Pituitary metastases: a case series and scoping review.

PURPOSE: To understand the natural history and optimal treatment strategy for pituitary gland metastasis. METHODS: We performed both a retrospective chart review of patients treated at our institution and a scoping review of the topic. RESULTS: The retrospective review identified seven patients with an average age of 59.6 years. Primary histologies included breast cancer (4), melanoma (1), renal cell carcinoma (1), and sarcoma (1). Two patients had anterior pituitary endocrine dysfunction, one of whom was the only patient with visual symptoms. All patients were treated with radiosurgery and two also underwent surgical resection. Overall survival ranged from 6.5 to 117 months. Literature review identified 166 patients from 71 studies. The most common primary cancer was lung (27.7%), followed by breast (18.7%) and renal (14.5%) cancer. 107 presented with endocrine dysfunction, including 41 cases of diabetes insipidus and 55 cases of hypopituitarism. 110 presented with visual compromise. 107 patients received radiotherapy, 96 underwent surgical resection and 44 received systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy. Surgery was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of vision improvement and a decreased likelihood of endocrine normalization. Radiographic regression predicted visual improvement. Median overall survival was 9.9 months (range: 0.2-96). CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review showed that both radiosurgery and surgical resection have been frequently used to treat pituitary metastases with good response. Vision improvement is more likely to happen following surgical resection, likely at the expense of endocrine dysfunction. Despite treatment and radiographic response, patient survival remains less than a year.

Postoperative CT scans after resection of brain metastases: neurosurgical routine or added value?

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is the most common brain tumor in adults. It is the standard of care at most North American centers to obtain an early postoperative imaging after their resection. However, the necessity of this practice in the absence of a new postoperative deficit remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our surgical cohort of patients who underwent resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019. We collected demographic data and reviewed results of routine postoperative CT scans and neurological morbidities to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of an early postoperative scan. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the topic. RESULTS: Our review included 130 patients, all of whom underwent gross total resection of one or more brain metastases. On postoperative CT, none had unexpected findings such as cavity hematoma or new ischemia; no changes in management resulted from postoperative imaging. One patient required a higher dose of dexamethasone on postoperative day 4 for delayed hemiparesis and aphasia due to cerebral edema. Three additional patients underwent a wound washout for delayed infection during a subsequent admission. Our systematic review identified three additional studies; in a combined cohort of 450 patients (including our own), no patients had clinically actionable findings on routine postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Following resection of brain metastases, a routine postoperative CT scan has low diagnostic yield and did not change patient management in any cases examined in this work.

Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent stroke patients suffer significant morbidity and mortality, representing almost 30% of the stroke population. Our objective was to determine the clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent ischemic stroke (recurrent-IS). METHODS: Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020192709). Following PRISMA guidelines, our medical librarian conducted a search in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL (last performed on August 25, 2020). INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Studies reporting clinical outcomes and/or costs of recurrent-IS; (2) Original research published in English in year 2010 or later; (3) Study participants aged ≥18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Case reports/studies, abstracts/posters, Editorial letters/reviews; (2) Studies analyzing interventions other than intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Four independent reviewers selected studies with review of titles/abstracts and full-text, and performed data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by a senior independent arbitrator. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Initial search yielded 20,428 studies. Based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 studies were selected, consisting of 24,499 recurrent-IS patients. In 5 studies, recurrent-IS ranged from 4.4-56.8% of the ischemic stroke cohorts at 3 or 12 months, or undefined follow-up. Mean age was 60-80 years and female proportions were 38.5-61.1%. Clinical outcomes included mortality 11.6-25.9% for in-hospital, 30-days, or 4-years (3 studies). In one study from the U.S., mean in-hospital costs were $17,121(SD-$53,693) and 1-year disability costs were $34,639(SD-$76,586) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the paucity of data on clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent-IS and identifies gaps in existing literature to direct future research.

Acute ischemic stroke outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the impact on stroke outcomes remains uncertain. AIMS: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS and COVID-19 (AIS-COVID+). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020211977). Systematic searches were last performed on June 3, 2021 in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Databases. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) studies reporting outcomes on AIS-COVID+; (2) original articles published in 2020 or later; (3) study participants aged ≥18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) case reports with <5 patients, abstracts, review articles; (2) studies analyzing novel interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random-effects models estimated the pooled OR and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of the 43 selected studies, 46.5% (20/43) reported patients with AIS without COVID-19 (AIS-COVID-) for comparison. Random-effects model included 7294 AIS-COVID+ and 158 401 AIS-COVID-. Compared with AIS-COVID-, AIS-COVID+ patients had higher in-hospital mortality (OR=3.87 (95% CI 2.75 to 5.45), P<0.001), less mRS scores 0-2 (OR=0.53 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.62), P<0.001), longer LOS (mean difference=4.21 days (95% CI 1.96 to 6.47), P<0.001), and less home discharge (OR=0.31 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.47), P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AIS-COVID had worse outcomes, with almost fourfold increased mortality, half the odds of mRS scores 0-2, and one-third the odds of home discharge. These findings confirm the significant impact of COVID-19 on early stroke outcomes.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam CT for Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to synthesize evidence in the literature to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hemorrhage types, including intraparenchymal (IPH), subarachnoid (SAH), and intraventricular (IVH). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO-CRD42021261915). Systematic searches were last performed on April 30, 2024 in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Studies reporting diagnostic metrics of CBCT for ICH; (2) Studies using a reference standard to determine ICH. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Case reports, abstracts, reviews; (2) Studies without patient-level data. Pooled-estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for diagnostic Odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity using random-effects and common-effects models. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate risk-of-bias. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis yielding 466 patients. Mean/median age ranged from 54-75 years. Females represented 51.4% (222/432) in reported studies. Multidetector-CT was the reference standard in all studies. DOR, pooled-sensitivity, and pooled-specificity for ICH were 5.28 (95%CI:4.11-6.46), 0.88 (95%CI:0.79-0.97), and 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). Pooled-sensitivity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.98 (95%CI:0.95-1.0), 0.82 (95%CI:0.57-1.0), and 0.78 (95%CI:0.55-1.0). Pooled-specificity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0), 0.99 (95%CI:0.97-1.0), and 1.0 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). DISCUSSION: CBCT had moderate DOR and high pooled-specificity for ICH and hemorrhage types. However, pooled-sensitivity varied by hemorrhage type, with the highest sensitivity for IPH, followed by SAH and IVH.

Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Kidney Disease in HIV Infected Individuals - A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Kidney disease is the fourth most common cause of non-AIDS-related mortality in people living with HIV. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) remains the cornerstone of treatment. However, little is known about the impact of cART on disease outcomes in patients with HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) and HIV-immune complex kidney disease (HIVICK). This systematic review evaluates the impact of cART on progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and other outcomes in HIV-infected individuals. We conducted a literature search utilizing PubMed, and Cochrane database and 11 articles met inclusion criteria for analysis of which nine HIVAN studies showed decreased progression to ESKD or death for subjects when treated with cART versus those untreated. However, two studies showed no survival advantage with cART. Three HIVICK studies showed improvement in delaying ESKD in subjects on cART compared to untreated subjects. cART appeared to reduce the risk to ESKD or death in patients with both HIVAN and HIVICK.

Illness perception in patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney failure: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patient education is a crucial component in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, many education programmes do not tailor to patients' disease-related belief and emotional reactions. According to Leventhal's self-regulation model, such beliefs and reactions, known as illness perceptions, are a part of patients' understanding of their disease and treatment-related actions. The existing research of illness perception in the field of nephrology has been heterogenous in terms of study outcomes and in study population; and the evidence of how illness perceptions affect behavioural and decisional outcomes is limited. This scoping review aims to map and summarise the evidence of published literature on illness perception among patients with CKD not yet treated by dialysis and kidney failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study bases its approach on Joanna Brigg's Institute Guidelines on scoping review methods. The search strategy was developed together with a medical information specialist. Searches will be performed on acceptance of publication in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO via Ovid, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Searches will be run without incorporating a date restriction in order to capture content from the databases' inception to present day. Search terms including 'illness perception', 'kidney disease' and 'kidney failure' will be screened in titles and abstracts. Two independent researchers will screen the abstracts and full text for full eligibility. We will include studies focusing on illness perception of patients with CKD with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney failure or recipients of kidney transplant. We will exclude patients <18 years of age, patients with acute kidney injury and non-English articles. All demographic data, study design and study findings will be collected and analysed using a data abstraction tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require internal review board approval. We will present the findings of this scoping review in a peer-reviewed journal.

Diving Under the SuRRFace: Achieving More Than Just Compliance with ACGME Scholarly Activity Mandate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if building a digital technology supported infrastructure improves general surgery residents' confidence to conduct clinical research. DESIGN: We developed and introduced a multimodal virtual Surgery Resident Research Forum (SuRRF) in July 2019. An anonymized survey asked residents to rate their confidence using a five-point Likert scale in various fields pre- and post-intervention. Fields included: finding a research mentor, developing a project, conducting research, performing an effective literature search, navigating internal and external resources, and ability to complete a research project. SETTING: Northwell Health - North Shore University Hospital / Long Island Jewish Medical Center: academic tertiary care centers. PARTICIPANTS: All 58 residents in our general surgery program, including research residents, were eligible to participate in our study. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 55% (28 clinical residents, 4 research fellows). Post-implementation of SuRRF, all respondents (PGY1-5) reported an increase in awareness of abstract/conferences submission deadlines (2.34 ± 1.1 pre- vs. 3.75 ± 1.1 post-implementation, p = 0.004) and ability to navigate institutional electronic medical information library resources (2.2 ± 1.0 pre- vs. 3.62 ± 1.2 post-implementation, p = 0.000). Junior residents (PGY1-3) had improvement in all areas except for finding a mentor and improving their confidence with literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Creation of a resident-led virtual laboratory infrastructure increases participation, improves perception of research abilities, and improves attitudes towards performing clinical research among general surgery residents. Future research will follow the impact of this virtual laboratory on publications and grants.