Validation of Inertial-Measurement-Unit-Based Ex Vivo Knee Kinematics during a Loaded Squat before and after Reference-Frame-Orientation Optimisation.

Recently, inertial measurement units have been gaining popularity as a potential alternative to optical motion capture systems in the analysis of joint kinematics. In a previous study, the accuracy of knee joint angles calculated from inertial data and an extended Kalman filter and smoother algorithm was tested using ground truth data originating from a joint simulator guided by fluoroscopy-based signals. Although high levels of accuracy were achieved, the experimental setup leveraged multiple iterations of the same movement pattern and an absence of soft tissue artefacts. Here, the algorithm is tested against an optical marker-based system in a more challenging setting, with single iterations of a loaded squat cycle simulated on seven cadaveric specimens on a force-controlled knee rig. Prior to the optimisation of local coordinate systems using the REference FRame Alignment MEthod (REFRAME) to account for the effect of differences in local reference frame orientation, root-mean-square errors between the kinematic signals of the inertial and optical systems were as high as 3.8° ± 3.5° for flexion/extension, 20.4° ± 10.0° for abduction/adduction and 8.6° ± 5.7° for external/internal rotation. After REFRAME implementation, however, average root-mean-square errors decreased to 0.9° ± 0.4° and to 1.5° ± 0.7° for abduction/adduction and for external/internal rotation, respectively, with a slight increase to 4.2° ± 3.6° for flexion/extension. While these results demonstrate promising potential in the approach's ability to estimate knee joint angles during a single loaded squat cycle, they highlight the limiting effects that a reduced number of iterations and the lack of a reliable consistent reference pose inflicts on the sensor fusion algorithm's performance. They similarly stress the importance of adapting underlying assumptions and correctly tuning filter parameters to ensure satisfactory performance. More importantly, our findings emphasise the notable impact that properly aligning reference-frame orientations before comparing joint kinematics can have on results and the conclusions derived from them.

Strain evaluation of axially loaded collateral ligaments: a comparison of digital image correlation and strain gauges.

The response of soft tissue to loading can be obtained by strain assessment. Typically, strain can be measured using electrical resistance with strain gauges (SG), or optical sensors based on the digital image correlation (DIC), among others. These sensor systems are already established in other areas of technology. However, sensors have a limited range of applications in medical technology due to various challenges in handling human soft materials. The aim of this study was to compare directly attached foil-type SG and 3D-DIC to determine the strain of axially loaded human ligament structures. Therefore, the medial (MCL) and lateral (LCL) collateral ligaments of 18 human knee joints underwent cyclic displacement-controlled loading at a rate of 20 mm/min in two test trials. In the first trial, strain was recorded with the 3D-DIC system and the reference strain of the testing machine. In the second trial, strain was additionally measured with a directly attached SG. The results of the strain measurement with the 3D-DIC system did not differ significantly from the reference strain in the first trial. The strains assessed in the second trial between reference and SG, as well as between reference and 3D-DIC showed significant differences. This suggests that using an optical system based on the DIC with a given unrestricted view is an effective method to measure the superficial strain of human ligaments. In contrast, directly attached SGs provide only qualitative comparable results. Therefore, their scope on human ligaments is limited to the evaluation of changes under different conditions.

Effect of shape and size of supraspinatus tears on rotator cuff strain distribution: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the size and shape of a supraspinatus tear on the strain of the intact rotator cuff and the kinematics of the shoulder is still unknown. This, however, can be relevant when deciding whether surgical reconstruction is required to prevent an increase in a tendon defect. In this study, the effect of tear width and shape on rotator cuff strain and glenohumeral kinematics was evaluated during active abduction. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with intact rotator cuffs were used in this study. We created 50% and 100% wide (full-thickness) crescent-shaped (CS) tears (n = 6) and reverse L-shaped (rLS) tears (n = 6) in the supraspinatus tendon and measured strain and kinematics during active humeral elevation until 30°. RESULTS: Both tear shapes and sizes led to an increase in internal rotation, supraspinatus loading force, and superior translation of the humerus. For the 100% wide tear size, anterior translation was observed in the CS tear group, whereas in the rLS tear group, this translation occurred mainly in the posterior direction. Strain was higher in the infraspinatus during the first 25° of abduction in comparison with the supraspinatus tendon in both tear shape groups. An analysis of the anterior and posterior tear borders showed a higher strain concentration on the same side of the tear in the CS tear group with 50% and 100% wide tears. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of different tear shapes on translation in the anterior-posterior direction was evident as both CS and rLS tears led to an oppositely directed translation of the humeral head. The strain analysis showed a stress-shielding effect of the infraspinatus at the beginning of abduction. Therefore, special attention must be paid to correctly identify the tear extension and adequately reconstruct the rotator cuff footprint. Moreover, the constant location of maximum strain in the CS tear group may lead to an earlier progression than in the rLS tear group.

Impact of femoro-tibial size combinations and TKA design on kinematics.

INTRODUCTION: The variability in patients' femoral and tibial anatomy requires to use different tibia component sizes with the same femoral component size. These size combinations are allowed by manufacturers, but the clinical impact remains unclear. Therefore, the goals of our study were to investigate whether combining different sizes has an impact on the kinematics for two well-established knee systems and to compare these systems' kinematics to the native kinematics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six fresh frozen knee specimens were tested in a force controlled knee rig before and after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR) and a posterior-stabilized (PS) implant. Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded using a ultrasonic-based motion analysis system while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. In each knee, the original best fit inlay was then replaced by different inlays simulating a smaller or bigger tibia component. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the original inlay kinematics using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: For all size combinations, the difference to the original kinematics reached an average of 1.3 ± 3.3 mm in translation and - 0.1 ± 1.2° in rotation with the CR implant. With the PS implant, the average differences reached 0.4 ± 2.7 mm and  - 0.2 ± 0.8°. Among all knees, no size combination consistently resulted in significantly different kinematics. Each knee showed a singular kinematic pattern. For both knee systems, the rotation was smaller than in the native knee, but the direction of the rotation was preserved. The PS showed more rollback and the CR less rollback than the native knee. CONCLUSION: TKA systems designed with a constant tibio-femoral congruency among size combinations should enable to combine different sizes without having substantial impact on the kinematics. The rotational pattern was preserved by both TKA systems, while the rollback could only be maintained by the PS design.

[Realistic preclinical finite element simulation in knee and hip replacements]. / Realitätsnahe Finite-Elemente-Simulation in der präklinischen Testung von Knie- und Hüftimplantaten.

BACKGROUND: In the process of developing an implant, computer simulation involving finite element (FE) methods allows the early identification of design-related issues, thus reducing the development process to a minimum. In addition, the FE simulation is used for selecting testing combinations in order to provide the relevant authority with proof of a "worst-case" construct scenario for the subsequent experimental fatigue test. RESULTS: Research studies with FE simulations show that implant positioning may affect mechanical loads under certain circumstances and, therefore, influence the preclinical evaluation of the prostheses. DISCUSSION: Although the FE simulation currently contributes significantly to preclinical testing, a standardization of the calculation models allowing comparability of results is lacking. Furthermore, the development of new dynamic and realistic models is necessary in order to identify complex damage modes that currently cannot be reproduced experimentally. When considering everyday clinical life in particular, models that can reproduce intraoperative kinematic changes and the resulting incorrect loads of the implant, as well as address these problems by changing the position or design of the prosthesis, are necessary and would help in future.

Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX. METHODS: 24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) "extended" unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) "extended" bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated. RESULTS: Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the "standard" bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.

[Scientific methods for in-vitro investigations in the field of joint kinematics : Cluster experimental joint kinematics]. / Wissenschaftliche Methoden bei In-vitro-Untersuchungen im Bereich der Gelenkkinematik : Cluster Experimentelle Gelenkkinematik.

In vitro studies are an established method to determine joint kinematics for answering preclinical questions regarding the effects of new treatment options, surgical techniques or implant designs. The lack of standardized, interdisciplinary representation in the determination of joint kinematics poses a problem. In addition to representation forms such as the "neutral-zero method" or the description of movements within the three basic planes, there are other mathematical joint-specific representations of individual working groups. The International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) has already made recommendations for standardization, but most of these cannot be implemented in biomechanical in-vitro studies. The cluster has therefore set itself the goal of standardizing in-vitro test methods in order to achieve better comparability of scientific results from different working groups.

Uncemented hip revision cup as an alternative for T-type acetabular fractures: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The current rise in elderly patients with compromised bone quality complicates the surgical treatment of acetabular T-type fractures (AO type 62B2 fractures). There is on ongoing discussion about the treatment options, mostly consisting of an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with or without primary or secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Yet, these patients are oftentimes unable to fulfil weight-bearing restrictions and mostly present with an unavailability of a stable anchor site. Consequently, this study investigates the feasibility of a cementless hip revision cup for acetabular T-type fractures and compares its biomechanical properties to ORIF. HYPOTHESIS: The cementless hip revision cup provides sufficient biomechanical stability under the simulation of full weight-bearing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study compared two groups of human cadaveric hip bones with T-type fractures, of whom 6 subjects were treated with ORIF (6 male; mean age: 62±17years; mean body weight: 75±15) versus 6 subjects treated with a cementless hip revision cup (2 male; 69±12 years; 73±15kg). The group-assignment was controlled for comparable BMD results (mean BMD: ORIF 110±37 mg Ca-Ha/mL versus hip revision cup 134±32 mg Ca-Ha/mL). To compare for biomechanical stability cyclic loading was applied measuring the force and dislocation of the fracture gap at standardized bone loci using an all-electric testing machine and a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. RESULTS: Comparing superior pubic ramus versus iliac wing (cementless hip revision cup versus ORIF [mean±standard deviation]: 5.8±2.0 versus 7.0±3.2; p=0.032) as well as sacral ala versus iliac wing (4.6±2.2 versus 6.4±3.7; p=0.002), the cementless revision cup achieved a significantly higher stability than the plate osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Revision cup and ORIF withstood biomechanical loading forces exceeding full weight-bearing in this biomechanical study. The results of our study suggest that the cementless hip revision cup might be promising alternative to the current standard care of ORIF with or without primary THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case control experimental study.

Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study.

PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what extent augmentation can increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws to improve the constructs stability. METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric anterior pelvic rings were separated at the symphyseal joint for bilateral testing, consequently achieving comparable sites. First, one non-augmented screw was drilled into the superior pubic ramus, whereas the contralateral side was primarily augmented. The screws were then withdrawn with a constant speed of 10 mm/min and the fixation strengths determined by the force (N) displacement (mm) curve. Finally, the primary non-augmented site was secondary augmented, representing revision surgery after initial implant failure, and the corresponding fixation strength was measured again. RESULTS: Augmentation compared to non-augmented screws displayed significantly higher pull-out forces with an increase in pull-out force by 377% for primary and 353% for secondary augmentation (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force comparing primary and secondary augmentation (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary augmentation significantly increases the stability of symphyseal screws and, therefore, potentially decreases rates of implant failure.

Does Posterior Tibial Slope Influence Knee Kinematics in Medial Stabilized TKA?

BACKGROUND: During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), one of the key alignment factors to pay attention to is the posterior tibial slope (PTS). The PTS clearly influences the kinematics of the knee joint but must be adapted to the coupling degree of the specific TKA design. So far, there is hardly any literature including clear recommendations for how surgeons should choose the PTS in a medial stabilized (MS) TKA. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of different degrees of PTS on femorotibial kinematics in MS TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An MS TKA was performed in seven fresh-frozen human specimens successively with 0°, 3°, and 6° of PTS. After each modification, weight-bearing deep knee flexion (30-130°) was performed, and femorotibial kinematics were analyzed. RESULTS: A lateral femoral rollback was observed for all three PTS modifications. With an increasing PTS, the tibia was shifted more anteriorly on the lateral side (0° PTS anterior tibial translation -9.09 (±9.19) mm, 3° PTS anterior tibial translation -11.03 (±6.72) mm, 6° PTS anterior tibial translation 11.86 (±9.35) mm). No difference in the tibial rotation was found for the different PTS variants. All PTS variants resulted in internal rotation of the tibia during flexion. With a 3° PTS, the design-specific medial rotation point was achieved more accurately. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, we recommend a PTS of 3° when implanting the MS prosthesis used in this study.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing.

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data-cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°-130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS' principle function.

Optimisation of the drill-in behaviour of the EcoFit® SC threaded cup.

Threaded cups show good clinical results when implanted correctly. In clinical use, multiple cases with an incomplete placement of the EcoFit threaded cup (implantcast) were observed. This behaviour could not be explained intra- and postoperatively. The aim of this study was to compare and optimise the drill-in-behaviour of the EcoFit cup in a biomechanical investigation. EcoFit cup sizes 46, 50 and 54 mm were compared with the SC cup (Aesculap) size 50 mm. Foam blocks (Sawbones) of density 0.16 g/ml (pcf 10), 0.32 g/ml (pcf 20) and 0.48 g/ml (pcf 30) were used. After standardised placement using a universal testing system (n = 8 per group), the primary stability, the overhang of the cups and the drill-in behaviour were measured. Overreamings of 1 and 2 mm were performed (pcf 20, n = 8) for the EcoFit cup size 50 and the primary stability as well as the overhang measurements were examined. Measurements of the cup diameter, thread depth and thread pitch were performed on three-dimensional (3D) images of the cup size 50 mm. The drill-in behaviour was different between the EcoFit and the SC cups. Even with maximum torque, the EcoFit cup could not be positioned as deep as the SC cup in standard reaming conditions (overhang of 1.1 ± 0.4 mm for the EcoFit size 50 in pcf 20 and of -0.01 ± 0.2 mm for the SC cup). The primary stability was lower for the EcoFit cup in comparison to the SC cup (128.8 ± 3.2 Nm vs. 138.6 ± 9.1 Nm, p = 0.0291). With overreaming to 51 mm, a deeper positioning of the EcoFit was possible (overlap of -0.3 ± 0.1, comparable to the SC cup). The overreaming of the cavity also led to a significantly higher primary stability of 143.4 ± 3.7 Nm (p < 0.001) comparable to the unaltered condition (128.8 ± 3.2 Nm). Overreaming to 52 mm had no further advantage in terms of primary stability or overhang. The geometric measurements showed significant differences as well. The previously clinically observed difficulties in inserting the cup were confirmed by this study. By overreaming to 51 mm, the drill-in behaviour, the primary stability and the measured overhang were comparable to the reference cup. The obtained results suggest that the extension of the acetabulum cavity to 51 mm while using the implantcast EcoFit size 50 should be implemented in clinical applications.

Influence of different anteversion alignments of a cementless hip stem on primary stability and strain distribution.

BACKGROUND: Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty is well known to have a high impact on dislocation, but empirical data regarding the clinical and biomechanical influence is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of different anteversion alignments on the primary stability and strain distribution of a cementless stem. METHODS: The cementless CLS Spotorno stem was implanted in 3 different groups (each group n = 6, total n = 21) with different anteversion alignments: reference anteversion (8°), +15° torsion in anteversion (+23°), -15° torsion in retroversion (-7°) using composite femurs (Sawbones). Primary stability was determined by 3-dimensional micromotions using a dynamic loading procedure simulating walking on level ground. Additionally, surface strains were registered before and after stem insertion in the 3 different groups, using one composite femur for each group (total n = 3). FINDINGS: The micromotion measurements did not show a significant difference between the 3 evaluated alignments. Moreover, determination of the strain distribution did also not reveal an obvious difference. INTERPRETATION: This biomechanical study simulating walking on level ground indicates that there is no considerable influence of stem ante-/retroversion variation (±15°) on the initial stability and strain distribution when evaluating the cementless CLS Spotorno in composite femora.

Biomechanical comparison of minimally invasive treatment options for Type C unstable fractures of the pelvic ring.

