Sex-Related Differences in the Phenotype and Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: SEXEII Study of ENEIDA.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of patient sex on the presentation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been poorly evaluated. Our aims were to assess potential disparities in IBD phenotype and progression between sexes. METHODS: We performed an observational multicenter study that included patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis from the Spanish ENEIDA registry. Data extraction was conducted in July 2021. RESULTS: A total of 51,595 patients with IBD were included, 52% were males and 25,947 had CD. The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 9 years in males and 10 years in females. In CD, female sex was an independent risk factor for medium disease onset (age, 17-40 y) (relative risk ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.31-1.62), later disease onset (age, >40 y) (relative risk ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.73), exclusive colonic involvement (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34), inflammatory behavior (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21), and extraintestinal manifestations (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59). However, female sex was a protective factor for upper gastrointestinal involvement (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90), penetrating behavior (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82), perianal disease (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82), and complications (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.80). In ulcerative colitis, female sex was an independent risk factor for extraintestinal manifestations (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.26-1.61). However, female sex was an independent protective factor for disease onset from age 40 onward (relative risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87), left-sided colonic involvement (relative risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78), extensive colonic involvement (relative risk ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.55-0.64), and abdominal surgery (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: There is sexual dimorphism in IBD. The patient's sex should be taken into account in the clinical management of the disease.

Clinical settings with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis.

There are aspects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, specifically tofacitinib, that distinguish them from other drugs used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), such as their oral administration, their short half-life and their lack of immunogenicity. With the available evidence, we can highlight tofacitinib's quick action and flexibility of use, and its efficacy in patients, irrespective of whether or not they have previously been exposed to TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF drugs) and other biologic agents. Moreover, their safety profile is known and manageable, with certain considerations and precautions being factored in before and during treatment. In this review, we have defined various scenarios pertaining to this drug, e.g. its use in the event of failure or intolerance to previous treatment with biologics, when a quick response is required or in patients with other concurrent immune-mediated diseases.

ABP 501 (adalimumab-atto) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: an example of evidence-based extrapolation.

We report the available evidence demonstrating the biosimilarity of ABP 501 (AMGEVITA®, adalimumab-atto) to its reference product (RP) (Humira®, adalimumab), and the rationale for the extrapolation of the results obtained with the RP in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to ABP 501. Based on its preclinical and clinical data, ABP 501 has been authorized for use in Europe in all the indications approved for the RP, including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on screening and treatment of tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre el cribado y tratamiento de la infección tuberculosa en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

There is evidence that following the recommendations on screening and treatment of tuberculosis infection does not completely prevent the onset of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This fact, and the increasing use of new biologics and immunomodulators, has led the Spanish Group Working on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis to update their recommendations for the prevention of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Diagnostic methods for latent tuberculosis infection, different scenarios in which screening is to be performed, strategies to reduce the risk of tuberculosis once biological treatment is initiated and chemoprophylaxis guidelines for latent tuberculosis infection are reviewed, as well as the management of active tuberculosis during biological treatment. Finally, there is a summary of the current recommendations within the paper and in an algorithm.

Changes in the requirement for early surgery in inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biological agents.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Biological therapies may be changing the natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), reducing the need for surgical intervention. We aimed to assess whether the availability of anti-TNF agents impacts the need for early surgery in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Retrospective, cohort study of patients diagnosed within a 6-year period before and after the licensing of anti-TNFs (1990-1995 and 2007-2012 for CD; 1995-2000 and 2007-2012 for UC) were identified in the ENEIDA Registry. Surgery-free survival curves were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 7370 CD patients (2022 in Cohort 1 and 5348 in Cohort 2) and 8069 UC patients (2938 in Cohort 1 and 5131 in Cohort 2) were included. Immunosuppressants were used significantly earlier and more frequently in both CD and UC post-biological cohorts. The cumulative probability of surgery was lower in CD following anti-TNF approval (16% and 11%, 22% and 16%, and 29% and 19%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively P < 0.0001), although not in UC (3% and 2%, 4% and 4%, and 6% and 5% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively; P = 0.2). Ileal involvement, older age at diagnosis and active smoking in CD, and extensive disease in UC, were independent risk factors for surgery, whereas high-volume IBD centers (in both CD and UC) and immunosuppressant use (in CD) were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF availability was associated with a reduction in early surgery for CD (driven mainly by earlier and more widespread immunosuppressant use) but not in UC.

