Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 174
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(12): 3219-3227, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28758341

RESUMO

In the phase II IM103-100 study, kidney transplant recipients were first randomized to belatacept more-intensive-based (n = 74), belatacept less-intensive-based (n = 71), or cyclosporine-based (n = 73) immunosuppression. At 3-6 months posttransplant, belatacept-treated patients were re-randomized to receive belatacept every 4 weeks (4-weekly, n = 62) or every 8 weeks (8-weekly, n = 60). Patients initially randomized to cyclosporine continued to receive cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Cumulative rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) from first randomization to year 10 were 22.8%, 37.0%, and 25.8% for belatacept more-intensive, belatacept less-intensive, and cyclosporine, respectively (belatacept more-intensive vs cyclosporine: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.92; P = .89; belatacept less-intensive vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.61; 95% CI 0.85-3.05; P = .15). Cumulative BPAR rates from second randomization to year 10 for belatacept 4-weekly, belatacept 8-weekly, and cyclosporine were 11.1%, 21.9%, and 13.9%, respectively (belatacept 4-weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.35-3.17, P = .92; belatacept 8-weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 2.00, 95% CI 0.75-5.35, P = .17). Renal function trends were estimated using a repeated-measures model. Estimated mean GFR values at year 10 for belatacept 4-weekly, belatacept 8-weekly, and cyclosporine were 67.0, 68.7, and 42.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2 , respectively (P<.001 for overall treatment effect). Although not statistically significant, rates of BPAR were 2-fold higher in patients administered belatacept every 8 weeks vs every 4 weeks.


Assuntos
Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Testes de Função Renal , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Am J Transplant ; 17(10): 2627-2639, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371372

RESUMO

We previously reported that two B cell receptor genes, IGKV1D-13 and IGKV4-1, were associated with tolerance following kidney transplantation. To assess the potential utility of this "signature," we conducted a prospective, multicenter study to determine the frequency of patients predicted tolerant within a cohort of patients deemed to be candidates for immunosuppressive minimization. At any single time point, 25-30% of patients were predicted to be tolerant, while 13.7% consistently displayed the tolerance "signature" over the 2-year study. We also examined the relationship of the presence of the tolerance "signature" on drug use and graft function. Contrary to expectations, the frequency of predicted tolerance was increased in patients receiving tacrolimus and reduced in those receiving corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, or Thymoglobulin as induction. Surprisingly, patients consistently predicted to be tolerant displayed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate that increased over time following transplantation. These findings indicate that the frequency of patients consistently predicted to be tolerant is sufficiently high to be clinically relevant and confirm recent findings by others that immunosuppressive agents impact putative biomarkers of tolerance. The association of a B cell-based "signature" with graft function suggests that B cells may contribute to the function/survival of transplanted kidneys.


Assuntos
Tolerância Imunológica/genética , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos B/genética , Sequência de Bases , Estudos de Coortes , Primers do DNA , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Am J Transplant ; 17(11): 2945-2954, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28675676

RESUMO

Early subclinical inflammation in kidney transplants is associated with later graft fibrosis and dysfunction. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) can reverse established inflammation in animal models. We conducted a pilot safety and feasibility trial of autologous Treg cell therapy in three kidney transplant recipients with subclinical inflammation noted on 6-month surveillance biopsies. Tregs were purified from peripheral blood and polyclonally expanded ex vivo using medium containing deuterated glucose to label the cells. All patients received a single infusion of ~320 × 106 (319, 321, and 363.8 × 106 ) expanded Tregs. Persistence of the infused Tregs was tracked. Graft inflammation was monitored with follow-up biopsies and urinary biomarkers. Nearly 1 × 109 (0.932, 0.956, 1.565 × 109 ) Tregs were successfully manufactured for each patient. There were no infusion reactions or serious therapy-related adverse events. The infused cells demonstrated patterns of persistence and stability similar to those observed in non-immunosuppressed subjects receiving the same dose of Tregs. Isolation and expansion of Tregs is feasible in kidney transplant patients on immunosuppression. Infusion of these cells was safe and well tolerated. Future trials will test the efficacy of polyclonal and donor alloantigen-reactive Tregs for the treatment of inflammation in kidney transplants.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/terapia , Inflamação/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Inflamação/etiologia , Inflamação/patologia , Isoantígenos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Doadores de Tecidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am J Transplant ; 15(6): 1644-53, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649117

RESUMO

Tofacitinib fixed-dose regimens attained better kidney function and comparable efficacy to cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplant patients, albeit with increased risks of certain adverse events. This post-hoc analysis evaluated whether a patient subgroup with an acceptable risk-benefit profile could be identified. Tofacitinib exposure was a statistically significant predictor of serious infection rate. One-hundred and eighty six kidney transplant patients were re-categorized to above-median (AME) or below-median (BME) exposure groups. The 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection rates in AME, BME and CsA groups were 7.8%, 15.7% and 17.7%, respectively. Measured glomerular filtration rate was higher in AME and BME groups versus CsA (61.2 and 67.9 vs. 53.9 mL/min) at Month 12. Fewer patients developed interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) at Month 12 in AME (20.5%) and BME (27.8%) groups versus CsA (48.3%). Serious infections occurred more frequently in the AME group (53.0%) than in BME (28.4%) or CsA (25.5%) groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) only occurred in the AME group. In kidney transplant patients, the BME group preserved the clinical advantage of comparable acute rejection rates, improved renal function and a lower incidence of IF/TA versus CsA, and with similar rates of serious infection and no PTLD.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Rim/fisiopatologia , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Biópsia , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Ciclosporina/farmacologia , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/efeitos dos fármacos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/patologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/farmacologia , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/farmacologia , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
5.
Am J Transplant ; 13(1): 136-45, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23137180

RESUMO

Polyomavirus BK (BKV)-associated nephropathy causes premature kidney transplant (KT) failure. BKV viruria and viremia are biomarkers of disease progression, but associated risk factors are controversial. A total of 682 KT patients receiving basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA), corticosteroids were randomized 1:1 to cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac). Risk factors were analyzed in 629 (92.2%) patients having at least 2 BKV measurements until month 12 posttransplant. Univariate analysis associated CsA-MPA with lower rates of viremia than Tac-MPA at month 6 (10.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.048) and 12 (4.8% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.004) and lower plasma BKV loads at month 12 (3.9 vs. 5.1 log(10) copies/mL; p = 0.028). In multivariate models, CsA-MPA remained associated with less viremia than Tac-MPA at month 6 (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-0.99) and month 12 (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.68). Viremia at month 6 was also independently associated with higher steroid exposure until month 3 (OR 1.19 per 1 g), and with male gender (OR 2.49) and recipient age (OR 1.14 per 10 years) at month 12. The data suggest a dynamic risk factor evolution of BKV viremia consisting of higher corticosteroids until month 3, Tac-MPA compared to CsA-MPA at month 6 and Tac-MPA, older age, male gender at month 12 posttransplant.


Assuntos
Vírus BK/fisiologia , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Replicação Viral , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
6.
Am J Transplant ; 13(11): 2875-83, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24047110

RESUMO

The Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial randomized patients receiving a living or standard criteria deceased donor kidney transplant to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine A (CsA). The 5-year results of the long-term extension (LTE) cohort are reported. A total of 456 (68.5% of intent-to-treat) patients entered the LTE at 36 months; 406 patients (89%) completed 60 months. Between Months 36 and 60, death occurred in 2%, 1% and 5% of belatacept MI, belatacept LI and CsA patients, respectively; graft loss occurred in 0% belatacept and 2% of CsA patients. Acute rejection between Months 36 and 60 was rare: zero belatacept MI, one belatacept LI and one CsA. Rates for infections and malignancies for Months 36-60 were generally similar across belatacept groups and CsA, respectively: fungal infections (14%, 15%, 12%), viral infections (21%, 18%, 16%) and malignancies (6%, 6%, 9%). No new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder cases occurred after 36 months. Mean calculated GFR (MDRD, mL/min/1.73 m(2) ) at Month 60 was 74 for belatacept MI, 76 for belatacept LI and 53 for CsA. These results show that the renal function benefit and safety profile observed in belatacept-treated patients in the early posttransplant period was sustained through 5 years.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Abatacepte , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Testes de Função Renal , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Segurança , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Am J Transplant ; 12(9): 2446-56, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22682022

