The helicase domain and C-terminus of human RecQL4 facilitate replication elongation on DNA templates damaged by ionizing radiation.

The vertebrate RECQL4 (RECQ4) gene is thought to be the ortholog of budding yeast SLD2. However, RecQL4 contains within its C-terminus a RecQ-like helicase domain, which is absent in Sld2. We established human pre-B lymphocyte Nalm-6 cells, in which the endogenous RECQL4 gene was homozygously targeted such that the entire C-terminus would not be expressed. The RECQL4(ΔC/ΔC) cells behaved like the parental cells during unperturbed DNA replication or after treatment with agents that induce stalling of DNA replication forks, such as hydroxyurea (HU). However, after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR), the RECQL4(ΔC/ΔC) cells exhibited hypersensitivity, inability to complete S phase and prematurely terminated or paused DNA replication forks. Deletion of BLM, a gene that also encodes a RecQ helicase, had the opposite phenotype; an almost wild-type response to IR, but hypersensitivity to HU. Targeting both RECQL4 and BLM resulted in viable cells, which exhibited mostly additive phenotypes compared with those exhibited by the RECQL4(ΔC/ΔC) and the BLM(-/-) cells. We propose that RecQL4 facilitates DNA replication in cells that have been exposed to IR.

The cullin Rtt101p promotes replication fork progression through damaged DNA and natural pause sites.

Accurate and complete DNA replication is fundamental to maintain genome integrity. While the mechanisms and underlying machinery required to duplicate bulk genomic DNA are beginning to emerge, little is known about how cells replicate through damaged areas and special chromosomal regions such as telomeres, centromeres, and highly transcribed loci . Here, we have investigated the role of the yeast cullin Rtt101p in this process. We show that rtt101Delta cells accumulate spontaneous DNA damage and exhibit a G(2)/M delay, even though they are fully proficient to detect and repair chromosome breaks. Viability of rtt101Delta mutants depends on Rrm3p, a DNA helicase involved in displacing proteinaceous complexes at programmed pause sites . Moreover, rtt101Delta cells show hyperrecombination at forks arrested at replication fork barriers (RFBs) of ribosomal DNA. Finally, rtt101Delta mutants are sensitive to fork arrest induced by DNA alkylation, but not by nucleotide depletion. We therefore propose that the cullin Rtt101p promotes fork progression through obstacles such as DNA lesions or tightly bound protein-DNA complexes via a new mechanism involving ubiquitin-conjugation.

Multiple domains of the Receptor-Interacting Protein 140 contribute to transcription inhibition.

In this study, we have investigated the role of C-terminal binding proteins (CtBPs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) in the repressive activity of the nuclear receptor cofactor Receptor-Interacting Protein 140 (RIP140). We have defined the interaction of both CtBP1 and CtBP2 with RIP140 and delineated two motifs (PIDLS and PINLS) differentially required for in vitro interaction. Using different approaches (titration of endogenous CtBPs, mutagenesis and transfection in CtBP knock-out cells), we find that recruitment of CtBPs only partially explains the negative regulation exerted by RIP140. We then demonstrate that RIP140 associates in vitro not only with class I HDACs but also with class II enzymes such as HDAC5. This interaction mainly involves the N-terminus of RIP140 (residues 27-199) and two domains of HDAC5. Moreover, the two proteins functionally interfere in transfection experiments, and confocal microscopy indicates that they co-localize in the nucleus. Interestingly, using the specific HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A, we show that HDAC activity is dispensable for active transrepression by RIP140. Finally, we demonstrate that the C-terminal region of RIP140 contains two additional silencing domains and confers strong active transrepression independently of HDAC activity and CtBPs. Altogether, these data indicate that transcriptional inhibition by the cofactor RIP140 involves complex mechanisms relying on multiple domains and partners.

Studies of genomic copy number changes in human cancers reveal signatures of DNA replication stress.

Human cancers are characterized by the presence of genomic instability. Recently, two studies have catalogued the presence of a specific class of genomic aberrations, large deletions and insertions, in a few thousand human cancers and reported that most of the prevalent recurrent focal deletions targeted common fragile sites and large genes. In various experimental systems, deletions in common fragile sites and large genes have been linked to the presence of DNA replication stress. Thus, taken together, these results suggest the presence of DNA replication stress in human cancers, consistent with the recently proposed oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development.

Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53.

The yeast checkpoint factors Mrc1p and Tof1p travel with the replication fork and mediate the activation of the Rad53p kinase in response to a replication stress. We show here that both proteins are required for normal fork progression but play different roles at stalled forks. Tof1p is critical for the activity of the rDNA replication fork barrier (RFB) but plays a minor role in the replication checkpoint. In contrast, Mrc1p is not necessary for RFB activity but is essential to mediate the replication stress response. Interestingly, stalled forks did not collapse in mrc1Delta cells exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) as they do in rad53 mutants. However, forks failed to restart when mrc1Delta cells were released from the block. The critical role of Mrc1p in HU is therefore to promote fork recovery in a Rad53p-independent manner, presumably through the formation of a stable fork-pausing complex.

The yeast Sgs1 helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication.

The members of the RecQ family of DNA helicases play conserved roles in the preservation of genome integrity. RecQ helicases are implicated in Bloom and Werner syndromes, which are associated with genomic instability and predisposition to cancers. The human BLM and WRN helicases are required for normal S phase progression. In contrast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells deleted for SGS1 grow with wild-type kinetics. To investigate the role of Sgs1p in DNA replication, we have monitored S phase progression in sgs1Delta cells. Unexpectedly, we find that these cells progress faster through S phase than their wild-type counterparts. Using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and DNA combing, we show that replication forks are moving more rapidly in the absence of the Sgs1 helicase. However, completion of DNA replication is strongly retarded at the rDNA array of sgs1Delta cells, presumably because of their inability to prevent recombination at stalled forks, which are very abundant at this locus. These data suggest that Sgs1p is not required for processive DNA synthesis but prevents genomic instability by coordinating replication and recombination events during S phase.