Correlation Between Anti-TNF Serum Levels and Endoscopic Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVES: (a) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-TNF trough levels to predict mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); (b) to determine the best cut-off point to predict mucosal healing in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective study. IBD patients under anti-TNF treatment for at least 6 months that had to undergo an endoscopy were included. Mucosal healing was defined as: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease < 3 for Crohn's disease (CD), Rutgeerts score < i2 for CD in postoperative setting, or Mayo endoscopic score ≤ 1 for ulcerative colitis (UC). Anti-TNF concentrations were measured using SMART ELISAs at trough. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included. Anti-TNF trough levels were significantly higher among patients that had mucosal healing than among those who did not. The area under the curve of infliximab for mucosal healing was 0.63 (best cutoff value 3.4 µg/mL), and for adalimumab 0.60 (best cutoff value 7.2 µg/mL). In the multivariate analysis, having anti-TNF drug levels above the cutoff values [odds ratio (OR) 3.1]) and having UC instead of CD (OR 4) were associated with a higher probability of having mucosal healing. Additionally, the need for an escalated dosage (OR 0.2) and current smoking habit (OR 0.2) were also associated with a lower probability of mucosal healing. CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between anti-TNF trough levels and mucosal healing in IBD patients; however, the accuracy of the determination of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations able to predict mucosal healing was suboptimal.

Differences in the need for adalimumab dose optimization between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

AIM: to compare the need for and time to adalimumab dose escalation and de-escalation between patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: this observational cohort study included patients with luminal CD or patients with UC treated with adalimumab. Adalimumab dose optimization was decided based on the Harvey-Bradshaw index (CD) or the partial Mayo score (UC). The co-primary endpoints were the differences in the rate of dose escalation and the cumulative probability of escalation-free survival between cohorts. We also evaluated the rates of de-escalation and predictors of adalimumab dose escalation and de-escalation. RESULTS: twenty-four of 43 CD patients (56%) and 28 of 43 UC patients (65%) required adalimumab dose escalation. UC patients had a higher adjusted rate of dose escalation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-4.56; p = 0.013) than CD patients. The median time to dose escalation was significantly shorter for UC than CD patients (3.2 months, interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-10.3 vs 12.2 months, IQR: 6.1-35.7; p = 0.001). Survival curves showed that UC patients had an increased probability of dose escalation (p < 0.001). Prior anti-TNF therapy was associated with dose escalation (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.05-4.34; p = 0.037). Adalimumab dose de-escalation was attempted in 32% of UC patients and 50% of CD patients. Survival curves showed that CD patients had an increased probability of dose de-escalation (p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: UC patients more frequently required adalimumab dose escalation than CD patients. UC patients required optimization earlier than CD patients. More CD patients than UC patients can be dose de-escalated later on during treatment.

Adalimumab for Induction of Histological Remission in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Histological remission represents a target distinct from endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) and seems a better predictor of clinical outcomes. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of adalimumab to achieve histological remission in UC patients. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, open-label study of patients treated with adalimumab. Eligible patients were anti-TNF naïve adults with moderately to severely active UC. The Mayo score including endoscopy was performed at baseline and weeks 8 and 52. Histological activity was scored using the Geboes Index. The primary endpoint was histological remission, defined as a Geboes grade ≤ 3.0, at week 52. RESULTS: We included 34 patients. At week 8, 6 of 34 patients (17.6%) achieved histological remission. At week 52, 9 patients (26.5%, intention to treat; 31%, per protocol) had histological remission. Patients had a significant and progressive reduction in the most severe subgrades of Geboes Index from baseline at weeks 8 and 52. At weeks 8 and 52, 50 and 61.8% of patients achieved mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1). All patients who achieved histological remission also had mucosal healing. At week 8, 85.3 and 20.6% of patients achieved clinical response (decrease in Mayo score ≤ 3 points) or remission (Mayo score ≤ 2), respectively. At week 52, the corresponding values were 67.6 and 52.9%, respectively. At week 52, agreement between histological remission and mucosal healing was fair (kappa 0.293). Agreement between histological remission and Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 was good (kappa 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was able to achieve histological remission in anti-TNF naïve patients with moderately to severely active UC.

Adalimumab Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: Outcomes by Prior Anti-TNF Use and Efficacy of Dose Escalation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of prior anti-TNF use on "real-life" outcomes of adalimumab therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is not well known. AIM: To compare the influence of prior anti-TNF use on the outcomes of adalimumab maintenance treatment in UC patients. We also assessed the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive UC who advanced to an adalimumab maintenance regimen. Patients in whom adalimumab was discontinued prior to week eight of treatment were excluded. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were the cumulative probabilities of adalimumab failure-free survival and colectomy-free survival. We also assessed the need for and the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. RESULTS: Of 184 UC on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, 116 (63%) had previous anti-TNF use. After a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range 13-49), 112 patients (60%) maintained corticosteroid-free clinical response. Sixty-nine patients (37%) had adalimumab failure, and 22 (12%) needed colectomy. Anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly lower adjusted rates of adalimumab failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; p < 0.001), adalimumab dose escalation (HR 0.35; p = 0.002), and need for colectomy (HR 0.26; p < 0.004). Seventy-six patients (41%) needed dose escalation after secondary loss of response, and 47% of these regained response after escalation. Short-term response after escalation was identified as a significant predictor of colectomy avoidance (HR 0.53; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this "real-life" cohort of UC patients on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly better long-term outcomes. Adalimumab dose escalation enabled recovery of response in nearly half of patients.

Treatment persistence during therapeutic sequences with adalimumab and infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment Crohn's disease (CD). However, the loss of response over time means that they are usually used sequentially. The aim of this study was to compare treatment persistence with different sequences of TNF inhibitors in patients with active luminal CD. METHODS: A Markov model (3-month cycles) was developed to simulate the therapeutic sequences of beginning biological treatment with infliximab or adalimumab, with a time horizon of three years. Each state of the model represented treatment (induction, standard dose or escalated dose) with each TNF inhibitor or the state without biological treatment. The transition probabilities between states were determined by the clinical response to TNF inhibitors obtained from the literature. The likelihood of discontinuation due to adverse effects was also considered. RESULTS: After three years, the percentage of CD patients receiving infliximab and adalimumab as a first TNF inhibitor that remained in treatment was 52.8% and 59.3% (p = 0.1) respectively. Median time to discontinuation of the standard dose was 26.26 months in patients who started with adalimumab and 24.39 months in patients who started with infliximab. CONCLUSION: In the model, there were no significant differences in persistence after three years with the initial drug among patients with active luminal CD starting treatment with infliximab or adalimumab.

Diagnostic Performance of the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Self-Administered Online at Home by Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: CRONICA-UC Study.

OBJECTIVES: New e-health technologies can improve patient-physician communication and contribute to optimal patient care. We compared the diagnostic performance of the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) self-administered by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) at home (through a website) with the in-clinic gastroenterologist-assessed SCCAI. METHODS: Patients were followed-up over 6 months. At months 3 and 6, patients completed the SCCAI online at home; within 48 h, gastroenterologists (blinded to patients' scores) completed the in-clinic SCCAI (reference). SCCAI scores were dichotomized to remission or active disease, and SCCAI changes in disease activity from month 3 to 6 were classed as worsening, stability, or improvement. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients (median age: 38 years; 56% female) contributed with 340 pairs of questionnaires. Correlation of SCCAI scores by patients and physicians was good (Spearman's ρ=0.79), with 85% agreement for remission or activity (95% CI: 80.8-88.6, κ=0.66). The negative predictive value for active disease was 94.5% (91.4-96.6); the positive predictive value was 68.0% (58.8-69.2). Agreement between patient and physician was higher in the 168 month 6 pairs than in the 172 month 3 pairs of questionnaires (89.3% (83.6-93.1) vs. 80.8% (74.2-86.0), P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UC, SCCAI self-administration via an online tool resulted in a high percentage of agreement with evaluation by gastroenterologists, with a remarkably high negative predictive value for disease activity. Remote monitoring of UC patients is possible and might reduce hospital visits.

