Single-shot intraoperative local anaesthetic infiltration does not reduce morphine consumption after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The infiltration of local anaesthetic (LA), ketorolac, and epinephrine has been suggested to be effective for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The part of action of each component of the mixture remains unclear. We investigated the contribution of infiltration of ropivacaine alone on the morphine consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing primary THA were included in this prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, after IRB approval and informed consent. Surgical and general anaesthetic management were standardized. At the end of surgery, 80 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% (160 mg) or saline was infiltrated. The primary endpoint was morphine consumption 24 h after surgery. The secondary endpoints were: visual analogue scale scores and opioid side-effects at H2, H4, H8, H12, H24, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, rehabilitation programme progress, chronic pain level, analgesic consumption, and surgical result at 3 months and 1 yr after surgery. The observation period was 1 yr. RESULTS: Groups were similar for patient characteristic and perioperative characteristics. The ropivacaine wound infiltration did not reduce morphine consumption at 24 h [median (25th and 75th inter-quartile) 27 (17-37) mg in the ropivacaine group vs 24 (18-34) mg in the placebo group, P=0.51] or its side-effects. No effect was found on rehabilitation progress or chronic pain after 3 months or 1 yr, but these were not the main endpoints of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine infiltration alone did not reduce morphine consumption at 24 h after operation nor did it improve postoperative rehabilitation.

[Systemic toxicity with mepivacaine following axillary block in a patient with terminal kidney failure]. / Toxicité systémique à la mépivacaïne après un bloc axillaire chez un patient insuffisant rénal chronique.

As onset time and duration of sensory block are intermediate, mepivacaine is widely used for regional anaesthesia. Few reports of systemic adverse effects are available following nerve blockade with mepivacaine. We report the case of a 54-year-old patient suffering from terminal renal failure who needs the confection of an arteriovenous shunt under axillary brachial plexus block. At completion of the injection of 25 ml (375 mg) of 1.5% mepivacaine the patient presented dysarthria, mental confusion followed by a loss of verbal contact and agitation, but no convulsion or cardiac dysrythmia. The patient received midazolam and surgery was planned the following day under general anaesthesia. Plasma mepivacaine concentration at time of neurological signs was measured at 5.1 microg/ml. Prevention and treatment of systemic toxic effects after regional anaesthesia are discussed.

[Pulmonary artery catheterization in the intensive care unit: at what time?]. / Cathétérisme artériel pulmonaire en réanimation: à quelle heure?

OBJECTIVES: Recording the time at which the insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter was decided. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective and descriptive study. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients in an university hospital. METHODS: The times at which the insertion of a PAC was decided were recorded. For each pulmonary artery catheterization, immediate complications were recorded (arterial puncture, pneumothorax, ventricular arrhythmia, hard and failed pulmonary artery catheterization). RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine patients were included (99 males, age = 63 +/- 15 year, body mass index = 25 +/- 6 kg.m-2, median Apache II score = 16). One hundred and sixty-five PAC insertions were decided (16 patients requiring two PACs). Nine arterial punctures, two pneumothoraces, 42 ventricular arrhythmias, 32 hard and eight failed pulmonary artery catheterizations occurred. Thirty-four PAC insertions were decided between 9 and 10 am whereas = 3 PAC insertions per hour were decided between 1 and 9 am. CONCLUSION: The rate of decision of PAC insertion are decreased during the second half of the night (1 to 9 AM).

[Anesthesia and preeclampsia]. / Anesthésie et prééclampsie.

