Is the tobacco 'footfall' argument justified for tobacco purchases in New Zealand convenience stores?

INTRODUCTION: New Zealand's Smokefree 2025 goal aims to greatly decrease the availability of tobacco. One option is to cease the sale of tobacco from convenience stores. However, tobacco companies and retail trade associations oppose this move and have argued that customers who purchase tobacco drive footfall and spend more than non-tobacco customers. The aim of this study is to test the validity of industry claims about the importance of tobacco to convenience stores. METHODS: During November and December 2019, immediate postpurchase surveys were undertaken with customers on exit from a random sample of 100 convenience stores in two New Zealand cities. We estimated the mean number of items purchased, including tobacco and non-tobacco items, and mean expenditure on non-tobacco items. RESULTS: Of the 3399 transactions recorded, 13.8% included tobacco, of which 8.3% comprised tobacco only and 5.5% included tobacco and non-tobacco items. The mean number of transactions containing both tobacco and non-tobacco items was 1.98, and 1.87 for those containing non-tobacco items only. Customers who purchased tobacco and non-tobacco items spent on average NZ$6.99 on non-tobacco items, whereas customers who purchased non-tobacco items only, spent on average NZ$5.07. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support claims that tobacco drives one-quarter of footfall into stores or that customers who purchase tobacco spend almost twice as much as non-tobacco customers. Combined purchases of tobacco and non-tobacco items constituted 5.5% of transactions; the impact on a store's profitability of removing tobacco sales is unknown and could be the focus of future research.

Associations between lung and endothelial function in early middle age.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic lung disease is associated with impaired endothelial function and this may be a risk factor for poor cardiovascular health. It is unknown if there is an association between lung and endothelial function in the general population. We investigated associations between lung and endothelial function in a population-based cohort of 38-year-old men and women. METHODS: Systemic endothelial function was measured using peripheral arterial tonometry to calculate the Framingham reactive hyperaemia index. Lung function was assessed using spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, airway conductance and gas transfer. Associations between lung and endothelial function were assessed with and without adjustment for potential confounding factors using regression analyses. RESULTS: Sex modified the association between lung and endothelial function. Among women, lower values of pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry, total lung capacity and functional residual capacity (FRC) were associated with worse endothelial function (P < 0.05). These associations persisted after adjustment for smoking, asthma diagnoses, fitness and body mass index. Associations were weaker among men: only FRC, airway conductance and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratios were associated with endothelial function. Endothelial function was not associated with gas transfer in either sex. CONCLUSION: Lower lung volumes and airflow obstruction are associated with endothelial dysfunction among women. There is weaker evidence for an association between airway and endothelial function in men. These findings may partly explain the increased risk of cardiovascular disease among people with poor lung function, but suggest that there are sex differences in this association.

New Zealand adolescents' responses to plain packaging and new pictorial warning labels: Repeat cross-sectional survey analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to examine the impact on adolescents of New Zealand's 2018 legislation introducing plain (standardised) packaging and enhanced pictorial warning labels (PWLs). METHODS: Data came from Year 10 (14-15 years old) students in the 2016 (2,884 participants) and 2018 (2,689 participants) Youth Insights Surveys conducted 2 years before and immediately after legislation implementation. We used binary and ordinal logistic regression to investigate changes in brand awareness and preference, brand and pack appeal, and PWL salience and impact. RESULTS: The proportion of all participants, and ever, ex/experimental and current smokers who could name one or five tobacco product brands decreased in 2018. There was a modest and nonstatistically significant decrease in the proportion of current smokers citing brand name and image, and a larger decrease in the proportion stating perceived harm to health, influenced preferred brand choice. Having a preferred brand among current smokers and pack appeal, and PWL salience and impact among ex/experimental and current smokers were largely unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: We found preliminary evidence that plain packaging and enhanced PWLs reduced tobacco brand awareness and salience, and misperceptions about tobacco brand harmfulness. Data collection occurred shortly after implementation. Additional studies are required to assess longer term impacts of these interventions. PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: The findings complement existing evidence documenting the impact of plain packaging and PWLs on adolescents. Given limitations due to the proximity of the 2018 survey to legislation implementation, further studies with longer follow-up are required.