Infliximab Dose Escalation as an Effective Strategy for Managing Secondary Loss of Response in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in ulcerative colitis (UC) have not been well evaluated. AIMS: To assess the short- and long-term outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in a cohort of patients with UC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. All consecutive UC patients who had lost response to infliximab maintenance infusions and who underwent infliximab dose escalation were included. Post-escalation short-term clinical response and remission were evaluated. In the long term, the cumulative probabilities of infliximab failure-free survival and colectomy-free survival were calculated. Predictors of short-term response and event-free survival were estimated using logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Fifty-four patients (68.4%) achieved short-term clinical response and 41 patients (51.9%) entered in clinical remission. After a median follow-up of 15 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-26], 33 patients (41.8%) had infliximab failure. Patients with short-term response had a significantly lower adjusted rate of infliximab failure [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.49; p < 0.001]. During a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 13-34), 9 patients (11.4%) needed colectomy. Short-term response was identified as a predictor of colectomy avoidance (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.69; p < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In UC patients who lost response to infliximab during maintenance, infliximab dose escalation enabled recovery of short-term response in nearly 70% of patients. In the long term, 58% of patients maintained sustained clinical benefit, and 9 of 10 avoided colectomy. Short-term response was associated with an 86% reduction in the relative risk of colectomy.

Response to Infliximab in Crohn's Disease: Genetic Analysis Supporting Expression Profile.

Substantial proportion of Crohn's disease (CD) patients shows no response or a limited response to treatment with infliximab (IFX) and to identify biomarkers of response would be of great clinical and economic benefit. The expression profile of five genes (S100A8-S100A9, G0S2, TNFAIP6, and IL11) reportedly predicted response to IFX and we aimed at investigating their etiologic role through genetic association analysis. Patients with active CD (350) who received at least three induction doses of IFX were included and classified according to IFX response. A tagging strategy was used to select genetic polymorphisms that cover the variability present in the chromosomal regions encoding the identified genes with altered expression. Following genotyping, differences between responders and nonresponders to IFX were observed in haplotypes of the studied regions: S100A8-S100A9 (rs11205276* G/rs3014866* C/rs724781* C/rs3006488* A; P = 0.05); G0S2 (rs4844486* A/rs1473683* T; P = 0.15); TNFAIP6 (rs11677200* C/rs2342910* A/rs3755480* G/rs10432475* A; P = 0.10); and IL11 (rs1126760* C/rs1042506* G; P = 0.07). These differences were amplified in patients with colonic and ileocolonic location for all but the TNFAIP6 haplotype, which evidenced significant difference in ileal CD patients. Our results support the role of the reported expression signature as predictive of anti-TNF outcome in CD patients and suggest an etiological role of those top-five genes in the IFX response pathway.

Early azathioprine therapy is no more effective than placebo for newly diagnosed Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A small placebo-controlled trial reported the efficacy of mercaptopurine therapy for children newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease, yet little is known about the efficacy of early thiopurine therapy in adults. METHODS: We performed a prospective double-blind trial of adult patients with a recent (<8 weeks) diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given azathioprine (2.5 mg · kg(-1) · day(-1), n = 68) or placebo (n = 63) at 31 hospitals from February 2006 to September 2009. Corticosteroids but no other concomitant medications were allowed for control of disease activity. The primary measure of efficacy was sustained corticosteroid-free remission. RESULTS: After 76 weeks of treatment, 30 patients treated with azathioprine (44.1%) and 23 given placebo (36.5%) were in sustained corticosteroid-free remission (difference of 7.6%; 95% confidence interval, -9.2 to 24.4%; P = .48). The rates of relapse (defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index score >175) and corticosteroid requirements were similar between groups. A post hoc analysis of relapse, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score >220, showed lower relapse rates in the azathioprine group than in the placebo group (11.8% vs 30.2%; P = .01). Serious adverse events occurred in 14 patients in the azathioprine group (20.6%) and 7 in the placebo group (11.1%) (P = .16). A larger percentage of patients in the azathioprine group had adverse events that led to study drug discontinuation (20.6%) than in the placebo group (6.35%) (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In a study of adults with Crohn's disease, early azathioprine therapy was no more effective than placebo to achieve sustained corticosteroid-free remission but was more effective in preventing moderate to severe relapse in a post hoc analysis. EudraCT 2005-001186-34.

Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents: data from the ENEIDA registry.

Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). RESULTS: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF.

Meta-analysis: Real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on real-world outcomes of ustekinumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is needed. AIMS: To summarise evidence on the real-world outcomes of ustekinumab for UC and conduct a meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety data. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted through September 2022 in electronic databases for observational studies evaluating ustekinumab for UC. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to calculate the pooled effect sizes (percentages or incidence rates [IRs]) of effectiveness and safety outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 19 studies were included with 3786 patients. More than 92% of patients were previously treated with any biologic, 61.1% with both anti-TNF and vedolizumab and 16.4% with any biologic and tofacitinib. Clinical remission was achieved in 45.4% at week 8 (95% CI: 30.1%-60.6%), 43.8% (38.4%-49.2%) at weeks 12-16, 44.6% (35.9%-53.3%) at month 6, and 50.6% (36.3%-64.8%) at month 12. Response was achieved in 61.2%, 59.4%, 65.2% and 76.8% at weeks 8, 12-16, month 6 and 12, respectively. CS-free remission was achieved in 18.7%, 36.8%, 34.5% and 39% at weeks 8, 12-16, month 6 and 12, respectively. Overall, 58.2% of patients had endoscopic improvement at month 12. Almost 30% of the patients needed dose escalation, which was effective in 40% of these patients. The IRs of colectomy, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and serious infections were 4.8, 7.9, 0.8 and 0.3 per 100 patient-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a highly treatment-refractory population of UC patients.

Initial management of intraabdominal abscesses and preventive strategies for abscess recurrence in penetrating Crohn's disease: a national multicenter study based on ENEIDA registry.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) are a challenging situation. Their management, during the hospitalization and after resolution, is still unclear. METHODS: Adult patients with CD complicated with intraabdominal abscess who required hospitalization were included from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry from GETECCU. Initial strategy effectiveness and safety to resolve abscess was assessed. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence risk. Predictive factors associated with resolution were evaluated by multivariate regression and predictive factors associated with recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: 520 patients from 37 Spanish hospitals were included; 322 (63%) were initially treated with antibiotics alone, 128 (26%) with percutaneous drainage, and 54 (17%) with surgical drainage. The size of the abscess was critical to the effectiveness of each treatment. In abscesses < 30mm, the antibiotic was as effective as percutaneous or surgical drainage. However, in larger abscesses, percutaneous or surgical drainage was superior. In abscesses > 50mm, surgery was superior to percutaneous drainage, although it was associated with a higher complication rate. After abscess resolution, luminal resection was associated with a lower 1-year abscess recurrence risk (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.76). However, those patients who initiated anti-TNF therapy had a similar recurrence risk whether luminal resection had been performed. CONCLUSIONS: Small abscesses (<30mm) can be managed with antibiotics alone, while larger ones require drainage. Percutaneous drainage will be effective and safer than surgery in many cases. After discharge, anti-TNF therapy reduces abscess recurrence risk in a similar way to bowel resection.