THE EFFECT OF PHLEBOTOMY-INDUCED HEMOLYSIS ON INSULIN LEVEL DETERMINATION.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of phlebotomy-induced hemolysis on serum insulin and C-peptide measurement by an immunochemiluminometric assay. METHODS: As part of a study designed to evaluate ß-cell function in a group of adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, we tested insulin and C-peptide levels in 1,048 samples. In order to evaluate the effect of phlebotomy-induced hemolysis, we determined insulin and C-peptide levels simultaneously in hemolyzed and nonhemolyzed samples. RESULTS: Forty-seven (4.5%) of the 1,048 samples were affected by hemolysis. In 26 cases, we had paired hemolyzed and nonhemolyzed serum samples that allowed a simultaneous comparison. We found that all degrees of hemolysis led to a significant decrease in insulin level. In hemolyzed serum, the median (interquartile range) of the insulin was 5.6 (1.8 to 24.3) mIU/L, versus 21.3 (11.4 to 48.5) mIU/L in nonhemolyzed serum, representing a 25 to 98% loss. This phenomenon was not found for C-peptide levels. CONCLUSION: Clinicians have to be aware that even a mild degree of phlebotomy-induced hemolysis has a significant effect on serum insulin level determination, which can lead to misinterpretation of test results. This finding has important implications, especially in the evaluation of suspected cases of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia.

Selective peripheral tissue response to high testosterone levels in an infertile woman without virilization signs.

Summary: Total testosterone, which is peripherally converted to its biologically active form dihydrotestosterone (DHT), is the first-line hormone investigation in hyperandrogenic states and infertility in premenopausal women. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common cause of hyperandrogenism and infertility in young women, is often associated with mild elevations of total testosterone. Whereas very high levels of total testosterone (>2-3 SD of normal reference), are most often associated with hyperandrogenic signs, menstrual irregularity, rapid onset of virilization, and demand a prompt investigation. Herein, we report a case of a 32-year-old woman who was referred to the endocrinology outpatient clinic due to secondary amenorrhea and extremely high testosterone levels without any virilization signs. We initially suspected pitfalls in the testosterone laboratory test. Total serum testosterone decreased after a diethyl-ether extraction procedure was done prior to the immunoassay, but testosterone levels were still elevated. An ovarian steroid-cell tumor (SCT) was then revealed, which was thereby resected. Twenty-four hours post surgery, the total testosterone level returned to normal, and a month later menstruation resumed. This case emphasizes that any discrepancy between laboratory tests and the clinical scenario deserves a rigorous evaluation to minimize misinterpretation and errors in diagnosis and therapeutic approach. Additionally, we describe a possible mechanism of disease: a selective peripheral target-tissue response to high testosterone levels that did not cause virilization but did suppress ovulation and menstruation. Learning points: Total testosterone is the most clinically relevant hormone in investigating hyperandrogenic states and infertility in premenopausal women. Very high total testosterone levels in women (>2-3 SD of normal reference) are most often associated with hyperandrogenic signs, menstrual irregularities, and a rapid onset of virilization. In women with very elevated testosterone levels and the absence of clinical manifestations, laboratory interference should be suspected, and diethyl ether extraction is a useful technique when other methods fail to detect it. Ovarian steroid cell tumors (SCT) encompass a rare subgroup of sex cord-stromal tumors and usually secrete androgen hormones. SCTs are clinically malignant in 25-43% of cases. A selective response of peripheral target tissues to testosterone levels, with clinical manifestations in some tissues and no expression in others, may reflect differences in the conformation of tumor-produced testosterone molecules.

Early beta-cell dysfunction characterizes males with type 2 diabetes of Yemenite origin.

