Birth asphyxia is under-rated as a cause of preterm neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: A prospective, observational study from PURPOSe.

OBJECTIVE: To assess respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared with birth asphyxia as the cause of death in preterm newborns, assigned by the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) physician at the time of death and assigned by a panel with complete obstetric history, placental evaluation, tissue histology and microbiology. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTINGS: Study NICUs in India and Pakistan. POPULATION: Preterm infants delivered in study facility. METHODS: A total of 410 preterm infants who died in the NICU with cause of death ascertained by the NICU physicians and independently by expert panels. We compared the percentage of cases assigned RDS versus birth asphyxia as cause of death by the physician and the panel. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RDS and birth asphyxia. RESULTS: Of 410 preterm neonatal deaths, the discharging NICU physicians found RDS as a cause of death among 83.2% of the cases, compared with the panel finding RDS in only 51.0%. In the same neonatal deaths, the NICU physicians found birth asphyxia as a cause of death in 14.9% of the deaths, whereas the panels found birth asphyxia in 57.6% of the deaths. The difference was greater in Pakistan were the physicians attributed 89.7% of the deaths to RDS and less than 1% to birth asphyxia whereas the panel attributed 35.6% of the deaths to RDS and 62.7% to birth asphyxia. CONCLUSIONS: NICU physicians who reported cause of death in deceased preterm infants less often attributed the death to birth asphyxia, and instead more often chose RDS, whereas expert panels with more extensive data attributed a greater proportion of deaths to birth asphyxia than did the physicians.

Lung Findings in Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) Examinations of Fetal and Preterm Neonatal Deaths: A Report From the PURPOSe Study.

BACKGROUND: Complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) is considered to be the gold-standard procedure that aids in determination of cause of death in stillbirths and neonatal deaths. However, CDA is not routinely practiced in South Asian countries due to religious beliefs, lack of expertise, and lack of resources. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has been recommended as a less mutilating and less expensive alternative to CDA for obtaining tissues for analysis. The present study aims to evaluate the yield of lung tissue and histological findings using MITS as part of a cause of death analysis for stillborns and preterm neonatal deaths. METHODS: Data were collected during an observational multicenter prospective study called the Project to Understand and Research Preterm birth and Stillbirth (PURPOSe) conducted in India and Pakistan. After obtaining written informed consent from parents, the eligible stillbirths and neonatal deaths were subjected to MITS using a standard protocol. The tissues were obtained from both lungs for histological and microbiological analysis. RESULTS: At both sites, a total of 453 stillbirths and 352 neonatal deaths underwent MITS. For stillbirths and neonatal deaths, the yield of lung tissue using MITS was high (92%). Intrauterine fetal distress and respiratory distress syndrome were the leading lung pathologies reported in stillbirths and neonatal deaths, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MITS appears to be a reasonable alternative to CDA in obtaining and evaluating lung tissue to inform accurate cause of death analysis in stillbirth and preterm deaths.