An assessment of the patient must take place as early as possible in view of anaesthesia. It is recommended to perform a clotting screen as close as possible to the performing of an epidural anaesthesia. The use of aspirin, if indicated for the prevention of PE, does not as such, constitute a contraindication to performing an epidural anaesthesia if: With regards to the minimum platelet count, the recommended cut-off value for the performing of an epidural and spinal anaesthesia are 75 & 50 x 10(9)/l respectively, only if all of the following conditions are met: It is recommended to quickly set up an epidural anaesthesia because this will improve the blood pressure as well as the utero-placenteric haemodynamics and also because this will facilitate the management in case of a caesarean section. Whereas methylergometrine (Methergin) is contraindicated in the preeclamptic patient, it is possible to use oxytocin (Syntocinion) during and after labour. Before performing a spinal anaesthesia, it is recommended to restrain the administration of crystalloids to a maximum of 1000 ml. Also the i.v. antihypertensive treatment should be reduced or interrupted until complete establishment of the anaesthetic. In case a general anaesthesia is to be performed, an assessment of the criteria for difficult intubation should be performed immediately prior to the induction. The technique employed should be a rapid sequence induction with intubation, while preventing a surge in blood pressure induced by the tracheal intubation. Difficulties to extubate should systematically be anticipated. It is possible to perform a loco-regional anaesthesia following an eclamptic crisis if the following conditions are met: In case of overlapping seizures and/or impaired consciousness, a general anaesthesia is recommended.

[Triple nerve block for ambulatory knee arthroscopy]. / Tribloc (fémoral, sciatique, obturateur) pour la chirurgie ambulatoire arthroscopique de genou: étude prospective de faisabilité et d'efficacité.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and postoperative conditions of the triple nerve block technique (femoral, obturator, sciatic block) for outpatient knee arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: After written informed consent, ASA I-III patients received a combined triple nerve block with 30-40 ml lidocaine or mepivacaine (1,5%). Blocks were performed using a nerve stimulation technique. Onset time, block failure, supplemental general anesthesia (GA) or analgesia and pain score were recorded intraoperatively. After surgery, side effects (at days 0, 1, 3, 7 and after 4 weeks), patient and surgeon satisfactions were noted. RESULTS: Three hundred and twelve patients were screened and 115 triple blocks were performed (157 chose GA, 19 spinal anaesthesia, 21 exclusion for regional anaesthesia). Failed blocks occurred for 12 (10%) patients. These 12 patients received GA before surgery incision. Time to complete block was 40 (10-60) min. Supplemental GA was required for 12 patients (12%) due to surgical (n=7, 7%) or tourniquet (n=5, 5%) pain. Intraoperative surgeon satisfaction was 90 (60-100). After surgery, time to discharge the postoperative care unit was 15 (5-60) min. Pain score at rest (Visual Analog Scale) until six hours was less than 30 /100, without any additional morphine. Two patients (< 2%) failed for ambulatory discharge criteria (no relation with triple block). At day 0, 3, 5% patients suffered PONV (8% at D1), paresthesia was noted in 1.7% at D0 (0,8% D3). No other secondary effects were observed after seven days and 91% patients "would like same anaesthesia" for next surgery. CONCLUSION: We conclude that triple nerve block provided reliable intraoperative patient and surgical conditions for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Failed block (10%) was the major reason of supplemental anaesthesia. To increase surgical turn over under triple nerve block, a preoperative room may be required (block onset time).

Chronobiology of labour pain perception: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Circadian variation may affect many biological and pharmacological phenomena. METHODS: To assess circadian variations in labour pain perception, 222 consecutive nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy, spontaneous labour, cervical dilatation (3-5 cm), ruptured membranes and normal fetal heart rate tracings were studied. Visual analogue pain scores (VAPS) were analysed and divided into four periods: night (1:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.), morning (7:01 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.), afternoon (1:01 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.) and evening (7:01 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.). VAPS were also compared between daytime (morning+afternoon) and nocturnal (evening+night) periods. RESULTS: Daytime mean VAPS were lower than nocturnal scores [75.6 (15.1) vs 85.7 (14.1), P<0.0001]. VAPS were lower in the morning than in the afternoon, evening and night periods (anova, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Labour pain perception appears to be chronobiological, and this might be taken into account when enrolling parturients in studies designed to assess or treat labour pain.