Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)-a randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group.

BACKGROUND: Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria). PATIENTS AND METHODS: NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

Ibrutinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: phase III RESOLVE study.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) includes nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibits antitumor activity through tumor microenvironment modulation. The safety and efficacy of first-line ibrutinib plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine treatment in patients with PDAC were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RESOLVE (NCT02436668) was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients (histologically-confirmed PDAC; stage IV diagnosis ≥6 weeks of randomization; Karnofsky performance score ≥70) were randomized to once-daily oral ibrutinib (560 mg) or placebo plus nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate and safety were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 424 patients were randomized (ibrutinib arm, n = 211; placebo arm, n = 213). Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms. After a median follow-up of 25 months, there was no significant difference in OS between ibrutinib plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine versus placebo plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (median of 9.7 versus 10.8 months; P = 0.3225). PFS was shorter for ibrutinib plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine compared with placebo plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (median 5.3 versus 6.0 months; P < 0.0001). Overall response rates were 29% and 42%, respectively (P = 0.0058). Patients in the ibrutinib arm had less time on treatment and received lower cumulative doses for all agents compared with the placebo arm. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events for ibrutinib versus placebo arms included neutropenia (24% versus 35%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (17% versus 8%), and anemia (16% versus 17%). Primary reasons for any treatment discontinuation were disease progression and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine did not improve OS or PFS for patients with PDAC. Safety was consistent with known profiles for these agents.

A multinational phase 2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan sucrosofate (PEP02, MM-398) for patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: PEP02, also known as MM-398, is a novel nanoliposomal irinotecan that has improved pharmacokinetics and tumour bio-distribution of the free drug. This phase 2 study evaluated PEP02 monotherapy as second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients who had metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Karnofsky performance status ≥70, and had progressed following gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. Intravenous injection of PEP02 120 mg m(-2) was given every 3 weeks. Simon 2-stage design was used. The primary objective was 3-month survival rate (OS(3-month)). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. The most common severe adverse events included neutropenia, abdominal pain, asthenia, and diarrhoea. Three patients (7.5%) achieved an objective response, with an additional 17 (42.5%) demonstrating stable disease for a minimum of two cycles. Ten (31.3%) of 32 patients with an elevated baseline CA19-9 had a >50% biomarker decline. The study met its primary end point with an OS(3-month) of 75%, with median progression-free survival and overall survival of 2.4 and 5.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: PEP02 demonstrates moderate antitumour activity with a manageable side effect profile for metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer patients. Given the limited treatment options available to this patient population, a phase 3 trial of PEP02 (MM-398), referred to as NAPOLI-1, is currently underway.

A phase 1 trial of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with refractory stage IV CRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks (fixed dose) plus oral cyclophosphamide q.d. and imatinib q.d. or b.i.d. in 28-day cycles with 3+3 dose escalation. Response was assessed every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of imatinib and cyclophosphamide and circulating tumour, endothelial, and immune cell subsets were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Maximum-tolerated doses were cyclophosphamide 50 mg q.d., imatinib 400 mg q.d., and bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included nausea/vomiting, neutropaenia, hyponatraemia, fistula, and haematuria. The DLT window required expansion to 42 days (1.5 cycles) to capture delayed toxicities. Imatinib exposure increased insignificantly after adding cyclophosphamide. Seven patients (20%) experienced stable disease for >6 months. Circulating tumour, endothelial, or immune cells were not associated with progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of metronomic cyclophosphamide, imatinib, and bevacizumab is safe and tolerable without significant drug interactions. A subset of patients experienced prolonged stable disease independent of dose level.

The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care and oncology clinical research: an experts' perspective.

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic promises to have lasting impacts on cancer clinical trials that could lead to faster patient access to new treatments. In this article, an international panel of oncology experts discusses the lasting impacts of the pandemic on oncology clinical trials and proposes solutions for clinical trial stakeholders, with the support of recent data on worldwide clinical trials collected by IQVIA. These lasting impacts and proposed solutions encompass three topic areas. Firstly, acceleration and implementation of new operational approaches to oncology trials with patient-centric, fully decentralized virtual approaches that include remote assessments via telemedicine and remote devices. Geographical differences in the uptake of remote technology, including telemedicine, are discussed in the article, focusing on the impact of the local adoption of new operational approaches. Secondly, innovative clinical trials. The pandemic has highlighted the need for new trial designs that accelerate research and limit risks and burden for patients while driving optimization of clinical trial objectives and endpoints, while testing is being minimized. Areas of considerations for clinical trial stakeholders are discussed in detail. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials; the approach for oncology clinical trials to improve generalizability of efficacy and outcomes data is discussed. Thirdly, a new problem-focused collaborative framework between oncology trial stakeholders, including decision makers, to leverage and further accelerate the innovative approaches in clinical research developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This could shorten timelines for patient access to new treatments by addressing the cultural and technological barriers to adopting new operational approaches and innovative clinical trials. The role of the different stakeholders is described, with the aim of making COVID-19 a catalyst for positive change in oncology clinical research and eventually in cancer care.

Pancreatic cancer treatment and research: an international expert panel discussion.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has proven extremely challenging to treat. A collaborative effort is needed to advance research and improve treatment. An expert conference was conducted to elicit perspectives regarding the current treatment and future research of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The conference comprised an international panel of experts representing five European countries and the United States. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiotherapy is used more frequently in the United States than in Europe. In locally advanced disease, there is now more emphasis on early chemotherapy in both Europe and the United States. In metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy is commonly used in Europe and the United States. This varies by country. Advancing pancreatic research will require improving biorepositories and developing a roadmap to prioritize therapeutic targets in different models. Small randomized phase II trials of both non-selected and enriched patient populations will help identify activity of new agents. Phase III trials should only be initiated in appropriate patients based on strong clinical and biological signals. Developing drugs in the adjuvant setting may be preferable to eliminate some of the challenges of drug development in the advanced disease setting. CONCLUSION: Progress in research combined with encouraging improvements from the past offer hope for the future of pancreatic cancer patients.

The diagnosis and management of rectal cancer: expert discussion and recommendations derived from the 9th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2007.

Knowledge of the biology and management of rectal cancer continues to improve. A multidisciplinary approach to a patient with rectal cancer by an experienced expert team is mandatory, to assure optimal diagnosis and staging, surgery, selection of the appropriate neo-adjuvant and adjuvant strategy and chemotherapeutic management. Moreover, optimal symptom management also requires a dedicated team of health care professionals. The introduction of total mesorectal excision has been associated with a decrease in the rate of local failure after surgery. High quality surgery and the achievement of pathological measures of quality are a prerequisite to adequate locoregional control. There are now randomized data in favour of chemoradiotherapy or short course radiotherapy in the preoperative setting. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is more beneficial and has less toxicity for patients with resectable rectal cancer than postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore chemoradiotherapy leads also to downsizing of locally advanced rectal cancer. New strategies that decrease the likelihood of distant metastases after initial treatment need be developed with high priority. Those involved in the care for patients with rectal cancer should be encouraged to participate in well-designed clinical trials, to increase the evidence-based knowledge and to make further progress. Health care workers involved in the care of rectal cancer patients should be encouraged to adopt quality control processes leading to increased expertise.

Chemoprevention of mouse colon tumors with difluoromethylornithine during and after carcinogen treatment.

alpha-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) treatment has been shown to modify carcinogenesis in many experimental tumor models, including skin, breast, and colon. This study was designed to determine whether DFMO treatment can inhibit experimental mouse colon tumors after carcinogen treatment and whether an associated effect of DFMO on cell proliferation in colon mucosa occurs. Male CD1 mice (40 per group) received dimethylhydrazine (30 mg/kg/week x 6 weeks, s.c.) and various schedules of DFMO, 1% in drinking water: Group A, none; Group B, following dimethylhydrazine treatment; Group C, during dimethylhydrazine treatment; and Group D, continuously throughout the study. Measurements of RBC polyamine levels showed that DFMO treatment ablated putrescine levels and confirmed that a systemic biological effect was achieved. Analysis of tumor data showed a significant inhibitory effect of DFMO treatment on colon tumor (adenomas and adenocarcinomas) incidence in Groups B (24%) and D (20%) compared to control Group A (52%, P less than 0.05 A versus B, P less than 0.02 A versus D) and on squamous cell carcinomas of the anus in all groups (P less than 0.001 A versus B, P less than 0.05 A versus C, A versus D). No consistent effect of DFMO treatment on cell proliferation in colon mucosa was identified. This study supports the hypothesis that DFMO treatment alters events in the postinitiation phases of mouse colon tumorigenesis.

Expression of blood group-related antigens ABH, Lewis A, Lewis B, Lewis X, Lewis Y, and CA 19-9 in pancreatic cancer cells in comparison with the patient's blood group type.

Blood group A, B, H, Le, Leb, Lex, and Ley antigenicity as well as the expression of CA 19-9 were examined in pancreatic cancer specimens from 30 patients, using monoclonal antibodies to the respective antigen and immunohistochemical techniques, and the findings were correlated with the blood group types (ABO and Lewis) of the individuals. Compatible antigen expression was found in 82, 75, and 50% of tumors from patients with A, B, and O blood group types, respectively. Deletion of the compatible antigen was found in 10 (33%) of the cases, predominantly in patients of blood group O type, and incompatible expression (of B antigen only) in 4 (13%). Lea was detected in 87%, Leb in 90%, Lex in 30%, and Ley in 43% of the specimens, regardless of ABH and Lewis phenotype of the patients. Coexpression of Lea and Leb was found in 87%, of Lex and Ley in 13%, of Lea and Lex in 23%, and of Leb and Ley in 40% of the cases. CA 19-9 was expressed in 80% of the tumors; it was present in the tumor tissue of 21 of 22 patients from Lea-b+, in all 4 individuals from Lea+b-, but in none of the 4 patients from Lea-b- phenotype (P less than 0.01). Heterogeneity in the expression of each of the antigens was found. The overall results indicate that blood group antigen expression in pancreatic tumor differs from that of other gastrointestinal cancers and that the Lewis antigen expression in pancreatic cancer cells is independent of the blood group phenotype of the patients and thus may be useful as a tumor marker.

Correlative study on expression of CA 19-9 and DU-PAN-2 in tumor tissue and in serum of pancreatic cancer patients.

The serum levels of CA 19-9 and DU-PAN-2 antigens and their expression in tumor tissue were examined in 22 pancreatic cancer patients and the results were correlated with the Lewis (Le) blood group phenotypes of the individuals. In tumor tissue, CA 19-9 was expressed in 17 of 22 (77%) specimens. The negative cases included three patients with Lea-b-, one with Lea+b- and the other with Lea-b+ phenotypes. DU-PAN-2 antigen was expressed in 20 of 22 (91%) cancer tissues. The two DU-PAN-2-negative cases were CA 19-9-positive. The combination of two markers increased the sensitivity to 100%. In the serum, CA 19-9 level was elevated (greater than 37 U/ml) in 16 of 21 (73%) cases. All Lea-b- patients had values less than 37 U/ml. An elevated level of DU-PAN-2 (greater than 300 U/ml) was detected in 14 of 21 (67%) patients including three cases with Lea-b- type. In only one patient were both antigens below the cutoff levels so that the combination of two biomarkers elevated the sensitivity to 95%. The study indicated that the cocktail of 19-9 and DU-PAN-2 antibodies might increase the sensitivity and specificity for clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In 19 of 21 (90%) cases, the serum CA 19-9 level correlated with the expression of the antigen in the cancer tissue. Discrepancy was seen in two cases; one patient had an elevated level of CA 19-9 in the serum, but lacked this antigen in the cancer cells. In the second case, the situation was reversed. For DU-PAN-2, positive correlation was seen in 14 of 21 (67%) cases. Six of seven patients with low DU-PAN-2 levels expressed the antigen in their tumor cells, and one patient with DU-PAN-2-negative cancer tissue had an elevated level of this marker in the serum. Thus, CA 19-9 expression in serum corresponded more closely to expression in tissue than did that of DU-PAN-2 antigen. The serum levels of these antigens, however, is likely due to multiple factors, only one of which is the qualitative and quantitative expression of the antigens in tumors.

Relationship of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and Lewis antigens in pancreatic cancer.

Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 identified by a murine monoclonal antibody against a colorectal carcinoma antigen is thought to be a sialylated Lewis (Le)a blood group antigen and occurs in high concentration in serum of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. This study was designed to identify the relationship between Lewis antigens and CA 19-9 in patients with pancreatic cancer. The following analyses were performed in 20 pancreatic cancer patients: Lea and Leb antigen phenotype in saliva (modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) or on red cells (hemagglutination); CA 19-9 levels (radioimmunoassay) in serum; and CA 19-9 and Lea and Leb expression (immunoperoxidase assay) on tumor tissue. Lea-b- patients based on salivary phenotype failed to express CA 19-9 in tumor tissue and had normal or low levels of CA 19-9 (less than 37 units/ml) in serum (P = 0.0011, versus Lea+b- and Lea-b+ patients). Eighty-eight % of Lea+b- and Lea-b+ patients had elevated serum CA 19-9 levels (greater than 37 units/ml). All Lea+b- and Lea-b+ patients expressed both Lea and Leb antigens in tumor tissue. These results support the view that Lea-b- pancreatic cancer patients cannot manufacture CA 19-9. Surprisingly, Lea-positive patients express Leb antigen in tumor tissue; in this subgroup, Leb antigen may be a tumor-specific biomarker.

Unconjugated bilirubin inhibits in vitro cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity of human lymphocytes.

Septic complications have been major problems in the management of patients with obstructive jaundice and neonatal jaundice. This study investigates effects bilirubin on human T lymphocyte responses against allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction. In vitro exposure of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) with unconjugated bilirubin at pathological levels (6 to 12 mg/dl) did not alter the subsets of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD19 and CD56 positive populations, or expression of costimulatory surface molecules CD2, CD3, CD4 and CD8. Further incubation of bilirubin-treated PBMNC with irradiated B lymphoid Raji cells after removal of the extracellular bilirubin resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, DNA synthesis, and expression of Tac antigen (CD25) and transferrin receptor (CD71). However, no significant change of interleukin-2 (IL-2) production was observed after this incubation between bilirubin-treated and -untreated PBMNC. These results suggest that bilirubin inhibits the induction of CTL activity, and this defect may result from the impaired responsiveness against IL-2. These observations may help explain the increased infection observed in hyperbilirubinemic patients.

Unconjugated bilirubin inhibits in vitro major histocompatibility complex-unrestricted cytotoxicity of human lymphocytes.

Septic complications have been major problems in the management of patients with obstructive jaundice and neonatal jaundice. This study investigates effects of unconjugated bilirubin on lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity against human tumor target cells. In vitro exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) with bilirubin IX alpha in bovine albumin solution resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of both natural killer activity and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity. Inhibition of both activities correlated with the amounts of intracellular bilirubin. Expression of cell surface CD16, CD56 antigen, and IL-2 receptor beta chain was unchanged in bilirubin-treated PBL as compared to bilirubin-untreated PBL. When bilirubin-treated PBL were cultured with interleukin-2 (IL-2), a dose-dependent decrease of lymphokine-activated killing activity, ADCC activity, and DNA synthesis was observed. Expression of CD56 antigen and IL-2 receptor alpha chain was unchanged in bilirubin-treated PBL following IL-2 stimulation as compared to bilirubin free control. These results suggest that bilirubin inhibits major histocompatibility complex-unrestricted cytotoxicity in both unstimulated and IL-2 stimulated lymphocytes. These observations may help explain the increased susceptibility to infection observed in hyperbilirubinemic patients.

The value of hepatic ultrasound and biochemical liver tests in screening for liver metastases.

The records of 92 patients with a known diagnosis of extrahepatic cancer who had undergone hepatic ultrasound, biochemical liver tests (alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, lactic dehydrogenase, and bilirubin levels), and subsequent liver biopsy or autopsy within a 6-week period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound and biochemical tests in the detection of metastatic liver disease were calculated. Although there was no significant difference in the sensitivity of either examination, the ultrasound demonstrated higher specificity and accuracy than the biochemical liver tests. The high sensitivity of hepatic ultrasound prevailed even in patients with normal biochemical liver tests. The sensitivity of hepatic ultrasound was significantly lower in patients with lymphoma compared with patients with colorectal cancer (50% v 100%, P less than .05). Notable incidental extrahepatic findings were reported in 25% of the ultrasound examinations. In institutions skilled in sonography, hepatic ultrasound may be a superior tool in the detection of liver metastases in most solid tumors, excluding lymphoma, and offers the additional advantage of simultaneous biliary tract and perihepatic visualization.

Phase II trial of interferon gamma and monoclonal antibody 17-1A in pancreatic cancer: biologic and clinical effects.

Thirty patients with advanced measurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were entered onto a phase II trial with recombinant interferon gamma (Biogen, Cambridge, MA; 10(6) U/m2 daily for 4 days) and monoclonal antibody (Mab) 17-1A (Centocor, Malvern, PA; 150 mg in autologous leukocytes on days 2, 3, and 4 following interferon infusion). The effect of a single interferon gamma treatment on natural and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), Fc receptor occupancy by antibody, and human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) expression on monocytes and lymphocytes was also studied. Toxicity was modest and generally limited to grade I to II fever, nausea and vomiting, and hepatotoxicity. Five patients were considered to be nonassessable for response. Of the 25 assessable patients, one objective response (complete remission for a duration of 4 months) was observed. Stable disease for 2 months or greater was noted in nine patients. The median survival for the group was 5 months. Analysis of cytotoxicity data obtained prior to treatment showed reduced natural cytotoxic activity in these patients compared with normal volunteers. A significant improvement in natural cytotoxic activity to normal levels occurred within 24 hours following the interferon gamma infusion. This was also associated with augmented antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Although HLA-DR expression was not increased on either monocytes or lymphocytes, an increased capacity of both lymphocytes and monocytes to bind Mab 17-1A was observed. In all in vitro assays of ADCC, the presence of antibody excess was associated with improved cytolytic activity. In spite of the favorable modulation of cytolytic activity and improved ability of effector cells to bind Mab, we failed to demonstrated adequate clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma using this dose and schedule of interferon gamma and Mab 17-1A. Future trials will focus on alternate schedules of Mab 17-1A with the hope of improving tumor antigen saturation and circulating levels of infused antibody.

Alternating hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase II trial using intermittent percutaneous hepatic arterial access.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective response to a short course of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) using temporary, percutaneously placed catheters alternating with systemic prolonged continuous infusion fluorouracil (ci 5-FU) and daily oral leucovorin (L). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated (except for adjuvant therapy) adults with liver-predominant metastases, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Treatment regimen included HAI with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) 60 mg/m2/d and L 15 mg/m2/d continuously infused daily for 4 days. After a 1-week rest, ci 5-FU was administered through a central venous access device using a dose of 180 mg/m2/d with a fixed dose of oral L at 5 mg/m2/d for 21 out of 28 days. Cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. After four cycles of therapy, patients were maintained on ci 5-FU and daily oral L until evidence of progression. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled onto this trial. One patient was ineligible. The objective response rate for all patients (17 partial, zero complete) was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). Five patients were not able to receive at least one complete cycle of HAI. Among patients who received at least one complete cycle of HAI, the response rate was 46% (95% CI, 30% to 62%). Five patients underwent a liver resection after enrolling onto the protocol. At the time of analysis, estimated median time to progression was 6 months, and estimated median overall survival was 13 months. CONCLUSION: The objective response rate was comparable to that achieved with more prolonged and more frequent HAI using FUDR. This approach should be studied as an acceptable alternative to surgically placed hepatic arterial catheters/pumps and may have a role as neoadjuvant therapy for liver metastases that are unresectable, as well as an adjuvant role for patients with resected hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer.

High-dose therapy with iodine-131-labeled monoclonal antibody CC49 in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: A phase I trial that evaluated for extrahematopoietic toxicity was conducted with iodine-131 (131I) labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) CC49. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetic and biodistribution analyses, estimates of absorbed radiation dose, and measurement of human antimonoclonal antibodies (HAMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After collection and cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells, 15 patients with gastrointestinal cancers were administered a tracer dose of 131I-MAb CC49. Within 5 to 6 days, 14 patients (two to three per activity level) underwent a single treatment with 131I-MAb CC49 (50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mCi/m2). Biodistribution was determined using planar and single photon emission computer tomographic (SPECT) imaging. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed by measuring radioactivity in serial blood samples. In some patients, biopsies of metastases and related normal tissues were obtained for radioactivity measurements. Radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated using available biodistribution, pharmacokinetic, and tissue biopsy data. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: No dose-limiting extrahematopoietic toxicity was identified. Twelve patients experienced grade IV myelosuppression and met criteria for infusion of hematopoietic stem cells. Radioimmunolocalization was excellent. The T1/2 for 131I-MAb CC49 after diagnostic and therapeutic administration was 39.7 +/- 10.4 and 46.1 +/- 10.6 hours, respectively. The percent injected dose per killigram of tumor ranged from 0.2 to 2.1. Absorbed radiation dose in metastatic tumor sites ranged from 630 to 3300 cGy. CONCLUSION: Although extrahematopoietic dose-limiting toxicity was neither observed or predicted, suboptimal absorbed dose estimates suggested that further escalation of 131I-MAb CC49 would not be useful. Future studies should focus on the use of radionuclides with high energy beta emissions, such as yttrium 90, and on strategies to optimize access of antibody to target antigens.

High-dose therapy with 90Yttrium-labeled monoclonal antibody CC49: a phase I trial.

A Phase I trial of increasing administered activities of 90yttrium (90Y)-labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) CC49 was conducted to determine whether extrahematopoietic toxicity occurred with this radioimmunoconjugate. Twelve patients with various gastrointestinal tract cancers were administered a tracer dose of 111In-labeled MAb CC49 for biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies. Patients then underwent a single treatment with increasing administered activities of 90Y-labeled MAb CC49 (0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mCi/kg). Biodistribution studies, using 111In-labeled MAb CC49 as a surrogate, were determined using planar and single photon emission computed tomography imaging. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed by measuring radioactivity in blood samples taken at intervals after radioimmunoconjugate infusions. Tissue biopsies of tumor metastases and related normal tissues (liver and bone marrow) were obtained for radioactivity measurements. Radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated using these data. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. No dose limiting extrahematopoietic toxicity was identified in the range of administered activities used in this study. Radioimmunolocalization based on planar and single photon emission computed tomography images 111In-labeled MAb CC49 showed heterogeneous (nonspecific) liver and splenic uptake. Liver metastases were usually photopenic, and extrahepatic metastases showed faint to moderate uptake. The alpha and beta half-lives of 111In-labeled MAb CC49 and 90Y-labeled MAb CC49 in the blood were similar. Absorbed radiation dose estimates in metastatic tumor sites ranged from 180 to 3000 cGy. The percentage of injected dose/kg of tumor ranged from 1.12 to 18.14; however, tumor:normal liver ratios were consistently <1. No objective responses were observed. Doses of up to 0.5 mCi/kg could be administered with reversible grade IV myelotoxicity. Absorbed radiation dose in tumor was suboptimal, even at the highest administered activity level. Deposition of 90Y in liver was high, and estimates of absorbed dose in liver equaled or exceeded that which could be achieved in metastatic tumor sites. Strategies to enhance access of radioimmunoconjugates in tumor and diminish deposition in the liver need to be developed for effective treatment using MAb CC49 with chelated radiometals.

Single-Dose versus fractionated radioimmunotherapy of human colon carcinoma xenografts using 131I-labeled multivalent CC49 single-chain fvs.

The prospects of radiolabeled antibodies in cancer detection and therapy remain promising. However, efforts to achieve cures, especially of solid tumors, with the systemic administration of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have met with limited success. Using genetic engineering techniques, MAbs have been tailored to improve the therapeutic index (tumor:normal tissue ratio) in clinical radioimmunotherapy. In the present study, we investigated the potential of tetravalent ([sc(Fv)2]2) and divalent [sc(Fv)2] single chain Fvs of MAb CC49 for therapy in athymic mice bearing s.c. LS-174T human colon carcinoma xenografts. Mice received 1,000 microCi of 131I-labeled [sc(Fv)2]2 or 131I-labeled sc(Fv)2, either as a single injection on day 6 or as four injections (250 microCi each) on days 6, 7, 8, and 9; the day of tumor implantation was taken as day 0. The median survival for the control group was 26 days. Comparisons of single and fractionated therapeutic regimens showed median survival as 32 (P < 0.001) and 53 days (P < 0.0001), respectively for [sc(Fv)2]2 and 26 (P > 0.5) and 38 days (P < 0.0001), respectively for sc(Fv)2 when compared with the control groups. The time for the quadrupling of tumor volume for single and fractionated therapeutic treatments were: 9.0 +/- 0.8 and 21.1 +/- 2.9 days respectively for sc(Fv)2; 16.6 +/- 1.9 and 32.9 +/- 2.7 days respectively for [sc(Fv)2]2; and 8.3 +/- 0.7 and 8.4 +/- 0.6 days respectively for the control group. No 131I-labeled systemic toxicity was observed in any treatment groups. The results show that radioimmunotherapy delivery for sc(Fv)2 and [sc(Fv)2]2 in a fractionated schedule clearly presented a therapeutic advantage over single administration. The treatment group receiving tetravalent scFv showed a statistically significant prolonged survival with both single and fractionated administrations suggesting a promising prospect of this reagent for cancer therapy and diagnosis in MAb-based radiopharmaceuticals.

Phase II trial of yttrium-90-DOTA-biotin pretargeted by NR-LU-10 antibody/streptavidin in patients with metastatic colon cancer.

A Phase II study of yttrium-90-tetra-azacyclododecanetetra-acetic acid-biotin (90Y-DOTA-biotin) pretargeted by NR-LU-10 antibody/streptavidin (SA) was performed. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this therapy in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Twenty-five patients were treated with a single dose of 110 mCi/m2 (mean administered dose, 106.5 +/- 10.3 mCi/m2) of 90Y-DOTA-biotin. There were three components of the therapy. Patients first received NR-LU-10/SA on day 1. A clearing agent (biotin-galactose-human serum albumin) was administered approximately 48 h after the NR-LU-10/SA to remove residual circulating unbound NR-LU-10/SA. Lastly, 24 h after administration of clearing agent, patients received biotin-DOTA-labeled with 110 mCi/m2 90Y. All three components of the therapy were administered i.v. Both hematological and nonhematological toxicities were observed. Diarrhea was the most frequent grade 4 nonhematological toxicity (16%; with 16% grade 3 diarrhea). Hematological toxicity was less severe with 8% grade 3 and 8% grade 4 neutropenia and 8% grade 3 and 16% grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The overall response rate was 8%. Two partial responders had freedom from progression of 16 weeks. Four patients (16%) had stable disease with freedom from progression of 10-20 weeks. Despite the relatively disappointing results of this study in terms of therapeutic efficacy and toxicity, proof of principle was obtained for the pretargeting approach. In addition, valuable new information was obtained about normal tissue tolerance to low-dose-rate irradiation that will help to provide useful guidelines for future study designs.