Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 61(1): 94-102, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35903934

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Children with hypopituitarism (CwHP) can present with orofacial clefting, frequently in the setting of multiple midline anomalies. Hypopituitarism (HP) can complicate medical and surgical care; the perioperative risk in CwHP during the traditionally lower risk cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) repair is not well described. The objective of this study is to examine the differences in complications and mortality of CL/P repair in CwHP compared to children without hypopituitarism (CwoHP). DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: The 1997 to 2019 Kids' Inpatient Databases (KID). PATIENTS: Children 3 years old and younger who underwent CL/P repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 34 106 weighted cases were analyzed, with 86 having HP. CwHP had a longer length of stay (3.0 days [IQR 2.0-10.0] vs 1.0 day [IQR 1.0-2.0], P < .001) and higher rates of complications and mortality (12.8% vs 2.9%, P < .001) compared to CwoHP. Controlling for demographic factors, CwHP had 6.61 higher odds of complications and mortality than CwoHP (95% CI 3.38-12.94, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CwHP can present with a CL/P and other midline defects that can increase the complexity of their care. These data show a significant increase in length of stay, complications, and mortality in CwHP undergoing CL/P repair. Increased multidisciplinary attention and monitoring may be needed for these children peri- and postoperatively, especially if additional comorbidities are present. Further studies on perioperative management in this population are warranted to reduce morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Fenda Labial , Fissura Palatina , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Fenda Labial/cirurgia , Fissura Palatina/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Transversais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
2.
J Asthma ; 59(6): 1248-1255, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33730979

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: School-based telehealth (SBTH) offers an opportunity to overcome traditional barriers to providing comprehensive asthma care for children. Guided by an implementation science framework considering factors internal and external to the school setting, we characterized barriers and facilitators to asthma care within an existing SBTH program available in over 50 under-resourced South Carolina schools. METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed barriers and facilitators to SBTH asthma care delivery using web-based surveys of school nurses, specifically addressing school implementation of telehealth methods. Surveys evaluated practices and nurse and school-specific factors related to telehealth implementation including perceived barriers, organizational readiness and self-efficacy. Utilizers were schools who completed 1-10 average visits per month while non-utilizers completed less than 1 average visit per month. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize perceptions in utilizers versus non-utilizers. RESULTS: Of 53 surveys distributed, 36 were completed (68% response rate). Commonly cited barriers included inadequate time due to competing tasks in both utilizers (65%) and non-utilizers (74%) as well as lack of caregiver involvement in care planning (94% of utilizers and 84% of non-utilizers). Of those utilizing specific, relevant telehealth services, schools scored high in perceptions of organizational readiness (n = 24, mean: 24.5/30), self-efficacy (n = 26, mean: 3.6/5) and comfort with identifying students eligible for SBTH (n = 26, mean: 3.5/5). CONCLUSIONS: We identified inadequate nurse time and challenges engaging caregivers as key barriers to implementation of a school-based telehealth asthma program providing care to an under-resourced population. Addressing these barriers when expanding telehealth services may promote utilization of telehealth.


Assuntos
Asma , Telemedicina , Asma/terapia , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Percepção , Serviços de Saúde Escolar
3.
Telemed J E Health ; 27(8): 955-962, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152858

RESUMO

Background: School-based telehealth (SBTH) plays a valuable role in child asthma management, although nurses have concerns with caregiver engagement. Mobile technology (m-health) has potential to improve this engagement. Objective: We identified barriers and key desired features of an asthma m-health application as a supplement to an existing SBTH asthma program in rural settings. Methods: Multimethod design using school nurse surveys and interviews with school and SBTH personnel to describe processes related to implementation of an m-health application. Results: Nurses reported SBTH programs were an ideal setting to identify potential families for m-health. Benefits of caregiver education and engagement and barriers related to technology, smart phone data availability, and family buy-in were described. Desired application features included education on inhaler technique, asthma symptom, and medication adherence reports. Conclusions: The feedback identified from nurses can be incorporated into an asthma m-health program within an SBTH program to facilitate implementation.


Assuntos
Asma , Aplicativos Móveis , Telemedicina , Asma/terapia , Criança , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Instituições Acadêmicas
4.
J Pediatr ; 195: 175-181.e2, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395170

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe hospital-based asthma-specific discharge components at children's hospitals and determine the association of these discharge components with pediatric asthma readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric asthma hospitalizations in 2015 at children's hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System. Children ages 5 to 17 years were included. An electronic survey assessing 13 asthma-specific discharge components was sent to quality leaders at all 49 hospitals. Correlations of combinations of asthma-specific discharge components and adjusted readmission rates were calculated. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 92% (45 of 49 hospitals). Thirty-day and 3-month adjusted readmission rates varied across hospitals, ranging from 1.9% to 3.9% for 30-day readmissions and 5.7% to 9.1% for 3-month readmissions. No individual or combination discharge components were associated with lower 30-day adjusted readmission rates. The only single-component significantly associated with a lower rate of readmission at 3 months was having comprehensive content of education (P < .029). Increasing intensity of discharge components in bundles was associated with reduced adjusted 3-month readmission rates, but this did not reach statistical significance. This was seen in a 2-discharge component bundle including content of education and communication with the primary medical doctor, as well as a 3-discharge component bundle, which included content of education, medications in-hand, and home-based environmental mitigation. CONCLUSIONS: Children's hospitals demonstrate a range of asthma-specific discharge components. Although we found no significant associations for specific hospital-level discharge components and asthma readmission rates at 30 days, certain combinations of discharge components may support hospitals to reduce healthcare utilization at 3 months.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 34(6): 403-408, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29189590

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric isolated skull fractures (ISFs) are common injuries that represent challenging disposition decisions for clinicians. The purpose of this study is to use a decision analysis to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of 3 emergency department (ED)-based disposition scenarios for a pediatric patient presenting with ISF. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ED disposition scenarios that included current practice, increased at-home surveillance, and observation unit utilization. Current rates of admission, deterioration after initial diagnosis, and ED return after discharge, as well as cost of observation-only status, were obtained through literature review. Cost calculations using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data included total ED cost, admission without complication, and admission with deterioration. RESULTS: In current practice, 76% of subjects with ISF are admitted and 2.5% of those develop persistent or new symptoms. No patient diagnosed with ISF required neurosurgical intervention. Of those discharged home from the ED, 2.8% return with a new concern with 7.4% having new findings on imaging leading to admission. Total cost per 100 patients by current practice was US $583,587. Increasing at-home surveillance by 20% resulted in a total cost saving of US $113,176 per 100 patients while increasing returns to the ED from less than 1% to 1.1%. Admitting at the current rate to an observation unit resulted in a US $205,395 cost saving per 100 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased inpatient utilization through home surveillance or observation unit use reduced cost associated with pediatric ISF management without increasing clinical risk owing to the low probability of clinical deterioration after initial diagnosis.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Cranianas/economia , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Fraturas Cranianas/terapia
6.
J Pediatr ; 167(6): 1280-6, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26456740

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of universal vs targeted approach to obtaining blood cultures in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree to compare 2 approaches to ordering blood cultures in children hospitalized with CAP: obtaining blood cultures in all children admitted with CAP (universal approach) and obtaining blood cultures in patients identified as high risk for bacteremia (targeted approach). We searched the literature to determine expected proportions of high-risk patients, positive culture rates, and predicted bacteria and susceptibility patterns. Our primary clinical outcome was projected rate of missed bacteremia with associated treatment failure in the targeted approach. Costs per 100 patients and annualized costs on the national level were calculated for each approach. RESULTS: The model predicts that in the targeted approach, there will be 0.07 cases of missed bacteremia with treatment failure per 100 patients, or 133 annually. In the universal approach, 118 blood cultures would need to be drawn to identify 1 patient with bacteremia, in which the result would lead to a meaningful antibiotic change compared with 42 cultures in the targeted approach. The universal approach would cost $5178 per 100 patients or $9,214,238 annually. The targeted approach would cost $1992 per 100 patients or $3,545,460 annually. The laboratory-related cost savings attributed to the targeted approach would be projected to be $5,668,778 annually. CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis model suggests that a targeted approach to obtaining blood cultures in children hospitalized with CAP may be clinically effective, cost-saving, and reduce unnecessary testing.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/economia , Pneumonia/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/economia , Criança , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/sangue , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pneumonia/sangue , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
7.
J Pediatr ; 166(3): 613-9.e5, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25477164

