Understanding depression as a workplace issue: Clarifying employers' attitudes to manage employees with depression.

BACKGROUND: Sickness absence due to depression has indirect and direct costs for employers. Whilst employers play a key role in establishing supportive work environments and providing work adjustments, there is a lack of knowledge on employers' attitudes to support employees with depression. OBJECTIVE: To investigate employers' attitudes to manage employees' depression, focusing on the employers' opportunities and challenges to support employees with depression. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with five employers. Interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories emerged from the interviews: Attitude to and understanding of depression affect supportive practices; Dilemma between supporting employees with depression and accommodating workplace needs; The employer-employee relationship influences supportive practices; and Work accommodations target the employee's ability to work. CONCLUSION: Employers may need a wider understanding of depression and the importance of the work environment influencing work disability due to depression. Studies should investigate how knowledge of work disability due to depression can be transferred to workplaces.Conflicting agendas of the vocational rehabilitation stakeholders poison opportunities to support, and initiatives may aim to promote employers' understanding of the benefits of collaborating with other stakeholders. The involvement of decision-makers to provide initiatives that support employers in managing employees with depression to promote their work participation is recommended.

Managing employees' depression from the employees', co-workers' and employers' perspectives. An integrative review.

Purpose: To synthesize evidence on factors promoting or hindering work participation (WP) of employees with depression from the employees', co-workers' and employers' perspectives, as well as an additional focus on the influence of the employee's occupation.Methods: An integrative review was conducted. Pre-defined eligibility criteria guided study selection. Articles were critically appraised using tools developed by Joanna Briggs and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were analysed and synthesised using qualitative inductive content analysis.Results: Seventeen studies were included: 12 quantitative studies, three qualitative studies and two mixed methods studies. From these, 144 findings were extracted and combined into six categories from which two syntheses were developed. One synthesis demonstrated that employees, co-workers and employers hold different perspectives on rehabilitation stakeholders' responsibilities hindering WP. The other synthesis revealed that WP is influenced by interactions between individual and occupational factors.Conclusions: Sufficient treatment from health professionals promotes WP. Employees' fear of stigmatization hinders WP. Co-workers and employers find that open communication is important, however, employers are concerned about entering employees' private sphere. When managing employees with depression, employers intervene at the individual level. There is a need for structural interventions to promote WP among employees with depression.Implications for RehabilitationThe responsibilities of rehabilitation stakeholders should be clarified to promote collaboration.Structural workplace interventions should be initiated to supplement individual level interventions.Workplace interventions may focus on more open communication and awareness towards mental illness.Interactions between the occupational factors and individual factors should be carefully considered.

Anxiety and depression in spine surgery-a systematic integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of preoperative anxiety and depression occur in approximately one-third of patients with chronic back pain undergoing surgery. In the last 2 decades, several studies have established that preoperative anxiety and depression are important outcome predictors of greater pain and physical impairments, and lower health-related quality of life in patients undergoing spine surgery. To accommodate symptoms of anxiety and depression and thereby better surgical outcomes, we need to identify factors associated with these symptoms. PURPOSE: We aimed to identify factors associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults both before and after undergoing spinal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: An integrative literature review was carried out. METHODS: The independent charity Helsefonden supported this literature review by contributing $45,000 to remunerate a dedicated investigator. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. A three-step selection and assessment process was conducted; titles and abstracts of 1,124 articles were skimmed for relevance and of these, 53 articles were found to be of relevance and were read in full. Articles not meeting the inclusion criteria (n=26) were excluded. The 31 articles were critically appraised for methodological validity; 14 of these were synthesized and analyzed using a convergent qualitative design to transform both qualitative and quantitative articles into qualitative findings. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included, reporting results based on 4,833 participants, 3,017 men and 1,816 women, whose mean age was approximately 49 years. From these results, we extracted 75 individual findings, which we then divided into five categories of factors associated with anxiety and depression both before and after undergoing spine surgery: pain, information, disability, employment, and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Five categories of interacting factors that influenced symptoms of anxiety and depression both before and after surgery were identified: pain, lack of information, disability, return to work, and mental health. Information appears to have a regulating effect on anxiety and depression.