Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density Is Associated with Late Endothelial Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To determine whether preoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and postoperative ECD after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) are associated with late endothelial graft failure (LEGF) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). DESIGN: Cohort study within a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1007 individuals (1223 study eyes), mean age 70 years, undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs' dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE) (6% of eyes) and followed for up to 5 years. METHODS: Central ECD was determined by a central image analysis reading center. Preoperative ECD was determined for 1209 eyes that did not fail and 14 eyes that experienced LEGF. The ECD at 6 and 12 months after DSAEK, the change in ECD from preoperative to 6 and 12 months, surgeon-reported operative complications, and postoperative graft dislocation were investigated for an association with LEGFs unrelated to other postoperative events. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Late endothelial graft failure and its associations with pre- and postoperative ECD and operative complications. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of LEGF was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8%-2.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) preoperative ECDs were similar for eyes with LEGF (2523; 2367-3161) cells/mm2) and eyes without failure (2727; 2508-2973) cells/mm2) (P = 0.34). The ECD at 6 months was associated with LEGF (P < 0.001) in time-to-event analyses, whereas preoperative ECD was not (P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence (95% CI) of LEGF was 6.5% (3.0%, 14.0%) for 97 grafts with a 6-month ECD less than 1200 cells/mm2, 0.3% (0.0%, 2.4%) for 310 grafts with a 6-month ECD between 1200 and 2000 cells/mm2, and 0.6% (0.1%, 2.7%) for 589 grafts with a 6-month ECD greater than 2000 cells/mm2. In multivariable analyses, ECD at 6 months and operative complications were both associated with LEGF (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively), whereas graft dislocation was not (P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes undergoing DSAEK, preoperative ECD is unrelated to LEGF, whereas lower ECD at 6 months is associated with LEGF. Early endothelial cell loss after DSAEK and intraoperative complications should be minimized to improve graft survival.

Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

PURPOSE: To associate donor, recipient, and operative factors with graft success 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). DESIGN: Cohort study within a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand ninety individuals (1330 study eyes) with a median age of 70 years undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE; 6% of eyes). METHODS: Eyes undergoing DSAEK were randomized to receive a donor cornea with preservation time (PT) of 0 to 7 days (n = 675) or 8 to 14 days (n = 655). Donor, recipient, and operative parameters were recorded prospectively. Graft failure was defined as regraft for any reason, a graft that failed to clear by 8 weeks after surgery, or an initially clear graft that became and remained cloudy for 90 days. Failure in the first 8 weeks was classified further as primary donor failure or early failure, in the absence or presence of operative complications, respectively. Proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for graft failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft success at 3 years. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-one of 1330 grafts (94%) remained clear at 3 years and were considered successful. After adjusting for PT, tissue from donors with diabetes (RR, 2.35; 99% CI, 1.03-5.33) and operative complications (RR, 4.21; 99% CI, 1.42-12.47) were associated with increased risk for primary or early failure. Preoperative diagnosis of PACE (RR, 3.59; 99% CI, 1.05-12.24) was associated with increased risk for late failure by 3 years after surgery compared with Fuchs dystrophy. Graft success showed little variation among other factors evaluated, including donor age (RR, 1.19 per decade; 99% CI, 0.91-1.56 per decade), preoperative donor endothelial cell density (RR, 1.10 per 500 cells; 99% CI, 0.74-1.63 per 500 cells), graft diameter (RR, 1.22 per 1 mm; 99% CI, 0.39-3.76 per 1 mm), and injector use for graft insertion (RR, 0.92; 99% CI, 0.40-2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty success in the early and entire postoperative period is more likely when the donor did not have diabetes and was without operative complications and in the long-term postoperative period in recipients with Fuchs dystrophy compared with those with PACE. Mechanisms whereby diabetic donors and PACE recipients reduce the rate of graft success after DSAEK warrant further study.

The S-stamp in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Safely Eliminates Upside-down Graft Implantation.

