Innovative Program to Prevent Pediatric Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Patient Partner Feedback on Intervention Development.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in youth is related to psychological factors, including preoperative anxiety, depression, patient/caregiver pain catastrophizing, and poor self-efficacy in managing pain. While interventions exist to address these factors, they are generally brief and educational in nature. The current paper details patient partner feedback on the development of a psychologist-delivered perioperative psychological program (PPP) designed to identify and target psychological risk factors for CPSP and improve self-efficacy in managing pain. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with two patients and their caregivers to discuss their surgical and pain management experience and to advise on components of the PPP. RESULTS: Reflexive thematic analysis of interviews generated the following themes, which were incorporated into the content and implementation of the PPP: caregiver involvement, psychological and physical strategies for pain management, biopsychosocial pain education, intervention structure, and supporting materials. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a novel psychologist-led PPP is a promising approach to mitigate mental health risks associated with pediatric CPSP and potentially boost postoperative outcomes and family wellbeing. Integrating patient partner feedback ensures that the PPP is relevant, acceptable, and aligned with the needs and preferences of the patients it is designed to serve.

Development and expansion of a pediatric transitional pain service to prevent complex chronic pain.

The prevention of chronic pain is a key priority in North America and around the world. A novel pediatric Transitional Pain Service (pTPS) at the Hospital for Sick Children was established to address four main areas of need, which the authors will describe in more detail: (1) provide comprehensive multi-modal pain management and prevention techniques to children at-risk for the development of chronic pain, (2) provide opioid stewardship for children at-risk for chronic pain and their families at home after discharge, (3) facilitate continuity of pain care for children across transitions between inpatient and outpatient care settings, and (4) support caregivers to manage their child's pain at home. The pTPS works with healthcare providers, patients, and their families to address these areas of need and improve quality of life. Furthermore the service fills the gap between inpatient acute pain services and outpatient chronic pain services (accessible only once pain has persisted for >3 months). In pediatric patients who experience pain in hospital and who have been prescribed opioids, discharge to home or rehabilitation may represent a vulnerable time in which pain may persist and during which analgesic requirements may change. This offers an important opportunity to address and prevent the development of chronic pain, and to monitor opioids while ensuring alternative pain therapy is available. The authors will outline risk factors for persistent postsurgical pain, the development and implementation of a pTPS, present initial clinical outcomes andsuggest areas for future research in this evolving area of care.

Designing a Child-, Family-, and Healthcare Provider-Centered Procedure Room in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital.

AIM: The study aim was to co-design new pediatric procedure room prototypes with children, caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs). BACKGROUND: Medical procedures can cause pain and anxiety for children and their families. If spaces are not designed for patients' needs, procedures may take longer, require sedation, and result in an inferior care experience. Involving HCPs in co-designing optimal spaces can result in more efficient and safer environments. co-designing spaces with patients and their families can inform psychologically safer and less traumatic environments. METHODS: We followed human-centered design methodology. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, field observations, and two multidisciplinary design workshops with patients, caregivers, and HCPs. Themes from the data were extracted using a content analysis and used to make evidence-informed recommendations for design features. RESULTS: The study took place from October 2021 to February 2022. Patients, families, and HCPs reported similar needs: (1) control over the environment, including the ability to adjust lighting, temperature, and sound; (2) space that supports patient privacy; (3) the use of evidence-based pain reduction and distraction methods; (4) attention to the sensory environment, including visual (light, color), tactile (textures of furniture and equipment), auditory, and olfactory stimuli; (5) human factors organization of the space and equipment; (6) accessible and equitable spatial design; and (7) the significance of the journey leading up to and after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to co-design procedure rooms that support evidence-based psychological, physical, and pharmacological interventions that are known to minimize pain for children.

Don't judge a book by its cover: Exploring low self-reported distress and repressive coping in a pediatric chronic pain population.

Repression has been linked to greater illness, somatic symptoms, and poorer physical health, both in adult and pediatric populations. The current study examined psychological and pain profiles of children with chronic pain who may under-report levels of psychological distress at a first interdisciplinary chronic pain assessment. Children and their caregiver completed measures of psychopathology and pain intensity, while clinicians rated their levels of disability. Based on self-report measures, children were classified as "repressors" (low anxiety/high social desirability) or as "true low anxious" (low anxiety/low social desirability). Groups were then compared on psychological and pain characteristics. Compared to children with true low anxiety, repressors reported lower levels of depressive and somatic symptoms but provided higher ratings on pain intensity, pain-unpleasantness, and self-oriented perfectionism. Caregivers of repressors rated their children as having higher levels of adaptability compared to caregivers of children in the true low anxious group. Groups did not differ on clinician-rated level of disability. Children classified as repressors exhibited different profiles than children classified as having true low anxiety on both psychological outcomes and pain characteristics. Repression may be an important factor to consider for those assessing and treating children with chronic pain.

The "STOP Pain" Questionnaire: using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model to implement a patient-family preferences-informed questionnaire into a pediatric transitional pain clinic.

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement is an important tool for quality improvement (QI) and optimizing the uptake of research findings. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model is a QI tool that encourages ongoing evaluation of clinical care, thus improving various aspects of patient care. Ascertaining pediatric patient priorities for a pain questionnaire in the post-acute, or transitional pain, setting is important to guide clinical care since active engagement with the population of interest can optimize uptake. We used the PDSA model to adapt a chronic pain questionnaire for the pediatric transitional pain setting to reflect pediatric patient and parent/guardian preferences and to form an example of how the PDSA model can be used to improve clinical care through patient engagement. METHODS: This project employed the PDSA model to adapt the pediatric Ontario Chronic Pain Questionnaire for use in the pediatric Transitional Pain Service (pedTPS) setting. Plan: Following reviewing the Ontario Chronic Pain Questionnaire and literature on pain questionnaire development, goal-based questions, questions on pain location, relevant Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, child (PCS-C) and parent (PCS-P), informed the questionnaire. Do: The questionnaire and a satisfaction survey were sent to patients and families through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap™). STUDY: Results from the satisfaction survey were analyzed. Act: Using descriptive statistics employing ordinal mixed-models with random effects, ANOVA, and double-blinded qualitative thematic coding, questionnaire preferences were analyzed and the questionnaire was adapted accordingly before implementation into the (pedTPS). RESULTS: Eighty-eight questionnaires and satisfaction surveys were analyzed from 69 respondents (32 patients; 37 parents/guardians). Sixty-six (75.00%) surveys indicated satisfaction with the questionnaire. A combined 77 (87.50%) "strongly agreed" (25/88) or "agreed" (52/88) that the questionnaire language was clear. The application of suggested changes to the questionnaire resulted in four versions across the project timeline, which reflected patient and parent/guardian preferences for questions that reflect the themes, "Story"; "Time-Optimal"; and "Pertinent" ("STOP"). There were no statistically significant differences in satisfaction across the versions due to sample size. CONCLUSION: Most respondents were satisfied with the questionnaire and prefer "STOP" questions. Future studies will focus on testing the questionnaire for validity and reliability across pedTPS populations.

Mapping the current state of pediatric surgical pain care across Canada and assessing readiness for change.

Background: Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain is a patient, parent/caregiver, health care professional, and policymaker priority. Poorly managed presurgical and acute postsurgical pain are established risk factors for pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. Effective perioperative pain management is essential to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Aims: The aim of this study was to identify current pediatric surgical pain management practices and assess health system readiness for change at health care institutions conducting pediatric surgery in Canada. Methods: An online survey was completed by 85 multidisciplinary health care professionals (nurses, surgeons, anesthesiologists, allied health) from 20 health institutions in Canada regarding institutional pre- and postsurgical pediatric pain care, specialty pain services, and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC). Results: Of all specialty pain services, acute and chronic/complex pain services were most common, primarily with physician and nursing involvement. Alignment to recommended practices for pediatric pre- and postsurgical pain care varied (38.1%-79.8% reported "yes, for every child"), with tertiary/quaternary children's hospitals reporting less alignment than other institutions (community/regional or rehabilitation hospitals, community treatment centers). No significant differences were reported between health care institutions serving pediatric populations only versus those also serving adults. Health care professional experience/practice was the most reported strength in pediatric surgical pain care, with inconsistent standard of care the most common gap. Participants "somewhat agreed" that their institutions were committed and capable of change in pediatric surgical pain care. Conclusions: There is a continued need to improve pediatric pain care during the perioperative period at Canadian health care institutions to effectively prevent the development of pediatric postsurgical pain.

Contexte: La prévention de la douleur post-chirurgicale chronique pédiatrique est une priorité des patients, des parents/prestataires de soins, des professionnels de la santé et des décideurs. La douleur pré-chirurgicale et post-chirurgicale aiguë mal prises en charge constituent des facteurs de risque connus de la douleur post-chirurgicale chronique pédiatrique. La prise en charge efficace de la douleur périopératoire est essentielle pour prévenir la transition de la douleur aiguë à la douleur chronique aprés une chirurgie.Buts: Le but de cette étude était de recenser les pratiques actuelles en matiére de prise en charge de la douleur chirurgicale pédiatrique et d'évaluer l'état de préparation au changement du systéme de santé dans les établissements de soins de santé menant des chirurgies pédiatriques au Canada.Méthodes: 85 professionnels de la santé multidisciplinaires (infirmiéres, chirurgiens, anesthésistes, auxiliaires médicaux) ont répondu à un sondage en ligne de 20 établissements de santé au Canada concernant les soins pédiatriques pré et post-chirurgicaux en établissement, les services spécialisés de traitement de la douleur, les services de la douleur spécialisés et la préparation organisationnelle à la mise en œuvre du changement.Résultats: De tous les services de la douleur spécialisés, les services de la douleur aiguë et chronique/complexe étaient les plus fréquents, principalement avec la participation d'un médecin et d'une infirmiére. L'adéquation avec les pratiques recommandées pour les soins pédiatriques pré et post-chirurgicaux était variable (38,1 %-79,8 % ont déclaré « oui, pour chaque enfant ¼), alors que les hôpitaux pour enfants tertiaires/quaternaires ont déclaré moins d'adéquation que les autres institutions (hôpitaux communautaires/régionaux ou de réadaptation, centres de traitement communautaires). Aucune différence significative n'a été rapportée entre les établissements de soins de santé desservant uniquement les populations pédiatriques et ceux desservant aussi les adultes. L'expérience professionnelle/la pratique en matière de soins de santé a été la force la plus rapportée dans les soins de la douleur chirurgicale pédiatrique, tandis que les normes de soins incoh'rentes constituaient la lacune la plus courante. Les participants ont « quelque peu convenu ¼ que leurs institutions étaient engagées et capables de changer les soins chirurgicaux pédiatriques.Conclusions: ll y a un besoin continu déaméliorer les soins de la douleur pédiatrique pendant la période périopératoire dans les établissements de soins de santé canadiens afin de prévenir efficacement le développement de la douleur postopératoire.

Understanding the use of over-the-counter pain treatments in adolescents with chronic pain.

Background: The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents is well established. What is not well understood is how over-the-counter (OTC) oral and topical pain treatments are being used by adolescents with chronic pain, their decision making around use of these products, and how they communicate with their health care providers about their use. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the use, decision-making process, and communication about the use of OTC pain medications with health care professionals among adolescents living with chronic pain and their primary caregiver. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design with semistructured, audiotaped individual interviews was undertaken with adolescents with chronic pain (n = 15, aged 12-18 years, mean age = 16, SD = 1.79) and their caregivers (n = 16). A convenience sample of patient-caregiver dyads was recruited from a tertiary care pediatric chronic pain clinic in Ontario. Results: Interview questions focused on four topics: (1) experience with chronic pain and medication; (2) perceptions of medications and concerns with long-term consumption; (3) decision making for use of OTC medications guided mainly by a trusted source or health care professional; and (4) topical OTC medications perceived as harmless. Content analysis within these four topics uncovered two to four subthemes, which are described in detail. Conclusions: An improved understanding of the prevalence of use, decision-making process around use, and how patients and their families communicate about the use of OTC pain medications with health care providers can help clinicians better personalize treatments and help adolescents with chronic pain to make sound self-care decisions.

Contexte: La prévalence de la douleur chronique chez les enfants et les adolescents est bien établie. Toutefois, on ne comprend pas bien comment les traitements antidouleur en vente libre administrés par voie topique ou orale sont utilisés par les adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique, leur prise de décision concernant ces produits et la façon dont ils communiquent avec les prestataires de soins de santé au sujet de leur utilisation.But: Étudier l'utilisation des médicaments antidouleur en vente libre, ainsi que la prise de décision et la communication avec les professionnels de la santé au sujet de l'utilisation de ces médicaments chez les adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique et leur principal prestataire de soins.Méthodes: Un devis de recherche axé sur la description qualitative à l'aide d'entrevues semi-structurées individuelles a été utilisé auprès d'adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique (n = 15, âgés de 12 à 18 ans, âge moyen de 16 ans, ÉT = 1,79) et leurs prestataires de soins (n = 16). Un échantillon de commodité de dyades patient-prestataire de soins a été recruté dans une clinique de soins tertiaires en douleur chronique pédiatrique de l'Ontario.Résultats: Les questions d'entrevue portaient sur quatre sujets: (1) l'expérience de la douleur chronique et la médication; (2) la perception des médicaments et les préoccupations concernant leur consommation à long terme; (3) la prise de décision concernant l'utilisation de médication en vente libre, principalement guidée par une personne de confiance ou un professionnel de la santé et (4) les médicaments en vente libre appliqués par voie topique qui sont perçus comme étant sans danger. L'analyse de contenu pour ces quatre sujets a révélé de 2 à 4 sous-thèmes, qui sont décrits en détail.Conclusions: Une meilleure compréhension de la prévalence de l'utilisation des médicaments antidouleur en vente libre, ainsi que du processus de décision entourant leur utilisation et de la façon dont les patients et leur famille communiquent avec les professionnels de la santé peut aider les cliniciens à mieux personnaliser les traitements et aider les adolescents qui souffrent de douleur chronique à prendre des décisions judicieuses en matière de soins auto-administrés.