Identification of four genes responsible for antimicrobial resistance of MEL-B against S. aureus.

There is increasing interest in the antimicrobial activity of mannosylerythritol lipids-B (MEL-B) against Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). However, the specific molecules involved in MEL-B's antimicrobial action against S. aureus have not been identified. This study utilized the Nebraska transposon mutant library (NTML), which contains 1920 mutants, each lacking three-quarters of the genes found in S. aureus. The NTML was screened to identify mutants resistant to MEL-B. Four mutants (Accession Number: SAUSA300_0904, SAUSA300_0752, SAUSA300_0387, and SAUSA300_2311) largely unaffected by incubation with MEL-B, indicating MEL-B resistance. Despite the strong binding of MEL-B to these mutants, the four molecules encoded by the deleted genes (yjbI, clpP, pbuX, or brpS) in each mutant were not directly recognized by MEL-B. Given that these molecules are not localized on the outer surface of S. aureus and that the antibacterial activity of MEL-B against S. aureus is facilitated by the effective transfer of two antibacterial fatty acids (caprylic acid and myristoleic acid) to S. aureus via ME, the deletion of each of the four molecules may alter the peptidoglycan structure, potentially inhibiting the effective transfer of these antimicrobial fatty acids into S. aureus.

Identification of Genes Associated with Resistance to Persulcatusin, a Tick Defensin from Ixodes persulcatus.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are present in a wide range of plants, animals, and microorganisms. Since AMPs are characterized by their effectiveness against emergent antibiotic-resistant bacteria, they are attracting attention as next-generation antimicrobial compounds that could solve the problem of drug-resistant bacteria. Persulcatusin (IP), an antibacterial peptide derived from the hard tick Ixodes persulcatus, shows high antibacterial activity against various Gram- positive bacteria as well as multidrug-resistant bacteria. However, reports on the antibacterial action and resistance mechanisms of IP are scarce. In this study, we spontaneously generated mutants showing increased a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of IP and analyzed their cross-resistance to other AMPs and antibiotics. We also used fluorescent probes to investigate the target of IP activity by evaluating IP-induced damage to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Our findings suggest that the antimicrobial activity of IP on bacterial cytoplasmic membranes occurs via a mechanism of action different from that of known AMPs. Furthermore, we screened for mutants with high susceptibility to IP using a transposon mutant library and identified 16 genes involved in IP resistance. Our results indicate that IP, like other AMPs, depolarizes the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, but it may also alter membrane structure and inhibit cell-wall synthesis.