Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 40(1): 277-282, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476595

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on functional urology procedures in France. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted within 11 secondary and tertiary referral centers in France. Patients aged > 18 years who were diagnosed with a functional urology disease before the national lockdown (March 17th, 2020) and who required a surgery were included. Study period went from March 17th to September 30th 2020. The included interventions were listed according to the guidelines for functional urology enacted by the French Association of Urology and delay of reoperation was compared to the guidelines' delay. The primary outcome was the number of procedures left unscheduled at the end of the study period. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: From March 17th 2020 to September 3 rd 2020, 1246 patients with a previous diagnosis of a functional urological disease requiring a surgery were included. The mean follow-up was 140.4 days (± 53.4). Overall, 316 interventions (25.4%) were maintained whereas 74 (5.9%) were canceled, 848 (68.1%) postponed and 8 patients (0.6%) died. At the end of the follow-up, 184 patients (21.7%) were still not rescheduled. If the intervention was postponed, the mean delay between the initial and final date was 85.7 days (± 64.4). CONCLUSION: Overall, more than two thirds of interventions had to be postponed and the mean delay between the initial and final date was about three months.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Triagem , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/mortalidade
2.
Fr J Urol ; 34(9): 102674, 2024 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a combination of multimodal pathways to improve surgical outcomes. Recommendations for radical cystectomy have been published by the ERAS society for the cystectomy but a lack of evidence is observed for urological procedures such as nephrectomy (Ne) and radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery protocol implementation for Ne ad RP at our academic institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric, comparative analysis, pre and post implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy or nephrectomy (partial or total) for cancer. The primary endpoint was the mean length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included 30-days readmission, postoperative complications, 90 days survival, and oncologic outcome at 6 months. RESULTS: We included 264 patients between January, 2019, and December, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed separately by type of surgery. The LOS of patients included in the ERP protocol was decreased on average by 1.3 days IC95% [-2.50; -0.08], P<0.001 for nephrectomies and by 2.2 days IC95% [-3.72; -0.62] P<0.001 for prostatectomies, compared to non-ERP patients. There were no more re-admission, death or oncologic recurrence. CONCLUSION: In our experience, ERP for oncological nephrectomy and prostatectomy reduced the length of stay, without increasing postoperative complications and readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA