Practical Considerations for the Clinical Application of Bone Turnover Markers in Osteoporosis.

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are released during the bone remodelling cycle and are measurable in blood or urine, reflecting bone remodelling rate. They have been useful in elucidating the pharmacodynamics and effectiveness of osteoporosis medication in clinical trials and are increasingly used in routine clinical management of osteoporosis, especially for monitoring therapy, in addition to their use in other metabolic bone disease such as Paget's disease of bone and osteomalacia. Serum ß isomerised C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and pro-collagen I N-terminal propeptide have been designated as reference BTMs for use in osteoporosis. In addition, bone-specific isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP) secreted by osteoblasts and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) secreted by osteoclasts are also found to be specific markers of bone formation and resorption, respectively. The concentrations of the latter enzymes in blood measured by immunoassay provide reliable measures of bone turnover even in the presence of renal failure. B-ALP is recommended for use in the assessment of renal bone disease of chronic kidney disease, and TRACP-5b shows promise as a marker of bone resorption in that condition. BTMs in blood do not suffer from biological variation to the same extent as the older BTMs that were measured in urine. Appropriate patient preparation and sample handling are important in obtaining accurate measures of BTMs for clinical use. Reference change values and treatment targets have been determined for the reference BTMs for their use in monitoring osteoporosis treatment. Further ongoing studies will enhance their clinical applications.

Analytical performance specifications for the measurement uncertainty of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D examinations.

OBJECTIVES: The exploration of the metabolites in the degradation pathways of vitamin D (VTD) has gained importance in recent years and simultaneous quantitation of twenty-five-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) mass concentration together with 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)2D) has been proposed as a newer approach to define VTD deficiency. Yet, no data are available on 24,25(OH)2D biological variation (BV). In this study, we evaluated 24,25(OH)2D's BV on the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) cohort samples to determine if analytical performance specifications (APS) for 24,25(OH)2D could be generated. METHODS: Six European laboratories recruited 91 healthy participants. 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D concentrations in K3-EDTA plasma were examined weekly for up to 10 weeks in duplicate with a validated LC-MS/MS method. The Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (24,25(OH)2D divided by 25(OH)D × 100) was also calculated at each time point. RESULTS: Linear regression of the mean 24,25(OH)2D concentrations at each blood collection showed participants were not in steady state. Variations of 24,25(OH)2D over time were significantly positively associated with the slopes of 25(OH)D concentrations over time and the concentration of 25(OH)D of the participant at inclusion, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI), but not with age, gender, or location of the participant. The variation of the 24,25(OH)2D concentration in participants over a 10 weeks period was 34.6%. Methods that would detect a significant change linked to the natural production of 24,25(OH)2D over this period at p<0.05 would need a relative measurement uncertainty (u%)<14.9% while at p<0.01, relative measurement uncertainty should be <10.5%. CONCLUSIONS: We have defined for the first time APS for 24,25(OH)2D examinations. According to the growing interest in this metabolite, several laboratories and manufacturers might aim to develop specific methods for its determination. The results presented in this paper are thus necessary prerequisites for the validation of such methods.

Comparison of four indirect (data mining) approaches to derive within-subject biological variation.

OBJECTIVES: Within-subject biological variation (CVi ) is a fundamental aspect of laboratory medicine, from interpretation of serial results, partitioning of reference intervals and setting analytical performance specifications. Four indirect (data mining) approaches in determination of CVi were directly compared. METHODS: Paired serial laboratory results for 5,000 patients was simulated using four parameters, d the percentage difference in the means between the pathological and non-pathological populations, CVi the within-subject coefficient of variation for non-pathological values, f the fraction of pathological values, and e the relative increase in CVi of the pathological distribution. These parameters resulted in a total of 128 permutations. Performance of the Expected Mean Squares method (EMS), the median method, a result ratio method with Tukey's outlier exclusion method and a modified result ratio method with Tukey's outlier exclusion were compared. RESULTS: Within the 128 permutations examined in this study, the EMS method performed the best with 101/128 permutations falling within ±0.20 fractional error of the 'true' simulated CVi , followed by the result ratio method with Tukey's exclusion method for 78/128 permutations. The median method grossly under-estimated the CVi . The modified result ratio with Tukey's rule performed best overall with 114/128 permutations within allowable error. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study demonstrates that with careful selection of the statistical approach the influence of outliers from pathological populations can be minimised, and it is possible to recover CVi values close to the 'true' underlying non-pathological population. This finding provides further evidence for use of routine laboratory databases in derivation of biological variation components.

Short- and long-term biological variation of cardiac troponin I in healthy individuals, and patients with end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis or cardiomyopathy.

Objectives High-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) assays can quantitate small fluctuations in cTn concentration. Determining biological variation allows calculation of reference change values (RCV), to define significant changes. We assessed the short- and long-term biological variation of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in healthy individuals and patients with renal failure requiring haemodialysis or cardiomyopathy. Methods Plasma samples were collected hourly for 4 h and weekly for seven further weeks from 20 healthy individuals, 9 renal failure patients and 20 cardiomyopathy patients. Pre- and post-haemodialysis samples were collected weekly for 7 weeks. Samples were analysed using a hs-cTnI assay (Abbott Alinity ci-series). Within-subject biological variation (CVI), analytical variation (CVA) and between-subject biological variation (CVG) was used to calculate RCVs and index of individuality (II). Results For healthy individuals, CVI, CVA, CVG, RCV and II values were 8.8, 14.0, 43.1, 45.8% and 0.38 respectively for short-term, and 41.4, 14.0, 25.8, 121.0% and 1.69 for long-term. For renal failure patients, these were 2.6, 5.8, 50.5, 17.6% and 0.30 respectively for short-term, and 19.1, 5.8, 11.2, 55.2% and 1.78 for long-term. For cardiomyopathy patients, these were 4.2, 10.0, 65.9, 30.0% and 0.16 respectively for short-term, and 17.5, 10.0, 63.1, 55.8% and 0.32 for long-term. Mean cTnI concentration was lower post-haemodialysis (15.2 vs. 17.8 ng/L, p < 0.0001), with a 16.9% mean relative change. Conclusions The biological variation of cTnI is similar between end-stage renal failure and cardiomyopathy patients, but proportionately greater in well-selected healthy individuals with very low baseline cTnI concentrations.

A multicenter study to evaluate harmonization of assays for N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP): a report from the IFCC-IOF Joint Committee for Bone Metabolism.

Background Biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM) are useful tools to assess bone remodeling at the cellular level. N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) has been recommended as a reference marker for bone formation in research studies. Methods We describe the results of a multicenter study for routine clinical laboratory assays for PINP in serum and plasma. Four centers (Athens, Greece [GR], Copenhagen, Denmark [DK], Liege, Belgium [BE] and Sheffield, United Kingdom [UK]) collected serum and plasma (EDTA) samples from 796 patients presenting to osteoporosis clinics. Specimens were analyzed in duplicate with each of the available routine clinical laboratory methods according to the manufacturers' instructions. Passing-Bablok regressions, Bland-Altman plots, V-shape evaluation method and the concordance correlation coefficient for PINP values between serum and plasma specimens and between methods were used to determine the agreement between results. A generalized linear model was employed to identify possible variables that affected the relationship between the methods. Results We showed that both EDTA plasma and serum were suitable for PINP determination. We observed a significant proportional bias between Orion radioimmunoassay and the automated methods for PINP (Roche Cobas and IDS iSYS), which both gave very similar results. The multivariate model did not improve the excellent correlation that was observed between the methods. Conclusions Harmonization of PINP assays is possible by applying a correction factor or correctly assigning the values of the calibrators. This work will benefit from further collaboration between assays manufacturers and clinical laboratory professionals.

Assuring the quality of interpretative comments in clinical chemistry.

The provision of interpretative advice on laboratory results is a post-analytic activity and an integral part of clinical laboratory services. It is valued by healthcare workers and has the potential to prevent or reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. It is important to ensure that interpretative comments provided by laboratory personnel are of high quality: comments should be patient-focused and answer the implicit or explicit question raised by the requesting clinician. Comment providers need to be adequately trained and qualified and be able to demonstrate their proficiency to provide advice on laboratory reports. External quality assessment (EQA) schemes can play a part in assessing and demonstrating the competence of such laboratory staff and have an important role in their education and continuing professional development. A standard structure is proposed for EQA schemes for interpretative comments in clinical chemistry, which addresses the scope and method of assessment including nomenclature and marking scales. There is a need for evidence that participation in an EQA program for interpretative commenting facilitates improved quality of comments. It is proposed that standardizing goals and methods of assessment as well as nomenclature and marking scales may help accumulate evidence to demonstrate the impact of participation in EQA for interpretative commenting on patient outcome.

A meta-analysis of reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture.

The aim of this report was to summarize the clinical performance of two reference bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the prediction of fracture risk. We used an updated systematic review to examine the performance characteristics of serum procollagen type I N propeptide (s-PINP) and serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTX) in fracture risk prediction in untreated individuals in prospective cohort studies. We excluded cross-sectional studies. Ten potentially eligible publications were identified and six included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant association between s-PINP and the risk of fracture. The hazard ratio per SD increase in s-PINP (gradient of risk [GR]) was 1.23 (95 % CI 1.09-1.39) for men and women combined unadjusted for bone mineral density. There was also a significant association between s-CTX and risk of fracture, GR = 1.18 (95 % CI 1.05-1.34) unadjusted for bone mineral density. For the outcome of hip fracture, the association between s-CTX and risk of fracture was slightly higher, 1.23 (95 % CI 1.04-1.47). Thus, there is a modest but significant association between BTMs and risk of future fractures.

Cortisol: ACTH ratio to test for primary hypoadrenalism: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: A standard short Synacthen test (SST) is the conventional diagnostic test for primary hypoadrenalism. Measuring simultaneous plasma cortisol and adrenocorticotrophin hormone (ACTH) and using the cortisol: ACTH ratio as a first-line test may be safer and more convenient than performing a SST. METHODS: A retrospective study of 349 patients who had a SST with simultaneous baseline plasma cortisol and ACTH performed between 2005 and 2010 in two separate Australian health centres. The plasma cortisol: ACTH ratio was calculated for each patient and their final diagnosis was determined based on their SST result and a review of their clinical notes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had primary hypoadrenalism, 46 patients had secondary hypoadrenalism and 285 patients had normal adrenal function. All the patients with primary hypoadrenalism had a plasma cortisol: ACTH ratio <3, while none of the patients with normal adrenal function or secondary hypoadrenalism had a cortisol: ACTH ratio <3. Therefore, a cortisol: ACTH ratio <3 had a 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of primary hypoadrenalism. Patients with secondary hypoadrenalism had a cortisol: ACTH ratio >3, while subjects with normal adrenal function had a cortisol: ACTH ratio >15. There was overlap in cortisol: ACTH ratios of patients with secondary hypoadrenalism and normal adrenal function. CONCLUSIONS: Although the cortisol: ACTH ratio predicts primary hypoadrenalism, its value is limited to diagnosing primary hypoadrenalism as it does not distinguish secondary hypoadrenalism from normal adrenal function. Larger prospective studies that include patients with early primary hypoadrenalism are needed to confirm the reliability of plasma cortisol: ACTH ratio as a diagnostic test for primary hypoadrenalism.

The Adrenal Vein Sampling Outcomes Study (AVOS): success rates following adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism.

The objective was to determine the clinical and biochemical success rates and assess the nature of follow-up after adrenalectomy in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), subtyped by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) in West Australia (WA) using the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated in patients with unilateral PA who underwent adrenalectomy according to AVS between September 2017 and September 2020. Pre- and post-surgical data were collected using a standardised questionnaire, review of clinic letters and examination of private and public pathology results and radiological reports. Follow-up data were available for 47 patients post-adrenalectomy; biochemical outcome data were available for 37 patients, clinical outcome data for 40 patients, with 30 patients having both outcomes available. Final assessment was performed between 0 to 3 months in 23/37 (62.2%) patients with biochemical outcomes, 15/40 (37.5%) with clinical outcomes, and 17/30 (56.7%) with both clinical and biochemical outcomes. Complete biochemical success was achieved in 83.8% (31/37) of patients, with 26.7% (8/30) obtaining both complete clinical and biochemical success. Complete clinical success was achieved in 35.0% (14/40) of patients, with 47.5% (19/40) obtaining partial clinical success. Overall, 93.6% (44/47) of patients derived benefit from adrenalectomy. The outcomes of adrenalectomy for unilateral PA in Western Australian using standardised PASO criteria demonstrate highly comparable clinical and biochemical success rates to international data. However, further standardisation of post-operative follow-up care needs to be implemented to ensure the recommended repeat follow-up assessment criteria are collected.

Functional Reference Limits: Describing Physiological Relationships and Determination of Physiological Limits for Enhanced Interpretation of Laboratory Results.

Functional reference limits describe key changes in the physiological relationship between a pair of physiologically related components. Statistically, this can be represented by a significant change in the curvature of a mathematical function or curve (e.g., an observed plateau). The point at which the statistical relationship changes significantly is the point of curvature inflection and can be mathematically modeled from the relationship between the interrelated biomarkers. Conceptually, they reside between reference intervals, which describe the statistical boundaries of a single biomarker within the reference population, and clinical decision limits that are often linked to the risk of morbidity or mortality and set as thresholds. Functional reference limits provide important physiological and pathophysiological insights that can aid laboratory result interpretation. Laboratory professionals are in a unique position to harness data from laboratory information systems to derive clinically relevant values. Increasing research on and reporting of functional reference limits in the literature will enhance their contribution to laboratory medicine and widen the evidence base used in clinical decision limits, which are currently almost exclusively contributed to by clinical trials. Their inclusion in laboratory reports will enhance the intellectual value of laboratory professionals in clinical care beyond the statistical boundaries of a healthy reference population and pave the way to them being considered in shaping clinical decision limits. This review provides an overview of the concepts related to functional reference limits, clinical examples of their use, and the impetus to include them in laboratory reports.

Comparison of two (data mining) indirect approaches for between-subject biological variation determination.

BACKGROUND: Between-subject biological variation (CVg) is an important parameter in several aspects of laboratory practice, including setting of analytical performance specification, delta checks and calculation of index of individuality. Using simulations, we compare the performance of two indirect (data mining) approaches for deriving CVg. METHODS: The expected mean squares (EMS) method was compared against that proposed by Harris and Fraser. Using numerical simulations, d the percentage difference in the mean between the non-pathological and pathological populations, CVi the within-subject coefficient of variation of the non-pathological distribution, f the fraction of pathological values, and e the relative increase in CVi of the pathological distribution were varied for a total of 320 conditions to examine the impact on the relative fractional of error of the recovered CVg compared to the true value. RESULTS: Comparing the two methods, the EMS and Harris and Fraser's approaches yielded similar performance of 158 conditions and 157 conditions within ± 0.20 fractional error of the true underlying CVg, for the normal and lognormal distributions, respectively. It is observed that both EMS and Harris and Fraser's method performed better using the calculated CVi rather than the actual ('presumptive') CVi. The number of conditions within 0.20 fractional error of the true underlying CVg did not differ significantly between the normal and lognormal distributions. The estimation of CVg improved with decreasing values of f, d and CViCVg. DISCUSSIONS: The two statistical approaches included in this study showed reliable performance under the simulation conditions examined.

Comparison of 8 methods for univariate statistical exclusion of pathological subpopulations for indirect reference intervals and biological variation studies.

BACKGROUND: Indirect reference intervals and biological variation studies heavily rely on statistical methods to separate pathological and non-pathological subpopulations within the same dataset. In recognition of this, we compare the performance of eight univariate statistical methods for identification and exclusion of values originating from pathological subpopulations. METHODS: The eight approaches examined were: Tukey's rule with and without Box-Cox transformation; median absolute deviation; double median absolute deviation; Gaussian mixture models; van der Loo (Vdl) methods 1 and 2; and the Kosmic approach. Using four scenarios including lognormal distributions and varying the conditions through the number of pathological populations, central location, spread and proportion for a total of 256 simulated mixed populations. A performance criterion of ± 0.05 fractional error from the true underlying lower and upper reference interval was chosen. RESULTS: Overall, the Kosmic method was a standout with the highest number of scenarios lying within the acceptable error, followed by Vdl method 1 and Tukey's rule. Kosmic and Vdl method 1 appears to discriminate better the non-pathological reference population in the case of log-normal distributed data. When the proportion and spread of pathological subpopulations is high, the performance of statistical exclusion deteriorated considerably. DISCUSSIONS: It is important that laboratories use a priori defined clinical criteria to minimise the proportion of pathological subpopulation in a dataset prior to analysis. The curated dataset should then be carefully examined so that the appropriate statistical method can be applied.

Current use of bone turnover markers in the management of osteoporosis.

The adult bone is continuously being remodelled to repair microdamage, preserve bone strength and mechanical competence as well as maintain calcium homeostasis. Bone turnover markers are products of osteoblasts (bone formation markers) and osteoclasts (bone resorption markers) providing a dynamic assessment of remodelling (turnover). Resorption-specific bone turnover markers are typically degradation products of bone collagen molecules (N- [NTX] and C-telopeptide cross-linked type 1 collagen [CTX]), which are released into the circulation and excreted in urine; or enzymatic activities reflecting osteoclastic resorption, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase [TRACP]. Formation-specific bone turnover markers embrace different osteoblastic activities: type 1 collagen synthesis (Procollagen type I N- propeptide [PINP]), osteoblast enzymes (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BALP]), or bone matrix proteins [osteocalcin]. Among individuals not receiving osteoporosis treatment, resorption and formation markers are tightly linked and highly correlated (r = 0.6-0.8). Significant biological variability was reported in the past, but these issues have been greatly improved with automated assays and attention to pre-analytical and analytical factors that are known to influence bone turnover marker levels. Bone turnover markers are not useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the individual prediction of bone loss, fracture, or rare complications, or in the selection of pharmacological treatment. Despite remaining issues with reference intervals and assays harmonization, bone turnover markers have proven to be useful in elucidating the pharmacodynamics and effectiveness of osteoporosis medications in clinical trials. As an alternative to BMD testing, BTMs may be useful to monitor osteoporosis therapies.

International Osteoporosis Foundation and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine position on bone marker standards in osteoporosis.

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Working Group on Bone Marker Standards (WG-BMS) has evaluated the clinical potential of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the prediction of fracture risk and for monitoring treatment. Research evidence suggests that BTMs may provide information on fracture risk independently from BMD, so that fracture risk prediction might be enhanced by their inclusion in assessment algorithms. The potential use of BTMs to predict the response to treatments for osteoporosis in the individual patient is also of great interest. Treatment-induced changes in specific markers account for a substantial proportion of fracture risk reduction. However, there is still a need for stronger evidence on which to base practice in both situations. IOF/IFCC recommends one bone formation marker (serum procollagen type I N propeptide, s-PINP) and one bone resorption marker (serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, s-CTX) to be used as reference markers and measured by standardised assays in observational and intervention studies in order to enlarge the international experience of the application of markers to clinical medicine and to help resolve uncertainties over their clinical use.

Official Positions for FRAX® clinical regarding biochemical markers from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®.

The best indirect evidence that increased bone turnover contributes to fracture risk is the fact that most of the proven therapies for osteoporosis are inhibitors of bone turnover. The evidence base that we can use biochemical markers of bone turnover in the assessment of fracture risk is somewhat less convincing. This relates to natural variability in the markers, problems with the assays, disparity in the statistical analyses of relevant studies and the independence of their contribution to fracture risk. More research is clearly required to address these deficiencies before biochemical markers might contribute a useful independent risk factor for inclusion in FRAX(®).

Interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry with worked examples for thyroid function test reports.

Correct interpretation of pathology results is a requirement for accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management. Clinical Pathologists and Scientists are increasingly focusing on providing quality interpretative comments on their reports and these comments are appreciated by clinicians who receive them. Interpretative comments may improve patient outcomes by helping reduce errors in application of the results in patient management. Thyroid function test (TFT) results are one of the areas in clinical chemistry where interpretative commenting is practised by clinical laboratories. We have provided a series of TFT reports together with possible interpretative comments and a brief explanation of the comments. It is felt that this would be of help in setting up an interpretative service for TFTs and also assist in training and continuing education in their provision.

The Role of PINP in Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Bone Disease.

Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP) is designated the reference marker of bone formation in osteoporosis; the reference marker for resorption is C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). PINP has very low circadian and biological variation, is not affected by food intake, and is very stable in serum after venepuncture. The two automated commercial assays for PINP provide similar results in subjects with normal renal function, allowing reference intervals to be used interchangeably. Bone turnover markers (BTM) are currently not recommended for fracture risk assessment and therefore not included in fracture risk calculators. In the management of osteoporosis, the main utility of BTM including PINP is for monitoring therapy, both antiresorptive as well as anabolic agents; monitoring is thought to help improve adherence. PINP as well as CTX may also be used in assessing offset of drug action following a pause in bisphosphonate therapy, to help decide when to re-instate therapy, or following cessation of denosumab therapy to assess efficacy of follow-on bisphosphonate therapy. PINP may also be used in the diagnosis of Paget's disease of bone as well as in monitoring response to therapy and for recurrence. Although BTM other than bone alkaline phosphatase are currently not recommended for use in metabolic bone disease of chronic kidney disease, PINP measured by assays specific to the intact molecule has potential in this condition. Further studies are needed to examine this area, as well as in malignant bone disease.

The path to the standardization of PTH: Is this a realistic possibility? a position paper of the IFCC C-BM.

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) determination is of greatest importance for patients suffering from parathyroid gland disorders and for the follow-up of bone turnover in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Two generations of PTH assays are simultaneously present on the market for PTH quantification. As these assays are not yet standardized, this results in a significant level of confusion in the care of CKD patients. One key objective of the IFCC Committee for Bone Metabolism is to improve this situation. In this position paper, we will highlight the current state of PTH testing and propose a pathway to ultimately overcome issues resulting from PTH assay variability.

Analytical considerations and plans to standardize or harmonize assays for the reference bone turnover markers PINP and ß-CTX in blood.

Procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP) and the C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ß-CTX) in blood have been designated as reference bone turnover markers in osteoporosis by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). The IFCC Committee on Bone Metabolism (C-BM) has examined current commercial assays and performed a multicentre study to examine the agreement between assays for PINP and ß-CTX in serum and plasma. The results of these studies will inform our work towards the harmonization of PINP assays and the standardization of ß-CTX assays in blood, with the development of common calibrators and reference measurement procedures in collaboration with the reagent manufacturing industry. Successful achievement of these goals will help develop universally acceptable practice guidelines for the management of osteoporosis with the inclusion of common reference intervals and treatment targets for PINP and ß-CTX.