BACKGROUND: The definite treatment of pelvic C fractures presents a widely discussed issue and undergoes continuous evolution. While the stabilization of the posterior ring has been studied extensively, the fixation of the anterior pelvic ring continuous to be rarely investigated. The importance of the simultaneous stabilization however lays in the earlier mobilization and prevention of long-term damage to the pelvis. Therefore we investigated four combinations of minimally invasive fixation techniques for unstable type C1-3 pelvic injuries and aimed to answer the following research questions: (1) what combination of fixation methods yields the highest stiffness and the least displacement? (2) Is the combination of a single sacroiliac screw (SI-screw) with a transiliac internal fixator (TIFI) a reasonable alternative to two SI-screws? (3) Is a modified unilateral anterior fixation comparable to a retrograde transpubic screw? HYPOTHESIS: Minimally invasive fixation techniques provide sufficient biomechanical stability for type C pelvic fractures. METHODS: Thirty synthetic full pelvises were divided into 5 groups, of which 4 groups were assigned a different osteosynthesis method and one was an intact pelvis used as reference (group 1: internal fixator+2 sacroiliac screws, group 2: internal fixator+transiliac internal fixator+1 sacroiliac screw, group 3: retrograde transpubic screw+2 sacroiliac screws, group 4: retrograde transpubic screw+transiliac internal fixator+1 sacroiliac screw). The pelvises underwent a protocol of cyclic loading between 100N and 200N, during which they were subjected to compression loads while the position of the fracture fragments was measured every 30 milliseconds. Displacement and stiffness were calculated for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The minimally invasive fixation methods investigated in this study all provide sufficient biomechanical stability without one method being superior to the others (p [anterior displacement]=0.61 and p [posterior displacement]=0.88). Group 3 was allowed the least displacement (1.8±0.2mm for anterior and posterior fracture) for the treatment of a C1.3 fracture. The other fixation methods displayed the following dislocations (mm) of the anterior pelvic ring: group 1: 1.9±0.3, group 2: 2.1±0.4, group 4: 2.0±0.5. Posteriorly, the displacements (mm) were the following: group 1: 1.8±0.6, group 2: 1.9±0.2, group 4: 2.0±0.5. DISCUSSION: The minimally invasive fixation methods investigated in this study all provide sufficient biomechanical stability without one method being superior to the others since differences were not significant regarding anterior and posterior displacements. Even if not significantly, we could reveal that out of all the methods tested the combination of 2 SI-screws with a retrograde transpubic screw (group 3) displayed the least displacement and highest stiffness. These techniques could therefore potentially improve patient's clinical outcome by reducing the surgical invasiveness and procedure time while providing sufficient biomechanical stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative in vitro study.

Biodegradable spacer reduces the subacromial pressure: A biomechanical cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Failure after rotator cuff repair remains a major clinical problem and could be related to excessive pressures from the acromion. Previous studies with irreparable tears showed good clinical results of tendon healing with arthroscopic insertion of a protective biodegradable spacer balloon between the repaired tendon and the acromion. One hypothesis is that compression pressures on the repaired tendon will be reduced by the spacer. This cadaver study aimed to investigate the effects of this subacromial spacer on compression pressures over a repaired supraspinatus tendon in passive motion. METHODS: Rotator cuff tear and repair were performed in six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders, followed by insertion of a biodegradable subacromial spacer. Specimens were tested using a passive shoulder simulator for abduction-adduction, flexion-extension and internal-external rotations. A sensor positioned below the acromion was used to measure compression pressure changes through passive range of motion before and after placement of a subacromial spacer. Peak pressures were measured in adduction-abduction motion, near 90° abduction. FINDINGS: Both the mean and peak pressures in abduction-adduction were significantly reduced after insertion of the subacromial spacer (from mean 121.7 (SD 9.5) MPa to 51.5 (SD 1.2) MPa and from peak 1749.6 (SD 80.7) MPa to 535.1 (SD 27.6) MPa) (P<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: The reduced peak pressures and wider load distributions over the sensor during both passive abduction-adduction and flexion-extension motions suggest that the use of the spacer will lead to reduced wear of the repair in patients, and potentially prevent rotator cuff re-tear after surgical repair.