RESUMO
Context: Collaborative care models for depression have been successful in a variety of settings, but their success may differ by patient engagement. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the INDEPENDENT trial to investigate the role of differential engagement of participants on health outcomes over 3 years. Settings and Design: INDEPENDENT study was a parallel, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted at four socio-economically diverse clinics in India. Participants were randomised to receive either active collaborative care or usual care for 12 months and followed up for 24 months. Method: We grouped intervention participants by engagement, defined as moderate (≤7 visits) or high, (8 or more visits) and compared them with usual care participants. Improvements in composite measure (depressive symptoms and at least one of three cardio-metabolic) were the primary outcome. Statistical Analysis: Mean levels of depression and cardio-metabolic measures were analysed over time using computer package IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results: The composite outcome was sustained the highest in the moderate engagers [27.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.5, 36.7] and the lowest in high engagers (15.8%, 95% CI: 8.1, 26.8). This pattern was observed for individual parameters - depressive symptoms and glycosylated haemoglobin. Progressive reductions in mean depressive symptom scores were observed for moderate engagers and usual care group from baseline to 36 months. However, in high engagers of collaborative care, mean depressive symptoms were higher at 36 months compared to 12 months. Conclusion: Sustained benefits of collaborative care were larger in participants with moderate engagement compared with high engagement, although a majority of participants relapsed on one or more outcome measures by 36 months. High engagers of collaborative care for co-morbid depression and diabetes may need light touch interventions for longer periods to maintain health and reduce depressive symptoms.
RESUMO
Background: The current life expectancy in India is <70 years. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is known to reduce life expectancy by 6-8 years. Hence elderly people with T2DM in India would be rare. We report on the clinical profile of Asian Indian patients with T2DM who lived beyond 90 years of age and compared them with T2DM patients aged 50 to 60 years. Methods: From the diabetes electronic medical records of >470,000 diabetes patients, we identified T2DM patients who had lived ≥90 years and compared them with those in the 50-60 years age group, matched for gender and duration of diabetes. Clinical data included age at last visit, age at diagnosis, duration of diabetes, family history, smoking and alcohol, details of medications, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure. Biochemical data included fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels, lipid profile, and renal function studies. Assessment of retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, coronary artery disease (CAD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was also done. Results: A total of 325 T2DM patients aged ≥90 years and 278 T2DM patients aged between 50 and 60 years were selected for the study. Patients aged ≥90 years had higher systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001) and lower BMI (P < 0.001) than those between 50 and 60 years. Prevalence of retinopathy (29.7% vs. 53.5%) and macroalbuminuria (3.7% vs. 16.0%) was lower in the ≥90 years T2DM patients than in the 50-60 years age group. However, prevalence of neuropathy (89.8% vs. 50.8%), PVD (13.5% vs. 2.0%), and CAD (60.3% vs. 32.0%) was higher among the ≥90 years patients. Eighty-five percent of the T2DM aged ≥90 years were on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs), (of whom 64.9% were on sulfonylurea), 12% were on insulin, and 3% on diet alone. Among the 50-60 years old, 87.8% were on OHAs and 12.2% on insulin. Conclusions: This is the first report on the clinical profile of Asian Indians with T2DM aged ≥90 years, and significant differences are seen in their clinical profile compared with younger T2DM patients.