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess readmission rates identified by 3M-Potentially Preventable Readmissions software (3M-PPRs) in a national cohort of children's hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1 719 617 hospitalizations for 1 531 828 unique patients in 58 children's hospitals from 2009 to 2011 from the Children's Hospital Association Case-Mix Comparative database were examined. Main outcome measures included rates, diagnoses, and costs of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and all-cause readmissions. RESULTS: The 7-, 15-, and 30-day rates by 3M-PPRs were 2.5%, 4.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. Corresponding all-cause readmission rates were 5.0%, 8.7%, and 13.3%. At 30 days, 60.6% of all-cause readmissions were considered nonpreventable by 3M-PPRs, more than one-half of which were related to malignancies. The percentage of readmissions rated as potentially preventable was similar at all 3 time intervals. Readmissions after chemotherapy, acute leukemia, and cystic fibrosis were all considered nonpreventable, and at least 80% of readmissions after index admissions for sickle cell crisis, bronchiolitis, ventricular shunt procedures, asthma, and appendectomy were designated potentially preventable. Total costs for all readmissions were $1.7 billion; PPRs accounted for 27.3% of these costs. The most costly readmissions were associated with ventricular shunt procedures ($26.5 million/year), seizures ($15.5 million/year), and sickle cell crisis ($15.0 million/year). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of PPRs were significantly lower than all-cause readmission rates more than one-half of which were caused by exclusion of malignancies. Annual costs of PPRs, although significant in the aggregate, appear to represent a much smaller cost-savings opportunity for children than for adults. Our study may help guide children's hospitals to focus readmission reduction strategies on areas where the financial vulnerability is greatest based on 3M-PPRs.


Assuntos
Emergências , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tonsilectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
8.
J Pediatr ; 164(4): 827-831.e1, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24370344

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the children with persistent asthma receiving non-preferred controller therapy in the form of leukotriene receptor antagonist monotherapy (LTRAM). STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 2007-2009 South Carolina Medicaid data of children aged 2- to 18 years with persistent asthma, defined by Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). Those without either LTRAM or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were excluded. With multivariable logistic regression modeling, we compared the outcome of LTRAM with the primary predictor of age and adjusted for covariates of race, sex, HEDIS class, rurality, and disease severity. We also used negative binomial regression to compare outcomes of albuterol and oral steroid claims, outpatient and emergency department visits, and hospitalizations with predictors of LTRAM vs ICS therapy. RESULTS: A total of 19,512 patients with asthma aged 2- to 18-years were studied: 2658 (13.6%) without controllers were excluded, 2508 (12.9%) received LTRAM, and 14 346 (73.5%) received ICS. Age, race, rurality, and HEDIS classification were all significantly associated with LTRAM (all P < .01): 5- to 13-year-olds relative to children <5 years old (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.64), Caucasians relative to African Americans (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27-1.53), and rural children relative to urban (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.3) were all more likely to receive LTRAM. Albuterol, oral steroid, and outpatient visits were lower in LTRAM (P < .01). No difference was detected in emergency department visits or admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Children 5- to 13-years of age, rural children, and Caucasian children were more likely to receive LTRAM. Uncovering provider rationale and practices as well as patient influences on this prescribing pattern may be helpful in optimizing asthma controller therapy.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino
9.
Pediatrics ; 153(6)2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716573

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Repurposed medications for acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continued to be prescribed after results from rigorous studies and national guidelines discouraged use. We aimed to describe prescribing rates of nonrecommended medications for acute COVID-19 in children, associations with demographic factors, and provider type and specialty. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort of children <18 years in a large United States all-payer claims database, we identified prescriptions within 2 weeks of an acute COVID-19 diagnosis. We calculated prescription rate, performed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors, and described prescriber type and specialty during nonrecommended periods defined by national guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 3 082 626 COVID-19 diagnoses in 2 949 118 children between March 7, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin were prescribed in 0.03% and 0.14% of COVID-19 cases, respectively, during nonrecommended periods (after September 12, 2020 for HCQ and February 5, 2021 for ivermectin) with considerable variation by state. Prescription rates were 4 times the national average in Arkansas (HCQ) and Oklahoma (ivermectin). Older age, nonpublic insurance, and emergency department or urgent care visit were associated with increased risk of either prescription. Additionally, residence in nonurban and low-income areas was associated with ivermectin prescription. General practitioners had the highest rates of prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Although nonrecommended medication prescription rates were low, the overall COVID-19 burden translated into high numbers of ineffective and potentially harmful prescriptions. Understanding overuse patterns can help mitigate downstream consequences of misinformation. Reaching providers and parents with clear evidence-based recommendations is crucial to children's health.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Adolescente , Lactente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Recém-Nascido
10.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 29(9): 957-62, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23974712

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine how frequently emergency department (ED) physicians prescribe inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and describe commonly cited barriers. METHODS: We surveyed members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine between May and August 2011. Demographic data were collected. Using the knowledge-attitude-behavior model for barriers to physician guideline adherence, we asked 20 Likert scale questions regarding barriers to ICS prescribing. Our primary outcome was reported frequency of ICS prescribing. We defined frequent prescribers as those who prescribe ICS more than 25% of the time. Logistic regression models were built for each barrier category and identified barriers that predict infrequent prescribing. RESULTS: Two hundred seven (19.5%) of the 1062 surveyed responded; 75.8% report prescribing ICS 25% of the time or less. For knowledge, those who agreed that the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines are not clear regarding the ED physician's role were less likely to be frequent prescribers compared with those who disagreed (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.90). For attitude, those who agreed it is not the role of the ED physician to prescribe long-term medications were less likely to be frequent prescribers (adjusted OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.37). For behavior, those who agreed they do not routinely start long-term medications because they cannot see patients in follow-up were less likely to be frequent prescribers (adjusted OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department physicians report low rates of ICS prescribing. Commonly cited barriers include unclear guidelines, believing that long-term medication prescribing is not within their role, and inability to see patients in follow-up. Addressing guideline discrepancies may improve preventive care delivery in the ED.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Pediatria , Papel do Médico , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
11.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(6): 1259-1267, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581101

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Reducing pediatric readmissions has become a national priority; however, the use of readmission rates as a quality metric remains controversial. The goal of this study was to examine short-term stability and long-term changes in hospital readmission rates. METHODS: Data from the Pediatric Health Information System were used to compare annual 30-day risk-adjusted readmission rates (RARRs) in 47 US children's hospitals from 2016 to 2017 (short-term) and 2016 to 2019 (long-term). Pearson correlation coefficients and weighted Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to measure correlation and agreement across years for hospital-level RARRs and performance quartiles. RESULTS: Median (IQR) 30-day RARRs remained stable from 7.7% (7.0-8.3) in 2016 to 7.6% (7.0-8.1) in 2019. Individual hospital RARRs in 2016 were strongly correlated with the same hospital's 2017 rate (R2 = 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.94]) and moderately correlated with those in 2019 (R2 = 0.49 [95%CI 0.23-0.68]). Short-term RARRs (2016 vs 2017) were more highly correlated for medical conditions than surgical conditions, but correlations between long-term medical and surgical RARRs (2016 vs 2019) were similar. Agreement between RARRs was higher when comparing short-term changes (0.73 [95%CI 0.59-0.86]) than long-term changes (0.45 [95%CI 0.27-0.63]). From 2016 to 2019, RARRs increased by ≥1% in 7 (15%) hospitals and decreased by ≥1% in 6 (13%) hospitals. Only 7 (15%) hospitals experienced reductions in RARRs over the short and long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-level performance on RARRs remained stable with high agreement over the short-term suggesting stability of readmission measures. There was little evidence of sustained improvement in hospital-level performance over multiple years.


Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos , Readmissão do Paciente , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
J Pediatr ; 160(2): 325-30, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21885062

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine what proportion of patients who are seen in an emergency department (ED) for asthma receive inhaled corticosteroids or attend follow-up appointments. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2007-2009 South Carolina Medicaid data. Enrollees aged 2-18 years who had an ED visit for asthma were included. Patients admitted for asthma or with an inhaled corticosteroid claim in the 2 months before the month of the ED visit were excluded. Covariates were sex, race, age, rural residence, and asthma severity. Outcome measures were a prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid filled within the 2 months after the ED visit and attendance at a follow-up appointment within the 2 months after the ED visit. RESULTS: A total of 3435 patients were included. Out of the study cohort, 57% were male, 76% were of a minority race/ethnicity, 69% lived in an urban areas, 18% had inhaled corticosteroid use, and 12% completed follow-up. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that patients with severe asthma were more likely to receive an inhaled corticosteroid (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.3-3.7) and attend a follow-up appointment (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.6). Patients aged 2-6 years and those aged >12 years were less likely to attend follow-up (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90 and OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83, respectively) (all models P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Children with asthma seen in the ED have low rates of inhaled corticosteroid use and outpatient follow-up. This indicates a need for further interventions to increase the use of inhaled corticosteroids in response to ED visits.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Agendamento de Consultas , Asma/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
J Pediatr ; 161(5): 903-7, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22717219

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3 inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) delivery options for children with asthma treated in and discharged from the emergency department (ED). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree to compare 3 ED-based ICS delivery options: usual care (recommending outpatient follow-up), prescribe (uniformly prescribing ICS), and dispense (uniformly dispensing ICS). Accounting for expected follow-up rates, prescription filling, and medication compliance, we compared projected rates of ED relapse visits and hospitalizations within 1 month of ED visit across all 3 arms. Direct and indirect costs were compared. RESULTS: The model predicts that the rate of return to ED per 100 patients within 1 month of the ED visit was 10.6 visits for the usual care arm, 9.4 visits for the prescription arm, and 8.4 visits for the medication-dispensing arm. Rates of hospitalization per 100 patients were 2.4, 2.2, and 1.9, respectively. Direct costs per 100 patients for each arm were $23,400, $20,800, and $19,100, respectively. Including indirect costs related to missed parental work, total costs per 100 patients were $27,100, $22,000, and $20,100, respectively. Total cost savings per 100 patients comparing the usual care arm with the medication dispensing arm was $7000. CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis model suggests that uniform prescribing or dispensing of ICS at the time of ED visit for asthma may lead to a decreased number of ED visits and hospital admissions within 1 month of the sentinel ED visit and provides a substantial cost-savings.


Assuntos
Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/economia , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Asma/economia , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Pediatria/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Hosp Pediatr ; 12(4): 337-353, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35257170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although pediatric health care use declined during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the impact on children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) has not been well reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of the pandemic on inpatient use and outcomes for children with CCCs. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study used data from the Pediatric Health Information System. We examined trends in admissions between January 2020 through March 2021, comparing them to the same timeframe in the previous 3 years (pre-COVID-19). We used generalized linear mixed models to examine the association of the COVID-19 period and outcomes for children with CCCs presenting between March 16, 2020 to March 15, 2021 (COVID-19 period) to the same timeframe in the previous 3 years (pre-COVID-19). RESULTS: Children with CCCs experienced a 19.5% overall decline in admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Declines began in the second week of March of 2020, reaching a nadir in early April 2020. Changes in admissions varied over time and by admission indication. Children with CCCs hospitalized for pneumonia and bronchiolitis experienced overall declines in admissions of 49.7% to 57.7%, whereas children with CCCs hospitalized for diabetes experienced overall increases in admissions of 21.2%. Total and index length of stay, costs, and ICU use, although statistically higher during the COVID-19 period, were similar overall to the pre-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: Total admissions for children with CCCs declined nearly 20% during the pandemic. Among prevalent conditions, the greatest declines were observed for children with CCCs hospitalized with respiratory illnesses. Despite declines in admissions, overall hospital-level outcomes remained similar.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Criança , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pandemias
15.
Pediatrics ; 150(3)2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701866

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines rapidly evolved during the pandemic. The December 2020 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline, endorsed by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, recommended steroids for critical disease, and suggested steroids and remdesivir for severe disease. We evaluated how medications for children hospitalized with COVID-19 changed after guideline publication. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of children aged 30 days to <18 years hospitalized with acute COVID-19 at 42 tertiary care US children's hospitals April 2020 to December 2021. We compared medication use before and after the December 2020 IDSA guideline (pre- and postguideline) stratified by COVID-19 disease severity (mild-moderate, severe, critical) with interrupted time series. RESULTS: Among 18 364 patients who met selection criteria, 80.3% were discharged in the postguideline period. Remdesivir and steroid use increased postguideline relative to the preguideline period, although the trend slowed. Postguideline, among patients with severe disease, 75.4% received steroids and 55.2% remdesivir, and in those with critical disease, 82.4% received steroids and 41.4% remdesivir. Compared with preguideline, enoxaparin use increased overall but decreased among patients with critical disease. Postguideline, tocilizumab use increased and hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, anakinra, and antibiotic use decreased. Antibiotic use remained high in severe (51.7%) and critical disease (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Although utilization of COVID-19 medications changed after December 2020 IDSA guidelines, there was a decline in uptake and incomplete adherence for children with severe and critical disease. Efforts should enhance reliable delivery of guideline-directed therapies to children hospitalized with COVID-19 and assess their effectiveness.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
Acad Pediatr ; 22(5): 797-805, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081468

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite extensive efforts, overall readmission rates at US children's hospitals have not materially declined over the past decade, raising questions about how to direct future efforts. Using measures of prevalence and performance variation we describe readmission rates by condition and identify priority conditions for future intervention. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 49 US children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System in 2017. Conditions were classified using All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. 30-day unadjusted and risk-adjusted readmission rates were calculated for each hospital/condition using the Pediatric All Cause Readmission measure. We ranked the highest volume conditions by rate variation (RV, interquartile range divided by the median) for each condition across hospitals. RESULTS: The sample included 811,434 index hospitalizations with 50,196 (6.2%) 30-day readmissions. The RV across hospitals/conditions was between 0 and 2.8 (median = 0.7). Common reasons for admission had low RVs across hospitals, for example, bronchiolitis (readmission rate = 5.6%, RV = 0.4), seizure (readmission rate = 6.6%, RV = 0.3), and asthma (readmission rate = 3.1%, RV = 0.4). We identified 33 conditions with high variation in readmission rates across hospitals, which accounted for 18% of all discharges and 11% of all pediatric readmissions. These conditions may serve as candidates for future readmission reduction activities. CONCLUSIONS: Many common childhood conditions have little variation in readmission rates across children's hospitals, suggesting limited future improvement opportunities. Conditions with high rate variation may provide opportunities for quality improvement; however, these conditions account for a relatively small share of total discharges suggesting modest potential impacts on national rates.


Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos , Readmissão do Paciente , Criança , Hospitalização , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
17.
Acad Pediatr ; 22(4): 614-621, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34929386

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Reutilization following discharge is costly to families and the health care system. Singular measures of the social determinants of health (SDOH) have been shown to impact utilization; however, the SDOH are multifactorial. The Childhood Opportunity Index (COI) is a validated approach for comprehensive estimation of the SDOH. Using the COI, we aimed to describe the association between SDOH and 30-day revisit rates. METHODS: This retrospective study included children 0 to 17 years within 48 children's hospitals using the Pediatric Health Information System from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2019. The main exposure was a child's ZIP code level COI. The primary outcome was unplanned readmissions and emergency department (ED) revisits within 30 days of discharge. Primary outcomes were summarized by COI category and compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Adjusted analysis used generalized linear mixed effects models with adjustments for demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital clustering. RESULTS: Of 728,997 hospitalizations meeting inclusion criteria, 30-day unplanned returns occurred for 96,007 children (13.2%). After adjustment, the patterns of returns were significantly associated with COI. For example, 30-day returns occurred for 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.2, 20.0) of children living within very low opportunity areas, with a gradient-like decrease as opportunity increased (15.5%, 95% CI: 14.5, 16.5 for very high). The relative decrease in utilization as COI increased was more pronounced for ED revisits. CONCLUSIONS: Children living in low opportunity areas had greater 30-day readmissions and ED revisits. Our results suggest that a broader approach, including policy and system-level change, is needed to effectively reduce readmissions and ED revisits.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Readmissão do Paciente , Criança , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Pediatrics ; 147(6)2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757994

