The impact of including a medication review in an integrated care pathway: A pilot study.

AIM: The objective of the present study was to measure the impact of the intervention of combining a medication review with an integrated care approach on potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and hospital readmissions in frail older adults. METHODS: A cohort of hospitalized older adults enrolled in the French PAERPA integrated care pathway (the exposed cohort) was matched retrospectively with hospitalized older adults not enrolled in the pathway (unexposed cohort) between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2018. The study was an analysis of French health administrative database. The inclusion criteria for exposed patients were admission to an acute care department in a general hospital, age 75 years or over, at least three comorbidities or the prescription of diuretics or oral anticoagulants, discharge alive and performance of a medication review. RESULTS: For the study population (n = 582), the mean ± standard deviation age was 82.9 ± 4.9 years, and 380 (65.3%) were women. Depending on the definition used, the overall median number of PIMs ranged from 2 [0;3] on admission to 3 [0;3] at discharge. The intervention was not associated with a significant difference in the mean number of PIMs. Patients in the exposed cohort were half as likely to be readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge relative to patients in the unexposed cohort. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a medication review was not associated with a decrease in the mean number of PIMs. However, an integrated care intervention including the medication review was associated with a reduction in the number of hospital readmissions at 30 days.

Importance of previous hospital stays on the risk of hospital re-admission in older adults: a real-life analysis of the PAERPA study population.

BACKGROUND: consideration of the first hospital re-admission only and failure to take account of previous hospital stays, which are the two significant limitations when studying risk factors for hospital re-admission. The objective of the study was to use appropriate statistical models to analyse the impact of previous hospital stays on the risk of hospital re-admission among older patients. METHODS: an exhaustive analysis of hospital discharge and health insurance data for a cohort of patients participating in the PAERPA ('Care Pathways for Elderly People at Risk of Loss of Personal Independence') project in the Hauts de France region of France. All patients aged 75 or over were included. All data on hospital re-admissions via the emergency department were extracted. The risk of unplanned hospital re-admission was estimated by applying a semiparametric frailty model, the risk of death by applying a time-dependent semiparametric Cox regression model. RESULTS: a total of 24,500 patients (median [interquartile range] age: 81 [77-85]) were included between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. In a multivariate analysis, the relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of hospital re-admission rose progressively from 1.8 (1.7-1.9) after one previous hospital stay to 3.0 (2.6-3.5) after five previous hospital stays. The relative risk [95%CI] of death rose slowly from 1.1 (1.07-1.11) after one previous hospital stay to 1.3 (1.1-1.5) after five previous hospital stays. CONCLUSION: analyses of the risk of hospital re-admission in older adults must take account of the number of previous hospital stays. The risk of death should also be analysed.

Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing is associated with socioeconomic factors: a spatial analysis in the French Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region.

Background: potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing is common in older people and leads to adverse events and hospital admissions. Objective: to determine whether prevalence of PIM prescribing varies according to healthcare supply and socioeconomic status. Methods: all prescriptions dispensed at community pharmacies for patients aged 75 and older between 1 January  and 31 March 2012 were retrieved from French Health Insurance Information System of the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region for patients affiliated to the Social Security scheme. PIM was defined according to the French list of Laroche. The geographic distribution of PIM prescribing in this area was analysed using spatial scan statistics. Results: overall, 65.6% (n = 207,979) of people aged 75 years and over living in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region were included. Among them, 32.6% (n = 67,863) received at least one PIM. The spatial analysis identified 16 and 10 clusters of municipalities with a high and a low prevalence of PIM prescribing, respectively. Municipalities with a low prevalence of PIM were characterised by a high socioeconomic status whereas those with a high prevalence of PIM were mainly characterised by a low socioeconomic status, such as a high unemployment rate and low household incomes. Markers of healthcare supply were weakly associated with high or low prevalence clusters. Conclusion: significant geographic variation in PIM prescribing was observed in the study territory and was mainly associated with socioeconomic factors.

GPs' interest in integrated care for frail older adults and corresponding consulting and prescribing data: qualitative and quantitative analyses of the PAERPA integrated care project.

BACKGROUND: Integrated care pathways can help to avoid unnecessary admissions to hospital and improve the overall quality of care for frail older patients. Although these integrated care pathways should be coordinated by GPs their level of commitment may vary. AIM: To profile GPs who had participated or had declined to participate in the Personnes Agées En Risque de Perte d'Autonomie (PAERPA) integrated care project (ICP) in the Valenciennois-Quercitain area of France between 2014 and 2019. DESIGN AND SETTING: A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of GPs who were participating in or had declined to participate in the PAERPA ICP. METHOD: Both GPs participating in the ICP and GPs who chose not to participate in the ICP were interviewed, and then consultation and prescription profiles for these two groups were compared. RESULTS: Some GPs were interested in the PAERPA ICP, whereas others were opposed. The 48 qualitative interviews revealed four issues that influenced participation in the PAERPA ICP: 1) awareness of issues in care of older adults and the value of collaborative work; 2) time saving; 3) task delegation; and 4) advantages of coordination. The level of interest in the ICP for frail older adults was indirectly reflected by the data on consulting and prescribing. In GPs who participated in the PAERPA ICP there was a greater proportion of older (aged ≥70 years) patients (P<0.05), a larger number of consultations per year (P<0.05), and a larger number of home visits (P<0.01), relative to GPs who declined to participate. CONCLUSION: The level of interest in the PAERPA ICP for frail older adults varied widely among GPs. These findings suggest that commitment to an integrated care pathway could be increased by customising the recruitment strategy as a function of the GP's profile.

Accuracy of the French Administrative Database to Describe Patients' Medication and Primary Care Visits: A Validation Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the French health administrative database to describe patients' medication and primary care visits, in the context of a transitional care intervention including an in-hospital medication reconciliation followed by a structured community follow-up by the patient's general practitioner and pharmacist. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of older persons enrolled in the transitional care intervention between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2018. RESULTS: Only 46.1% of the community follow-up were timely billed, in the 3 months after the patient discharge. The sensitivity of the health administrative database to identify medications was 90.0%. Its positive predictive value was 50.1%. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the French health administrative database was poorly reliable to identify both community follow-up and chronic medications.

Transforming French Electronic Health Records into the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership's Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Common data models (CDMs) enable data to be standardized, and facilitate data exchange, sharing, and storage, particularly when the data have been collected via distinct, heterogeneous systems. Moreover, CDMs provide tools for data quality assessment, integration into models, visualization, and analysis. The observational medical outcome partnership (OMOP) provides a CDM for organizing and standardizing databases. Common data models not only facilitate data integration but also (and especially for the OMOP model) extends the range of available statistical analyses. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing French national electronic health records in the OMOP CDM. METHODS: The OMOP's specifications were used to audit the source data, specify the transformation into the OMOP CDM, implement an extract-transform-load process to feed data from the French health care system into the OMOP CDM, and evaluate the final database. RESULTS: Seventeen vocabularies corresponding to the French context were added to the OMOP CDM's concepts. Three French terminologies were automatically mapped to standardized vocabularies. We loaded nine tables from the OMOP CDM's "standardized clinical data" section, and three tables from the "standardized health system data" section. Outpatient and inpatient data from 38,730 individuals were integrated. The median (interquartile range) number of outpatient and inpatient stays per patient was 160 (19-364). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that data from the French national health care system can be integrated into the OMOP CDM. One of the main challenges was the use of international OMOP concepts to annotate data recorded in a French context. The use of local terminologies was an obstacle to conceptual mapping; with the exception of an adaptation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision, the French health care system does not use international terminologies. It would be interesting to extend our present findings to the 65 million people registered in the French health care system.

Low and stable prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in northern France.

OBJECTIVES: Few data are available on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in France. Results of the Epidémiologie des rhumatismes inflammatoires (EPIRHUM-2) study suggest a lower prevalence in northern France (0.13%) than nationwide (0.31%) or in southern France (0.66%). Here, our objective was to confirm the lower prevalence of RA in northern France than in the rest of the country or in Europe. METHODS: We used the universal health insurance database to identify patients with RA in northern France (Nord-Pas de Calais region) in 2005. RESULTS: Seven thousand one hundred and twenty-eight patients of the 3,617,224 individuals receiving health insurance under the plan for salaried workers in the Nord-Pas de Calais region (89.3% of the population in the region) were listed as receiving free care for RA, yielding a prevalence of 197.1/100,000 population (female-to-male ratio, 2.99:1; mean age, 60.8 years). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of RA in northern France (0.197% in 2005) is lower than in southern France and northern Europe; thus, the prevalence gradient in France is in the opposite direction to the decreasing north-to-south gradient previously described in Europe. Although environmental and genetic factors involved in the pathogenesis of RA may be involved, the main explanation to the low prevalence in northern France may be the young age of the population.