been widely used in China for patients with osteoporosis (OP) but a comprehensive literature review is still important. Therefore, we performed meta-analysis using six electronic databases prior to 30 April 2021 only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using CPM as the first-line treatment in adults with OP were included. Thirty RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2723 patients, and seven types of CPM were included. Compared with the control group, 23 studies showed significantly improved bone mineral density (BMD) (lumbar spine) (mean difference [MD] = 0.08; confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.13), 15 studies showed significantly improved BMD (femoral) (MD = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07), 6 studies showed significantly improved BMD (radius) (MD = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.09), 2 trials showed significantly improvement of BMD (ulna) (MD = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03), and 4 trials showed significantly improved BMD (MD = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.10). The meta-analysis also showed that CPM had superior pain improvement, a higher total effectiveness rate, and a lower risk of adverse events compared with standard western treatment. The findings of this study suggest that CPM therapy may be a safe and effective alternative treatment modality for OP, it has potential benefits in relieving symptoms and improving BMD compared to western medications or placebos.

No significant association between immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: It is known that organ transplant recipients have a significantly higher risk for developing cancers, but the association between immunosuppression in organ transplantation and the risk for prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the evidence regarding the association of solid organ transplantation with PCa risk. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was performed up to March 2019. Combined relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using a fixed-effect or random-effect model. RESULTS: In total, 26 articles including 33 independent population-based cohort studies with 556,812 recipients and 2,438 PCa cases were identified and included in this meta-analysis. PCa risk in the solid organ transplant recipients did not increase compared with the general population (RR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.90-1.18). Independent analysis of different kinds of organ replacements further indicated immune inhibition in the transplantation of kidney, liver, heart, and lung, and was not associated with elevated PCa risk (RR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95; RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.21-1.02; RR=1.70, 95% CI: 0.88-2.52; RR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.57-1.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients was not associated with higher PCa risk.

[Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate cancer receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) using three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems. METHODS: From February, 2014 to January 2016, 72 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent LRP with 2D or 3D imaging systems performed by a single experienced surgeon. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and functional and oncologic outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent 3D LRP and the other 36 patients underwent 2D LRP. Compared with 2D LRP group, 3D LRP group had a significantly shorter operative time (167 vs 218 min, P<0.001), a smaller volume of intraoperative blood loss (86.11 vs 177.78 mL, P<0.001) and a better early urinary continence outcome (88.89% vs 63.89%, P=0.026). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of complications, potency outcome or biochemical recurrence-free rate. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D LRP, 3D LRP shortens the operative time, reduces intraoperative blood loss and is associated with a better early urinary continence outcome in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Prognostic value of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been controversial with the advent of targeted therapy. Our study was to identify the prognostic value of CN combined with targeted therapy for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by conducting a meta-analysis based on the existing population-based studies. METHODS: Research articles published up to September 2015 were searched through PubMed and Embase. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mRCC undergoing CN combined with targeted therapy compared with targeted therapy alone. Furthermore, analysis was made to evaluate some potential prognostic factors predicting survival. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in our analysis with 2688 mRCC patients. A fixed-effect model was performed and found the pooled HR of OS was 0.60 (95 % CI 0.53-0.67, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the pooled median survival ratio was elevated (HR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.78-2.49, p < 0.0001), indicating that patients who received CN combined with targeted therapy yielded a more than twofold prolonged OS compared with those who received targeted therapy alone. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in PFS in the patients undergoing CN combined with targeted therapy (HR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.57-1.19, p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that CN combined with targeted therapy has a significant OS advantage in patients with mRCC. However, the results should be evaluated in the context of the potential selection biases of the existing evidence. Large prospective cohort studies are required to confirm these findings.