PURPOSE: To present 6-month clinical outcomes from a series of 165 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) procedures before and after the introduction of a novel stromal-sided S-stamp preparation technique that has decreased the incidence of iatrogenic primary graft failure by eliminating upside-down grafts. DESIGN: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: We included 165 consecutive eyes that had undergone DMEK surgery for Fuchs' or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. These cases were divided into 2 cohorts: the first cohort comprised 31 cases that used unstamped tissue before the S-stamp was introduced, and the second cohort comprised 133 cases after the S-stamp was incorporated into the standardized technique. A single unstamped DMEK case was performed after the introduction of the S-stamp for a total of 32 unstamped cases. METHODS: Donor materials were prepared at a single eye bank using a standardized technique, which subsequently incorporated the addition of a dry ink gentian violet S-stamp to the stromal side of Descemet membrane. All surgeries were performed at a single clinical site by 5 surgeons (2 attending surgeons and 3 fellows). Two of the 165 DMEK cases were performed for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (2 cases, 1 in each cohort), and the remaining cases were for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Primary outcome measures were assessed at 6 months and maintained in a prospective institutional review board-approved study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed the 6-month endothelial cell density, incidence of iatrogenic primary graft failure, upside-down graft implantation, and rebubble events. RESULTS: The S-stamp eliminated upside-down graft implantations (0/133 S-stamped vs 3/32 unstamped) and did not significantly alter 6-month endothelial cell loss (31±17% S-stamped vs 29±14% unstamped; P = 0.62) or frequency of rebubble (17/133 S-stamped vs 1/32 unstamped; P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The incorporation of a stromal-sided S-stamp eliminates iatrogenic primary graft failure owing to upside-down implantation of DMEK grafts, without adversely affecting early postoperative complications or 6-month endothelial cell loss.

The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare results of the first 100 eyes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) that were performed with a standardized technique at a single institution. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: The first 100 eyes of standardized DSAEK and DMEK that underwent surgery for Fuchs corneal dystrophy at our center. We excluded patients with prior ocular surgery other than cataract surgery to limit confounding variables. METHODS: Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA; in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] units) was obtained and specular microscopy of donor corneal tissue was performed before surgery. Postoperative complications, BSCVA, and the percent of endothelial cell loss (ECL) recorded at 6 months were compared with the Student t test. Patients with pre-existing ocular comorbidity that impacted visual potential such as macular degeneration, amblyopia, advanced glaucoma, and other optic neuropathies were excluded from the analysis of visual acuity, but were included for the outcomes of complications and ECL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity improvement, ECL 6 months after surgery, postoperative complications, iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF), and rebubbling. RESULTS: Of the 200 eyes, 62 DSAEK eyes and 70 DMEK eyes had 6-month BSCVA available and no vision-limiting comorbidities. Mean BSCVA increased from 0.41±0.19 logMAR and 0.27±0.11 logMAR before surgery to 0.20±0.13 logMAR and 0.11±0.13 logMAR 6 months after DSAEK and DMEK, respectively (P<0.001). Seventy-one DSAEK eyes and 70 DMEK eyes had 6-month ECL data available: ECL was 25.9±14.0% after DSAEK and 27.9±16.0% after DMEK (P=0.38). There were no IPGFs in the DSAEK cohort and there were 4 of 100 IPGFs after DMEK (P=0.12). Rebubbling was performed in 2 of 100 eyes after DSAEK and in 6 of 100 eyes after DMEK (P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DSAEK, DMEK provided better visual recovery and comparable 6-month ECL. The DMEK group had a higher, although not statistically significant, percentage of rebubbling procedures and IPGFs.

The effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density (ECD) after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the Cornea Donor Study. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand ninety subjects undergoing PK for a moderate risk condition, principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema, were enrolled by 105 surgeons from 80 clinical sites in the United States. METHODS: Corneas from donors 12 to 75 years of age were assigned by 43 eye banks to participants without respect to recipient factors. Donor and recipient diabetes status was determined from existing medical records. Images of the central endothelium were obtained before surgery (baseline) and at intervals for 10 years after surgery and were analyzed by a central image analysis reading center to determine ECD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to graft failure (regraft or cloudy cornea for 3 consecutive months) and ECD. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant association of donor diabetes history with 10-year graft failure, baseline ECD, 10-year ECD, or ECD values longitudinally over time in unadjusted analyses, nor after adjusting for donor age and other significant covariates. The 10-year graft failure rate was 23% in the 199 patients receiving a cornea from a donor with diabetes versus 26% in the 891 patients receiving a cornea from a donor without diabetes (95% confidence interval for the difference, -10% to 6%; unadjusted P=0.60). Baseline ECD (P=0.71), 10-year ECD (P>0.99), and changes in ECD over 10 years (P=0.86) were similar comparing donor groups with and without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The study results do not suggest an association between donor diabetes and PK outcome. However, the assessment of donor diabetes was imprecise and based on historical data only. The increasing frequency of diabetes in the aging population in the United States affects the donor pool. Thus, the impact of donor diabetes on long-term endothelial health after PK or endothelial keratoplasty, or both, warrants further study with more precise measures of diabetes and its complications.

Evolving indications for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in the field of endothelial transplantation, including increasing acceptance of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty, may alter the indications for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, to a procedure reserved for complex endothelial disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature demonstrates that Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty provides better and faster visual outcomes and decreased immunologic rejection compared to Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. However, Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty may be more challenging in the management of a number of more complex endothelial disorders. While the literature on complex Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty is limited, the utility of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty has been validated in the management of endothelial dysfunction in the setting of a number of comorbid conditions including prior penetrating keratoplasty, prior glaucoma surgery, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, aniridia, aphakia, and anterior chamber intraocular lenses, among others. SUMMARY: The increasing adoption of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplast is changing the practice of endothelial keratoplasty. However, limitations of the Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedure have also served to crystallize the essential role of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in many complex endothelial keratoplasty scenarios. This article will review indications for endothelial keratoplasty, along with the current evidence for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in their management.

Gingival foreign body granuloma in conjunction with the use of a dental water jet: a case report.

Foreign body gingivitis has been described as an inflammatory reaction of marginal or attached gingival tissues due to foreign material in the connective tissue. This article presents the case of a 58-year-old woman with the chief complaint of periodic discomfort in her maxillary "gums" and redness in the facial gingival tissues of the maxillary anterior segment. A biopsy showed a granulomatous reaction in both the red and neutral areas. The patient revealed that she had been using a water jet device on a high pressure setting. She was advised to discontinue the water jet use, after which the gingival redness and inflammation began to subside, and appeared normal at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits.

Rate of Endothelial Cell Loss and Graft Survival in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes Requiring a Rebubble.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the rate of 6-month endothelial cell loss (ECL) and 6-month graft survival in eyes that did not require a postoperative rebubble with eyes that did require a postoperative rebubble after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. METHODS: A consecutive series of DMEK surgeries performed from September 2013 to March 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Eyes that did not require a rebubble for graft detachment were compared with eyes with 1 rebubble and eyes with 2 or more rebubbles for 6-month ECL and graft survival. A subanalysis of the rebubble rate for different indications for transplantation was also performed. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred ninety-eight eyes were included in this study. The 6-month ECL for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 29.3% ± 16.2% (n = 793), 36.4% ± 18.6% (n = 97, P = 0.001), and 50.1% ± 19.6% (n = 28, P < 0.001), respectively. The 6-month graft survival rate for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 99.5%, 97.8% ( P = 0.035), and 81.8% ( P < 0.001), respectively. When compared to the rebubble rate for DMEK for Fuchs dystrophy (156/1165 eyes = 13.4%), the rebubble rates were statistically higher for DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty (28.5%, P = 0.021) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (28.0%, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes undergoing any rebubble procedure in the postoperative period after DMEK have an increased risk of endothelial cell loss and graft failure at 6 months postoperative. DMEK in eyes for failed penetrating keratoplasty and failed DMEK had the highest rebubble rate, with the former reaching statistical significance.

Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term improvement of visual acuity after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eight patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy without other ocular comorbidities who completed a full 3-year follow-up period. METHODS: Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Improvement in BSCVA between each time point was evaluated using paired-samples t tests. Subanalysis evaluating the percentage of eyes achieving a BSCVA of 20/20, 20/25, 20/30, and 20/40 at each time point was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in postoperative BSCVA. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant trend toward improvement in average BSCVA with time at postoperative month 6 and postoperative years 2 and 3. There were also increasing proportions of eyes reaching vision of 20/20, 20/25, and 20/30 from 6 months to 1 year, 1 year to 2 years, and 2 years to 3 years. The percentage of patients achieving 20/25 BSCVA improved from 36.1% at 6 months to 70.4% at 3 years after surgery. A similar increase in the percentage of patients reaching a BSCVA of 20/20 after DSAEK surgery also was observed from 11.1% at 6 months to approximately 47.2% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is gradual improvement of visual acuity over time after DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in patients without other vision-limiting ocular comorbidities. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Graft dislocation and hypotony after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in patients with previous glaucoma surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine if patients with prior glaucoma surgery experience higher rates of postoperative graft dislocation after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and to determine if postoperative hypotony may be a risk factor in these patients. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative analysis of an interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred fifty-four eyes (67 eyes with prior glaucoma surgery and 787 controls) from 582 patients who underwent DSAEK at 1 institution between January 2005 and April 2011. METHODS: Groups were compared with regard to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters. Continuous variables were compared using the independent samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequencies of postoperative graft dislocation and postoperative hypotony. RESULTS: Study eyes before surgery differed from control eyes with regard to corneal thickness (768 vs. 655 µm; P<0.001) and intraocular pressure (13 vs. 16 mmHg; P<0.001). Postoperative graft dislocation occurred significantly more frequently in study eyes compared with control eyes (9% vs. 2%; P = 0.008). Among eyes in which dislocation occurred, postoperative hypotony was present in 5 study eyes (83%) and 0 control eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Previous glaucoma surgery was associated with a significantly increased rate of graft dislocation compared with control eyes. Dislocation was related strongly to postoperative hypotony in eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Graft rejection after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of graft rejection episodes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery (DSAEK) on long-term endothelial cell density (ECD) decline and graft survival. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative analysis of an interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: We included 615 eyes of 415 Fuchs' dystrophy patients at a single institution with ≥ 6 months follow-up and without comorbidities known to influence postoperative ECD. All patients were enrolled as part of an ongoing, institutional review board-approved clinical protocol for a long-term, prospective study of endothelial keratoplasty in patients with endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: Preoperative specular microscopy of donor corneal tissue was performed. Postoperative specular microscopy measurements were recorded at 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. The percentages of endothelial cell loss recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage ECD declines were calculated at each time point from the results of the preoperative and postoperative specular microscopy. Patients with graft rejection episodes and late endothelial failure were identified. Graft rejection was defined as findings of keratic precipitates with or without corneal edema, or anterior chamber cell and flare with or without corneal edema after the initial resolution of perioperative inflammation. RESULTS: We identified 45 cases of graft rejection. The greatest number of rejections occurred between postoperative months 12 and 18. Eyes with a graft rejection episode had a higher median percentage decline in ECD at all time points compared with eyes without graft rejection episodes. This was statistically significant at 2 and 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend toward a greater percentage of ECD loss with time in eyes experiencing graft rejection after DSAEK surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: the tenuous relationship between donor thickness and postoperative vision.

PURPOSE: To determine whether preoperative donor thickness has a relationship with postoperative visual acuity after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). DESIGN: Retrospective correlation and comparative analysis of an interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 418 eyes of 292 patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy without visual loss from comorbidities. METHODS: Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was performed in 548 eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy, and preoperative graft thickness (GT) was recorded. After exclusion of patients with confounding variables that would affect postoperative visual acuity, postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was measured at 6 months in 418 eyes. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed between preoperative GT and BSCVA. Cases were split into deciles on the basis of GT and BSCVA and then compared with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean GT of the series was 162.9±29.0 µm (range, 80-265 µm), and mean Snellen BSCVA was 20/28 with a range of 20/16 to 20/70. There was a weak correlation between GT and BSCVA that was significant (R = 0.236, P<0.001) but only accounted for 5% of the visual outcome (R(2) = 0.056). Visual outcome was best within the thinnest decile group of 45 donors (GT range, 80-124), with a mean Snellen BSCVA of 20/25 (range, 20/20-20/50), and worst within the thickest decile group of 41 donors (GT range, 200-265), with a mean Snellen BSCVA of 20/33 (range, 20/20-20/70). Post hoc comparison of BSCVA between the thickest and thinnest groups was significant (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative GT may have a small effect on visual outcome in the extremes of thickness, but not in the common range of 100 to 200 µm. Donor thickness has a tenuous relationship with visual outcome, accounting for only 5% of the variance in vision between patients, and should play a minimal role in surgical planning.

Modified procedure for Loading "Flat" DMEK Grafts Into an Injector.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether loading a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft using a drop-in procedure results in more endothelial cell loss (ECL) than the standard suction procedure. METHODS: Pairs of donor corneas with equivalent preprocessing endothelium were prepared using the standard protocol of our eye bank. One member of each pair was loaded into an injector using the standard suction protocol. The mate graft was loaded using a drop-in protocol, in which the edge of the graft was gently grasped with a forceps, lifted to the edge of the injector, and dropped inside. Grafts were evaluated for ECL and examined for grab marks or other loading-associated damage. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean ECL of grafts prepared for DMEK using the standard protocol (20.6% ± 4.5%) compared with that of mate grafts prepared using the drop-in loading protocol (19.5% ± 4.8%, P = 0.59). There was no consistent pattern of damage in the drop-in-loaded grafts, as grab marks or other tissue damage associated with the drop-in loading protocol were not consistently identified by a trained corneal surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: ECL was not significantly different in grafts prepared using a drop-in loading procedure compared with grafts prepared using the standard suction protocol. The drop-in loading protocol may be particularly useful to surgeons who load their own grafts and eye bank processing technicians who encounter a "flat" DMEK graft that does not scroll or a loosely scrolled DMEK graft.

Examination of a Modified Graft Preparation Technique to Induce Double-Scroll Formation and Promote the Use of Younger Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Donor Tissue.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether controlled balanced salt solution (BSS) bursts during graft preparation can safely promote formation of a double-scrolled Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft in younger donor tissue. METHODS: DMEK grafts prepared from young donor tissue (average age, 55 years; range, 39-66 years) were floated in BSS to spontaneously form scrolls (N = 10 pairs). Controlled BSS bursts were used to promote double-scroll (DS) formation in 1 member of each pair. Grafts were stained, preloaded, and shipped before cell viability analysis. After appropriate training, a less experienced technician performed this technique on 10 additional corneas. Outcomes measured for both technicians include the success rate for obtaining a DS, scroll conformation after shipping, and endothelial cell loss (ECL). RESULTS: There was no difference in ECL between grafts subjected to additional manipulation compared with unmanipulated mate grafts (observer 1: 15.2% ± 3.3% vs. 15.2% ± 4.4%, P = 0.99; observer 2: 16.3% ± 2.9% vs. 15.9% ± 4.5%, P = 0.8). A technician experienced with this technique had a 90% success rate, whereas a less experienced technician had a 70% success rate. The mean ECL of the 10 grafts manipulated by the less experienced technician was not significantly different from results obtained from the experienced technician (observer 1: 18.5% ± 6.0% vs. 15.2% ± 3.3%, P = 0.15; observer 2: 18.1% ± 5.6% vs. 16.3% ± 2.9%, P = 0.34). Scrolls maintained their conformation during shipping events. CONCLUSIONS: Double-scroll graft formation using controlled BSS bursts is a reliable technique that can be performed without causing additional damage to DMEK grafts. This technique may make graft unscrolling easier and can promote the use of younger donor tissue for DMEK.

Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue size and donor endothelial survival.

