Aetiological, clinical and therapeutic prognostic factors for the evolution of deep vein thrombosis followed up with serial venous Doppler ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a dynamic process that can be followed up with Doppler ultrasound (DUS). AIMS: To evaluate the role of certain factors that can influence the evolution of DVT. METHODS: In 121 DVT patients (mean age 58.19 ± 14.47 years; 30 with no venous thromboembolism (VTE) identifiable risk factors (RF), 31 with weak RF, 30 with moderate RF and 30 with strong RF), DUS was performed at admission and after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Favourable evolution was defined as complete resolution of thrombus, whereas unfavourable evolution was defined as incomplete resolution, thrombosis recurrence or post-thrombotic syndrome. RESULTS: Complete thrombus resolution was found at 1 month (M1) in 24.8% of patients, at 6 months (M6) in 49.6% and at 24 months (M24) in 61.2% of patients. Favourable evolution was seen in younger patients at M1 and M3 (P = 0.004 and P = 0.045) and in cases with earlier treatment (P < 0.0001). In proximal DVT, the risk of non-favourable evolution was higher (4.05 times at M3, 4.23 times at M6 and 4.29 times at M12). Patients with moderate RF had an earlier favourable evolution (40% at M1, 56.67% at M6 and 70% at M24), and patients with strong RF had the lowest rate of thrombus regression (20% at M1, 36.67% at M6 and 43.33% at M24). CONCLUSIONS: DVT evolution can last up to 24 months. Older age, strong VTE RF, proximal DVT localisation and late start of therapy constitute unfavourable evolutive prognosis. These cases need closer clinical and DUS monitoring to prevent complications.

Open anterior glenohumeral dislocation with associated supraspinatus avulsion: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Open dislocation of the glenohumeral joint is a very rare complication with only six cases described in the literature. Most cases resulted in severe complications like avascular necrosis of the humeral head or septic arthritis with poor functional results. The "mandatory" treatment of choice is surgery, with accurate debridement and reconstruction of the damaged soft tissues. However, the results in these cases do not approach those seen in classical dislocations. CASE SUMMARY: This case report is the first description of an anterior open glenohumeral dislocation without associated fractures, but with complete avulsion of the soft tissue envelope of the proximal humerus. Surgical treatment consisted of copious lavage with saline solution, meticulous debridement of the nonviable soft tissues, reduction of the dislocated humeral head and reconstruction of the soft tissue envelope of the humeral head. The selected surgical approach was an inferior extension of the wound at the level of the delto-pectoral groove, as the best choice to be able to perform an adequate debridement and capsulo-tendinous reinsertion. At 6 mo there were no clinical signs of instability of the glenohumeral joint, the functionality of the joint was restricted to 90º of anterior elevation, internal rotation to L2, with severe limitation of abduction (60º) and external rotation (0º) but without residual pain, with an Oxford shoulder Score of 28. CONCLUSION: Thorough reconstruction of the soft tissues surrounding the shoulder joint and an early rehabilitation program are key points to a good functional result.