Identification of biological factors predictive of response to imatinib mesylate in aggressive fibromatosis.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib induces responses and disease stabilisations in non-resectable patients with aggressive fibromatosis (AF). The precise target of imatinib in AF and predictive factors for response to treatment are unknown. METHODS: We investigated factors potentially predictive of response to imatinib in a series of 40 patients with progressive AF included in a phase II trial of imatinib: we tested the presence of KIT exon 10 variant (M541L), the expression of imatinib-sensitive kinases and cell cycle proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and other clinical and biological factors. RESULTS: Of 10 patients for whom DNA could be extracted, 3 had a KIT exon 10 variant (30%), with no correlation with response or progression-free survival (PFS). The expression of other imatinib targets (PDGFRA/B, macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (M-CSFR)) and of downstream components of the cell cycle, cell proliferation and proliferation pathway (cyclin D1, ERK, MEK 1-2) did not correlate with PFS. Pre-treatment lymphopenia (<1500/microl) and tumour size >120 mm correlated with shorter PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that a baseline biological characteristic of the patient is the major parameter influencing response to imatinib in aggressive fibromatosis. Tumour characteristics, including the presence of a KIT exon 10 M541L variant, may influence tumour control but this needs to be confirmed and better explained.

Neo/adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve outcome in resected primary synovial sarcoma: a study of the French Sarcoma Group.

BACKGROUND: There are only scarce data about the benefit of adjunctive chemotherapy in patients with localized synovial sarcoma (SS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 237 SS patients recorded in the database of the French Sarcoma Group were retrospectively analyzed. The respective impact of radiotherapy, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were assessed after adjustment to prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 58 months (range 1-321). Adjuvant, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy were administered in 112, 45 and 181 cases, respectively. In all, 59% of patients treated with chemotherapy received an ifosfamide-containing regimen. The 5-year OS, LRFS and DRFS rates were 64.0%, 70% and 57%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age >35 years old, grade 3 and not-R0 margins were highly significant independent predictors of worse OS. After adjustment to prognostic factors, radiotherapy significantly improved LRFS but not DRFS or OS. Neither neo-adjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy had significant impact on OS, LRFS or DRFS. CONCLUSION: As for other high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas, well-planned wide surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for SS. Neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy should not be delivered outside a clinical trial setting.

Phase II multicenter study of larotaxel (XRP9881), a novel taxoid, in patients with metastatic breast cancer who previously received taxane-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Larotaxel (XRP9881) is a novel taxoid with preclinical activity against taxane-resistant breast cancer. The current phase II trial of larotaxel was conducted in women with taxane-treated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified by response to prior taxane therapy (resistant or nonresistant). Larotaxel 90 mg/m(2) was administered as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for tumor response every two cycles. A blinded external response review committee determined the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to progression (TtP) of the disease. Median survival time (MST) and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients were treated. In the nonresistant group, the ORR was 42%; median DOR 5.3 months; median TtP 5.4 months; and MST 22.6 months. In the resistant group, the ORR was 19%; median DOR 5.0 months; median TtP 1.6 months; and MST 9.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (82%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (12%), febrile neutropenia (9%), neutropenic infection (8%), and sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Larotaxel has good activity, manageable toxicity, and a favorable therapeutic index in women with taxane-pretreated MBC.

Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate that women with breast cancer are at increased risk of fracture compared with their age-matched peers. Current treatment guidelines are inadequate for averting fractures in osteopenic women, especially those receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Therefore, we sought to identify clinically relevant risk factors for fracture that can be used to assess overall fracture risk and to provide practical guidance for preventing and treating bone loss in women with breast cancer receiving AI therapy. METHODS: Systematic review of pertinent information from published literature and meeting abstracts through December 2007 was carried out to identify factors contributing to fracture risk in women with breast cancer. An evidence-based medicine approach was used to select risk factors that can be used to determine when to initiate bisphosphonate treatment of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). RESULTS: Fracture risk factors were chosen from large, well-designed, controlled, population-based trials in postmenopausal women. Evidence from multiple prospective clinical trials in women with breast cancer was used to validate AI therapy as a fracture risk factor. Overall, eight fracture risk factors were validated in women with breast cancer: AI therapy, T-score <-1.5, age >65 years, low body mass index (BMI <20 kg/m(2)), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use >6 months, and smoking. Treatment recommendations were derived from randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend the following for preventing and treating AIBL in women with breast cancer. All patients initiating AI therapy should receive calcium and vitamin D supplements. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score >/=-2.0 and no additional risk factors should be monitored every 1-2 years for change in risk status and bone mineral density (BMD). Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score <-2.0 should receive bisphosphonate therapy. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with any two of the following risk factors-T-score <-1.5, age >65 years, low BMI (<20 kg/m(2)), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use >6 months, and smoking-should receive bisphosphonate therapy. BMD should be monitored every 2 years, and treatment should continue for at least 2 years and possibly for as long as AI therapy is continued. To date, the overwhelming majority of clinical evidence supports zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months to prevent bone loss in women at high risk. Although there is a trend towards fewer fractures with zoledronic acid, studies completed to date have not been designed to capture significant differences in fracture rate, and longer follow-up is needed.

Multiparametric prognostic evaluation of biological factors in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: An array of biological features related to tumor cell differentiation status, growth rate, and invasive potential have been identified as potential prognostic factors in breast cancer. We were interested in determining their relative importance in predicting patient survival. PURPOSE: We evaluated the relative weight of the following four biological factors in predicting survival of patients with breast cancer: tumor cell DNA content (determined by flow cytometry), tumor cell proliferation rate (determined by thymidine kinase activity), expression levels of cathepsin D and urokinase plasminogen activator, and several "classical" clinical and histological factors. METHODS: Selected from a prospectively updated database, the study population consisted of 319 primary breast cancer patients who received treatment and follow-up care (median, 6 years) in the Centre René Huguenin. To determine the profile of biological factors for each patient, we used frozen tumor specimens and (except for the flow cytometric DNA content assay) commercially available assay kits. We determined by Cox multivariate analysis the relationships of the biological factors to each other, to classical prognostic factors, and to disease-free and metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: In the overall population, disease-free survival was best predicted by node status (P = .004), clinical tumor size (P = .02), and cathepsin D expression (P = .01), whereas metastasis-free survival was best predicted by node status (P = .0004), clinical tumor size (P = .009), and urokinase plasminogen activator expression (P = .04). In node-negative patients, thymidine kinase activity was the only factor selected for disease-free (P = .04) and metastasis-free (P = .05) survival. In node-positive patients, the number of positive axillary lymph nodes was the only factor selected for disease-free (P = .0008) and metastasis-free (P = .00017) survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis has identified protease expression and tumor cell proliferation rate as important biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Prospective clinical trials should be undertaken to confirm these results.

A randomized double-blind comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy.

Seventy-five breast cancer patients scheduled to receive a first course (in a new cycle) of cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (FAC) or epirubicin (FEC) participated in a double-blind crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032), a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, and metoclopramide. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg loading dose (4 mg intravenously [IV] plus 4 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 8 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. Metoclopramide was given as an 80 mg loading dose (60 mg IV plus 20 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 20 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. A "period" interaction in the analysis of emetic response in the first 24 hours necessitated a parallel group analysis of first treatments only, 68 patients being assessable for this parameter. In the first 24 hours, complete or major control (zero to two emetic episodes) of emesis was achieved in 30 of 35 (86%) patients receiving ondansetron and in 14 of 33 (42%) patients receiving metoclopramide (P less than .001). Ondansetron was also more effective in reducing acute nausea. On days 2 to 3, the complete or major responses were significantly better with ondansetron (81% v 65%; P = .033), but there was no statistical difference in the control of nausea. There was a significant patient preference for ondansetron (63% v 26%; P = .001). Extrapyramidal reactions were observed in two metoclopramide treatments; both treatments were otherwise well tolerated. These results are consistent with serotonin (5-HT), being a significant neurotransmitter of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin- or epirubicin/fluorouracil-induced emesis.

Intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: 5-year results of a randomized trial comparing conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim in operable breast cancer with 10 or more involved axillary nodes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intensifying the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and 10 or more involved axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 150) were randomized to receive either four cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (arm A) or four courses of intensified mitoxantrone 23 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), with filgrastim 5 g/kg/d from days 2 to 15, every 3 weeks (arm B). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in DFS (P =.44), DDFS (P =.67), or OS (P =.99) between the two groups at 5 years; DDFS was 45% (arm A) versus 50% (arm B), and DFS was 41% versus 49%, respectively. Five-year survival was similar in both arms (61% v 60%, respectively). Failure to note an intergroup difference in outcome was unrelated to relative dose-intensity. Analysis of patients with 15 or more positive nodes revealed a significant difference in 5-year DDFS (19% v 49% in arm B; P =.01). Toxicity was generally mild in both groups, with no toxic death. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (0.3% v 3%). Alopecia was less frequent in arm B (P <.001). CONCLUSION: This randomized trial confirms the feasibility of administering mitoxantrone 23 mg/m(2) with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim. Although there was no significant difference between conventional and intensified arms at 5 years, according to subgroup analysis, intensified treatment may decrease the risk of relapse in patients with 15 or more positive nodes compared with doxorubicin an cyclophosphamide.

Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer results in better overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival rates and whether preoperative chemotherapy permits more breast-conserving surgery procedures than postoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred ninety-eight breast cancer patients (T1c, T2, T3, T4b, N0 to 1, and M0) were enrolled onto a randomized phase III trial that compared four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide administered preoperatively versus the same regimen administered postoperatively (the first cycle administered within 36 hours after surgery). Patients were followed up for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no significant difference in terms of OS (hazards ratio, 1.16; P =.38), PFS (hazards ratio, 1.15; P =.27), and time to LRR (hazards ratio, 1.13; P =.61). Fifty-seven patients (23%) were downstaged by the preoperative chemotherapy, whereas 14 patients (18%) underwent mastectomy and not the planned breast-conserving therapy. CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative chemotherapy yields similar results in terms of PFS, OS, and locoregional control compared with conventional postoperative chemotherapy. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy enables more patients to be treated with breast-conserving surgery. Because preoperative chemotherapy does not improve disease outcome compared with postoperative chemotherapy, future trials should involve quality-of-life studies to investigate whether patients will benefit from this treatment modality.

Dissemination risk index based on plasminogen activator system components in primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To study interactions between disease-free survival (DFS) and four components of the plasminogen activator system: urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its two inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2), and its membrane receptor uPAR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 499 primary breast cancer patients (median follow-up, 6 years). uPA, PAI-1, and PAI-2 were determined on cytosols and uPAR on solubilized pellets, using enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay kits (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, CT). Classical univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used together with multiple correspondence analysis to graphically examine interactions between the variables and outcome. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, higher uPA and PAI-1 values were significantly related to shorter DFS (P =.002; P <.00002). PAI-2 was not significantly related to DFS, although patients with high and very low PAI-2 values had a longer DFS. Multiple correspondence analysis showed the parallel impact of uPA and PAI-1 on outcome, and the clearly different behavior of PAI-2 compared with PAI-1. The prognostic contribution of uPAR seemed weak by both methods. A dissemination risk index [uPA x PAI-1/(PAI-2 + 1)], taking into account the modulation of uPA proteolytic activity by the ratio of its two inhibitors, was then tested. Dissemination risk index was selected as an independent variable in the Cox model in the overall population (P <.000001) and in node-positive patients (P <.00001). It was the only variable selected in node-negative patients (P =. 003). CONCLUSION: A dissemination risk index determined on primary tumor and taking into account the different effects of PAI-1 and PAI-2 on uPA can be of major help in clinical management of breast cancer, particularly in node-negative patients.

Activity of exemestane in metastatic breast cancer after failure of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of a new steroidal aromatase inactivator, exemestane, in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease (PD) after treatment with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, eligible patients were treated with exemestane 25 mg daily (n = 241) followed, at the time PD was determined, by exemestane 100 mg daily (n = 58). RESULTS: On the basis of the intent-to-treat analysis by independent review, exemestane 25 mg produced objective responses in 6.6% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 10.6%) and overall success (complete response + partial response + no change for 24 weeks or longer) in 24.3% (95% CI, 19.0% to 30.2%). The median durations of objective response and overall success were 58.4 weeks (95% CI, 49.7 to 71.1 weeks) and 37.0 weeks (95% CI, 35.0 to 39.4 weeks), respectively. Increasing the dose of exemestane to 100 mg upon the development of PD produced one partial response (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 9.2%). Both dosages were well tolerated and were discontinued because of adverse events in only 1.7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Exemestane 25 mg once daily seems to be an attractive alternative to chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after multiple hormonal therapies have failed.

Randomized phase II trial comparing different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the hypocalcemic effect and safety of three different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in tumor-associated hypercalcemia, and to identify factors predicting response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-four cancer patients with a serum calcium level greater than 2.7 mmol/L (10.8 mg/dL) were enrolled onto the trial. If hypercalcemia persisted after fluid repletion, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 0.6 mg, 1.1 mg, and 2.0 mg of ibandronate. Response, defined as restoration of normocalcemia, was evaluated by an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three (99%) patients were assessable for toxicity and 151 (87%) for efficacy. The administration of 0.6 mg (group A), 1.1 mg (group B), or 2.0 mg (group C) of ibandronate led to response rates of 44%, 52%, and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients in group C responded than in group A (P = .0276). Of the various parameters examined, only the initial serum calcium level (P < .0001; odds ratio, 0.083) and the dose of ibandronate (P = .0162; odds ratio, 2.094) correlated with response. One hundred ninety-five adverse events (AEs) were reported, 99 classified as serious and 96 as nonserious. Three serious and sixteen nonserious AEs were considered related to ibandronate treatment. The three serious AEs were one case with thrombocytopenia, one with nausea, and one with fever. CONCLUSION: Ibandronate therapy led to a dose-dependent reduction in serum calcium levels. The response to ibandronate treatment correlated negatively with the initial serum calcium level and positively with the dose administered. A dose of 2 mg was necessary to achieve a response rate comparable to that in previous studies with the bisphosphonates pamidronate and clodronate. Because the incidence of drug-associated AEs was low, a dose escalation of ibandronate can be recommended for further clinical trials.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil in taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of combined oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (5-FU) in taxane-pretreated advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated (within 6 months of study entry) women were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous [IV] infusion), day 1, and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2)/d (continuous IV infusion) days 1 to 4, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Median patient age was 51 years (range, 34 to 71 years), with a median of two involved organs (range, one to six organs), and metastases in the liver (70%), bone (47%), and lung (34%). Patients had a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens (range, one to six regimens), and 78% had previous hormonal therapy, with clinical taxane and anthracycline resistance in 53% and 34%, respectively. A total of 367 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles/patient (range, one to 15 cycles). Sixty patients were assessable for response (World Health Organization criteria): 17 partial response, 26 stable disease, and 17 disease progression, giving an overall response rate of 27% (95% confidence interval, 16.3% to 39.1%), and 26% and 36% in taxane- and anthracycline-resistant populations, respectively, all responders having metastatic liver disease. Median time to progression was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 11.9 months. Four treatment-related serious adverse events occurred, seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Hematotoxicity was prevalent but rarely severe, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in 34%, 19%, and 16% of patients, respectively, and a single episode of febrile neutropenia. One third of patients developed grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy (oxaliplatin-specific scale), with grade 3 in only 8%. CONCLUSION: This oxaliplatin/5-FU combination is effective with an excellent safety profile in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated ABC patients, showing encouraging activity in patients with anthracycline/taxane-resistance or visceral disease.

How to maximize the efficacy of taxanes in breast cancer.

The life-expectancy of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is closely linked to response to therapy. A significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) has been demonstrated in women who achieve a complete response. Anthracycline combinations have been proven as highly effective in MBC, and anthracycline regimens plus cyclophosphamide with or without fluorouracil were established as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in the 1990s. Clinical trials have shown that anthracycline-taxane combinations are more effective than anthracyclines or taxanes alone in terms of overall response rates (ORR), PFS and OS in women who have not received prior anthracycline chemotherapy. The use of anthracycline-based regimens is limited, however, by the widespread use of anthracycline adjuvant therapy and the development of anthracycline-resistance. Platinum-taxane combinations have similar efficacy to anthracycline-based regimens and are well-tolerated by patients. Carboplatin combined with paclitaxel or docetaxel is more effective than carboplatin or taxanes alone, with ORR of 53-62%. Taxane combinations with gemcitabine or capecitabine are also more effective than docetaxel, paclitaxel, capecitabine or gemcitabine administered alone. The efficacy of docetaxel and paclitaxel can be increased, and drug-related toxicity decreased, by adapting dose-dense schedules of drug administration. The addition of trastuzumab to taxane-based chemotherapy increases the efficacy of taxane-based regimens in women with HER2-positive MBC.

Relationship between c-erbB-2 and other tumor characteristics in breast cancer prognosis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate c-erbB-2 overexpression by means of a quantitative biochemical technique in 488 primary breast cancer patients with long-term follow-up (median, 10 years) and its relation to other biochemical prognostic factors (uPA, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor) and adjuvant therapy. High levels of c-erbB-2 (>500 IU/mg protein) were associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor negativity, high histoprognostic SBR grade and high levels of uPA and p53. Univariate analyses showed shorter metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients whose tumors overexpressed c-erbB-2 in the overall population, in subgroups defined by ER and uPA status, and in patients with positive pathological nodal status, SBR grade II, progesterone receptor, and p53-negative tumors. Patients with ER-positive, c-erbB-2-positive tumors had a shorter MFS and OS than those patients with c-erbB-2-negative tumors. No difference was observed between adjuvant-treated and untreated patients (chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy) in the c-erbB-2-negative subgroup. There was a trend toward a longer short-term MFS in c-erbB-2-positive patients treated with chemotherapy, whereas an opposite effect was observed with hormone therapy. Cox multivariate analyses showed that high levels of c-erbB-2 negatively influenced MFS in the overall population as well as in node-positive patients and in tamoxifen-treated patients, along with pN and uPA. Results for OS were comparable with those obtained for MFS. These results suggest that c-erbB-2 overexpression in breast cancer may be a better predictor of the response to tamoxifen than is ER status alone.

Serum parathyroid hormone-related protein levels and response to bisphosphonate treatment in hypercalcemia of malignancy.

The pathogenesis of hypercalcemia of malignancy comprises increased net bone resorption and enhanced renal tubular reabsorption of calcium (Ca). To evaluate the prevalence of an increased renal tubular reabsorption of Ca index [tubular reabsorption of calcium index (TRCaI)] in cancer patients with hypercalcemia and of elevated circulating levels of PTH-related protein (PTHrP), which is recognized as a major mediator of this syndrome, we investigated 315 well rehydrated patients, aged 58.1 +/- 0.7 yr (mean +/- SEM), with hypercalcemia [albumin-corrected plasma Ca (pCa), >2.7 mmol/L] secondary to histologically proven malignancy. Changes in pCa and, therefore, various Ca filtered loads were obtained by different degrees of bone resorption inhibition achieved with a single infusion of the bisphosphonate ibandronate, given at various doses on a randomized, double blind basis. PTHrP was determined at baseline in 147 of the patients and 7 days after bisphosphonate therapy in 73. Before ibandronate therapy, pCa was 3.36 +/- 0.02 mmol/L, mean TRCaI was increased at 3.09 +/- 0.03 mmol/L glomerular filtration rate (GFR; normal, 2.40-2.90), and 65% of patients had TRCaI above 2.90 mmol/L GFR. Mean serum PTHrP levels were 4.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/L (normal, <2.5) and values above the normal range were found in 53% of the patients (76% in lung and upper respiratory tract malignancies). By 7 days after the infusion of ibandronate, a decrease in pCa of 0.69 +/- 0.03 mmol/L (20.0 +/- 0.7%; P < 0.001) and in bone resorption [mean change in fasting urinary Ca, 0.09 +/- 0.04 mmol/L GFR (47.6 +/- 8.6%; P < 0.001) and 14.4 +/- 1.7 nmol/mmol (27.6 +/- 10.6%; P < 0.01) in deoxypyridinoline] was observed. TRCaI was slightly lowered by 0.30 +/- 0.09 mmol/L GFR. Mean changes in PTHrP, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and PTH were +0.7 +/- 0.4 (P = NS), +27.6 +/- 3.0 (P < 0.001), and +2.9 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.005) pmol/L, respectively. After ibandronate treatment, the relative risk of relapsing hypercalcemia was particularly increased (3.43-fold) in lung and upper respiratory tract malignancies. These results obtained in a large cohort of patients indicate a significant prevalence of an increased renal tubular reabsorption of calcium index in hypercalcemia of malignancy and a substantial proportion of patients with detectable PTHrP.

Tetracosactrin vs. methylprednisolone in the prevention of emesis in patients receiving FEC regimen for breast cancer.

0.5 mg tetracosactrin is considered to be equivalent to 40 mg methylprednisolone with regard to the induced cortisol secretion. 97 female breast cancer patients who received their first two FEC courses (epirubicin 50-75 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) entered this randomised crossover study (76 had previously received an adjuvant treatment); tetracosactrin was administered intramuscularly and methylprednisolone intravenously immediately before chemotherapy administration. The tolerability was evaluated using a diary card during 5 days and patients were asked for their preference at the end of the two cycles. There was no difference either for vomiting (dry heaves were included) or nausea between the two treatments (the analysis was performed on day 1, the worse day of days 2 and 3 and the worse day of days 4 and 5). At day 1, 49% of the patients experienced no or mild nausea after tetracosactrin and 62% after methylprednisolone (not significant) (first period analysis); a complete control of vomiting (including dry heaves) was observed in 49% of the patients after tetracosactrin and 53% after methylprednisolone (not significant). No difference was observed between patients with or without previous chemotherapy. However, slightly more patients preferred tetracosactrin (P = 0.048).

Phase I studies of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic offast cancer: the French experience.

In an attempt to develop new, active, and convenient outpatient combination-chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic breast cancer, we performed two phase I studies combining paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus anthracycline for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, without the use of hematopoietic growth factors. Study I was designed to test the tolerability and antitumor activity of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in combination with an epirubicin intravenous bolus. Study 2 explored a three-drug chemotherapy regimen: a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. If any dose-limiting events occurred in two or more of six patients in the first course of a given dose level, that dose level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting criteria included the following: neutrophils less than 0.25 x 10(9)/L lasting for > or = 5 days, any febrile neutropenia, World Health Organization grade 4 thrombocytopenia, World Health Organization grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity or grade > or = 3 mucositis for more than 5 days, and absence of hematologic recovery at day 35. In both studies, paclitaxel doses were escalated in subsequent groups of three to six patients. For study I, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (110 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2). To date 40 patients have entered the study at eight dose levels. Of the 181 cycles evaluated, grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 63% of courses, with only five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 43% of patients. Two patients experienced clinical heart failure. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached so far. At dose level 7 (paclitaxel [250 mg/m2]/epirubicin [50 mg/m2]), only one patient of six experienced febrile neutropenia. We are currently testing paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/epirubicin (75 mg/m2). Preliminary evaluation of response documents two complete and 16 partial responses in 37 evaluable patients (48% overall response rate). In study 2, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (150 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2)/cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2). To date, three dose levels have been investigated in 16 evaluable patients (82 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 80% of courses, and five episodes were associated with neutropenic fever. Grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% of patients. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached, and we are currently investigating dose level 4 (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2). These trials confirm the tolerability of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. The antitumor activity is encouraging.

ERBB2 status and benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in ERalpha-positive postmenopausal breast carcinoma.

We examined the relation between ERBB2 gene expression (as determined by a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay) and the response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in a well-defined cohort of 125 ERalpha-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Although ERBB2 overexpression was associated with shorter relapse-free survival in univariate analysis (P=0.00029), ERBB2 did not persist as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, when we analyzed the ERBB2 mRNA level as a continuous variable, the higher the ERBB2RNA level, the poorer the outcome (P=0.00036). The results point to the need for a quantitative ERBB2 expression assay for use in future studies of ERBB2-based clinical management of breast cancer.

Real-time reverse transcription PCR assay of CYP19 expression: application to a well-defined series of post-menopausal breast carcinomas.

Aromatase, the product of the CYP19 gene, plays a key role in androgenic steroids transformation into estrogens from various hormonal sensitive tissues. Thus, in situ expression of CYP19 has been suggested to be involved in breast tumor growth especially in post-menopausal patients.We developed a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay based on fluorescent TaqMan methodology to quantify total CYP19 gene expression at the mRNA level in breast tumors. This method, based on nucleic acid quantification in homogeneous solutions, has the potential to become a standard in terms of its sensitivity, wide dynamic range and high-throughput capacity. In a well-defined series of 107 post-menopausal breast tumor samples, relative CYP19 mRNA levels ranged from 1 to 131. Among the four major CYP19 exon I-spliced transcripts, designated I.a, I.b, I.c and I.d, mRNA levels of the latter three correlated positively with total CYP19 mRNA levels. In ER alpha-positive breast tumors, CYP19 and ER alpha mRNA levels correlated negatively with each other (P=0.0078, r=-0.266), while CYP19 and ER beta mRNA levels correlated positively (P=0.00012, r=+0.388). Patients with high CYP19 mRNA levels did not relapse more frequently or have shorter relapse-free survival than other patients. Finally, mRNA levels of IL6, a major CYP19 regulatory factor, were significantly higher in tumors strongly expressing CYP19 than in tumors weakly expressing CYP19 (P=0.018). In conclusion, CYP19 expression did not influence the outcome of post-menopausal patients with breast cancer.