PURPOSE: To determine if donor graft diameter has a relationship with postoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD) and survival in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative analysis of an interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-one eyes of 243 patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy without a history of rejection or graft dislocation. METHODS: Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was performed in 331 eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy. After exclusion of confounding variables, postoperative ECD and percentage cell loss was compared for 8.0-mm grafts (n = 154) versus 8.5-mm grafts (n = 165) over a 2-year postoperative period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total central ECD and percentage of donor endothelial cell loss as measured by specular microscopy of central ECD. RESULTS: Mean preoperative ECD was 2635 cells/mm(2) for 8.0-mm grafts and 2732 cells/mm(2) for 8.5-mm grafts (P = 0.003). Mean ECD (and percent cell loss from before surgery) was 2011 cells/mm(2) (22.9%) for 8.0-mm grafts and 2078 cells/mm(2) (23.5%) for 8.5-mm grafts at 6 months, 2009 cells/mm(2) (23.3%) and 2113 cells/mm(2) (23.1%) at 1 year, and 2060 cells/mm(2) (23.4%) and 2111 cells/mm(2) (24.3%) at 2 years (P>0.72 for percentage cell loss at all time points). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts with a diameter of 8.5 mm do not offer a clinical advantage over smaller 8.0-mm grafts for postoperative endothelial cell counts in the first 2 years after surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue storage time and donor endothelial survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between storage time in Optisol GS (Bausch & Lomb, St. Louis, MO) and postoperative cell loss after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty-two eyes of 265 patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. METHODS: Storage times (death to surgery) of donor tissue were recorded for 362 eyes undergoing DSAEK surgery. Donor cell loss at 6, 12, and 24 months was recorded. Analysis of storage times with endothelial cell loss was performed using a Pearson correlation coefficient and an independent samples Student t test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of donor endothelial cell loss as measured by specular microscopy of central endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS: The mean storage time was 98.95 ± 33 hours (range, 20.65-186.02 hours). The mean percent endothelial cell loss from before to after surgery was 29 ± 16% at 6 months (n = 362), 31 ± 16% at 12 months (n = 263), and 32 ± 20% at 24 months (n = 98). Storage time did not correlate significantly with endothelial cell loss at any postoperative time point (6 months: r = -0.047, P = 0.373; 12 months: r = -0.023, P = 0.709; 24 months: r = -0.14, P = 0.169). The mean cell loss for corneas stored 0 to 4 days (n = 55) was 32 ± 17% at 2 years and the mean cell loss for corneas stored for more than 4 days (n = 43) was 30 ± 18% at 2 years (P = 0.57). At the extremes of storage time, 10 corneas stored for the shortest time (1.5 days) had a 1-year cell loss of 33% and 10 corneas stored for the longest time (7 days) had a 1-year cell loss of 30% (P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: No correlation was found between the characteristic of storage time and the decline of ECD. Surgeons should not make special requests to the eye bank for short storage times with the hope of improving donor endothelial survival. The upper limit of donor storage time as it relates to acceptable postoperative endothelial cell loss is not known.

The Role of Donor Rim Fungal Cultures.

ABSTRACT: Culturing all donor rims for fungus makes no sense. Only 1% of all cultures will be positive, and of those positive cultures, only 6% will also have a clinical infection. Prophylactically treating all positive cultures means 94% of patients will be treated unnecessarily. Fungal cultures do not reliably direct specific medication choice, and fungal infections of the interface in endothelial keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty are nearly impervious to medical therapy. Suspected fungal infections of the deep stromal interface should be treated expeditiously with penetrating keratoplasty before peripheral spread or endophthalmitis occur.

Younger Donor Tissue in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery: Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether using younger donor tissue for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery influences clinical outcomes. METHODS: Scroll tightness, unscrolling time, rebubble rate, and preoperative and 3- and 6-month postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) were compared for 661 DMEK grafts prepared from younger (aged younger than 50 yrs, n = 81) and older donors (aged 50 yrs or older, n = 580) with Student t test, χ2 test, or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall unscrolling time (younger donors: 3.1 ± 3.1 min, older donor: 2.9 ± 2.7 min, P = 0.503). Experienced faculty surgeons, compared with fellows, had a significantly lower unscrolling times for both younger donors (2.4 ± 2.3 vs. 4.6 ± 3.9 min, P = 0.002) and older donors (2.5 ± 2.1 vs. 3.7 ± 3.3 min, P <0.001). Rebubble rates were not statistically different between younger (12.3%) and older donors (15.0%, P = 0.527). Three-month ECD was higher in grafts from younger compared with that in those from older donors (2138 ± 442 vs. 1974 ± 470 cells/mm2, P = 0.024). Six-month ECD was similar for younger (1972 ± 509 cells/mm2) and older donors (1947 ± 460 cells/mm2, P = 0.585). There was no difference in 3- or 6-month ECL comparing younger (3-mo: 24.3% ± 13.4%; 6-mo: 31.1% ± 15.2%) with older donors (3-mo: 25.9% ± 15.5%, P = 0.489; 6-mo: 27.8% ± 15.1%, P = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK grafts prepared from younger donors exhibited similar unscrolling times, rebubble rates, and 3- and 6-month ECL compared with older donors. Experienced surgeons might begin to accept DMEK grafts from younger donors with confidence.

Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure.

BACKGROUND: Although Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) was demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of endothelial corneal diseases, a variable hyperopic shift has been measured as a common occurrence postoperatively. The aim of this work was to investigate the variance in the corneal and refractive responses to DSAEK combined with phacoemulsification and implantation of intra-ocular lens (IOL), namely the DSAEK triple procedure. METHODS: The refractive, topographic, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) data of 23 eyes treated with DSAEK triple procedure were analyzed. A mean refractive IOL target of -1.04 +/- 0.09 D was calculated based on empirical data of our early experience to achieve emmetropia in all the eyes included in the study. Donor corneal parameters, i.e., graft diameter, thickness, and profile, were investigated in order to verify their possible role in the variable refractive shift after DSAEK. RESULTS: Although the 1-year mean refractive outcome was close to emmetropia (-0.01 +/- 0.89 D), the average difference between the targeted postoperative refraction and the 1-year postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +0.98 +/- 0.87 D. Correlations of refractive change with central graft thickness (r = 0.36, p = 0.05) and graft diameter (r = 0.45; p = 0.03) were statistically significant. AS-OCT analysis revealed how the graft shape, with graft thicker in the periphery compared with the center, contributed to reduce the radius of curvature of the posterior cornea, thus favoring the hyperopic shift postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK triple procedure provides negligible changes in the surface topography, however with a variable amount of hyperopic shift postoperatively. Central graft thickness and graft profile together contributed to approximately two-thirds of the variance in refractive shift postoperatively. Lenticule diameter provided a minor influence on postoperative hyperopic shift than other graft parameters.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: The influence of preoperative endothelial cell density and triple procedures on grafts at 5 years postoperative.

The purpose is to determine if the preoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD) in triple (phacoemulsification plus intraocular lens implantation plus DSAEK) and non-triple Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) procedures have a relationship with the 5-year postoperative ECD or percent Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL).Out of 986 consecutive DSAEK surgeries for Fuchs dystrophy, 241 eyes had 5-year ECD measurements available. Endothelial cell densities were then evaluated against preoperative ECDs to obtain measures of ECL. Triple and non-triple procedures were isolated and compared independently.One hundred eighty two eyes had undergone a triple procedure and 59 had not. The mean ECD at 5 years was 1560 ±â€Š648 cells/mm for triples and 1483 ±â€Š621 cells/mm for non-triples (P = .42). Endothelial Cell loss was 44.4% ±â€Š21.7% and 44.4% ±â€Š22.0%, respectively for eyes that underwent a triple or non-triple (P = .99). There was a moderate, but significant correlation between preoperative ECD and the ECD at 5 years after DSAEK for both triples (r = 0.39, P < .001), and non-triples (r = 0.32, P = .01), respectively.In Descemets stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts, higher preoperative donor ECD was correlated with higher ECD at 5 years postoperatively but was unaffected by a concurrent cataract surgery in the triple procedure.