Long-term outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 variants and other respiratory infections: evidence from the Virus Watch prospective cohort in England.

This study compared the likelihood of long-term sequelae following infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants, other acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and non-infected individuals. Participants (n=5,630) were drawn from Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort investigating SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology in England. Using logistic regression, we compared predicted probabilities of developing long-term symptoms (>2 months) during different variant dominance periods according to infection status (SARS-CoV-2, other ARI, or no infection), adjusting for confounding by demographic and clinical factors and vaccination status. SARS-CoV-2 infection during early variant periods up to Omicron BA.1 was associated with greater probability of long-term sequalae (adjusted predicted probability (PP) range 0.27, 95% CI = 0.22-0.33 to 0.34, 95% CI = 0.25-0.43) compared with later Omicron sub-variants (PP range 0.11, 95% CI 0.08-0.15 to 0.14, 95% CI 0.10-0.18). While differences between SARS-CoV-2 and other ARIs (PP range 0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.11 to 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.28) varied by period, all post-infection estimates substantially exceeded those for non-infected participants (PP range 0.01, 95% CI 0.00, 0.02 to 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.06). Variant was an important predictor of SARS-CoV-2 post-infection sequalae, with recent Omicron sub-variants demonstrating similar probabilities to other contemporaneous ARIs. Further aetiological investigation including between-pathogen comparison is recommended.

Assessing the impact of health-care access on the severity of low back pain by country: a case study within the GBD framework.

BACKGROUND: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) is key for policy making. Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs). Due to sparse data, a current limitation of GDB is that a uniform severity distribution is presumed based on 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores derived from US Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). We present a novel approach to estimate the effect of exposure to health interventions on the severity of low back pain by country and over time. METHODS: We extracted treatment effects for ten low back pain interventions from the Cochrane Database, combining these with coverage data from the MEPS to estimate the hypothetical severity in the absence of treatment in the USA. Severity across countries was then graded using the Health Access and Quality Index, allowing estimates of averted and avoidable burden under various treatment scenarios. FINDINGS: We included 210 trials from 36 Cochrane systematic reviews in the network analysis. The pooled effect sizes (measured as a standardised mean difference) for the most effective intervention classes were -0·460 (95% uncertainty interval -0·606 to -0·309) for a combination of psychological and physical interventions and -0·366 (-0·525 to -0·207) for surgery. Globally, access to treatment averted an estimated 17·6% (14·8 to 23·8) of the low back pain burden in 2020. If all countries had provided access to treatment at a level estimated for Iceland with the highest Health Access and Quality Index score, an extra 9·1% (6·4 to 11·2) of the burden of low back pain could be avoided. Even with full coverage of optimal treatment, a large proportion (65·9% [56·9 to 70·4]) of the low back pain burden is unavoidable. INTERPRETATION: This methodology fills an important shortcoming in the GBD by accounting for low back pain severity variations over time and between countries. Assumptions of unequal treatment access increased YLD estimates in resource-poor settings, with a modest decrease in countries with higher Health Access and Quality Index scores. Nonetheless, the large proportion of unavoidable burden indicates poor intervention efficacy. This method, applicable to other GBD conditions, provides policy makers with insights into health gains from improved treatment and underscores the importance of investing in research for new interventions. FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Queensland Health.

Burden of osteoarthritis in China, 1990-2017: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

BACKGROUND: China has seen a remarkable epidemiological and demographic transition during the past three decades. We aimed to describe the prevalence of osteoarthritis as well as years lived with disability (YLDs) due to osteoarthritis in China, according to age, sex, and geographical location, from 1990 to 2017. METHODS: Data were obtained from systematic reviews of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and hip in the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017 (GBD 2017). Three categories of sequelae (mild, moderate, and severe) of osteoarthritis were defined to indicate the degrees of severity and functional loss associated with the condition. A Bayesian meta-regression tool was applied to estimate the prevalence of osteoarthritis and the distribution of its severity. YLDs were calculated by multiplying the prevalence of osteoarthritis sequelae by their corresponding disability weights. All data were analysed by age-sex-province-year groups in China. FINDINGS: Around 26·1 million individuals in China had osteoarthritis in 1990, and this number rose to 61·2 million in 2017. The age-standardised prevalence of osteoarthritis increased from 2·9% (95% uncertainty interval 2·5-3·3) in 1990 to 3·1% (2·7-3·4) in 2017. The total YLDs due to osteoarthritis increased from 0·84 million (0·42-1·69) in 1990 to 1·97 million (0·98-3·94) in 2017, while the age-standardised YLD rate increased from 92·5 (45·7-185·6) per 100 000 people to 98·8 (49·4-197·6) per 100 000. Osteoarthritis prevalence and YLDs were higher in females than in males, and YLD rate increased with age. Osteoarthritis was the 24th most common cause of YLDs in China in 2017, accounting for 1·08% (0·64-2·02) of all YLDs. INTERPRETATION: Osteoarthritis is prevalent in China. Between 1990 and 2017, disease burden increased and varied greatly according to geographical location. Appropriate prevention and treatment strategies, predominantly those targeted at women, older people, and underdeveloped areas, must be developed to reduce the burden of the disease. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, China National Key Research and Development Programme.

La carga de enfermedad, lesiones, factores de riesgo y desafíos para el sistema de salud en México / Burden of disease, injuries, risk factors and challenges for the health system in Mexico

Objetivo. Presentar los resultados de la carga de enfermedad en México de 1990 a 2010 para las principales enfermedades, lesiones y factores de riesgo, por sexo. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario del estudio de la carga mundial de la enfermedad 2010. Resultados. En 2010 se perdieron 26.2 millones de años de vida saludable (AVISA), 56% en hombres y 44% en mujeres. Las principales causas de AVISA en hombres fueron violencia, cardiopatía isquémica y los accidentes de tránsito. En las mujeres fueron la diabetes, la enfermedad renal crónica y la cardiopatía isquémica. Los trastornos mentales y musculoesqueléticos concentran 18% de la carga. Los factores de riesgo que más afectan a los hombres son sobrepeso/obesidad; niveles de glucosa en sangre y de presión arterial elevados; y el consumo de alcohol y tabaco (35.6% de AVISA perdidos). En las mujeres, el sobrepeso y la obesidad; glucosa elevada; hipertensión arterial; baja actividad física; y el consumo de alcohol y tabaco fueron responsables de 40% de los AVISA perdidos; en ambos sexos, la dieta contribuye con 12% de la carga. Conclusiones. El panorama epidemiológico en México demanda una urgente adecuación y modernización del sistema de salud.

Objective. To present the results of the burden of disease, injuries and risk factors in Mexico from 1990 to 2010 for the principal illnesses, injuries and risk factors by sex. Materials and methods. A secondary analysis of the study results published by the Global Burden of Disease 2010 for Mexico performed by IHME. Results. In 2010, Mexico lost 26.2 million of Disability adjusted live years (DALYs), 56 % were in male and 44 % in women. The main causes of DALYs in men are violence, ischemic heart disease and road traffic injuries. In the case of women the leading causes are diabetes, chronic kidney disease and ischemic heart diseases. The mental disorders and musculoskeletal conditions concentrate 18% of health lost. The risk factors that most affect men in Mexico are: alcohol consumption, overweight/obesity, high blood glucose levels and blood pressure and tobacco consumption (35.6 % of DALYs lost). In women, overweight and obesity, high blood sugar and blood pressure, lack of physical activity and consumption of alcohol are responsible for 40 % of DALYs lost. In both sexes the problems with diet contribute 12% of the burden. Conclusions. The epidemiological situation in Mexico, demands an urgent adaptation and modernization of the health system.