Longitudinal Changes in Circulating Ketone Body Levels in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EMPA-Response-AHF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ketone bodies are endogenous fuels produced by the liver under conditions of metabolic or neurohormonal stress. Circulating ketone bodies are increased in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), yet little is known about the effect of acute HF on ketosis. We tested the hypothesis that ketogenesis is increased in patients with acute decompensated HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a post hoc analysis of 79 patients with acute HF included in the EMPA-RESPONSE-AHF trial, which compared sodium-dependent glucose-cotransporter protein 2 inhibitor treatment with empagliflozin for 30 days with placebo in patients with acute HF [NCT03200860]. Plasma concentrations of ketone bodies acetone, ß-hydroxybutyrate, and acetoacetate were measured at baseline and 5 different timepoints. Changes in ketone bodies over time were monitored using repeated measures analysis of variance. In the total cohort, median total ketone body concentration was 251 µmol/L (interquartile range, 178-377 µmol/L) at baseline, which gradually decreased to 202 µmol/L (interquartile range, 156-240 µmol/L) at day 30 (P = .041). Acetone decreased from 60 µmol/L (interquartile range, 34-94 µmol/L) at baseline to 30 µmol/L (interquartile range, 21-42 µmol/L) ( P < .001), whereas ß-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate remained stable over time. Higher acetone concentrations were correlated with higher N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide levels (r = 0.234; P = .039). Circulating ketone bodies did not differ between patients treated with empagliflozin or placebo throughout the study period. A higher acetone concentration at baseline was univariately associated with a greater risk of the composite end point, including in-hospital worsening HF, HF rehospitalizations, and all-cause mortality after 30 days. However, after adjustment for age and sex, acetone did not remain an independent predictor for the combined end point. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating ketone body concentrations, and acetone in particular, were significantly higher during an episode of acute decompensated HF compared with after stabilization. Treatment with empagliflozin did not affect ketone body concentrations in patients with acute HF.

Short- and long-term haemodynamic consequences of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure might have opposite short- and long-term haemodynamic consequences compared with restricted interatrial shunt creation, which recently emerged as a potential treatment modality for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Given the opposing approaches of ASD and PFO closure versus shunt creation, we investigated the early and sustained cardiac structural and functional changes following transcatheter ASD or PFO closure. METHODS: In this retrospective study, adult secundum-type ASD and PFO patients with complete echocardiography examinations at baseline and at 1­day and 1­year follow-up who also underwent transcatheter closure between 2013 and 2017 at the University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands were included. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (mean age 48 ± standard deviation 16 years, 61.5% women) were included. Transcatheter ASD/PFO closure resulted in an early and persistent decrease in right ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Additionally, transcatheter ASD/PFO closure resulted in an early and sustained favourable response of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, but also in deterioration of LV diastolic function with an increase in LV filling pressure (LVFP), as assessed by echocardiography. Age (ß = 0.31, p = 0.009) and atrial fibrillation (AF; ß = 0.24, p = 0.03) were associated with a sustained increase in LVFP after transcatheter ASD/PFO closure estimated by mean E/e' ratio (i.e. ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling to diastolic mitral annular velocity). In subgroup analysis, this was similar for ASD and PFO closure. CONCLUSION: Older patients and patients with AF were predisposed to sustained increases in left-sided filling pressures resembling HFpEF following ASD or PFO closure. Consequently, these findings support the current concept that creating a restricted interatrial shunt might be beneficial, particularly in elderly HFpEF patients with AF.

Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after pharmacological up-titration in new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported suboptimal up-titration of heart failure (HF) therapies in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Here, we report on the achieved doses after nurse-led up-titration, reasons for not achieving the target dose, subsequent changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mortality. METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, 378 HFrEF patients with a recent (< 3 months) diagnosis of HF were referred to a specialised HF-nurse led clinic for protocolised up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The achieved doses of GDMT at 9 months were recorded, as well as reasons for not achieving the optimal dose in all patients. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after up-titration in 278 patients. RESULTS: Of 345 HFrEF patients with a follow-up visit after 9 months, 69% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitors, 73% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of beta-blockers and 77% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The main reasons for not reaching the target dose were hypotension (RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers), bradycardia (beta-blockers) and renal dysfunction (RAS inhibitors). During a median follow-up of 9 months, mean LVEF increased from 27.6% at baseline to 38.8% at follow-up. Each 5% increase in LVEF was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.84 (0.75-0.94, p = 0.002) for mortality and 0.85 (0.78-0.94, p = 0.001) for the combined endpoint of mortality and/or HF hospitalisation after a mean follow-up of 3.3 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that protocolised up-titration in a nurse-led HF clinic leads to high doses of GDMT and improvement of LVEF in patients with new-onset HFrEF.

Tumour biomarkers: association with heart failure outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that heart failure (HF) and cancer are conditions with a number of shared characteristics. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between tumour biomarkers and HF outcomes. METHODS: In 2,079 patients of BIOSTAT-CHF cohort, we measured six established tumour biomarkers: CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and AFP. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 21 months, 555 (27%) patients reached the primary end-point of all-cause mortality. CA125, CYFRA 21-1, CEA and CA19-9 levels were positively correlated with NT-proBNP quartiles (all P < 0.001, P for trend < 0.001) and were, respectively, associated with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI 1.12-1.23; P < 0.0001), 1.45 (95% CI 1.30-1.61; P < 0.0001), 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.30; P = 0.006) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16; P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality after correction for BIOSTAT risk model (age, BUN, NT-proBNP, haemoglobin and beta blocker). All tumour biomarkers (except AFP) had significant associations with secondary end-points (composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and non-CV mortality). ROC curves showed the AUC of CYFRA 21-1 (0.64) had a noninferior AUC compared with NT-proBNP (0.68) for all-cause mortality (P = 0.08). A combination of CYFRA 21-1 and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.71) improved the predictive value of the model for all-cause mortality (P = 0.0002 compared with NT-proBNP). CONCLUSIONS: Several established tumour biomarkers showed independent associations with indices of severity of HF and independent prognostic value for HF outcomes. This demonstrates that pathophysiological pathways sensed by these tumour biomarkers are also dysregulated in HF.

Novel endotypes in heart failure: effects on guideline-directed medical therapy.

Aims: We sought to determine subtypes of patients with heart failure (HF) with a distinct clinical profile and treatment response, using a wide range of biomarkers from various pathophysiological domains. Methods and results: We performed unsupervised cluster analysis using 92 established cardiovascular biomarkers to identify mutually exclusive subgroups (endotypes) of 1802 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the BIOSTAT-CHF project. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 813 patients. Based on their biomarker profile, six endotypes were identified. Patients with endotype 1 were youngest, less symptomatic, had the lowest N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and lowest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF. Patients with endotype 4 had more severe symptoms and signs of HF, higher NT-proBNP levels and were at highest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.8]. Patients with endotypes 2, 3, and 5 were better uptitrated to target doses of beta-blockers (P < 0.02 for all). In contrast to other endotypes, patients with endotype 5 derived no potential survival benefit from uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker and beta-blockers (Pinteraction <0.001). Patients with endotype 2 (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.10-1.42) experienced possible harm from uptitration of beta-blockers in contrast to patients with endotype 4 and 6 that experienced benefit (Pinteraction for all <0.001). Results were strikingly similar in the independent validation cohort. Conclusion: Using unsupervised cluster analysis, solely based on biomarker profiles, six distinct endotypes were identified with remarkable differences in characteristics, clinical outcome, and response to uptitration of guideline directed medical therapy.

Determinants and clinical outcome of uptitration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: a prospective European study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite clear guidelines recommendations, most patients with heart failure and reduced ejection-fraction (HFrEF) do not attain guideline-recommended target doses. We aimed to investigate characteristics and for treatment-indication-bias corrected clinical outcome of patients with HFrEF that did not reach recommended treatment doses of ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and/or beta-blockers. METHODS AND RESULTS: BIOSTAT-CHF was specifically designed to study uptitration of ACE-inhibitors/ARBs and/or beta-blockers in 2516 heart failure patients from 69 centres in 11 European countries who were selected if they were suboptimally treated while initiation or uptitration was anticipated and encouraged. Patients who died during the uptitration period (n = 151) and patients with a LVEF > 40% (n = 242) were excluded. Median follow up was 21 months. We studied 2100 HFrEF patients (76% male; mean age 68 ±12), of which 22% achieved the recommended treatment dose for ACE-inhibitor/ARB and 12% of beta-blocker. There were marked differences between European countries. Reaching <50% of the recommended ACE-inhibitor/ARB and beta-blocker dose was associated with an increased risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization. Patients reaching 50-99% of the recommended ACE-inhibitor/ARB and/or beta-blocker dose had comparable risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization to those reaching ≥100%. Patients not reaching recommended dose because of symptoms, side effects and non-cardiac organ dysfunction had the highest mortality rate (for ACE-inhibitor/ARB: HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.43-2.01; for beta-blocker: HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.36-2.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with HFrEF who were treated with less than 50% of recommended dose of ACE-inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers seemed to have a greater risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization compared with patients reaching ≥100%.

A comparison of the prognostic value of BNP versus NT-proBNP after hospitalisation for heart failure.

AIMS: Concentrations of circulating B­type natriuretic peptides provide important prognostic information in heart failure (HF) patients. We directly compared the prognostic performance of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) versus N­terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP) measurements in a large population of HF patients at hospital discharge after an admission for decompensated HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: BNP and NT-proBNP were measured in 563 stable HF patients before discharge. All patients were followed for a fixed period of 18 months. The primary endpoint was time to first major event (HF hospitalisation or death). Patients were in NYHA class II (47%) or III/IV (53%) at discharge and the mean age of the patients was 71 ± 11 years, 217 (39%) females, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.32 ± 0.14 and 234 (42%) had an ischaemic aetiology of HF. During the study, 236 patients (42%) reached the primary endpoint. Multivariate odds ratios of the primary endpoint for doubling of baseline levels of BNP and NT-proBNP were 1.46 (95% CI 1.19-1.80, p < 0.001) and 1.45 (95% CI 1.18-1.78, p < 0.001), respectively. The multivariable adjusted areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for prediction of the primary endpoint for doubling of BNP and NT-proBNP were 0.69 and 0.68, respectively. Direct comparison of the prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP did not reveal significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: BNP and NT-proBNP at discharge for hospitalisation for HF are powerful, and equally strong and independent predictors of all-cause death and HF rehospitalisation.

Prevalence of AAV1 neutralizing antibodies and consequences for a clinical trial of gene transfer for advanced heart failure.

Adeno-associated virus serotype 1 (AAV1) has many advantages as a gene therapy vector, but the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is an important limitation. This study was designed to determine: (1) characteristics of AAV NAbs in human subjects, (2) prevalence of AAV1 NAbs in heart failure patients and (3) utility of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy in reducing NAb seroconversion in an animal model. NAb titers were assessed in a cohort of heart failure patients and in patients screened for a clinical trial of gene therapy with AAV1 carrying the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase gene (AAV1/SERCA2a). AAV1 NAbs were found in 59.5% of 1552 heart failure patients. NAb prevalence increased with age (P=0.001) and varied geographically. The pattern of NAb titers suggested that exposure is against AAV2, with AAV1 NAb seropositivity due to crossreactivity. The effects of immunosuppression on NAb formation were tested in mini-pigs treated with immunosuppressant therapy before, during and after a single AAV1/SERCA2a infusion. Aggressive immunosuppression did not prevent formation of AAV1 NAbs. We conclude that immunosuppression is unlikely to be a viable solution for repeat AAV1 dosing. Strategies to reduce NAbs in heart failure patients are needed to increase eligibility for gene transfer using AAV vectors.

Hallmarks of cancer in patients with heart failure: data from BIOSTAT-CHF.

BACKGROUND: Within cardio-oncology, emerging epidemiologic studies have demonstrated a bi-directional relationship between heart failure (HF) and cancer. In the current study, we aimed to further explore this relationship and investigate the underlying pathophysiological pathways that connect these two disease entities. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis in which we identified 24 Gene Ontology (GO) processes associated with the hallmarks of cancer based on 92 biomarkers in 1960 patients with HF. We performed Spearman's correlations and Cox-regression analyses to evaluate associations with HF biomarkers, severity and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Out of a total of 24 GO processes, 9 biological processes were significantly associated with adverse clinical outcome. Positive regulation of mononuclear cell proliferation demonstrated the highest hazard for reaching the clinical endpoint, even after adjusting for confounders: all-cause mortality HR 2.00 (95% CI 1.17-3.42), p = 0.012. In contrast, negative regulation of apoptotic process was consistently associated with a lower hazard of reaching the clinical outcome, even after adjusting for confounders: all-cause mortality HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.95), p = 0.016. All processes significantly correlated with HF biomarkers, renal function and HF severity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF, GO processes associated with hallmarks of cancer are associated with HF biomarkers, severity and all-cause mortality.

Disconnect between the effects of serelaxin on renal function and outcome in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to study whether improvement in renal function by serelaxin in patients who were hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) might explain any potential effect on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We included 6318 patients from the RELAXin in AHF-2 (RELAX-AHF2) study. Improvement in renal function was defined as a decrease in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL and ≥ 25%, or increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥ 25% between baseline and day 2. Worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as the reverse. We performed causal mediation analyses regarding 180-day all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular death (CVD), and hospitalization for HF/renal failure. RESULTS: Improvement in renal function was more frequently observed with serelaxin when compared with placebo [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.64-2.15, p < 0.0001)], but was not associated with subsequent clinical outcomes. WRF occurred less frequent with serelaxin [OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.60-0.83, p < 0.0001)] and was associated with increased risk of ACM, worsening HF and the composite of CVD and HF or renal failure hospitalization. Improvement in renal function did not mediate the treatment effect of serelaxin [CVD HR 1.01 (0.99-1.04), ACM HR 1.01 (0.99-1.03), HF/renal failure hospitalization HR 0.99 (0.97-1.00)]. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant improvement in renal function by serelaxin in patients with acute HF, the potential beneficial treatment effect was not mediated by improvement in renal function. These data suggest that improvement in renal function might not be a suitable surrogate marker for potential treatment efficacy in future studies with novel relaxin agents in acute HF. Central illustration. Conceptual model explaining mediation analysis; treatment efficacy of heart failure therapies mediated by renal function.

Longitudinal changes in cardiac function after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies showed that treatment with cisplatin chemotherapy for testicular cancer is associated with an increased incidence of cardiac dysfunction. We investigated longitudinal progression of and contributing factors to cardiac dysfunction in testicular cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cardiac assessments were carried out before 10 months (range 7-15 months) and 6.9 years (range 4.9-9.7 years) after start of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, consisting of echocardiography [systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (myocardial tissue velocities; tissue velocity imaging of early diastole, TVI Et)] and plasma biomarkers (N-Terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, NT-proBNP; galectin-3). RESULTS: In 37 patients [median age 34 years (range 24-51 years)], the incidence of abnormal TVI Et increased from 0% at baseline and 4.5% at 10 months (in 27 patients) to 16.7% at 6.9 years post-chemotherapy (P = 0.03). One patient developed LVEF <50%; no other systolic abnormalities occurred. Hypertension, obesity and age were associated with larger decreases in TVI Et. Changes in NT-proBNP and galectin-3 were not related to echocardiographic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal cohort study, we observed a gradual decline in diastolic parameters after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer, whereas the rate of systolic dysfunction remains low. The association of larger declines in diastolic parameters with hypertension and obesity stresses the need to monitor and treat cardiovascular risk factors.

Abnormal liver function in relation to hemodynamic profile in heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: We studied the relation between liver function abnormalities and hemodynamic profile in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 323 HF patients, liver function was determined by aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST, ALT), alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase, and direct and total bilirubin (Bili dir, Bili tot). Central venous pressure (CVP) and cardiac index (CI) were determined invasively. Follow-up consisted of time to all-cause mortality. Mean age was 53 +/- 15 years, and 60% were male. In multivariable analysis, all liver function tests related to CVP, but higher CVP was predominantly related to GGT (r = 0.336, P < .001) and Bili dir (r = 0.370, P < .001). Only elevated AST (r =-0.177, P < .01), ALT (r = -0.130, P < .05), and Bili tot (r = -0.158, P < .01) were associated with both low CI and elevated CVP. The prognostic value of abnormal liver function tests was related to their interaction with CI and CVP. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated liver function tests mainly indicate higher CVP, whereas only the presence of elevated AST, ALT, or Bili dir may indicate a low CI. The absence of prognostic information in the presence of invasive hemodynamic measurements suggests that abnormal liver function tests in HF reflect a poor hemodynamic status.

Prevalence and misdiagnosis of chronic heart failure in nursing home residents: the role of B-type natriuretic peptides.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Without knowing the exact CHF prevalence, chronic heart failure (CHF) occurs frequently in elderly people both inside and outside nursing homes. For a diagnosis we have to rely on physical examination and additional tests. We therefore run the risk of missing CHF diagnoses or of diagnosing CHF when we should not. Natriuretic peptide assays have emerged as a diagnostic test but their use in nursing home residents is limited. We examined the number of misdiagnoses, the CHF prevalence and the role of natriuretic peptide. METHOD: Residents in one centre without aphasia, cognitive impairments or metastatic cancer were screened for CHF; the natriuretic peptide levels were measured separately. RESULTS: Of the 150 residents, 103 (64%) were included (79+/-11 years). The diagnosis of CHF was established in 24 of these 103 residents with NTproBNP 1871 (IQR 539 to 4262) and BNP 194 (IQR 92 to 460) pg/ml. A striking result was that of the 24 residents found to have CHF after the screening, 15 (66%) had previously been undetected: NT-proBNP 1146 (interquartile range (IQR) 228 to 3341) and BNP 200 (IQR 107 to 433) pg/ml. Moreover, in 13 out of 22 residents (62%) who had previously been thought to have CHF, the diagnosis was rejected: NT-proBNP 388 (IQR 174 to 719) and BPN 90 (IQR 35 to 128) pg/ml). Regarding the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP and BNP, the optimal cut-off level of NT-proBNP was 450 pg/ml with a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.67, and for BNP it was 100 pg/ml with a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.70. CONCLUSION: Both undetected and incorrect diagnoses of CHF were common. NT-proBNP and BNP were moderately accurate at diagnosing CHF. CHF prevalence was 23%. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:123-8.).

Rationale and design of a study to evaluate management of proteinuria in patients at high risk for vascular events: the IMPROVE trial.

Declining kidney function predicts increasing cardiovascular risk in people with hypertension. Microalbuminuria is a marker for cardiovascular risk and declining kidney function. Agents that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), notably angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), reduce proteinuria and microalbuminuria, lower blood pressure and slow the progression of proteinuric kidney disease. Evidence is accumulating that the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB is the optimal means of RAAS blockade in this setting, slowing the progression of nephropathy independently of blood pressure lowering to a greater degree than can be achieved using maximum approved doses of either agent alone. However, the emerging therapeutic potential of ACE inhibitor/ARB combination therapy in hypertensive kidney disease requires further characterization. The Irbesartan in the Management of PROteinuric patients at high risk for Vascular Events trial aims to determine definitively whether the combination therapy of an ARB, irbesartan and an ACE inhibitor, ramipril, is more effective than ramipril alone in reducing the urinary albumin excretion rate in patients at high cardiovascular risk with hypertension and proteinuria or microalbuminuria.

Determinants of increased angiotensin II levels in severe chronic heart failure patients despite ACE inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: The beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors are generally ascribed to blockade of neurohormonal activation. However, especially in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone levels can be elevated despite ACE inhibition, the so-called ACE escape. In the present study, we aimed to identify the frequency and determinants of ACE escape in CHF patients. METHODS: We studied 99 stable chronic heart failure patients (NYHA class III and IV, 66% ischemic etiology) receiving long-term therapy with ACE inhibitors. In all patients, cardiac, renal, and neurohormonal parameters were measured. ACE escape was defined as plasma angiotensin level > or = 16 pmol/L. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) left ventricular ejection fraction of our 99 patients (79 men and 20 women, age 69 +/- 12 years) was 28 +/- 10%. In addition to an ACE inhibitor, 93% of patients received diuretics, 71% a beta-blocker, and 49% spironolactone. None of the patients used an angiotensin receptor blocker. In our population, 45% of the patients had an angiotensin II plasma concentration higher than 16 pmol/L (median concentration was 14.1 pmol/L). Spironolactone use was an independent predictor of elevated plasma angiotensin II levels. Furthermore, spironolactone users had significantly higher plasma active renin protein and aldosterone levels. Plasma angiotensin II concentration was positively correlated to active renin, plasma angiotensin I and plasma aldosterone. No correlation was found between plasma angiotensin II levels and serum ACE activity, dose of ACE inhibitor, or duration of use. CONCLUSION: In a group of severe chronic heart failure patients, 45% had elevated plasma angiotensin II levels independent of serum ACE activity despite long-term ACE inhibitor use. Although a causal link could not be proven, an association was found between spironolactone use and active renin protein, angiotensin II and aldosterone levels, suggesting that escape from ACE is mainly caused by a feedback mechanism.

Effect of very early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction in patients receiving thrombolysis: results of a meta-analysis of 845 patients. FAMIS, CAPTIN and CATS Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition <9 h after myocardial infarction (MI) on left ventricular (LV) dilation in patients receiving thrombolysis. BACKGROUND: The ACE inhibitors reduce mortality after MI. Attenuation of LV dilation has been suggested as an important mechanism. METHODS: The data of 845 patients with three-month echocardiographic follow-up after MI were combined from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The criteria for these studies included: 1) thrombolytic therapy; 2) ACE inhibition within 6 to 9 h; and 3) evaluation of LV dilation as the primary objective. RESULTS: The ACE inhibitor was started 3.2+/-1.7 h after the patients' first (mainly, 85%) anterior MI. After three months, LV dilation was not significantly attenuated by very early treatment with an ACE inhibitor. The diastolic volume index was attenuated by 0.5 ml/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 2.5, p = 0.61), and the systolic volume index by 0.5 ml/m2 (95% CI -1.0 to 1.9, p = 0.50). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that LV dilation was significantly attenuated by ACE inhibitor treatment for patients in whom reperfusion failed. In contrast, LV dilation was almost unaffected by ACE inhibitor treatment in successfully reperfused patients. CONCLUSIONS: We could not demonstrate attenuation of LV dilation in patients receiving thrombolysis by ACE inhibitor treatment within 6 to 9 h after MI. We speculate that very early treatment with an ACE inhibitor has a beneficial effect on LV remodeling only in patients in whom reperfusion failed. Other mechanisms may be responsible for the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in successfully reperfused patients after MI.

Pre-procedural ACE-activity does not predict symptomatic in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies indicate that ACE-activity is related to atherosclerosis. We investigated the correlation between ACE-activity, in plasma as well as in the atherosclerotic plaque, and in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: ACE-activity was measured in blood samples from 178 patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement. During 8 months follow-up, 51 of these patients had an adverse clinical event. ACE-activity did not differ between patients with or without adverse events (21.5 vs. 23.1 nM/ml/min; P=0.36). Tissue samples were obtained with an atherectomy catheter before elective stent placement in another group of 13 patients with de novo stenosis. In this tissue, we determined the ACE-content immunohistologically. These patients were scheduled for follow-up quantitative coronary angiography after 12 months. In this group, the quantity of ACE was not correlated to the late luminal loss (0.31 vs. 0.38 mm; P=0.76). CONCLUSION: In this study, pre-procedural ACE-activity, in plasma as well as in the atherosclerotic plaque, does not predict the occurrence of in-stent restenosis.

Pharmacological treatment of chronic heart failure according to the 2005 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.

Recently, the updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure were published. This review focuses on the pharmacological treatment. Basically, all patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be treated with diuretics, ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers, unless contra-indicated or not tolerated. It is important to uptitrate ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers to the high recommended doses that were used in the randomised clinical trials. If an ACE-inhibitor is not tolerated or contra-indicated, it is recommended to start an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Dose and choice of diuretics (loop acting or thiazides or combination) depends on volume status, renal function, and severity of heart failure. If patients remain symptomatic (NYHA class II), an ARB can be added, mainly to reduce worsening of heart failure and related hospitalisation. If patients remain severely symptomatic (NYHA class III), it is recommended to either add an aldosterone blocker, an ARB or both. The choice between an aldosterone blocker and an ARB depends on volume status, other specific patient characteristics, side effects, and personal preference. If all other therapies fail, one might consider nitrates, hydralazine and/or digoxin, while digoxin is always recommended in chronic heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. Therefore, treatment of chronic heart failure is relatively simple. Although individual patient characteristics should always be taken into account, the current recommendations apply to all patients with chronic heart failure, irrespective its underlying cause.

Cost-effectiveness of eplerenone plus standard treatment compared with standard treatment in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Netherlands.

AIMS: Following the results of the EPHESUS study in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction, a cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken from a Dutch societal perspective to evaluate the lifetime benefits and costs of eplerenone as add-on to standard treatment. METHODS: Life-years gained in the eplerenone arm during the trial period were extrapolated to lifetime life-years gained using three sources of life expectancy data (Framingham Heart Study, Saskatchewan Health Database and Worcester Heart Attack Registry). Resource use measured included direct medical costs of hospitalisation, medications including eplerenone, outpatient diagnostic tests and procedures, and emergency room visits. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for life-years gained and quality-adjusted life-years gained. RESULTS: Eplerenone prolonged lifetime survival by five weeks at an additional cost of €803. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was about €8000 per life-year gained, well below the only published Dutch benchmark for cost-effectiveness of €18,000. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the results to be robust when varying the discount rate applied to benefits and costs, the hospitalisation costs, and the source of life expectancy data used. CONCLUSION: Treatment with adjunctive eplerenone is effective in preventing deaths and prolonging life.

Cerebroprotective effects of angiotensin II (AT 1) receptor antagonists?

The results of the Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors (ACCESS) study show that treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in the acute phase of a stroke improves mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. In addition, direct comparative antihypertensive trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of ARBs in preventing stroke. These possible cerebro-protective effects of ARBs are supported by animal studies, demonstrating that stimulation of the AT2 receptor was related to a reduction in both cerebral infarct size and mortality. In the present report, we review both pathophysiological and clinical evidence for possible cerebroprotective effects of ARBs, independent of their effect on blood pressure.