[Use of emergency services for suicide attempts during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic-a prevalence study]. / Inanspruchnahme des Rettungsdiensts bei Suizidversuchen im Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie.

Background: The pandemic has caused several changes in the emergency care system. The deployment figures in emergency medical services have shown atypical fluctuations. This has also been explained by changes in behavior and an increased sense of stress among the population. Existing research provides hints for the increased incidence of mental health symptoms in emergency care during ongoing pandemics. Objective: In this context, this paper examines the occurrence of emergency medical services calls related to the keyword suicide in relation to total calls. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study based on routine documentation from a fire and rescue dispatch center with descriptive and exploratory data analyses. The data are divided by settlement-structural county types and compared with incidences and pandemic phases. Results: Phase 1 and 2a show a decrease in the number of dispatches during the pandemic. In addition, there is a shift in the number of dispatch cases with a context of suicide by structure types in phase 3. A decreased dispatch rate in the sparsely populated rural county is offset by an increase in the metropolitan area. Changes made to the control center system resulted in an increase in the number of dispatch cases in the context of suicide. Conclusion: Continuous mental health surveillance, including data collected by emergency medical services, can provide valuable insight. The study also highlights the need for standardization of emergency dispatch center data.

Improving detection of oral lesions: Eye tracking insights from a randomized controlled trial comparing standardized to conventional approach.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of oral cancer (OC) or its precursors is the most effective measure to improve outcome. The reasons for missing them on conventional oral examination (COE) or possible countermeasures are still unclear. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of standardized oral examination (SOE) compared to COE. 49 dentists, specialists, and dental students wearing an eye tracker had to detect 10 simulated oral lesions drawn into a volunteer's oral cavity. RESULTS: SOE had a higher detection rate at 85.4% sensitivity compared to 78.8% in the control (p = 0.017) due to higher completeness (p < 0.001). Detection rate correlated with examination duration (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized approach can improve systematics and thereby detection rates in oral examinations. It should take at least 5 min. Perceptual and cognitive errors and improper technique cause oral lesions to be missed. Its wide implementation could be an additional strategy to enhance early detection of OC.

Usability-Tests of Mechanical Ventilators: A Systematic Review.

The usability of ventilators is critical for patient safety. This systematic review shows the methods used in usability studies on ventilators, if those are similar in methodology. Furthermore, the usability tasks are compared to the requirements for manufactures during approval. Results show that the methodology and procedure of the studies are similar, but only cover part of the primary operating functions from their corresponding ISO Norm. Therefore optimisation of aspects of the study design, e.g., scope of tested scenarios, is possible.

ILEG - A Case of Recording Patient Journeys.

In 2019 the Gemeindenotfallsanitäter was introduced in the area of Oldenburg, and scientific monitoring starting 2021 with Inanspruchnahme, Leistungen und Effekte des Gemeindenotfallsanitäters. Since then, it is possible to track patient journeys, starting from the emergency call to the subsequent treatment. This short communication provides an overview of the necessary data-acquisition and dataflow from all participating institutions and its possibilities.

Augmented Reality in Medicine: Systematic and Bibliographic Review.

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) is a technology that integrates digital information into the user's real-world environment. It offers a new approach for treatments and education in medicine. AR aids in surgery planning and patient treatment and helps explain complex medical situations to patients and their relatives. OBJECTIVE: This systematic and bibliographic review offers an overview of the development of apps in AR with a medical use case from March 2012 to June 2017. This work can aid as a guide to the literature and categorizes the publications in the field of AR research. METHODS: From March 2012 to June 2017, a total of 1309 publications from PubMed and Scopus databases were manually analyzed and categorized based on a predefined taxonomy. Of the total, 340 duplicates were removed and 631 publications were excluded due to incorrect classification or unavailable technical data. The remaining 338 publications were original research studies on AR. An assessment of the maturity of the projects was conducted on these publications by using the technology readiness level. To provide a comprehensive process of inclusion and exclusion, the authors adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: The results showed an increasing trend in the number of publications on AR in medicine. There were no relevant clinical trials on the effect of AR in medicine. Domains that used display technologies seemed to be researched more than other medical fields. The technology readiness level showed that AR technology is following a rough bell curve from levels 4 to 7. Current AR technology is more often applied to treatment scenarios than training scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This work discusses the applicability and future development of augmented- and mixed-reality technologies such as wearable computers and AR devices. It offers an overview of current technology and a base for researchers interested in developing AR apps in medicine. The field of AR is well researched, and there is a positive trend in its application, but its use is still in the early stages in the field of medicine and it is not widely adopted in clinical practice. Clinical studies proving the effectiveness of applied AR technologies are still lacking.