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to changes in health care use, including decreased emergency department visits for children. In this study, we sought to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient use within children's hospitals. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Pediatric Health Information System. We compared inpatient use and clinical outcomes for children 0 to 18 years of age during the COVID-19 period (March 15 to August 29, 2020) to the same time frame in the previous 3 years (pre-COVID-19 period). Adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the association of the pandemic period with inpatient use. We assessed trends overall and for a subgroup of 15 medical All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs). RESULTS: We identified 424 856 hospitalizations (mean: 141 619 hospitalizations per year) in the pre-COVID-19 period and 91 532 in the COVID-19 period. Compared with the median number of hospitalizations in the pre-COVID-19 period, we observed declines in hospitalizations overall (35.1%), and by APR-DRG (range: 8.5%-81.3%) with asthma (81.3%), bronchiolitis (80.1%), and pneumonia (71.4%) experiencing the greatest declines. Overall readmission rates were lower during the COVID-19 period; however, other outcomes, including length of stay, cost, ICU use, and mortality remained similar to the pre-COVID-19 period with some variability by APR-DRGs. CONCLUSIONS: US children's hospitals observed substantial reductions in inpatient admissions with largely unchanged hospital-level outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the impact on use varied by condition, the most notable declines were related to inpatient admissions for respiratory conditions, including asthma, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Pediátricos/tendências , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(8): 785-793, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34210764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for childhood asthma exacerbations has increased significantly in the last decade. Emergency department administration of IVMg has been shown to reduce asthma hospitalization, yet most children receiving IVMg in the emergency department are subsequently hospitalized. Our objective with the study was to examine hospital outcomes of children given IVMg for asthma exacerbations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Pediatric Health Information System. We used propensity score matching to compare children who received IVMg on the first day of hospitalization with those who did not. Primary outcomes were initiation and duration of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation (MV) initiation, duration of MV, length of stay, and subsequent tertiary medication use. Primary analysis was restricted to children admitted to nonintensive care inpatient units. RESULTS: Overall, 91 309 hospitalizations met inclusion criteria. IVMg was administered in 25 882 (28.4%) children. After propensity score matching, IVMg was not significantly associated with lower initiation (adjusted odds ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.05) or shorter duration of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (rate ratio 0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.02). Similarly, no significant associations were seen for MV initiation, MV duration, or length of stay. IVMg was associated with lower subsequent tertiary medication use (adjusted odds ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.72). However, the association was lost when ipratropium was removed from the tertiary medication definition. CONCLUSIONS: IVMg administration was not significantly associated with improved hospital outcomes. Further study is needed to inform the optimal indications and timing of magnesium use during hospitalization.


Assuntos
Asma , Magnésio , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Ipratrópio , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
J Hosp Med ; 16(10): 603-610, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34613896

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the clinical factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in children and adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study across 45 US children's hospitals between April 2020 to September 2020 of pediatric patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed factors associated with hospitalization and factors associated with clinical severity (eg, admission to inpatient floor, admission to intensive care unit [ICU], admission to ICU with mechanical ventilation, shock, death) among those hospitalized. RESULTS: Among 19,976 COVID-19 encounters, 15,913 (79.7%) patients were discharged from the emergency department (ED) and 4063 (20.3%) were hospitalized. The clinical severity distribution among those hospitalized was moderate (3222, 79.3%), severe (431, 11.3%), and very severe (380, 9.4%). Factors associated with hospitalization vs discharge from the ED included private payor insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR],1.16; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), obesity/type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) (aOR, 10.4; 95% CI, 8.9-13.3), asthma (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), cardiovascular disease, (aOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 4.3- 5.8), immunocompromised condition (aOR, 5.9; 95% CI, 5.0-6.7), pulmonary disease (aOR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.4-8.2), and neurologic disease (aOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.7-5.8). Among children and adolescents hospitalized with COVID-19, greater disease severity was associated with Black or other non-White race; age greater than 4 years; and obesity/type 2 DM, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and pulmonary conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Among children and adolescents presenting to US children's hospital EDs with COVID-19, 20% were hospitalized; of these, 21% received care in the ICU. Older children and adolescents had a lower risk for hospitalization but more severe illness when hospitalized. There were differences in disease severity by race and ethnicity and the presence of selected comorbidities. These factors should be taken into consideration when prioritizing mitigation and vaccination strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA