Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease and that tumours arising from different sides of the colon (left versus right) have different clinical outcomes. Furthermore, previous analyses comparing the activity of different classes of targeted agents in patients with KRAS wild-type (wt) or RAS wt mCRC suggest that primary tumour location (side), might be both prognostic and predictive for clinical outcome. METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic and predictive influence of the localization of the primary tumour in patients with unresectable RAS wt mCRC included in six randomized trials (CRYSTAL, FIRE-3, CALGB 80405, PRIME, PEAK and 20050181), comparing chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy (experimental arm) with chemotherapy or chemotherapy and bevacizumab (control arms). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with left-sided versus right-sided tumours, and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were estimated by pooling individual study HRs/ORs. The predictive value was evaluated by pooling study interaction between treatment effect and tumour side. RESULTS: Primary tumour location and RAS mutation status were available for 2159 of the 5760 patients (37.5%) randomized across the 6 trials, 515 right-sided and 1644 left-sided. A significantly worse prognosis was observed for patients with right-sided tumours compared with those with left-sided tumours in both the pooled control and experimental arms for OS [HRs = 2.03 (95% CI: 1.69-2.42) and 1.38 (1.17-1.63), respectively], PFS [HRs = 1.59 (1.34-1.88) and 1.25 (1.06-1.47)], and ORR [ORs = 0.38 (0.28-0.50) and 0.56 (0.43-0.73)]. In terms of a predictive effect, a significant benefit for chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy was observed in patients with left-sided tumours [HRs = 0.75 (0.67-0.84) and 0.78 (0.70-0.87) for OS and PFS, respectively] compared with no significant benefit for those with right-sided tumours [HRs = 1.12 (0.87-1.45) and 1.12 (0.87-1.44) for OS and PFS, respectively; P value for interaction <0.001 and 0.002, respectively]. For ORR, there was a trend (P value for interaction = 0.07) towards a greater benefit for chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy in the patients with left-sided tumours [OR = 2.12 (1.77-2.55)] compared with those with right-sided tumours [OR = 1.47 (0.94-2.29)]. Exclusion of the unique phase II trial or the unique second-line trial had no impact on the results. The predictive effect on PFS may depend of the type of EGFR antibody therapy and on the presence or absence of bevacizumab in the control arm. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis showed a worse prognosis for OS, PFS and ORR for patients with right-sided tumours compared with those with left-sided tumours in patients with RAS wt mCRC and a predictive effect of tumour side, with a greater effect of chemotherapy plus EGFR antibody therapy compared with chemotherapy or chemotherapy and bevacizumab, the effect being greatest in patients with left-sided tumours. These predictive results should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective nature of the analysis, which was carried out on subpopulations of patients included in these trials, and because none of these studies contemplated a full treatment sequence strategy.

Predicted vitamin D status and colon cancer recurrence and mortality in CALGB 89803 (Alliance).

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D) are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and improved survival of colorectal cancer patients. However, the influence of vitamin D status on cancer recurrence and survival of patients with stage III colon cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined the influence of post-diagnosis predicted plasma 25(OH)D on outcome among 1016 patients with stage III colon cancer who were enrolled in a National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant therapy trial (CALGB 89803). Predicted 25(OH)D scores were computed using validated regression models. We examined the influence of predicted 25(OH)D scores on cancer recurrence and mortality (disease-free survival; DFS) using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Patients in the highest quintile of predicted 25(OH)D score had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for colon cancer recurrence or mortality (DFS) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.86), compared with those in the lowest quintile (Ptrend = 0.005). Higher predicted 25(OH)D score was also associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (Ptrend = 0.01 and 0.0004, respectively). The benefit associated with higher predicted 25(OH)D score appeared consistent across predictors of cancer outcome and strata of molecular tumor characteristics, including microsatellite instability and KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutation status. CONCLUSION: Higher predicted 25(OH)D levels after a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer may be associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival. Clinical trials assessing the benefit of vitamin D supplementation in the adjuvant setting are warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00003835.

A phase 1 trial of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with refractory stage IV CRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks (fixed dose) plus oral cyclophosphamide q.d. and imatinib q.d. or b.i.d. in 28-day cycles with 3+3 dose escalation. Response was assessed every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of imatinib and cyclophosphamide and circulating tumour, endothelial, and immune cell subsets were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Maximum-tolerated doses were cyclophosphamide 50 mg q.d., imatinib 400 mg q.d., and bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included nausea/vomiting, neutropaenia, hyponatraemia, fistula, and haematuria. The DLT window required expansion to 42 days (1.5 cycles) to capture delayed toxicities. Imatinib exposure increased insignificantly after adding cyclophosphamide. Seven patients (20%) experienced stable disease for >6 months. Circulating tumour, endothelial, or immune cells were not associated with progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of metronomic cyclophosphamide, imatinib, and bevacizumab is safe and tolerable without significant drug interactions. A subset of patients experienced prolonged stable disease independent of dose level.

Temsirolimus combined with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I dose-finding trial with pharmacokinetic and biomarker correlates.

BACKGROUND: Based upon preclinical evidence for improved antitumor activity in combination, this phase I study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarkers of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, temsirolimus, combined with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with incurable HCC and Child Pugh score ≤B7 were treated with sorafenib plus temsirolimus by 3 + 3 design. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) interval was 28 days. The response was assessed every two cycles. PK of temsirolimus was measured in a cohort at MTD. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The MTD was temsirolimus 10 mg weekly plus sorafenib 200 mg twice daily. Among 18 patients at MTD, DLT included grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 related adverse events at MTD included hypophosphatemia (33%), infection (22%), thrombocytopenia (17%), HFSR (11%), and fatigue (11%). With sorafenib, temsirolimus clearance was more rapid (P < 0.05). Two patients (8%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 15 (60%) had stable disease (SD). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) declined ≥50% in 60% assessable patients. CONCLUSION: The MTD of sorafenib plus temsirolimus in HCC was lower than in other tumor types. HCC-specific phase I studies are necessary. The observed efficacy warrants further study.

Design and rationale for the non-interventional Global Investigation of Therapeutic DEcisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Of its Treatment with Sorafenib (GIDEON) study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complicated condition influenced by multiple confounding factors, making optimum patient management extremely challenging. Ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, comorbidities and tumour morphology affect outcomes and vary from region to region, and there is no common language to assess patient prognosis and make treatment recommendations. Despite recent efforts to reduce the incidence of HCC, most patients present with unresectable disease. Non-surgical treatments include ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation and the multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib, but their effects in all patient subgroups are not known and further information is needed to optimise the use of these treatments. AIMS: The Global Investigation of Therapeutic DEcisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Of its Treatment with SorafeNib (GIDEON) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00812175; http://clinicaltrials.gov/) is an ongoing global, prospective, non-interventional study of patients with unresectable HCC who are eligible for systemic therapy and for whom the decision has been taken to treat with sorafenib under real-life practice conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in different subgroups, especially Child-Pugh B where data are limited. DISCUSSION: This study will recruit 3000 patients from > 40 countries and follow them for approximately 5 years to compile a large and robust database of information that will be used to analyse local, regional and global differences in baseline characteristics, disease aetiology, treatment practice patterns and treatment outcomes, with a view to improve the knowledge base used to guide physician treatment decisions and to improve patient outcomes.

Biological activities of a recombinant adenovirus p53 (SCH 58500) administered by hepatic arterial infusion in a Phase 1 colorectal cancer trial.

The major focus of intrahepatic arterial (IHA) administration of adenoviruses (Ad) has been on safety. Currently, there is little published data on the biological responses to Ad when administered via this route. As part of a Phase I study, we evaluated biological responses to a replication-defective adenovirus encoding the p53 transgene (SCH 58500) when administered by hepatic arterial infusion to patients with primarily colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. In analyzing biological responses to the Ad vector, we found that both total and neutralizing Ad antibodies increased weeks after SCH 58500 infusion. The fold increase in antibody titers was not dependent on SCH 58500 dosage. The proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) transiently peaked within 6 h of dosing. The cytokine sTNF-R2 showed elevation by 24 h post-treatment, and fold increases were directly related to SCH 58500 doses. Cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and sTNF-R1 showed no increased levels over 24 h. Predose antibody levels did not appear to predict transduction, nor did serum Ad neutralizing factor (SNF). Delivery of SCH 58500 to tumor tissue occurred, though we found distribution more predominantly in liver tissues, as opposed to tumors. RT-PCR showed significantly higher expression levels (P<0.0001, ANOVA) for adenovirus type 2 and 5 receptor (CAR) in liver tissues, suggesting a correlation with transduction. Evidence of tumor-specific apoptotic activity was provided by laser scanning cytometry, which determined a coincidence of elevated nuclear p53 protein expression with apoptosis in patient tissue. IHA administration of a replication defective adenovirus is a feasible mode of delivery, allowing for exogenous transfer of the p53 gene into target tissues, with evidence of functional p53. Limited and transient inflammatory responses to the drug occurred, but pre-existing immunity to Ad did not preclude SCH 58500 delivery.

Alternating hepatic intra-arterial floxuridine and fluorouracil: a less toxic regimen for treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) infusion of floxuridine (FUDR) via an implanted pump has shown promise in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastasized to the liver. However, the potential benefit of this therapy may be offset by the high incidence of treatment-limiting biliary toxicity. Although weekly HIA bolus of fluorouracil (5-FU) is effective against metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver with no biliary toxicity, it is limited by systemic side effects. In December 1986, we began a phase II trial of alternating HIA FUDR and 5-FU via the implanted pump in an attempt to extend the duration of treatment by obviating the limiting biliary (FUDR) and systemic (5-FU) drug toxic effects. Patients received continuous HIA FUDR at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight per day on days 1 through 8 followed by an HIA bolus of 5-FU at 15 mg/kg given via the pump sideport on days 15, 22, and 29, with the cycle repeated every 35 days. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this trial, and 64 were fully evaluable. Of the 64 patients, 30 (47%) previously had received chemotherapy. Major response (complete response plus partial response) was observed in 32 (50%) of 64 patients, and the median survival from pump implantation in all patients was 22.4 months. In contrast to the experience with the single-agent HIA FUDR regimen, no patient had treatment terminated because of drug toxicity. Alternating HIA FUDR and 5-FU has efficacy similar to that of HIA FUDR given alone, but when closely monitored and adjusted appropriately, is not associated with toxic effects requiring treatment termination.

A phase II study of axitinib in advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are highly vascular neoplasms overexpressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as well as VEGF receptors (VEGFR). Axitinib is a potent, selective inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2 and -3, currently approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. We performed an open-label, two-stage design, phase II trial of axitinib 5mg twice daily in patients with progressive unresectable/metastatic low-to-intermediate grade carcinoid tumors. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and 12-month PFS rate. The secondary end points included time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), overall radiographic response rate (ORR), biochemical response rate and safety. A total of 30 patients were enrolled and assessable for toxicity; 22 patients were assessable for response. After a median follow-up of 29months, we observed a median PFS of 26.7months (95% CI, 11.4-35.1), with a 12-month PFS rate of 74.5% (±10.2). The median OS was 45.3 months (95% CI, 24.4-45.3), and the median TTF was 9.6months (95% CI, 5.5-12). The best radiographic response was partial response (PR) in 1/30 (3%) and stable disease (SD) in 21/30 patients (70%); 8/30 patients (27%) were unevaluable due to early withdrawal due to toxicity. Hypertension was the most common toxicity that developed in 27 patients (90%). Grade 3/4 hypertension was recorded in 19 patients (63%), leading to treatment discontinuation in six patients (20%). Although axitinib appears to have an inhibitory effect on tumor growth in patients with advanced, progressive carcinoid tumors, the high rate of grade 3/4 hypertension may represent a potential impediment to its use in unselected patients.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: too many options?

PURPOSE: This study attempts to review the therapeutic interventions being used to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). DESIGN: An English language literature search, including abstracts and original articles, and a review of the bibliographies of such articles, was conducted. RESULTS: Surgery is possible in few patients and curative in only a small percentage. Conventional chemotherapy is ineffective in HCC. Modifications of chemotherapy, including intraarterial infusion, chemoembolization, lipiodol, styrene-maleic acid-neocarzinostatin (SMANCS), and isolated hepatic perfusion, have led to improved tumor responses, but have not materially affected patient outcome. Radioimmunotherapy and conformal radiotherapy have had no more than a marginal impact on patient outcome. Surgical innovations such as cryosurgery and percutaneous alcohol injection have not yet been shown to offer any advantage, and liver transplantation, while curative in some patients, requires an enormous expenditure of resources to achieve cure in few patients. CONCLUSION: Prevention is the ideal approach to HCC. Surgical cure is rarely possible, and while numerous therapies may palliate symptoms, patient selection and the lack of randomized studies make their impact on median survival difficult to assess. Patients being treated for HCC should be enrolled on treatment protocols testing multimodality or new strategies.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of gemcitabine in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9565.

PURPOSE: To ascertain if hepatic or renal dysfunction leads to increased toxicity at a given dose of gemcitabine and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its major metabolite in patients with such dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with tumors appropriate for gemcitabine therapy and who had abnormal liver or renal function tests were eligible. Patients were assigned to one of three treatment cohorts: I-AST level less than or equal to two times normal and bilirubin level less than 1.6 mg/dL; II-bilirubin level 1.6 to 7.0 mg/dL; and III-creatinine level 1.6 to 5.0 mg/dL with normal liver function. Doses were explored in at least three patients within each cohort. Gemcitabine and its metabolite were to be measured in the blood in all patients. RESULTS: Forty patients were assessable for toxicity. Transient transaminase elevations were observed in many patients but were not dose limiting. Patients with AST elevations tolerated gemcitabine without increased toxicity, but patients with elevated bilirubin levels had significant deterioration in liver function after gemcitabine therapy. Patients with elevated creatinine levels had significant toxicity even at reduced doses of gemcitabine, including two instances of severe skin toxicity. There were no apparent pharmacokinetic differences among the three groups or compared with historical controls. CONCLUSION: If gemcitabine is used for patients with elevations in AST level, no dose reduction is necessary. Patients with elevated bilirubin levels have an increased risk of hepatic toxicity, and a dose reduction is recommended. Patients with elevated creatinine levels seem to have increased sensitivity to gemcitabine, but the data are not adequate to support a specific dosing recommendation.

Cisplatin, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for salivary gland malignancies: a pilot study of the Northern California Oncology Group.

Seventeen patients with advanced or recurrent salivary gland cancer were treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy (PAF). Two patients achieved a complete response and four patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 35%. Six of the nine patients who received PAF in the neoadjuvant setting did not respond and proceeded to surgery and/or radiation therapy. No difference in response rate was found between those patients treated for recurrent disease v those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All three patients with adenocarcinoma responded. The response duration in patients with metastatic or recurrent disease ranged from 6 to 15 months. The PAF regimen was delivered primarily in the outpatient setting and was associated with acceptable toxicity. PAF demonstrates activity in salivary gland malignancies, and further evaluation of this combination seems warranted.

Octreotide acetate long-acting formulation versus open-label subcutaneous octreotide acetate in malignant carcinoid syndrome.

PURPOSE: Subcutaneous (SC) octreotide acetate effectively relieves the diarrhea and flushing associated with carcinoid syndrome but requires long-term multiple injections daily. A microencapsulated long-acting formulation (LAR) of octreotide acetate has been developed for once-monthly intramuscular dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial compared double-blinded octreotide LAR at 10, 20, and 30 mg every 4 weeks with open-label SC octreotide every 8 hours for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Seventy-nine patients controlled with treatment of SC octreotide 0.3 to 0.9 mg/d whose symptoms returned during a washout period and who returned for at least the week 20 evaluation constituted the efficacy-assessable population. RESULTS: Complete or partial treatment success was comparable in each of the four arms of the study (SC, 58.3%; 10 mg, 66.7%; 20 mg, 71.4%; 30 mg, 61.9%; P> or =.72 for all pairwise comparisons). Control of stool frequency was similar in all treatment groups. Flushing episodes were best controlled in the 20-mg LAR and SC groups; the 10-mg LAR treatment was least effective in the control of flushing. Treatment was well tolerated by patients in all four groups. CONCLUSION: Once octreotide steady-state concentrations are achieved, octreotide LAR controls the symptoms of carcinoid syndrome at least as well as SC octreotide. A starting dose of 20 mg of octreotide LAR is recommended. Supplemental SC octreotide is needed for approximately 2 weeks after initiation of octreotide LAR treatment. Occasional rescue SC injections may be required for possibly 2 to 3 months until steady-state octreotide levels from the LAR formulation are achieved.

Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Fifty-one patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were treated with Gelfoam (absorbable gelatin sterile powder; The Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, MI) chemoembolization. A mixture of Gelfoam powder, contrast media, and three drugs (doxorubicin, mitomycin, and cisplatin) was injected under fluoroscopic guidance via a percutaneous catheter into the hepatic artery until stagnation of blood flow was achieved. Of the 51 patients, 50 are assessable for response, and all are assessable for toxicity and complications. The median percent of liver replacement was 50% (range, 15% to 95%). By conventional response criteria, there were 12 partial responses (PRs) (24%), 13 minor responses (MRs) (26%), 12 stabilization of disease (SD) (24%), and 13 (26%) progressive disease (PD). Tumor liquefaction was noted on computed tomographic (CT) scan in 35 of 50 patients (70%). Of the 34 patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), 23 (68%) had a greater than 50% reduction following treatment. Responding patients were re-treated at the time of tumor progression if they still met the entry criteria. The median survival of assessable patients from the time of treatment was 207 days and from the diagnosis of the primary was 302 days. Fourteen patients remain alive at 3 months to 3 years following treatment. The vast majority of patients had transient pain, fever, nausea, and elevation in liver enzymes. Ascites developed in 14 patients. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from tumor hemorrhage and one from liver failure. Chemoembolization appears to have significant activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and is relatively well tolerated.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of paclitaxel in patients with hepatic dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9264.

PURPOSE: To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with abnormal liver function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with tumors appropriate for paclitaxel therapy who had abnormal liver function tests were eligible. Patients were assigned to one of three treatment cohorts: I, AST level twofold normal and bilirubin level less than 1.5 mg/dL; II, bilirubin level 1.6 to 3.0 mg/dL; and III, bilirubin level greater than 3.0 mg/dL. Doses were explored in at least three patients within each cohort. Although designed to assess a 24-hour infusion schedule, the trial was extended to also assess a 3-hour regimen. Pharmacokinetics were to be studied in all patients. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were assessable for toxicity. Patients with bilirubin levels greater than 1.5 mg/dL had substantial toxicity at all doses explored, whereas the toxicity for patients with elevated AST levels occurred at doses that ranged from 50 to 175 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours. In most patients, the DLT was myelosuppression. The pharmacokinetic data were insufficient to adequately evaluate the relationship between pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients who received 24-hour infusions but provided evidence of a longer exposure to paclitaxel than anticipated for the doses used in this study in the 3-hour infusion group. CONCLUSION: If paclitaxel is used for patients with elevated levels of AST or bilirubin, dose reductions are necessary, and an increase in toxicity can be anticipated. The increased myelosuppression observed is at least partially because of altered paclitaxel pharmacokinetics in such patients.

Hepatic cancers and their response to chemoembolization therapy. Quantitative image-guided 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatic embolization combined with intra-arterial administration of cytostatic drugs (chemoembolization) is frequently used to treat primary and metastatic cancers to the liver. Quantitative phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) was used to assess the metabolic state of hepatic cancers and their metabolic response to chemoembolization. METHODS: Fifteen localized 31P MRS studies were performed on five patients with liver tumors. Thirteen healthy volunteers served as controls. Metabolite ratios and molar metabolite concentrations were calculated. RESULTS: Untreated hepatic tumors, relative to normal controls, showed elevated phosphomonoester/adenosine triphosphate (PME/ATP) ratios, reduced concentrations of ATP and inorganic phosphate (Pi), and normal phosphodiester (PDE) concentrations. As an acute response to chemoembolization, ATP, PME, and/or PDE concentrations diminished, whereas Pi concentrations increased or stayed relatively constant. Long-term follow-up after chemoembolization showed decreased PME/ATP and increased ATP concentrations in the absence of changes on standard magnetic resonance and computed tomographic images. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary spectroscopic data suggest that quantitative 31P MRS can be successfully used to monitor directly metabolic response to hepatic chemoembolization.

Update on hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy.

The use of hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) chemotherapy is based on the pharmacologic principle that the regional administration of certain drugs can lead to higher drug concentrations at the site of a tumor. This has been studied most extensively in patients with liver-only colorectal metastases. Four large randomized studies have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of regional treatment over systemic chemotherapy, although two meta-analyses confirmed an improvement in response rate and suggest a trend toward improvement in survival. Two randomized studies have shown improved survival in patients treated with HIA chemotherapy, as compared with those given supportive care, and quality of life also appears to be superior in HIA chemotherapy recipients. The treatment employed in all of the randomized studies was hindered by substantial hepatobiliary toxicity and many surgical complications. Improved surgical techniques and newer chemotherapy combinations appear to have improved phase II results with HIA therapy, leading to a randomized trial now being conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB). The role of HIA chemotherapy in adjuvant settings and in other diseases has not been as well-studied, and such uses remain appropriate only for very selected patients. Ultimately, the regional advantage gained by the HIA route may prove to be most advantageous for the delivery of newer biologic agents.

Regional strategies for managing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common, difficult-to-treat cancer that has a variable natural history depending on patient demographics and the etiology and extent of underlying liver disease. Resection is the preferred treatment option but is only possible in the rare patient who has adequate hepatic reserve and limited-stage cancer. Systemic chemotherapy is mostly inactive. Because most patients with hepatocellular cancer succumb to hepatic failure, this is a disease that appears to be amenable to regional treatments. For this reason, numerous intratumoral, ablative techniques are available. Other routinely used regional treatment modalities include intraarterial chemotherapy, chemoembolization, Lipiodol chemoembolization, and internal radiation. However, the benefits of these interventions have been difficult to ascertain given the variable clinical course of the disease. Regional delivery may prove to be most valuable as a route for administering newer agents.

Regional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.

Regionally directed therapies, especially hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy, have produced encouraging results against liver metastases from colorectal cancer. An implanted system allows treatment to be administered in the outpatient setting. Intra-arterial floxuridine has been shown to produce an increased response rate and prolonged time to progression of intrahepatic tumor compared to conventional treatment, but whether or not survival is prolonged has not yet been determined. Hepatobiliary toxicity from floxuridine limits the duration of therapy. Other experimental methods of regional therapy include chemoembolization, chemofiltration and mechanical alterations in hepatic arterial flow rate.

NCCN Practice Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer.

The NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines panel believes that a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of the patient with colorectal cancer. The panel endorses the concept that treatment of patients in a clinical trial has priority over standard or accepted therapy. The recommended surgical procedure for resectable colon cancer is an en bloc resection; laparoscopic surgery should be done only in the context of a clinical trial. For patients with stage III disease, 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy is recommended. A patient who has metastatic disease in the liver or lung should be considered for surgical resection if he or she is a candidate for surgery and if surgery can extend survival. Surgery should be followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The panel advocates a conservative post-treatment surveillance program for colon and rectal carcinoma patients. Serial CEA determinations are appropriate if the patient is a candidate for aggressive surgical resection, should recurrence be detected. Abdominal and pelvic CT scans should be utilized only when there are clinical indications of possible recurrence. Patients whose disease progresses during 5-FU-based therapy should be treated with irinotecan or encouraged to participate in a phase I or phase II clinical trial.

Regional chemotherapy approaches for primary and metastatic liver tumors.

There are pharmacologic principles that make regional chemotherapy to the liver a logical treatment strategy. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma would appear to be the best candidates for such an approach. Although there are many objective responses to such treatment, survival benefit has not been demonstrated, but new regimens and refined techniques appear to be improving results. Ultimately, regional delivery may be best suited for innovative treatments such as biologicals and gene therapies.