RESUMO
Bone sarcomas are rare in childhood, and their presentation can often mimic more benign complaints or chronic musculoskeletal pain. Ewing sarcomas in particular are often diagnosed after a significant delay from the onset of symptoms. At a population level, a long diagnostic delay is not necessarily associated with worse survival , as tumours that display slow growth also tend to be less aggressive. For any specific individual however, a delayed diagnosis can result in a larger tumour that is more difficult to treat. We explore a case of Ewing sarcoma and discuss how the presenting features, approach to imaging and the role of clinician cognitive bias may have led to diagnostic delay.Ewing sarcoma is treated with chemotherapy and surgery and/or radiotherapy based on the initial site of disease, size of tumour and response to initial treatment. With current UK treatments, overall survival is approximately 70% for localised tumours and up to 20% in those with metastatic disease. Bone sarcomas usually present with deep-seated mechanical bone pain akin to toothache. The pain can be intermittent over the course of days or weeks, but pain occurring at night should be considered a red flag. Swelling may also present. On plain X-ray, bone sarcomas can demonstrate areas of bone destruction, new bone formation, periosteal inflammation and soft tissue swelling, but in some cases the changes are very subtle. Persistent unexplained symptoms require MRI to exclude tumours and detect potential benign causes that are amenable to treatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Sarcoma de Ewing/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Parents use the Internet increasingly for information about their children's medical problems. There is no quality control for medical information content. The goals of our study were to assess Internet awareness by families seen in paediatric orthopaedic outpatients departments and the type, quality and reliability of information available, using clubfoot as an example. Parents accompanying children to the outpatient's clinic were surveyed regarding the use of the Internet for medical information. They were asked about their ability to use the Internet, and whether this helped the consultation. To assess the quality of information available, the search phrases 'clubfoot' and 'club foot' were placed in the five most commonly used World Wide Web search engines. Web sites were evaluated for authorship, content and informational value using our own agreed scoring system, ranging from 0-100 points. Sixty-one percent of the questionnaires were completed, the mothers completed 67%. Eighty-four percent reported access to the Internet. Most found their searches useful and 26% were reminded of questions to ask at consultation. When a search for 'clubfoot' was carried out we found 11% of web sites were affiliated to academic institutions. There was a significant difference when the terms 'clubfoot' or 'club foot' were searched. Twenty-eight percent offered conventional information. Thirty-six percent of web sites were not related to congenital talipes equinovarus. The average information value was 26 points (0-98). Parents frequently use the Internet for information about paediatric orthopaedic consultations, prior to consultation. The quality of clubfoot information on the Internet is variable. The development of academic-based websites should be encouraged, as these offer the most useful information.