Reanalysis of eMERGE phase III sequence variants in 10,500 participants and infrastructure to support the automated return of knowledge updates.

PURPOSE: The clinical genomics knowledgebase is dynamic with variant classifications changing as newly identified cases, additional population data, and other evidence become available. This is a challenge for the clinical laboratory because of limited resource availability for variant reassessment. METHODS: Throughout the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics phase III program, clinical sites associated with the Mass General Brigham/Broad sequencing center received automated, real-time notifications when reported variants were reclassified. In this study, we summarized the nature of these reclassifications and described the proactive reassessment framework we used for the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics program data set to identify variants most likely to undergo reclassification. RESULTS: Reanalysis of 1855 variants led to the reclassification of 2% (n = 45) of variants, affecting 0.6% (n = 67) of participants. Of these reclassifications, 78% (n = 35) were high-impact changes affecting reportability, with 8 variants downgraded from likely pathogenic/pathogenic to variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 27 variants upgraded from VUS to likely pathogenic/pathogenic. Most upgraded variants (67%) were initially classified as VUS-Favor Pathogenic, highlighting the benefit of VUS subcategorization. The most common reason for reclassification was new published case data and/or functional evidence. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of periodic sequence variant reevaluation and the need for automated approaches to advance routine implementation of variant reevaluations in clinical practice.

Multiple GYPB gene deletions associated with the U- phenotype in those of African ancestry.

BACKGROUND: The MNS blood group system is defined by three homologous genes: GYPA, GYPB, and GYPE. GYPB encodes for glycophorin B (GPB) carrying S/s and the "universal" antigen U. RBCs of approximately 1% of individuals of African ancestry are U- due to absence of GPB. The U- phenotype has long been attributed to a deletion encompassing GYPB exons 2 to 5 and GYPE exon 1 (GYPB*01N). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from two U-individuals underwent Illumina short read whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Nanopore long read WGS. In addition, two existing WGS datasets, MedSeq (n = 110) and 1000 Genomes (1000G, n = 2535), were analyzed for GYPB deletions. Deletions were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Twenty known U- donor samples were tested by a PCR assay to determine the specific deletion alleles present in African Americans. RESULTS: Two large GYPB deletions in U- samples of African ancestry were identified: a 110 kb deletion extending left of GYPB (DEL_B_LEFT) and a 103 kb deletion extending right (DEL_B_RIGHT). DEL_B_LEFT and DEL_B_RIGHT were the most common GYPB deletions in the 1000 Genomes Project 669 African genomes (allele frequencies 0.04 and 0.02). Seven additional deletions involving GYPB were seen in African, Admixed American, and South Asian samples. No samples analyzed had GYPB*01N. CONCLUSIONS: The U- phenotype in those of African ancestry is primarily associated with two different complete deletions of GYPB (with intact GYPE). Seven additional less common GYPB deletion backgrounds were found. GYPB*01N, long assumed to be the allele commonly encoding U- phenotypes, appears to be rare.

Overcoming the challenges of interpreting complex and uncommon RH alleles from whole genomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rh is one of the most diverse and complex blood group systems. Recently, next generation sequencing (NGS) has proven to be a viable option for RH genotyping. We have developed automated software (bloodTyper) for determining alleles encoding RBC antigens from NGS-based whole genome sequencing (WGS). The bloodTyper algorithm has not yet been optimized and evaluated for complex and uncommon RH alleles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two samples with previous polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing-based RH genotyping underwent WGS. bloodTyper was used to detect RH alleles including those defined by structural variation (SV) using a combination of three independent strategies: sequence read depth of coverage, split reads and paired reads. RESULTS: bloodTyper was programmed to identify D negative and positive phenotypes as well as the presence of alleles encoding weak D, partial D and variant RHCE. Sequence read depth of coverage calculation accurately determined RHD zygosity and detected the presence of RHD/RHCE hybrids. RHCE*C was determined by sequence read depth of coverage and by split read methods. RHD hybrid alleles and RHCE*C were confirmed by using a paired read approach. Small SVs present in RHCE*CeRN and RHCE*ceHAR were detected by a combined read depth of coverage and paired read approach. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of several different interpretive approaches allowed for automated software based-RH genotyping of WGS data including RHD zygosity and complex compound RHD and RHCE heterozygotes. The scalable nature of this automated analysis will enable RH genotyping in large genomic sequencing projects.