Complications of Mesh Sacrocolpopexy and Rectopexy: Imaging Review.

Sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy are commonly used surgical options for treatment of patients with pelvic organ and rectal prolapse, respectively. These procedures involve surgical fixation of the vaginal vault or the rectum to the sacral promontory with mesh material and can be performed independently of each other or in a combined fashion and by using an open abdominal approach or laparoscopy with or without robotic assistance. Radiologists can be particularly helpful in cases where patients' surgical histories are unclear by identifying normal sacrocolpopexy or rectopexy mesh material and any associated complications. Acute complications such as bleeding or urinary tract injury or stricture are generally evaluated with CT. More chronic complications such as mesh extrusion or exposure with or without fistulization to surrounding structures are generally evaluated with MRI. Other complications can have a variable time of onset after surgery. Patients with suspected bowel obstruction are generally evaluated with CT. Those with suspected infection, abscess formation, and discitis or osteomyelitis may be evaluated with MRI, although CT evaluation may be appropriate in certain scenarios. The authors review the sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy surgical techniques, discuss appropriate imaging protocols for evaluation of patients with suspected complications, and illustrate the normal appearance and common complications of these procedures. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

[The rôle of MRI in exploration anorectal pathologies]. / Place de l'IRM pour explorer les pathologies anorectales.

PLACE DE L'IRM POUR EXPLORER LES PATHOLOGIES ANORECTALES. L'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) est l'un des examens d'imagerie les plus utiles à l'exploration des pathologies ano rectales. Elle est complémentaire de l'examen clinique et de l'endo scopie. Elle permet de fournir des données indispensables à une prise en charge optimale du patient par le proctologue, le chirurgien ou l'oncologue en fonction de la nature de l'atteinte anale ou rectale. Il est nécessaire de respecter les différentes indications de cet examen, qui ont été bien définies pour chaque pathologie par les différentes sociétés savantes. Le protocole de l'IRM varie en fonction de la zone explorée et de la pathologie suspectée. C'est pourquoi il est indispensable de fournir au radiologue les informations nécessaires telles que la suspicion diagnostique, les données cliniques, ainsi que les résultats des examens complémentaires déjà réalisés. Les indications les plus fréquentes de l'IRM en proctologie sont les tumeurs anales et rectales. L'IRM permet le bilan initial de l'extension locorégionale de la tumeur ainsi que le suivi oncologique précoce et tardif grâce à l'étude comparative des examens de surveillance par rapport au bilan initial. L'IRM est indispensable pour l'exploration des suppurations anopérinéales complexes, en particulier liées à la maladie de Crohn. Elle permet la réalisation du bilan lésionnel initial ainsi que le contrôle post-drainage. En cas de suspicion de maladie de Verneuil ou de sinus pilonidal infecté, l'IRM participe à l'orientation vers le diagnostic étiologique. La déféco-IRM est une variante particulière de l'IRM pelvienne et périnéale. Elle fait partie du bilan des dysfonctions du plancher pelvien, car elle permet l'étude du comportement des différents organes pelviens au cours des efforts de poussée et de défécation. Les fissures anales et les thromboses hémorroïdaires sont les causes les plus fréquentes de douleurs anales. Leur diagnostic est purement clinique. En cas d'examen proctologique normal, l'IRM sert à chercher une autre cause à ces douleurs.

THE ROLE OF MRI IN EXPLORATION ANORECTAL PATHOLOGIES. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful imaging modalities for the exploration of anorectal pathologies. It is complementary to the clinical examination and endoscopy. It provides essential elements for optimal care of the patient by the proctologist, the surgeon or the oncologist depending on the nature of the anal or rectal condition. It is necessary to respect the different indications of this exam which have been well defined for each pathology by the different scientific societies. The MRI protocol varies depending on the site to be investigated and the pathology suspected. Therefore, it is essential to provide the radiologist with the necessary information such as the diagnostic suspicion, clinical findings, and the results of previous paraclinical examinations. MRI ensures the initial assessment of the locoregional extension of the tumor as well as the early and late oncological follow-up thanks to the comparative study of the surveillance examinations with the initial exam. MRI is essential for the assessment of complex anoperineal suppurations, in particular those related to Crohn's disease. It is necessary for the initial lesional assessment and for the post-drainage control. In case of suspicion of Verneuil's (hidradenitis suppurativa) disease or infected pilonidal sinus, MRI helps to orientate towards the right etiological diagnosis. MR defecating proctography is a particular variant of pelvic and perineal MRI. It is performed as part of the assessment of pelvic floor dysfunctions because it allows the study of the dynamics of the different pelvic organs during straining and defecation. Anal fissures and hemorrhoidal thrombosis are the most frequent etiologies of anal pain. Their diagnosis is purely clinical. If the proctological examination is normal, MRI is used to search for other causes of anal pain.

Impact of Repeated Clot Retrieval Attempts on Infarct Growth and Outcome After Ischemic Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the association between increasing number of clot retrieval attempts (CRA) and unfavorable outcome is due to an increase in emboli to new territory (ENT) and greater infarct growth (IG) in successfully recanalized patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). METHODS: Data were extracted from 2 pooled multicentric prospective registries of consecutive patients with anterior AIS-LVO treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between January 2016 and 2019. Patients with pretreatment and 24-hour posttreatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) achieving successful recanalization, defined as expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale score of 2B, 2C, or 3, were included. ENT were assessed and IG was measured by voxel-based segmentation after DWI coregistration. Associations between number of CRA, ENT, IG, and 3-month outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred nineteen patients achieving successful recanalization were included. ENT occurrence was strongly correlated with increasing CRA (ρ = 0.73, p = 10-4). In multivariable linear analysis, IG was independently associated with CRA (ß = 1.6 per retrieval attempt, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-9.74, p = 0.03) and ENT (ß = 2.7 [95% CI 1.21-4.1], p = 0.03). Unfavorable functional outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score >2) increased with each additional CRA. IG was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome (odds ratio 1.05 [95% CI 1.02-1.07] per 1-mL IG increase, p = 10-4) in binary logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing number of CRA in acute stroke is correlated with an increased ENT rate and increased IG volume, affecting functional outcome even when successful recanalization is achieved. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that, for patients with acute stroke undergoing successful recanalization, an increasing number of CRA is associated with poorer functional outcome.

Long Term Efficacy and Assessment of Tumor Response of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: A 15-Year Monocentric Experience.

BACKGROUND: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established treatment for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases. The aim was to evaluate the long-term treatment efficacy of TACE for NET liver metastases, and correlate imaging response with survival. METHODS: this IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective study evaluated all TACE procedures performed for NET liver metastases from 2003-2017 for imaging tumor response (RECIST and mRECIST), time to liver progression (TTLP), time to untreatable progression with TACE (TTUP), and overall survival (OS). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed as prognostic factors. Survival curves according to the Kaplan-Meier method were compared by Log-rank test. Tumor responses according to RECIST and mRECIST were correlated with OS. RESULTS: 555 TACE procedures were performed in 202 NET patients (38% grade 1, 60% grade 2) with primary tumors originating from pancreas, small bowel, and lung (39, 26, and 22% respectively). Median follow-up was 8.2 years (90-139 months). Median TTLP and TTUP were 19.3 months (95%CI 16.3-22.3) and 26.2 months (95%CI 22.3-33.1), respectively. Median OS was 5.3 years (95%CI 4.2-6.7), and was higher among mRECIST responders (80.5 months; 95%CI 64.6-89.8) than in non-responders (39.6 months; 95%CI = 32.8-60.2; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, age, tumor grade and liver involvement predicted worse OS, whereas administration of somatostatin analogs correlated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: TACE for NET liver metastases provides objective response and sustained local disease control rates. RECIST and mRECIST responses correlate with OS.