RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most incident cancers, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and usually classified into three main molecular pathways: chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Currently, available screening methods are either costly or of limited specificity, impairing global implementation. More cost-effective strategies, including DNA methylation-based tests, might prove advantageous. Although some are already available, its performance is suboptimal, entailing the need for better candidate biomarkers. Herein, we tested whether combined use of APC, IGF2, MGMT, RASSF1A, and SEPT9 promoter methylation might accurately detect CRC irrespective of molecular subtype. METHODS: Selected genes were validated using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 214 CRC and 50 non-malignant colorectal mucosae (CRN). Promoter methylation levels were assessed using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. MSI and CIMP status were determined. Molecular data were correlated with standard clinicopathological features. Diagnostic and prognostic performances were evaluated by receiver operator characteristics curve and survival analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Except for IGF2, promoter methylation levels were significantly higher in CRC compared to CRN. A three-gene panel (MGMT, RASSF1A, SEPT9) identified malignancy with 96.6% sensitivity, 74.0% specificity and 91.5 positive predictive value (area under the curve: 0.97), independently of tumor location, stage, and molecular pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Combined promoter methylation analysis of MGMT/RASSF1A/SEPT9 displays a better performance than currently available epigenetic-based biomarkers for CRC, providing the basis for the development of a non-invasive assay to detect CRC irrespective of the molecular pathway.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Metilação de DNA/genética , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Ilhas de CpG , Epigênese Genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fenótipo , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CR-HIPEC) is a locorregional surgical therapy applied in patients with peritoneal-only metastatic disease of primary abdominal malignancies. Integrated in a multimodal treatment, CR-HIPEC is associated with increased overall survival. In cases of peritoneal-site only relapse, it may be carried out more than once. METHODS: Patients who received a CR-HIPEC between January 2016 and December 2020 at Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Portugal were included in a unicentric, retrospective, observational study. Short- and long-term outcomes after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: In this period, 259 CR-HIPEC were performed on 248 patients. Of these, 31 were CR-HIPEC repeats, with 6 being the third HIPEC in the same patient. Of the 31 cases, 15 (48.4 %) had an appendicular origin. Mean PCI in re-HIPEC group was 10.6 (SD ± 7.1). No significant differences in baseline characteristics between the first and re-HIPEC groups were found, except for mean PCI, higher in the 1st HIPEC group (p = 0.047). In re-HIPEC group, major complications rate (CT-CAE 3-4) was 12.9 % (n = 4), without postoperative mortality. The 1st and re-HIPEC group had similar morbidity rates and hospitalization time. With a median follow-up time of 44 months, relapse rate after repeat CR-HIPEC was 45.2 % (n = 14), with a mean overall survival (OS) of 68.7 months and 5-year OS of 78 %. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat CR-HIPEC is a safe approach with an acceptable complication rate for its complexity, associated with a survival benefit in selected patients. It should be presented as a valid therapeutic option in recurrent peritoneal disease.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seguimentos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Prognóstico , Terapia Combinada , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , AdultoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification for gastric cancer introduced changes, mainly in stage III, with the incorporation of the pN3 sub-classification in the final staging group. The goal was to compare the 7th and 8th editions to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the new edition. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients with gastric cancer treated with surgery in 2013 and 2014. RESULTS: We analysed 310 patients, with a median age of 66 years and out of which 55.5% were male. The most commonly performed surgery was subtotal gastrectomy (n = 158; 51%), with a median of 30 lymph nodes removed. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, the 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) was 82% and 59%, respectively. In stage III (n = 115), there was stage migration in 40 cases (34.8%), with upstage in 11 cases and downstage in 29 cases. In this group, there was a statistically significant difference in OS between N3a and N3b patients (p = 0.002), as well as a statistically significant difference in OS between stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC when the 8th edition was applied (p = 0.001), which was not verified with the 7th edition (p = 0.057). In multivariate analysis, both extracapsular extension and N classification from TNM were independent prognostic factors (p = 0.033 and p = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 8th edition of the AJCC TNM classification allows for a better prognostic refinement, namely in the new stage III groups after the stratification of lymph node disease in N3a and N3b. Factors that evaluate the biological behaviour of the disease remain excluded from this edition, such as extracapsular extension, which had a prognostic impact in our series.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Studies on the performance of epigenetic-based biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) are scarce and have shown contradictory results. Thus, we sought to examine the prognostic value of histone-modifying enzymes (EZH2, SETDB1 and LSD-1) and histone post-translational marks (H3K27me3 and H3K9me3) in CRC. METHODS: A retrospective series of 207 CRC patients primarily submitted to surgery in a cancer center was included in this study. Clinicopathological data were retrieved. One representative paraffin block per case was selected for immunohistochemistry, including normal and CRC tissues whenever possible. The percentage of positive nuclear staining (digital image analysis) was used to classify patients into "low" and "high" expression groups for each biomarker. Correlations between immunoexpression levels, clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes [disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free (DFS) survival] were examined. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: CRC tissues showed significantly lower expression of SETDB1 and higher expression of the remainder four biomarkers compared to normal mucosa. High EZH2 expression correlated with disease recurrence/progression, whereas low LSD1 expression and high H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 expression were associated with more advanced stage. In multivariable analysis, cases with high LSD1 expression displayed significantly better DSS and DFS (HR 0.477, 95% confidence interval: 0.247-0.923) adjusted for pathological TNM stage. CONCLUSION: EZH2, SETDB1, LSD1, H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 expression are altered in CRC and may play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. LSD1 immunoexpression levels independently predicted patient outcome in this cohort. Further investigations, using larger series, are warranted to confirm its potential clinical value and unravel underlying molecular mechanisms.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/metabolismo , Proteína Potenciadora do Homólogo 2 de Zeste/biossíntese , Histona Desmetilases/biossíntese , Histonas/metabolismo , Proteínas Metiltransferases/biossíntese , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/biossíntese , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Histona-Lisina N-Metiltransferase , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Lisina/metabolismo , Masculino , Metilação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIM: To investigate the rate of laparoscopic colectomies for colon cancer using registries and population-based studies. To provide a position paper on mini-invasive (MIS) colon cancer surgery based on the opinion of experts leader in this field. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines for the rate of laparoscopy in colon cancer. Moreover, Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus among 35 international experts in four study rounds. Consensus was defined as an agreement ≥75.0%. Domains of interest included nosology, essential technical/oncological requirements, outcomes and MIS training. RESULTS: Forty-four studies from 42 articles were reviewed. Although it is still sub-optimal, the rate of MIS for colon cancer increased over the years and it is currently >50% in Korea, Netherlands, UK and Australia. The remaining European countries are un-investigated and presented lower rates with highest variations, ranging 7-35%. Using Delphi methodology, a laparoscopic colectomy was defined as a "colon resection performed using key-hole surgery independently from the type of anastomosis". The panel defined also the oncological requirements recognized essential for the procedure and agreed that when performed by experienced surgeons, it should be marked as best practice in guidelines, given the principles of oncologic surgery be respected (R0 procedure, vessel ligation and mesocolon integrity). CONCLUSION: The rate of MIS colectomies for cancer in Europe should be further investigated. A panel of leaders in this field defined laparoscopic colectomy as a best practice procedure when performed by an experienced surgeon respecting the standards of surgical oncology.