Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Orthop ; 45(7): 1735-1744, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33893523

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life. METHODS: In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrodese/efeitos adversos , Pinos Ortopédicos , Criança , Fixadores Externos , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Med Arch ; 74(6): 433-438, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33603267

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis could develop at the childhood age and progress beyond skeletal maturity. An early spinal fusion arrests growth of the spine and thorax, risking the development of secondary thoracic insufficiency syndrome. Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) is a fusionless technique aiming to correct the deformity with preservation of growth potential. AIM: To show our experience and results regarding the use of VEPTR in children with scoliosis in regard to coronal profiles(length and deformity angle), spinal growth, and the complications we faced during the follow-up of two years after the index procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of a case series. Forty child with scoliosis of different etiologies. Their primary diagnoses were neuromuscular scoliosis in 13, Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis in12, Congenital Scoliosis in 8, syndromatic patients 5 and 2 with Arthrogryposis. All 40 patients received percutaneous rib-to-pelvis or rib to vertebra or rib to rib VEPTR implantation between January 2016 and January 2018. None of them needed blood transfusion. They underwent 56 primary implantation, 16(40%) bilateral system and 24(60%) unilateral followed by lengthening procedure in a period of 4-6 months. The patients were assessed based on mechanical measures, that is, the radiographic improvement of their scoliosis, spinal height, and sagittal and coronal correction, which are measured and compared preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at two years follow up, complication encountered during this period are also counted. RESULTS: The average initial correction in Cobb angle immediately after the index surgery was 14.4° (5°-26°) and the average final correction of Cobb which is measured after the last expansion procedure (Cobb angle of the major curve measured after last expansion minus initial preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve) was 7.3° (12%). The average of preoperative coronal T1-S1 length was 25.6 cm with an average initial correction achieved immediately after implantation of VEPTR of2.8 cm (1.2-5.1cm) which is 10.9%, and the average coronal length gain at 2 years follow up was 5.7 cm (3.7-9.8cm) that is 22.2%. Complication occurred in 18 of our patients (45%). CONCLUSION: Early results of VEPTR for childhood scoliosis are encouraging. Follow-up till skeletal maturity will best determine future indications.


Assuntos
Próteses e Implantes , Escoliose/cirurgia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Titânio , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Jordânia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA