RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Opioid agonist therapy is strongly recommended for pregnant persons with opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine may be associated with more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes than methadone, but existing data are limited. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study involving pregnant persons who were enrolled in public insurance programs in the United States during the period from 2000 through 2018 in which we examined outcomes among those who received buprenorphine as compared with those who received methadone. Exposure to the two medications was assessed in early pregnancy (through gestational week 19), late pregnancy (gestational week 20 through the day before delivery), and the 30 days before delivery. Risk ratios for neonatal and maternal outcomes were adjusted for confounders with the use of propensity-score overlap weights. RESULTS: The data source for the study consisted of 2,548,372 pregnancies that ended in live births. In early pregnancy, 10,704 pregnant persons were exposed to buprenorphine and 4387 to methadone. In late pregnancy, 11,272 were exposed to buprenorphine and 5056 to methadone (9976 and 4597, respectively, in the 30 days before delivery). Neonatal abstinence syndrome occurred in 52.0% of the infants who were exposed to buprenorphine in the 30 days before delivery as compared with 69.2% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.75). Preterm birth occurred in 14.4% of infants exposed to buprenorphine in early pregnancy and in 24.9% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.62); small size for gestational age in 12.1% and 15.3%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.80); and low birth weight in 8.3% and 14.9% (adjusted relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.63). Delivery by cesarean section occurred in 33.6% of pregnant persons exposed to buprenorphine in early pregnancy and 33.1% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.08), and severe maternal complications developed in 3.3% and 3.5%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13). Results of exposure in late pregnancy were consistent with results of exposure in early pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of buprenorphine in pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than methadone use; however, the risk of adverse maternal outcomes was similar among persons who received buprenorphine and those who received methadone. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.).
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Metadona , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Complicações na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Buprenorfina/efeitos adversos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Metadona/efeitos adversos , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a dyadic-centered framework focused on clinical care, surveillance, and research for birthing persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) and their infants and children. STUDY DESIGN: Between February and March 2023, an analysis was conducted within the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of activities directed at opioid-exposed birthing persons and their infants and children (the dyad) to identify: 1) number of activities, stratified by type and 2) characteristics across health and supportive activities that serve the dyad vs birthing persons or infants and children individually. Descriptive and thematic analyses were used to assess quantity and characteristics of fiscal year 2023-2024 activities aggregated across eleven HHS agencies. RESULTS: Of 181 activities examined, 75 met inclusion criteria specific to serving birthing persons with OUD and opioid-exposed infants and children. Sixty-two percent of activities were dyad focused. Five categories of dyadic activities were identified: research (45%), education and training (28%), health and supportive services (21%), surveillance (4%), and quality improvement (2%). Eight specific characteristics were key to dyadic activities: a life course and generational approach, emphasis on relationship, dyadic outcomes, service wraparound, payment structures supporting dyadic care, data linkage, and social determinants of health. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of HHS activities directed at birthing persons with OUD and opioid-exposed infants and children showed that most programs had a dyadic focus. Synthesizing elements identified from activities serving the dyad facilitated the development of a dyadic framework integrating clinical care, public health surveillance, and research.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the known harms, alcohol consumption is common in pregnancy. Rates vary between countries, and are estimated to be 10% globally, with up to 25% in Europe. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of psychosocial interventions and medications to reduce or stop alcohol consumption during pregnancy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (via CRSLive), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, from inception to 8 January 2024. We also searched for ongoing and unpublished studies via ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared medications or psychosocial interventions, or both, to placebo, no intervention, usual care, or other medications or psychosocial interventions used to reduce or stop alcohol use during pregnancy. Our primary outcomes of interest were abstinence from alcohol, reduction in alcohol consumption, retention in treatment, and women with any adverse event. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies (1369 participants) in which pregnant women received an intervention to stop or reduce alcohol use during pregnancy. In one study, almost half of participants had a current diagnosis of alcohol use disorder (AUD); in another study, 40% of participants had a lifetime diagnosis of AUD. Six studies took place in the USA, one in Spain, and one in the Netherlands. All included studies evaluated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions; we did not find any study that evaluated the efficacy of medications for the treatment of AUD during pregnancy. Psychosocial interventions were mainly brief interventions ranging from a single session of 10 to 60 minutes to five sessions of 10 minutes each. Pregnant women received the psychosocial intervention approximately at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy, and the outcome of alcohol use was reassessed 8 to 24 weeks after the psychosocial intervention. Women in the control group received treatment as usual (TAU) or similar treatments such as comprehensive assessment of alcohol use and advice to stop drinking during pregnancy. Globally, we found that, compared to TAU, psychosocial interventions may increase the rate of continuously abstinent participants (risk ratio (RR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.57; I2 =0%; 3 studies; 378 women; low certainty evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on the number of drinks per day, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference -0.42, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.28; I2 = 86%; 2 studies; 157 women; very low certainty evidence). Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on the number of women who completed treatment (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02; I2 = 0%; 7 studies; 1283 women; moderate certainty evidence). None of the included studies assessed adverse events of treatments. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision of the estimates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Brief psychosocial interventions may increase the rate of continuous abstinence among pregnant women who report alcohol use during pregnancy. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of psychosocial interventions and other treatments (e.g. medications) for women with AUD. These studies should provide detailed information on alcohol use before and during pregnancy using consistent measures such as the number of drinks per drinking day. When heterogeneous populations are recruited, more detailed information on alcohol use during pregnancy should be provided to allow future systematic reviews to be conducted. Other important information that would enhance the usefulness of these studies would be the presence of other comorbid conditions such as anxiety, mood disorders, and the use of other psychoactive substances.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Acamprosato/uso terapêutico , Abstinência de Álcool/psicologia , Dissuasores de Álcool/uso terapêutico , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/prevenção & controle , Viés , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Intervenção Psicossocial/métodos , Taurina/uso terapêutico , Taurina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
Importance: Buprenorphine combined with naloxone is commonly used to treat opioid use disorders outside of pregnancy. In pregnancy, buprenorphine alone is generally recommended because of limited perinatal safety data on the combination product. Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes following prenatal exposure to buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone. Design, Settings, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using health care utilization data from Medicaid-insured beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. The cohort was restricted to pregnant individuals linked to their liveborn infants, with maternal Medicaid enrollment from 3 months before pregnancy to 1 month after delivery and infant enrollment for the first 3 months after birth, unless they died sooner. Exposure: Use of buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone during the first trimester based on outpatient dispensings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included major congenital malformations, low birth weight, neonatal abstinence syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, small for gestational age, cesarean delivery, and maternal morbidity. Confounder-adjusted risk ratios were calculated using propensity score overlap weights. Results: This study identified 3369 pregnant individuals exposed to buprenorphine with naloxone during the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [4.6] years) and 5326 exposed to buprenorphine alone or who switched from the combination to buprenorphine alone by the end of the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [4.5] years). When comparing buprenorphine combined with naloxone with buprenorphine alone, a lower risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome (absolute risk, 37.4% vs 55.8%; weighted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84]) and a modestly lower risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (absolute risk, 30.6% vs 34.9%; weighted relative risk, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]) and small for gestational age (absolute risk, 10.0% vs 12.4%; weighted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]) was observed. For maternal morbidity, the comparative rates were 2.6% vs 2.9%, respectively, and the weighted relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.68-1.19). No differences were observed with respect to major congenital malformations overall, low birth weight, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, or cesarean delivery. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: There were similar and, in some instances, more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes for pregnancies exposed to buprenorphine combined with naloxone compared with buprenorphine alone. For the outcomes assessed, compared with buprenorphine alone, buprenorphine with naloxone during pregnancy appears to be a safe treatment option. This supports the view that both formulations are reasonable options for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy, affirming flexibility in collaborative treatment decision-making.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Some states, including Massachusetts, require automatic filing of child abuse and neglect for substance-exposed newborns, including infants exposed in-utero to clinician-prescribed medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD). The aim of this article is to explore effects of these mandated reporting policies on pregnant and postpartum people receiving MOUD. METHODS: We used modified grounded research theory, literature findings, and constant comparative methods to extract, analyze and contextualize perinatal experiences with child protection systems (CPS) and explore the impact of the Massachusetts mandated reporting policy on healthcare experiences and OUD treatment decisions. We drew from 26 semi-structured interviews originally conducted within a parent study of perinatal MOUD use in pregnancy and the postpartum period. RESULTS: Three themes unique to CPS reporting policies and involvement emerged. First, mothers who received MOUD during pregnancy identified mandated reporting for prenatally prescribed medication utilization as unjust and stigmatizing. Second, the stress caused by an impending CPS filing at delivery and the realities of CPS surveillance and involvement after filing were both perceived as harmful to family health and wellbeing. Finally, pregnant and postpartum individuals with OUD felt pressure to make medical decisions in a complex environment in which medical recommendations and the requirements of CPS agencies often compete. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Uncoupling of OUD treatment decisions in the perinatal period from mandated CPS reporting at time of delivery is essential. The primary focus for families affected by OUD must shift from surveillance and stigma to evidence-based treatment and access to supportive services and resources.
What is already known on this subject? Child protection systems (CPS) reporting is associated with barriers to prenatal care and family resources and services. Some state policies in the United States mandate reporting to CPS for prenatal substance exposure, including prescribed medications for opioid use disorder.What this study adds? This study centers the experiences of pregnant and postpartum people with opioid use disorder with mandated reporting policies for prenatal substance exposure, describes the harms to families associated with these policies, and makes recommendations for policy change. Findings emphasize the need to uncouple medical decisions from CPS reporting and involvement.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Massachusetts , Mães , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Período Pós-PartoRESUMO
Misinformation, or the spread of false information, can affect policy and individual health behaviors. Harm reduction practitioners and researchers have seen their work misrepresented in the media to the detriment of people in their community. Media coverage affects both public opinion and policy, which necessitates that it be informed by the current science and carefully platforms people who can speak to the science. Reporting on Addiction was formed to understand issues with media coverage and the consequences of this uninformed media coverage and propose solutions to these issues. Our "three-legged stool" approach defines this work (academic experts, researchers, community members, and the media) by identifying the problems and guiding our solutions. By working collaboratively with the media to improve their knowledge about addiction science, we aim to reduce misinformation and improve the lives of people with an addiction, in treatment, and during recovery.
Assuntos
Redução do Dano , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Opinião Pública , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To standardize the clinical definition of opioid withdrawal in neonates to address challenges in clinical care, quality improvement, research, and public policy for this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Between October and December 2020, we conducted 2 modified-Delphi panels using ExpertLens, a virtual platform for performing iterative expert engagement panels. Twenty clinical experts specializing in care for the substance-exposed mother-neonate dyad explored the necessity of key evidence-based clinical elements in defining opioid withdrawal in the neonate leading to a diagnosis of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS)/neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Expert consensus was assessed using descriptive statistics, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, and thematic analysis of participants' comments. RESULTS: Expert panels concluded the following were required for diagnosis: in utero exposure (known by history, not necessarily by toxicology testing) to opioids with or without the presence of other psychotropic substances, and the presence of at least two of the most common clinical signs characteristic of withdrawal (excessive crying, fragmented sleep, tremors, increased muscle tone, gastrointestinal dysfunction). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that both a known history of in utero opioid exposure and a distinct set of withdrawal signs are necessary to standardize a definition of neonatal withdrawal. Implementation of a standardized definition requires both patient engagement and a mother-neonate dyadic approach mindful of program and policy implications.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Mães , Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The prevalence of pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD), including those receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), is increasing. Challenges associated with pain management in people with OUD include tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and risk for return to use. Yet, there are few evidence-based recommendations for pain management in the setting of pregnancy and the postpartum period, and many peripartum pain management studies exclude people with OUD. This scoping review summarized the available literature on peridelivery pain management in people with OUD, methodologies used, and identified specific areas of knowledge gaps. PubMed and Embase were comprehensively searched for publications in all languages on peripartum pain management among people with OUD, both treated with MOUD and untreated. Potential articles were screened by title, abstract, and full text. Data abstracted were descriptively analyzed to map available evidence and identify areas of limited or no evidence. A total of 994 publications were imported for screening on title, abstracts, and full text, yielding 84 publications identified for full review: 32 (38.1%) review articles, 14 (16.7%) retrospective studies, and 8 (9.5%) case reports. There were 5 randomized controlled trials. Most studies (64%) were published in perinatology (32; 38.1%) journals or anesthesiology (22; 26.2%) journals. Specific areas lacking trial or systematic review evidence include: (1) methods to optimize psychological and psychosocial comorbidities relevant to acute pain management around delivery; (2) alternative nonopioid and nonpharmacologic analgesia methods; (3) whether or not to use opioids for severe breakthrough pain and how best to prescribe and monitor its use after discharge; (4) monitoring for respiratory depression and sedation with coadministration of other analgesics; (5) optimal neuraxial analgesia dosing and adjuncts; and (6) benefits of abdominal wall blocks after cesarean delivery. No publications discussed naloxone coprescribing in the labor and delivery setting. We observed an increasing number of publications on peripartum pain management in pregnant people with OUD. However, existing published works are low on the pyramid of evidence (reviews, opinions, and retrospective studies), with a paucity of original research articles (<6%). Opinions are conflicting on the utility and disutility of various analgesic interventions. Studies generating high-quality evidence on this topic are needed to inform care for pregnant people with OUD. Specific research areas are identified, including utility and disutility of short-term opioid use for postpartum pain management, role of continuous wound infiltration and truncal nerve blocks, nonpharmacologic analgesia options, and the best methods to support psychosocial aspects of pain management.
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Manejo da Dor/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides , Perinatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , NaloxonaRESUMO
Introduction: Reproductive and sexual health (RSH) is an important component of wellness and recovery for people with substance use disorder (SUD). Evidence to guide better integration of RSH services into SUD treatment is limited. Our objectives were to compare 1) unmet RSH needs; and 2) barriers to RSH service utilization between care settings providing treatment for SUD or other chronic medical conditions. Methods: Participants at two outpatient clinics, addiction medicine (women n = 91, men n = 75) and primary care (women n = 59, men n = 50), completed a one-time electronic survey between July and September 2019. Separately for men and women, comparisons between addiction medicine and primary care groups were made using Pearson χ2, Fisher's Exact, and T-tests. Results: Participants were 75.0% Black and aged 49.4 years. Overall, unmet RSH needs were less prevalent among participants at the primary care than the addiction medicine clinic, such as receipt of a past 12-month sexual exam (men: 36.0% vs. 17.3%; women: 55.6% vs. 30.1%). The most common barrier to RSH service receipt was cost (men: 59.4%; women: 52.6%), followed by fear of judgment for drug/alcohol use for SUD participants (men: 33% vs. 12%; women: 26% vs. 7%). Many SUD participants expressed high desire for integrated RSH services into the addiction medicine clinic (men: 51.4%; women: 59.8%). Conclusion/Implications: The integration of RSH into addiction medicine is lagging compared to care settings for people with other chronic medical conditions. Future research should focus on advancing sex- and gender-informed RSH service integration into SUD treatment settings.
Assuntos
Medicina do Vício , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Saúde Sexual , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The postpartum year is a vulnerable period for women with opioid use disorder, with increased rates of fatal and nonfatal overdose; however, data on the continuation of medications for opioid use disorder on a population level are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of discontinuing methadone and buprenorphine in women with opioid use disorder in the year following delivery and determine the extent to which maternal and infant characteristics are associated with time to discontinuation of medications for opioid use disorder. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked administrative data of 211,096 deliveries in Massachusetts between 2011 and 2014 to examine the adherence to medications for opioid use disorder. Individuals receiving medications for opioid use disorder after delivery were included in the study. Here, demographic, psychosocial, prenatal, and delivery characteristics are described. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression modeling were used to examine factors associated with medication discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 2314 women who received medications for opioid use disorder at delivery were included in our study. Overall, 1484 women (64.1%) continued receiving medications for opioid use disorder for a full 12 months following delivery. The rate of continued medication use varied from 34% if women started on medications for opioid use disorder the month before delivery to 80% if the medications were used throughout pregnancy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves differed by maternal race and ethnicity (the 12-month continuation probability was .65 for White non-Hispanic women and .51 for non-White women; P<.001) and duration of use of prenatal medications for opioid use disorder (12-month continuation probability was .78 for women with full prenatal engagement and .60 and .44 for those receiving medications for opioid use disorder ≥5 months [but not throughout pregnancy] and ≤4 months prenatally, respectively; P<.001). In all multivariable models, duration of receipt of prenatal medications for opioid use disorder (≤4 months vs throughout pregnancy: adjusted hazard ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 2.72-3.91) and incarceration (incarceration during pregnancy or after delivery vs none: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-2.12) were most strongly associated with the discontinuation of medications for opioid use disorder. CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of women with opioid use disorder continued using medications for opioid use disorder for a full year after delivery; however, the rates of medication continuation varied significantly by race and ethnicity, degree of use of prenatal medications for opioid use disorder, and incarceration status. Prioritizing medication continuation across the perinatal continuum, enhancing sex-specific and family-friendly recovery supports, and expanding access to medications for opioid use disorder despite being incarcerated can help improve postpartum medication adherence.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Período Pós-Parto , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Estabelecimentos Correcionais , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , População Branca , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recovery is a multidimensional process that includes health, quality of life, and citizenship. Recovery capital is a strengths-based concept representing the sum of an individual's resources that support recovery. This study (1) describes recovery capital, (2) examines the relationship between recovery capital and treatment duration, and (3) assesses differences by gender in recovery capital among people receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study, with survey and medical record review components, conducted with patients recruited from an office-based opioid treatment clinic between July and September 2019. Analyses included participants receiving MOUD with buprenorphine who completed the Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10; n = 130). Univariate analyses explored differences by gender. Multivariate linear regression assessed the relationship between BARC-10 total score and length of current treatment episode. RESULTS: Participants were 54.6% women and 67.4% Black with mean age of 42.4 years (SD = 12.3). Mean length of current MOUD treatment was 396.1 days (SD = 245.9). Total BARC-10 scores were high, but participants perceived low community-level resources. Women scored higher than men within the health and purpose recovery dimensions. While length of treatment was not associated with BARC-10 score, experiencing recent discrimination was associated with a significantly lower BARC-10 score. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery capital among individuals receiving MOUD was high suggesting that participants have resources to support recovery, but gender differences and prevalent discrimination highlight areas for improved intervention. More work is needed to investigate recovery capital as an alternative treatment outcome to abstinence in outpatient MOUD populations.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
We characterized the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota in a cohort of 149 women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection at baseline who were followed quarterly for 9 months after antibiotic treatment. At time of diagnosis, the vaginal microbiota was dominated by Lactobacillus iners or a diverse array of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria including Gardnerella vaginalis. Interestingly, L. iners-dominated communities were most common after azithromycin treatment (1 g monodose), consistent with the observed relative resistance of L. iners to azithromycin. Lactobacillus iners-dominated communities have been associated with increased risk of C. trachomatis infection, suggesting that the impact of antibiotic treatment on the vaginal microbiota could favor reinfections. These results provide support for the dual need to account for the potential perturbing effect(s) of antibiotic treatment on the vaginal microbiota, and to develop strategies to protect and restore optimal vaginal microbiota.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Microbiota/efeitos dos fármacos , Vagina/microbiologia , Vaginose Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gardnerella vaginalis/efeitos dos fármacos , Gardnerella vaginalis/genética , Humanos , Lactobacillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Lactobacillus/genética , Microbiota/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Ribossômico 16S , Resultado do Tratamento , Vaginose Bacteriana/microbiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the current unmet major depression and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment needs among reproductive age women METHODS: Data from the 2007 to 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were analyzed to determine proportions of women ages 18 to 44 years with unmet treatment need for depression and SUD. Logistic regression determined factors associated with receiving past year SUD and major depression treatment among those in need. RESULTS: Only 9.2% of women with past year SUD treatment need received treatment (95% CI 8.3-10.1%) compared to 60.7% for those in need of depression treatment (95% CI 59.5-62.0%). Over time, treatment receipt for depression increased significantly (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.15-1.67) but not for substance use disorders (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.69-1.45). Neither pregnant nor parenting women were more likely to receive treatment for SUD or depression. Young and racial/ethnically minority women were less likely to receive needed behavioral health treatment for either condition. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and SUD treatment need are common among women. However, treatment receipt differs between these behavioral health conditions.
Assuntos
Depressão/terapia , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Gravidez , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Needle syringe programs (NSPs), a proven harm reduction strategy for people who inject drugs, frequently offer limited healthcare services for their clients. Women who inject drugs face multiple barriers to accessing reproductive health care in traditional settings: personal histories of trauma, judgmental treatment from providers, and competing demands on their time. Our aim was to implement patient-centered reproductive healthcare services at a Seattle NSP. METHODS: We interviewed clients and staff of an NSP in Seattle and staff of other community-based organizations serving women who inject drugs, then used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to code transcripts deductively. Based on our qualitative work, we implemented reproductive health care at the NSP program 1 day per week. We evaluated the implementation by surveying staff and clients and auditing charts over a 9-month period. RESULTS: Clients and staff (N = 15 for clients, N = 13 for staff) noted a high unmet need for trauma-informed, accessible reproductive health care. We successfully implemented reproductive health care services including short- and long-acting contraception, sexually transmitted disease testing, and cervical cancer screening. Survey data was limited but demonstrated client satisfaction with services. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating reproductive health care into an NSP's clinical services is feasible and can be a source of low-barrier preventive care for women unable to seek gynecologic care elsewhere.
Assuntos
Redução do Dano , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Troca de Agulhas/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Washington/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Introduction: Cannabis use is common in pregnancy and prevalence of reported past month use have been increasing despite recommendations of abstinence. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of cannabis use in pregnancy using urine drug screens obtained at the time of admission to Labor and Delivery. Methods: De-identified laboratory data from three birthing hospitals located in Maryland were used to determine the percentage of cannabis positive urine toxicology tests among women admitted to Labor and Delivery. Data were collected at each site starting the year that universal urine cannabis testing was instituted. One hospital also performed universal testing of newborns which was contrasted with maternal data there. Results: Overall, 5.7% of the 22,435 maternal and 3.4% of the 8,346 newborn urine toxicology tests and were positive for cannabis. Trends varied between institutions. When all three institutions were combined, the percent of positive urine toxicology tests was unchanged between 2016 and 2018. At Site 1 between 2014 and 2018, the percentage of cannabis positive urine toxicology tests increased from 5.7% to 9.9% and newborn tests increased from 1.7% to 3.4%. Only 27.7% of the neonates born to women with positive screens also had a positive screen at the time of birth. Conclusions: Prevalence of cannabis use until the time of delivery vary by location but were largely unchanged over a period of drug liberalization.
Assuntos
Cannabis , Dronabinol/urina , Fumar Maconha , Produtos Biológicos , Feminino , Alucinógenos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Maryland , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Gravidez , Detecção do Abuso de SubstânciasAssuntos
Saúde do Lactente , Uso da Maconha , Saúde Materna , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , CannabisAssuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Prisões Locais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , PrisõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical abortion is a generally safe procedure. Obesity is a known risk factor for complications in other surgical procedures, but insufficient information exists to determine the effects of increasing body mass index on the risk of surgical abortions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether obesity is a risk factor for major complications in surgical abortions. METHODS: A quality control database from a single outpatient center was analyzed to determine rates of major complications during surgical abortions in relation to obesity class. Complications included hemorrhage, need for repeat evacuation, uterine perforation, cervical laceration, medication reaction, unexpected surgery, or unplanned admission to the hospital. Chi-squared and analysis of variance were used for analysis. RESULTS: We included 2468 procedures: 1475 procedures (59.8%) in the first trimester and 993 procedures (40.2%) in the second trimester. The overall complications rate was 2.2%. Second-trimester procedures were more likely than those in the first trimester to have complications (3.1% vs 1.6%; P=.009). Overall, 39.6% of the women were obese, and 9.6% of them met criteria for class 3 obesity (body mass index, >40 kg/m2). Women who underwent second-trimester abortions with class 3 obesity had a rate of complication of 8.7%, which was significantly more than normal weight women (odds ratio, 5.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-8.07; P<.001). COMMENT: Surgical abortions are overall safe procedures, but class 3 obesity increases the rate of complication in second-trimester procedures.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Obesidade/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy challenges public health. This study examines how pregnancy intention affects OUD treatment. METHODS: The primary exposure and outcome were pregnancy intention and treatment duration among MOTHER (Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research) participants (N = 175). RESULTS: Treatment durations were longer (21.3 vs. 16.3 weeks; p = .01) among intended (n = 29) compared to unintended (n = 146) pregnancy participants, but this was not significant in adjusted analyses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Unintended pregnancies intersect with OUD and may modify one's treatment outcomes. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: OUD treatment may be a setting to help women implement informed family planning choices. (Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-3).