Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 129(3): 717-725.e5, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285278

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main aim of specific immunotherapy is sustained effect due to changes in the immune system that can be demonstrated only in long-term trials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate sustained efficacy and disease modification in a 5-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, including 2 years of blinded follow-up after completion of a 3-year period of treatment, with the SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet, Grazax (Phleum pratense 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU,(∗) ALK, Denmark) or placebo. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, phase III trial included adults with a history of moderate-to-severe grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma, inadequately controlled by symptomatic medications. Two hundred thirty-eight participants completed the trial. End points included rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication scores, combined scores, asthma symptom and medication scores, quality of life, days with severe symptoms, immunologic end points, and safety parameters. RESULTS: The mean rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score was reduced by 25% to 36% (P ≤ .004) in the grass allergy immunotherapy tablet group compared with the placebo group over the 5 grass pollen seasons covered by the trial. The rhinoconjunctivitis DMS was reduced by 20% to 45% (P ≤ .022 for seasons 1-4; P = .114 for season 5), and the weighted rhinoconjunctivitis combined score was reduced by 27% to 41% (P ≤ .003) in favor of active treatment. The percentage of days with severe symptoms during the peak grass pollen exposure was in all seasons lower in the active group than in the placebo group, with relative differences of 49% to 63% (P ≤ .0001). Efficacy was supported by long-lasting significant effects on the allergen-specific antibody response. No safety issues were identified. CONCLUSION: The results confirm disease modification by SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet in addition to effective symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Administração Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Poaceae , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 123(1): 167-173.e7, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19130937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy with the SQ-standardized grass tablet Grazax is efficacious and well-tolerated in adult patients with rhinoconjunctivitis. Allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis are closely linked, and a strategy combining treatment of the upper and lower airways is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of treatment with the grass tablet on grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma as well as the immunologic response and the safety profile in children. METHODS: A total of 253 children age 5 to 16 years, with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma, were randomized 1:1 to active treatment or placebo. Treatment was initiated 8 to 23 weeks before the start of the grass pollen season 2007 and continued throughout the entire season. Symptomatic medication was provided as relief medication to both groups in a stepwise fashion. Primary endpoints were rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication scores. RESULTS: The rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication scores and the asthma symptom score were all statistically significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. The differences in medians relative to placebo were 24%, 34%, and 64% in favor of active treatment. The immunologic response was similar to that observed in adults. The most common adverse reaction was oral pruritus, reported by 40 subjects (32%) in the active and 3 (2%) in the placebo group. Six subjects withdrew because of adverse events. No serious adverse events were assessed as treatment-related. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy with the grass tablet reduced grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma symptoms in a pediatric population and introduced an immunomodulatory response, consistent with treatment of the underlying allergic disease. The treatment was well tolerated.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Asma/terapia , Conjuntivite Alérgica/terapia , Imunoterapia , Poaceae , Pólen , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Adolescente , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Asma/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Poaceae/efeitos adversos , Poaceae/imunologia , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 18(6): 516-22, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17680910

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to confirm the safety of an orodispersible grass allergen tablet 75,000 SQ-T (Grazax, ALK-Abelló A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark) in children aged 5-12 yr. The study was randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Sixty children aged 5-12 yr suffering from grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without asthma) from five centres in two countries (three in Germany and two in Spain) participated in the study. They were randomized at the ratio of 3:1 as receiving either Grazax or placebo tablet given sublingually once daily for 28 days outside the grass pollen season. A total of 810 treatment-related adverse events were reported in the Grazax group. The majority of these were local reactions in the mouth or throat and were mostly mild (71%) to moderate (27%) in severity and resolved within days. Thirty-five (78%) subjects treated with Grazax and five (33%) treated with placebo reported at least one treatment-related adverse event. Oral pruritus, throat irritation, mouth oedema and ear pruritus appeared as the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events. 62% (28 of 45) of the actively treated subjects reported oral pruritus, 36% (16 of 45) throat irritation, 31% (14 of 45) mouth oedema and 22% (10 of 45) ear pruritus. Two actively treated subjects withdrew from the study: one subject due to four adverse events (moderate eye pruritus, moderate pharyngolaryngeal pain, moderate non-cardiac chest pain and moderate dysphagia) and one subject due to a serious adverse event (asthmatic attack). The subjects recovered completely from the events. In conclusion, in the present study, Grazax was in general tolerated in a paediatric population and considered suitable for further clinical investigations in children.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Conjuntivite Alérgica/terapia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Poaceae/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Administração Sublingual , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Espanha , Comprimidos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA