Quality of life, fatigue and changes therein as predictors of return to work during breast cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge, only one study has assessed Quality of Life (QOL) as a predictor of return to work (RTW) during breast cancer treatment and one has evaluated multidimensional cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as a determinant of RTW. However, no study has assessed the impact of changes in these variables on RTW. The objective of this study was to evaluate QOL, multidimensional CRF and changes in these variables as determinants of RTW during breast cancer treatment. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study of 68 patients with a mean age of 46.97 years (SD = 6.92), who were employed at the time of diagnosis. Women were assessed at the beginning of adjuvant treatments (T0) and followed up with by telephone at three (T1) and 6 months later (T2), using questionnaires (QLQ-C30; MFI-20). RESULTS: Global QOL, OR = 1.12 [1.01-1.25], sleep disturbance, OR = 1.04 [1.002-1.08], fatigue (QLQ-C30), OR = 0.93 [0.88-0.99], nausea-vomiting, OR = 0.84 [0.73-0.97], reduced motivation, OR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11] and general fatigue, OR = 0.79 [0.63-0.99] at T0 were associated with RTW at T1. At T2 global QOL, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], cognitive functioning, OR = 1.10 [1.03-1.17], general fatigue, OR = 1.82 [1.04-3.17] and mental fatigue, OR = 0.29 [0.11-0.81] were associated with RTW. Furthermore, changes in mental fatigue were associated with RTW at T2, OR = 0.02 [0.001-0.29]. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life, fatigue and their changes in them, especially cognitive functioning and mental fatigue, can play an important role in predicting the RTW of women with breast cancer. This confirms the importance of multidisciplinary care for cancer and the emergence of a theoretical psychological model of RTW.

A Prospective Study on Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is increasingly used in invasive breast cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) can increase the rate of local complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity of SSM-IBR after neoadjuvant CT and RT. METHODS: A French prospective pilot study of women aged 18-75 years with invasive breast cancer requiring mastectomy after CT and RT. Reconstruction was performed using autologous latissimus dorsi flap with or without prosthesis. The primary endpoint was the skin necrosis rate within 6 months, while secondary endpoints included pathological complete response rate (pCR) and global morbidity. RESULTS: Among 94 patients included in this study, 83 were analyzed (mean age 45.2 ± 9.5 years, T1 23.6 %, T2 55.6 %, T3 18.1 %). All but one patient received anthracyclines and taxanes, and all patients received RT (49.3 ± 5.2 Gy) before SSM-IBR. Prostheses were used for IBR in 32 patients (mean volume 256 ± 73 mm(3)). Five patients had necrosis (≤2 cm(2), 2-10 cm(2) and >10 cm(2), in three, one, and one cases, respectively), and they all recovered without revision surgery. Among 50 patients who underwent upfront mastectomy, 36 % achieved pCR. CONCLUSIONS: SSM-IBR performed after CT and RT is safe, with an acceptable local morbidity rate. Long-term data are needed to evaluate recurrence rates.

[Positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: is axillary surgery necessary in all cases?]. / Biopsie du ganglion sentinelle positive dans le cancer du sein: place du curage axillaire de complément?

Our retrospective study analyzes various factors to evaluate the risk of invasion of the not sentinel node when the sentinel node biopsy is positive in the infiltrated breast cancers. We compared in single varied then multivaried analysis, various parameters between two groups: positive not sentinel nodes and negative not sentinel nodes among 180 cases of positive sentinel node biopsy between 2001 and 2004. At the time of the single varied analysis, seem to be risk factors of non sentinel node involvement: the histopronostic SBRIII rank, positive a HER2neu status, the presence of extracapsulal node extension and infiltration of the sentinel node by a macrometastasis. The tumoral embol, the absence of hormonal receivers, a tumoral size > 10 mm and the number of sentinel node taken appear at the limit of the significativity. In multivaried analysis, SBRIII rank and the presence of an extracapsular node extension remain related to non sentinel node involvement. The histological type, association with a CIS, the size of the sentinel nodes, the number of positive sentinel nodes and the year of surgery are nonsignificant. Additional axillairy clearing out at the time of a positive node sentinel biopsy should be discussed according to different criteria determined by a precise histological analysis.