RESUMO

In this Phase 2b study, 331 low-to-moderate risk de novo kidney transplant patients (approximately 60% deceased donors) were randomized to a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of tofacitinib (CP-690, 550), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor or cyclosporine (CsA). All patients received basiliximab induction, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids. Primary endpoints were: incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) with a serum creatinine increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL and ≥20% (clinical BPAR) at Month 6 and measured GFR at Month 12. Similar 6-month incidences of clinical BPAR (11%, 7% and 9%) were observed for MI, LI and CsA. Measured GFRs were higher (p < 0.01) at Month 12 for MI and LI versus CsA (65 mL/min, 65 mL/min vs. 54 mL/min). Fewer (p < 0.05) patients in MI or LI developed chronic allograft nephropathy at Month 12 compared with CsA (25%, 24% vs. 48%). Serious infections developed in 45%, 37% and 25% of patients in MI, LI and CsA, respectively. Anemia, neutropenia and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred more frequently in MI and LI compared with CsA. Tofacitinib was equivalent to CsA in preventing acute rejection, was associated with improved renal function and less chronic allograft histological injury, but had side-effects at the doses evaluated.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Janus Quinase 3/antagonistas & inibidores , Transplante de Rim , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/farmacocinética
8.
Am J Transplant ; 12(1): 210-7, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21992533

RESUMO

The clinical profile of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated to determine if earlier results in the BENEFIT study were sustained at 3 years. BENEFIT is a randomized 3 year, phase III study in adults receiving a kidney transplant from a living or standard criteria deceased donor. Patients were randomized to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept, or cyclosporine. 471/666 patients completed ≥3 years of therapy. A total of 92% (MI), 92% (LI), and 89% (cyclosporine) of patients survived with a functioning graft. The mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was ∼21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher in the belatacept groups versus cyclosporine at year 3. From month 3 to month 36, the mean cGFR increased in the belatacept groups by +1.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (MI) and +1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (LI) versus a decline of -2.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (cyclosporine). One cyclosporine-treated patient experienced acute rejection between year 2 and year 3. There were no new safety signals and no new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases after month 18. Belatacept-treated patients maintained a high rate of patient and graft survival that was comparable to cyclosporine-treated patients, despite an early increased occurrence of acute rejection and PTLD.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim , Abatacepte , Adulto , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Am J Transplant ; 11(1): 66-76, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21114656

RESUMO

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1-year, randomized, controlled, open-label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept-based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)-based, steroid-avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept-mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept-sirolimus (SRL), or TAC-MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept-MMF, belatacept-SRL and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two-thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI- and steroid-free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8-10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC-MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC-based regimen.


Assuntos
Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Abatacepte , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Inibidores de Calcineurina , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Imunoconjugados/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Rim/fisiologia , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico
11.
Am J Transplant ; 11(7): 1444-55, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21564523

RESUMO

Sotrastaurin, a selective protein-kinase-C inhibitor, blocks early T-cell activation through a calcineurin-independent mechanism. In this study, de novo renal transplant recipients with immediate graft function were randomized 1:2 to tacrolimus (control, n = 44) or sotrastaurin (300 mg b.i.d.; n = 81). All patients received basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and steroids. The primary endpoint was the composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up at month 3. The main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) at month 3. Composite efficacy failure at month 3 was higher for the sotrastaurin versus control regimen (25.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001), driven by higher BPAR rates (23.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.003), which led to early study termination. Median (± standard deviation [SD]) eGFR was higher for sotrastaurin versus control at all timepoints from day 7 (month 3: 59.0 ± 22.3 vs. 49.5 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.006). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (control: 63.6%; sotrastaurin: 88.9%) which led to study-medication discontinuation in two sotrastaurin patients. This study demonstrated a lower degree of efficacy but better renal function with the calcineurin-inhibitor-free regimen of sotrastaurin+MPA versus the tacrolimus-based control. Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative sotrastaurin regimens.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Proteína Quinase C/antagonistas & inibidores , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Inibidores de Calcineurina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico
12.
Am J Transplant ; 10(8): 1870-80, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20659093

RESUMO

The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirurgia , Transplante das Ilhotas Pancreáticas/métodos , Antígeno-1 Associado à Função Linfocitária/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Soro Antilinfocitário/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem
13.
Am J Transplant ; 10(3): 535-46, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20415897

RESUMO

Belatacept, a costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation. This Phase III study (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial) assessed a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adults receiving a kidney transplant from living or standard criteria deceased donors. The co-primary endpoints at 12 months were patient/graft survival, a composite renal impairment endpoint (percent with a measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at Month 12 or a decrease in mGFR > or =10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) Month 3-Month 12) and the incidence of acute rejection. At Month 12, both belatacept regimens had similar patient/graft survival versus cyclosporine (MI: 95%, LI: 97% and cyclosporine: 93%), and were associated with superior renal function as measured by the composite renal impairment endpoint (MI: 55%; LI: 54% and cyclosporine: 78%; p < or = 0.001 MI or LI versus cyclosporine) and by the mGFR (65, 63 and 50 mL/min for MI, LI and cyclosporine; p < or = 0.001 MI or LI versus cyclosporine). Belatacept patients experienced a higher incidence (MI: 22%, LI: 17% and cyclosporine: 7%) and grade of acute rejection episodes. Safety was generally similar between groups, but posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was more common in the belatacept groups. Belatacept was associated with superior renal function and similar patient/graft survival versus cyclosporine at 1 year posttransplant, despite a higher rate of early acute rejection.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Abatacepte , Adulto , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Incidência , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/etiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Am J Transplant ; 10(3): 547-57, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20415898

RESUMO

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT-EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors) is a 3-year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The co-primary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4-7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine-treated patients.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Abatacepte , Adulto , Inibidores de Calcineurina , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Rim/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco
15.
Am J Transplant ; 10(5): 1228-37, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20353469

RESUMO

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem with a standard 3-month prophylaxis regimen. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of 200 days' versus 100 days' valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) in 326 high-risk (D+/R-) kidney allograft recipients. Significantly fewer patients in the 200-day group versus the 100-day group developed confirmed CMV disease up to month 12 posttransplant (16.1% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.0001). Confirmed CMV viremia was also significantly lower in the 200-day group (37.4% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.015 at month 12). There was no significant difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection between the groups (11% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.114). Adverse events occurred at similar rates between the groups and the majority were rated mild-to-moderate in intensity and not related to study medication. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that extending valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) to 200 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV disease and viremia through to 12 months compared with 100 days' prophylaxis, without significant additional safety concerns associated with longer treatment. The number needed to treat to avoid one additional patient with CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant is approximately 5.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Citomegalovirus/metabolismo , Biópsia , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Ganciclovir/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Incidência , Rim/virologia , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Segurança , Valganciclovir , Viremia/induzido quimicamente , Viremia/tratamento farmacológico , Viremia/virologia
16.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 186: 113302, 2020 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353681

RESUMO

Oxidative stress is a pathological condition characterized by an imbalance between body's antioxidant defenses and oxidizing agents, resulting in damage of endogenous molecules. These products can be used as markers of oxidative conditions; in particular, isoprostanes (IsoPs) come from the reaction of arachidonic acid with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and are currently defined as gold markers of oxidative stress in urine. Our main goal was the development of a reliable analytical method for the determination and quantification of the IsoPs in human urine by dispersive Liquid-Liquid Micro Extraction (dLLME) coupled with micro Solid Phase Extraction (µSPE) clean-up and HPLC-MS/MS analysis. The selected compounds are present in very small concentration in urine, furthermore, due to relevant matrix effect, they are challenging for ESI-MS/MS analysis. This approach provided selectivity and sensitivity for 8-isoprotaglandine F2α (8-iso-PGF2α), the "gold" OS marker, together with the main isomers. dLLME extraction allowed a significant enrichment factor and µSPE clean-up provided the removal of ion-suppressing compounds from the sample resulting in low matrix effect. The chromatographic separation was also challenging as the target compounds possess very similar chemical characteristics, so experimental conditions were carefully tuned. The reported method represents a useful tool for the detection of IsoPs in urine taking advantage of the combination of dLLME extraction and µSPE clean-up; overall recoveries were above 50 % and matrix effects were ≤15 %, with LOQs ranging between 0.020 and 0.060 ng mL-1. The procedure is easy to use and rapid allowing the removal of interfering compounds and matrix effect maintaining a highly sensitive determination.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Dinoprosta/análogos & derivados , F2-Isoprostanos/urina , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Adulto , Biomarcadores/urina , Dinoprosta/análise , Dinoprosta/urina , F2-Isoprostanos/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Isomerismo , Microextração em Fase Líquida , Masculino , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Microextração em Fase Sólida , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por Electrospray , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Adulto Jovem
17.
Am J Transplant ; 9(8): 1936-45, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19660021

RESUMO

This randomized, pilot study compared the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690,550 (15 mg BID [CP15] and 30 mg BID [CP30], n = 20 each) with tacrolimus (n = 21) in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Patients received an IL-2 receptor antagonist, concomitant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. CP-690,550 doses were reduced after 6 months. Due to a high incidence of BK virus nephropathy (BKN) in CP30, MMF was discontinued in this group. The 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 1 of 20, 4 of 20 and 1 of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. BKN developed in 4 of 20 patients in CP30 group. The 6-month rates of cytomegalovirus disease were 2 of 20, 4 of 20 and none of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was >70 mL/min at 6 and 12 months (all groups). NK cells were reduced by

Assuntos
Inibidores de Calcineurina , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Janus Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Rim/patologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Transplante de Rim/patologia , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Projetos Piloto , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Transplante Homólogo , Adulto Jovem
18.
Am J Transplant ; 8(10): 1972-81, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18828764

RESUMO

The first decade of the new millennium has been disappointing for transplant therapeutics: no new immunosuppression agents have been approved. Several high profile drugs and biologics failed the rigors of clinical trials or had disappointing preclinical results (FTY720, FK778, anti-CDI54, anti-IL15, anti-CD28, R3421). Several challenges face the industry and clinical investigators in bringing novel drugs to the clinic including the difficulty in targeting new endpoints for toxicities or chronic allograft disease since acute rejection has been reduced to below 15% as well as the Food and Drug Administration insistence of excluding the use of immunosuppression regimens embraced by the transplant community in control arms of clinical trials. Currently six new agents, 3 small molecules (ISA247, a semisynthetic analogue of cyclosporine; AEB071, a protein kinase C isoforms inhibitor; CP 690,550, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor) are in phase II trials and 3 biologics (belatacept, a second generation CTLA4Ig; efalizumab, a humanized antiCD11a [LFA1] monoclonal antibody; and alefacept, a LFA3-IgG1 fusion receptor protein) are in phase II/III clinical trials. The preclinical pipeline is not only full but promises to address previously neglected targets and fulfill unmet medical needs in transplant therapeutics.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Linfócitos B/efeitos dos fármacos , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Adesão Celular , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Desenho de Fármacos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/química , Modelos Biológicos , Transplante de Órgãos/métodos , Transplante de Órgãos/tendências , Traumatismo por Reperfusão , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
19.
Am J Transplant ; 8(1): 222-7, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17979998

RESUMO

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurs in 30% of patients with FSGS receiving a first renal transplant and in over 80% of patients receiving a second transplant after a recurrence. Recurrence often leads to graft failure. The pathogenesis remains unknown and may involve a circulating permeability factor that initiates injury to the glomerular capillary. There are anecdotal reports of pediatric patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and recurrent FSGS who have had remission of proteinuria after treatment with rituximab. These observations have prompted speculation that B cells may play a role in the pathogenesis of recurrent FSGS. We report four consecutive adult patients with early recurrent FSGS refractory or dependent on plasmapheresis who received rituximab (total dose 2000-4200 mg). None of the patients treated with rituximab achieved remission in proteinuria, and one patient experienced early graft loss. In these four adult renal transplant patients with recurrent FSGS, rituximab failed to diminish proteinuria.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/etiologia , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Síndrome Nefrótica/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Criança , Feminino , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/complicações , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/terapia , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Nefrótica/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Recidiva , Rituximab
20.
Am J Transplant ; 8(2): 307-16, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18211506

RESUMO

In a randomized, open-label, multicenter study, de novo renal transplant patients received no steroids (n = 112), steroids to day 7 (n = 115), or standard steroids (n = 109) with cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and basiliximab. The primary objective, to demonstrate noninferiority of 12-month GFR in the steroid-free or steroid-withdrawal groups versus standard steroids, was not met in the intent-to-treat population. However, investigational groups were not inferior to standard steroids in the observed-case analysis. Median 12-month GFR was not significantly different in the steroid-free or steroid-withdrawal groups (58.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 59.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) versus standard steroids (60.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The 12-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death was 36.0% in the steroid-free group (p = 0.007 vs. standard steroids), 29.6% with steroid withdrawal (N.S.) and 19.3% with standard steroids. BPAR was significantly less frequent with standard steroids than either of the other two regimens. Reduced de novo use of antidiabetic and lipid-lowering medication, triglycerides and weight gain were observed in one or both steroid-minimization group versus standard steroids. For standard-risk renal transplant patients receiving CsA-ME, EC-MPS and basiliximab, steroid withdrawal by the end of week 1 achieves similar 1-year renal function to a standard-steroids regimen, and may be more desirable than complete steroid avoidance.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA