Right ventricular systolic function in organic mitral regurgitation: impact of biventricular impairment.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence, determinants, and prognosis value of right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) impairment in organic mitral regurgitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients (62±12 years, 138 males) with chronic organic mitral regurgitation referred to surgery underwent an echocardiography and biventricular radionuclide angiography with regional function assessment. Mean RV EF was 40.4±10.2%, ranging from 10% to 65%. RV EF was severely impaired (≤35%) in 63 patients (30%), and biventricular impairment (left ventricular EF<60% and RV EF≤35%) was found in 34 patients (16%). Pathophysiologic correlates of RV EF were left ventricular septal function (ß=0.42, P<0.0001), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index (ß=-0.22, P=0.002), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ß=-0.14, P=0.047). Mitral effective regurgitant orifice size (n=84) influenced RV EF (ß=-0.28, P=0.012). In 68 patients examined after surgery, RV EF increased strongly (27.5±4.3-37.9±7.3, P<0.0001) in patients with depressed RV EF, whereas it did not change in others (P=0.91). RV EF ≤35% impaired 10-year cardiovascular survival (71.6±8.4% versus 89.8±3.7%, P=0.037). Biventricular impairment dramatically reduced 10-year cardiovascular survival (51.9±15.3% versus 90.3±3.2%, P<0.0001; hazard ratio, 5.2; P<0.0001) even after adjustment for known predictors (hazard ratio, 4.6; P=0.004). Biventricular impairment reduced also 10-year overall survival (34.8±13.0% versus 72.6±4.5%, P=0.003; hazard ratio, 2.5; P=0.005) even after adjustment for known predictors (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with organic mitral regurgitation referred to surgery, RV function impairment is frequent (30%) and depends weakly on pulmonary artery systolic pressure but mainly on left ventricular remodeling and septal function. RV function is a predictor of postoperative cardiovascular survival, whereas biventricular impairment is a powerful predictor of both cardiovascular and overall survival.

Imagine how many lives you save: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition for atherosclerotic vascular disease in the present era of risk reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is clearly beneficial in patients with hypertension, heart failure, and post-myocardial infarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, whereas initial trials had reported a benefit of ACE inhibition in high-risk vascular patients, current trials of ACE inhibition have failed to demonstrate a clear benefit in vascular patients who are receiving risk-reduction interventions. The purpose of this review is to analyze the reasons behind the failure of the most recent trials of ACE inhibitors in vascular patients without overt LV dysfunction. The reader will gain an understanding of the time-dependent trend towards a reduction in the absolute benefit conferred by ACE inhibition in patients with vascular atherosclerosis as risk reduction interventions are increasingly implemented. AREAS COVERED: Major trials with a follow-up period of at least 1 year assessing the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with a history of cardiac or vascular events were identified via a PubMed literature search. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality outcomes were reported for each trial, as well as the use of aspirin, lipid-lowering drugs and ß-blockers, and the mean LV ejection fraction. EXPERT OPINION: The findings of recent trials do not support the use of ACE inhibitors in vascular patients who, adherent with risk reduction therapy, do not have hypertension, diabetes, or LV dysfunction.