Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Radiol ; 90(1073): 20160783, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28337922

RESUMO

Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysms (PAPs) are uncommon but potentially lethal. They may be incidentally discovered on imaging, or following massive haemoptysis if they rupture, with high risk of mortality. The most frequent causes of PAP are trauma and infectious disease. Vasculitis, in particular Behçet's disease, neoplasm, congenital disease and pulmonary hypertension are rarer causes of PAP. A PAP can be suspected from chest X-ray and contrast CT, but requires confirmation by CT angiography. Arteriography is no longer performed for diagnostic purposes, but can be useful in preparing endovascular occlusion of the PAP. In rare cases, surgery is necessary. The aim of this pictorial review was to illustrate the most common causes of acquired PAPs.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Pulmonar/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 39(5): 683-689, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26676110

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Mesenteric bleeding is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of blunt abdominal trauma. It can induce active hemorrhage and a compressive hematoma leading to bowel ischemia. Emergency laparotomy remains the gold standard treatment. We aimed to study the effectiveness and complications of embolization in patients with post-traumatic mesenteric bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 7 consecutive patients with active mesenteric bleeding treated by embolization in a level-one trauma center from 2007 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients presented with active mesenteric bleeding on CT scans without major signs of intestinal ischemia. We focused on technical success, clinical success, and the complications of embolization. RESULTS: Six endovascular procedures were successful in controlling hemorrhage but 1 patient had surgery to stop associated arterial and venous bleeding. One patient suffered from bowel ischemia, a major complication of embolization, which was confirmed by surgery. No acute renal failure was noted after angiography. For 1 patient we performed combined management as the endovascular approach allowed an easier surgical exploration. CONCLUSION: In mesenteric trauma with active bleeding, embolization is a valuable alternative to surgery and should be considered, taking into account the risk of bowel ischemia.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Artérias Mesentéricas , Mesentério/irrigação sanguínea , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Angiografia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Feminino , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Artérias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Mesentério/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 150(1): 108-15, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25940416

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short- and long-term results of an original aortic fenestration method using the funnel technique during aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome. METHODS: The funnel technique consists of deployment of an uncovered aortic stent graft placed from the false to the right lumen through an intimal flap aortic fenestration made by balloon angioplasty. Twenty-eight patients presenting with an aortic dissection (type A, n = 19; type B, n = 9) were treated for malperfusion syndrome owing to dynamic compression (16 renal, 17 bowel, and 13 lower limb ischemia) using the aforementioned technique, and had follow-up evaluation at short term (30 days) and long term (mean: 55 ± 40 months). Eight patients had severe ischemia on arrival (6 bowel, 7 renal, 3 lower limb). RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 27 of 28 patients (96%), and ischemic symptoms had disappeared in 25 of 28 patients (89%) at short-term follow up. Five patients presented postprocedure complications: 4 minor and 1 major with arterial thrombosis which caused technical failure (3.6%). The 30-day mortality rate was 7% (n = 2), related to bowel ischemia complications. At long-term follow up, 21 patients had a stable thoracic aortic diameter (91%). CONCLUSIONS: The funnel technique, in cases of malperfusion syndrome after aortic dissection, safely improves short- and long-term clinical outcome, and could represent an interesting alternative in the management of patients. The hemodynamic efficiency of this technique may account for a lower mortality in our series.


Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta/complicações , Doenças da Aorta/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Doença Aguda , Doenças da Aorta/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome
4.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 21(4): 327-33, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26081719

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and early adverse events of operative management (OM), nonoperative management (NOM), and NOM with splenic artery embolization (SAE) in blunt splenic injury (BSI) and identify the prognostic factors. METHODS: Medical records of 136 consecutive patients with BSI admitted to a trauma center from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into three groups: OM, NOM, and SAE. We focused on associated injuries and early adverse events. Multivariate analysis was performed on 23 prognostic factors to find predictors. RESULTS: The total survival rate was 97.1%, with four deaths all occurred in the OM group. The spleen salvage rate was 91% in NOM and SAE. At least one adverse event was observed in 32.8%, 62%, and 96% of patients in NOM, SAE, and OM groups, respectively (P < 0.001). We found significantly more deaths, infectious complications, pleural drainage, acute renal failures, and pancreatitis in OM and more pseudocysts in SAE. Six prognostic factors were statistically significant for one or more adverse events: simplified acute physiology score 2 ≥25 for almost all adverse events, age ≥50 years for acute respiratory syndrome, limb fracture for secondary bleeding, thoracic injury for pleural drainage, and at least one associated injury for pseudocyst. Adverse events were not related to the type of BSI management. CONCLUSION: Patients with BSI present worse outcome and more adverse events in OM, but this is related to the severity of injury. The main predictor of adverse events remains the severity of injury.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Baço/lesões , Baço/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/patologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Gerenciamento Clínico , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Baço/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA