Is There Still a Role of Plasma Exchange in the Current Management of ANCA-Associated Vasculitides?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Plasma exchange (PLEX) is often recommended as an adjunctive therapy for patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) in the setting of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or diffuse alveolar haemorrhage. Since ANCAs are pathogenic, it seems a reasonable and justified approach to remove them through therapeutic PLEX, as despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy regimens, AAV is associated with significant morbidity and death. However, the association between ANCA levels and mortality or disease activity is uncertain. In addition, any treatment must be judged on the potential risks and benefits of its use. Here, we summarise the current data on PLEX usage in patients with AAV. RECENT FINDINGS: The largest randomised trial to date the Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (PEXIVAS) study failed to show added benefit for PLEX on the prevention of death or end-stage renal failure (ESRF) for the management of patients with severe AAV. However, there is a possibility that PLEX delays dialysis dependence and ESRF in the early stages of the disease. Regardless of whether this is only for 3 to 12 months, this could be of clinical significance and a substantial improvement in patient's quality of life. Cost utility analysis and trials including patient-centred outcomes are required to evaluate the use of PLEX. Furthermore, ascertaining those at high risk of developing ESRF could help identify those who may benefit from PLEX the most, and further insights are required in setting of diffuse alveolar haemorrhage.

Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis in At-Risk Individuals: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Early intervention has been the cornerstone of improving outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Over the past decade, the boundaries have been pushed in an attempt to achieve effective prevention strategies in those who are at high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Core risk factors including the presence of serum anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, arthralgia and subclinical inflammation on imaging are highly predictive of arthritis development. The influence of air pollution, diet and the role of microbiome on disease progression are less clear. In turn, therapeutic focus has shifted to an earlier pre-arthritis phase of the disease continuum where the clinically apparent arthritis may potentially be intercepted. Seven proof-of-concept interventional trials in at-risk individuals have been conducted so far. Whether true prevention of rheumatoid arthritis is possible remains elusive. Promising signals towards permanent disease modulation and improvement in symptom burden were seen with some immunomodulatory therapies, whilst others were unsuccessful. Long-term follow-up is required to ascertain a true effect. Looking forward, a better understanding of the natural history and underlying biological mechanisms of arthritis development and more accurate, validated risk stratification is needed.

Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

The last British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guideline on PMR was published in 2009. The guideline needs to be updated to provide a summary of the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of adults with PMR. This guideline is aimed at healthcare professionals in the UK who directly care for people with PMR, including general practitioners, rheumatologists, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, psychologists and other health professionals. It will also be relevant to people living with PMR and organisations that support them in the public and third sector, including charities and informal patient support groups. This guideline will be developed using the methods and processes outlined in the BSR Guidelines Protocol. Here we provide a brief summary of the scope of the guideline update in development.

Cognitive impairment in the immune-mediated inflammatory diseases compared with age-matched controls: Systematic review and meta-regression.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the magnitude of cognitive impairment against age-expected levels across the immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs: systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], rheumatoid arthritis [RA], axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], psoriasis [PsO]). METHODS: A pre-defined search strategy was implemented in Medline, Embase and Psychinfo on 29/05/2021. Inclusion criteria were: (i) observational studies of an IMID, (ii) healthy control comparison, (iii) measuring cognitive ability (overall, memory, complex attention/executive function, language/verbal fluency), and (iv) sufficient data for meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (SMD) in cognitive assessments between IMIDs and controls were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. IMIDs were compared using meta-regression. RESULTS: In total, 65 IMID groups were included (SLE: 39, RA: 19, axSpA: 1, PsA: 2 PsO: 4), comprising 3141 people with IMIDs and 9333 controls. People with IMIDs had impairments in overall cognition (SMD: -0.57 [95% CI -0.70, -0.43]), complex attention/executive function (SMD -0.57 [95% CI -0.69, -0.44]), memory (SMD -0.55 [95% CI -0.68, -0.43]) and language/verbal fluency (SMD -0.51 [95% CI -0.68, -0.34]). People with RA and people with SLE had similar magnitudes of cognitive impairment in relation to age-expected levels. People with neuropsychiatric SLE had larger impairment in overall cognition compared with RA. CONCLUSIONS: People with IMIDs have moderate impairments across a range of cognitive domains. People with RA and SLE have similar magnitudes of impairment against their respective age-expected levels, calling for greater recognition of cognitive impairment in both conditions. To further understand cognition in the IMIDs, more large-scale, longitudinal studies are needed.

Reduced cognitive ability in people with rheumatoid arthritis compared with age-matched healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the cognitive ability of people with RA with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: People with RA were recruited from the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR), a population-based cohort study of people with inflammatory arthritis. Data on aged-matched HCs (people with no cognitive impairment) came from the comparison arm of The Dementia Research and Care Clinic Study (TRACC). People with RA and HCs performed a range of cognitive ability tasks to assess attention, memory, verbal fluency, language, visuospatial skills, emotional recognition, executive function and theory of mind. A score of <88 on the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III was considered cognitive impairment. Scores were compared using linear regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, education, BMI, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Thirty-eight people with RA [mean (S.D.) age: 69.1 (8.0) years; 25 (65.8%) women] were matched with 28 HCs [mean (S.D.) age: 68.2 (6.4) years; 15 (53.6%) women]. Twenty-three (60.5%) people with RA were considered to have mild cognitive impairment [mean (S.D.) Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III: RA = 85.2 (7.4), HC = 96.0 (2.5)]. People with RA had impairments in memory, verbal fluency, visuospatial functioning, executive function and emotional recognition in faces compared with HCs, after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: People with RA had cognitive impairments in a range of domains. People with RA might benefit from cognitive impairment screening to allow for early administration of appropriate interventions.