Romosozumab in patients who experienced an on-study fracture: post hoc analyses of the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials.

Post hoc analysis of FRAME and ARCH revealed that on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 were less common in women initially treated with romosozumab versus placebo or alendronate. Recurrent fracture risk was also lower in romosozumab­treated patients, and there were no fracture­related complications. Results support continuing romosozumab treatment post­fracture. PURPOSE: Post hoc analysis evaluating efficacy and safety of romosozumab, administered in the immediate post­fracture period, in the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials. METHODS: In FRAME (NCT01575834) and ARCH (NCT01631214), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to romosozumab 210 mg monthly or comparator (FRAME, placebo; ARCH, alendronate 70 mg weekly) for 12 months, followed by antiresorptive therapy (FRAME, denosumab; ARCH, alendronate). In patients who experienced on-study nonvertebral or new/worsening vertebral fracture by Month 12, we report the following: fracture and treatment­emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence through 36 months, bone mineral density changes (BMD), and romosozumab timing. Due to the sample sizes employed, meaningful statistical comparisons between treatments were not possible. RESULTS: Incidence of on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 was numerically lower in romosozumab- versus comparator-treated patients (FRAME, 1.6% and 0.5% versus 2.1% and 1.6%; ARCH, 3.4% and 3.3% versus 4.6% and 4.9%, respectively). In those who experienced on-study nonvertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent nonvertebral and subsequent vertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower in patients initially treated with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 3.6% [2/56] and 1.8% [1/56] versus 9.2% [7/76] and 3.9% [3/76]; ARCH, 10.0% [7/70] and 5.7% [4/70] versus 12.6% [12/95] and 8.4% [8/95], respectively). Among those with on-study vertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent vertebral and subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 0.0% [0/17] and 0.0% [0/17] versus 11.9% [7/59] and 8.5% [5/59]; ARCH, 9.0% [6/67] and 7.5% [5/67] versus 15.0% [15/100] and 16.0% [16/100], respectively). In patients with fracture by Month 12, no fracture­related complications were reported in romosozumab-treated patients. BMD gains were numerically greater with romosozumab than comparators. CONCLUSION: Data suggest support for the efficacy and safety of continuing romosozumab treatment following fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: NCT01575834; NCT01631214.

Is a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis applicable in clinical practice? Consensus among a panel of European experts.

A panel of European experts was convened to establish consensus on a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis. Panellists agreed that the ultimate goals of treating osteoporosis are recovering pre-fracture functional level and reducing subsequent fracture risk; there was consensus that total hip bone mineral density is currently the most appropriate treatment target in clinical practice. INTRODUCTION: A modified Delphi approach was convened to establish consensus among European experts on best practice management for patients with fragility fractures and whether a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy is applicable in osteoporosis. METHODS: A panel of 12 clinical experts (from eight European countries) voted on 13 final statements relating to a T2T strategy for osteoporosis across three rounds of blinded, remotely conducted electronic surveys (Likert scale: 'strongly disagree', 'disagree', 'unable to answer', 'agree', 'strongly agree'). When panellists disagreed, they were asked how the statement could be adjusted to allow for a positive response, which was used to refine the statement for the following round. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement with a statement. Panellists were selected by UCB Pharma, which provided financial and logistical support. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 13/13 statements. Panellists agreed that the most important goals for fragility fracture patients are recovery of pre-fracture functional level and reduction of subsequent fracture risk. There was also consensus that a T2T strategy is applicable to osteoporosis and that bone mineral density (BMD) is currently the most clinically appropriate target. With regard to the definition of a specific BMD treatment target and timeframes applicable to T2T in osteoporosis, no clear consensus was reached; panellists emphasised that these would need to be individually determined. CONCLUSIONS: According to a panel of European experts, the main goals of fracture management are to recover pre-fracture functional level and reduce fracture risk. Total hip BMD seems to be the most clinically appropriate treatment target within a T2T strategy.

Endogenous interleukin-10 regulates Th1 responses that induce crescentic glomerulonephritis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-10 plays a pivotal role in regulating the Th1/Th2 predominance of immune responses. Exogenously administered IL-10 suppresses nephritogenic Th1 responses, inhibits macrophage function, and attenuates crescentic glomerulonephritis (GN). To determine the role of endogenous IL-10, the development of the nephritogenic immune response and crescentic GN was compared in IL-10-deficient (IL-10-/-) and normal (IL-10+/+) C57BL/6 mice. METHODS: GN was initiated in sensitized mice by the intravenous administration of sheep antimouse glomerular basement membrane globulin. Renal injury was evaluated 21 days later. RESULTS: Following the administration of anti-glomerular basement membrane globulin, normal (IL-10+/+) C57BL/6 mice developed proliferative GN with occasional crescents, glomerular CD4+ T-cell and macrophage accumulation, and fibrin deposition. Using an identical induction protocol, IL-10-/-mice developed more severe GN. Crescent formation (IL-10-/-, 23 +/- 2% of glomeruli; IL-10+/+, 5 +/- 2%), glomerular CD4+ T cells [IL-10-/-, 1. 0 +/- 0.2 cells per glomerular cross-section (c/gcs); IL-10 +/+, 0.3 +/- 0.05 c/gcs], glomerular macrophages (IL-10-/-, 4.8 +/- 0.3 c/gcs; IL-10 +/+, 1.7 +/- 0.2 c/gcs), fibrin deposition [fibrin score (range 0 to 3+); IL-10-/-, 1.10 +/- 0.04; IL-10+/+, 0.6 +/- 0. 07], and serum creatinine (IL-10-/-, 30 +/- 2 micromol/L; IL-10 +/+, 23 +/- 1 micromol/L) were all significantly increased in IL-10-/- mice (P < 0.05). Circulating antibody (IL-10-/-, 1.05 +/- 0.16 OD units; IL-10+/+, 0.63 +/- 0.08 OD units) and cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity (skin swelling; IL-10-/-, 0.21 +/- 0.03 mm; IL-10+/+, 0.12 +/- 0.02 mm) to the nephritogenic antigen (sheep globulin) were also increased (both P < 0.05). Interferon-gamma production by cultured splenocytes was increased (IL-10-/- 7.9 +/- 2. 5 ng/4 x 106 cells, IL-10+/+ 0.28 +/- 0.09 ng/4 x 106 cells, P < 0. 05), but IL-4 production was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Endogenous IL-10 counter-regulates nephritogenic Th1 responses and attenuates crescentic GN.