AIMS: The aim of the current study was to characterize ß-cell function, insulin sensitivity and line of inheritance in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes of Yemenite and non-Yemenite Jewish origin. METHODS: A cohort study including 121 GAD negative diabetic patients, 59 of Yemenite and 62 of non-Yemenite origin, treated by diet ± oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy who underwent 180-min meal tolerance test (MMT). Based on MMT, indexes of insulin resistance and secretion were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, HbA1c and lipid profile. A significant difference was found in family history of diabetes: 63 % of patients of Yemenite origin had maternal inheritance versus 35 % in the non-Yemenite origin (p < 0.001). Both indexes of ß-cell function, the insulinogenic and the disposition indexes were significantly lower in patients of Yemenite origin compared with non-Yemenite origin (0.66 ± 0.4 vs. 0.93 ± 0.8, p = 0.04; 2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 3.3 ± 3.3, p = 0.04, respectively) with no difference in insulin sensitivity. When females and males were analyzed separately, the difference in maternal inheritance remained significant in both, but the difference in ß-cell function indexes was observed only in males (p = 0.03, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Males with recent-onset diabetes of Yemenite origin have a significant reduction of ß-cell function and reduced ability to compensate for insulin resistance compared with diabetic males of non-Yemenite origin. Both males and females of Yemenite origin have a significantly higher maternal inheritance of diabetes. These data suggest different underlying mechanisms leading to early loss of ß-cell in diabetic males of Yemenite origin.

Monitoring gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) treatment in girls with central precocious puberty: a comparison of four methods.

AIM: The objective of this study was to validate basal, post-gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (post-GnRHa) and first-voided urinary LH (ULH) as alternatives to an LHRH stimulation test in monitoring treatment efficacy in central precocious puberty (CPP). METHODS: Seventeen girls with CPP were followed over 22.5±9.1 months during GnRHa (triptorelin) treatment. ULH and post-GnRHa LH levels were obtained every 4 months before and 24 h after GnRHa administration, respectively, along with clinical and bone age (BA) evaluation. LHRH stimulation tests were performed annually. RESULTS: A total of 36 LHRH stimulation tests demonstrated adequate suppression with a peak LH of 0.57±0.33 IU/L. The corresponding basal LH was 0.27±0.16 IU/L. Ninety post-GnRHa LH measurements were similar to LHRH-stimulated LH levels (0.56±0.31 IU/L), whereas 8% of ULH levels were above prepubertal threshold. Fourteen episodes of growth acceleration and ten episodes of BA advancement resolved without treatment modification. CONCLUSION: Suppressed basal and post-GnRHa LH levels indicate adequate suppression of puberty. Clinical breakthroughs during treatment are transient and resolved spontaneously.

The diagnostic value of first-voided urinary LH compared with GNRH-stimulated gonadotropins in differentiating slowly progressive from rapidly progressive precocious puberty in girls.

OBJECTIVE: Characterization of pubertal progression is required to prevent unnecessary intervention in unsustained or slowly progressive (SP) precocious puberty (PP), while delivering hormonal suppression in rapidly progressive (RP) PP. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of first-voided urinary LH (ULH) compared with GNRH-stimulated gonadotropins in differentiating these forms of PP. METHODS: A total of 62 girls with PP underwent both GNRH stimulation and ULH assay. Fifteen girls with peak LH ≥ 10 IU/L started treatment immediately, whereas the other 47 girls were evaluated after 6 months for pubertal advancement, height acceleration, and bone-age maturation. Based on these criteria, the participants were assigned to five subgroups: pubertal regression, no progression or progression by one, two or three criteria. The first three subgroups were defined as SP-PP (n=29), while the other two subgroups were defined as RP-PP (n=18). An additional 23 prepubertal girls were evaluated for ULH. RESULTS: ULH but not serum gonadotropins could distinguish girls with two and three criteria from less progressive subgroups. By comparison with SP-PP (i.e. regression group and groups 0 and 1), those with RP-PP (group 2+3) had lower peak FSH (9.28±2.51 vs 12.57±4.30; P=0.007) and higher peak LH:FSH ratio (0.42±0.30 vs 0.22±0.12; P=0.022) and ULH (1.63±0.65 vs 1.05±0.26 IU/l; P<0.001). Based on receiver operating characteristics analysis, a ULH cutoff of 1.16 IU/l had a better sensitivity (83%) and positive and negative predictive values (65 and 88% respectively) than the other two parameters, with a specificity of 72%. CONCLUSIONS: ULH assay is a noninvasive, reliable method that can assist in the distinction between SP- and RP-PP.