Disulfiram, an Anti-alcoholic Drug, Targets Macrophages and Attenuates Acute Rejection in Rat Lung Allografts.

Macrophages contribute to post-transplant lung rejection. Disulfiram (DSF), an anti-alcoholic drug, has an anti-inflammatory effect and regulates macrophage chemotactic activity. Here, we investigated DSF efficacy in suppressing acute rejection post-lung transplantation. Male Lewis rats (280-300 g) received orthotopic left lung transplants from Fisher 344 rats (minor histocompatibility antigen-mismatched transplantation). DSF (0.75 mg/h) monotherapy or co-solvent only (50% hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin) as control was subcutaneously administered for 7 days (n = 10/group). No post-transplant immunosuppressant was administered. Grades of acute rejection, infiltration of immune cells positive for CD68, CD3, or CD79a, and gene expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the grafts were assessed 7 days post-transplantation. The DSF-treated group had significantly milder lymphocytic bronchiolitis than the control group. The infiltration levels of CD68+ or CD3+ cells to the peribronchial area were significantly lower in the DSF than in the control groups. The normalized expression of chemokine ligand 2 and interleukin-6 mRNA in allografts was lower in the DSF than in the control groups. Validation assay revealed interleukin-6 expression to be significantly lower in the DSF than in the control groups. DSF can alleviate acute rejection post-lung transplantation by reducing macrophage accumulation around peripheral bronchi and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine expression.

Safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy compared to transbronchial forceps biopsy in patients with diffuse lung disease: An observational study using a national database in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a new technique for obtaining high-quality and large-sized lung tissues, as compared to transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), and is useful in the diagnosis of diffuse lung disease (DLD). We aimed to evaluate the safety of TBLC as compared to TBFB in DLD patients in Japan using a nationwide database. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022. Eligible patients (n = 9673) were divided into the following two groups: those who underwent TBFB (TBFB group, n = 8742) and TBLC (TBLC group, n = 931). To compare the outcomes between the two groups, a stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied using propensity scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, complications (mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, and bleeding), and length of hospital stay after bronchoscopy. RESULTS: The crude in-hospital mortality rates were 3.2% and 0.9% in the TBFB and TBLC groups, respectively. The stabilized IPTW analysis showed no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality rates between the two groups; the odds ratio of the TBLC group as compared with the TBFB group was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.34-1.60; p = 0.44). Moreover, the secondary outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TBLC for DLD patients had a similar mortality and complication rates as TBFB.

Endoscopic reflux esophagitis and decline in pulmonary function in nonsmokers: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association between reflux esophagitis and pulmonary function remains controversial. Thus, evaluating the relationship between endoscopic reflux esophagitis and changes in pulmonary function over time in a nonsmoking population is an important clinical issue. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, a medical examination database at Kameda Medical Center Makuhari was employed to identify nonsmokers who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and spirometry in 2010 and were followed up in 2015. Gastroenterologists carefully double-checked the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to compare the decline in the percentage of predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (%FVC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV1) between participants with reflux esophagitis and those without. Furthermore, using multivariable logistic regression analyses, we evaluated the factors associated with rapid decline in %VC, %FVC, and %FEV1, which is defined as a decrease of >10% in each parameter over the 5-year observation period. RESULTS: We identified 3098 eligible subjects, including 72 and 44 participants who had a Los Angeles classification grade A and B-C (severe) reflux esophagitis in 2010, respectively. The decline in %VC was significantly larger in the participants with severe reflux esophagitis than in the control subjects (standardized coefficient, -0.037; 95% confidence interval, -0.071 to -0.004). Moreover, reflux esophagitis was significantly associated with a rapid decline in %VC and %FVC but not in %FEV1 (P for trend: 0.009, 0.009, and 0.276, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severe reflux esophagitis among nonsmokers had clinical disadvantages in terms of a decline in %VC.

Efficacy of initial high- versus low-dose intravenous corticosteroid therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: A nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (AE-IIPs) has a high mortality. However, there is no established treatment for AE-IIPs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of high- and low-dose corticosteroid therapies in AE-IIPs patients. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 2010 to March 2018. Adult patients with AE-IIPs who received high-dose (methylprednisolone at a dose of 500-1000 mg/day for 3 days starting within 4 days after admission) or low-dose (methylprednisolone at a dose of 100-200 mg/day for at least 5 days starting within 4 days after admission) corticosteroid therapy were identified. Eligible patients (n = 17,317) were divided into the high-dose (n = 16,998) and low-dose (n = 319) groups. A stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was performed to compare outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, infections during hospitalization, length of hospitalization, duration of steroid use, and discharge to home. The in-hospital mortality rates of the high- and low-dose corticosteroid groups were 50.6% and 47.0%, respectively. In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups after stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, and the odds ratio in the low-dose corticosteroid group was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.16; p = 0.33). The secondary outcomes also did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients with AE-IIPs who received high- and low-dose corticosteroid therapies.